Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
editMy other accounts
editMy bookmarks
edit
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Kr0l42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 126 three times in the last 5 minutes (Youtube links, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Rumila production (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1233 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters with no punctuation or markup, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-34349-96 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2026-34101-01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. The /32 shows a history of blocks that should likely be expended. UtherSRG (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Nathanivic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – User is making changes that appear to violate AI policy, not leaving edit summaries, making non-English edits, and not engaging with notes/warnings on talk page. I'm at a loss of how to get this user's attention without an Administrator temporarily blocking to get their attention. RickyCourtney (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- This isn't a case for this noticeboard. I suggest you wait for them to return to editing to see if they respond to their user talk page notices, and if not, report at WP:ANI. PhilKnight (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-34145-41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Actions indicate a vandalism only account. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:40, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- He only made one edit, @Dafootballguy. Wait until he has made more vandalism edits. Hamimh2 (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Hamimh2 I reported the user because their edits were offensive and seemed to be an indicator there would be more. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 02:18, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- He only made one edit, @Dafootballguy. Wait until he has made more vandalism edits. Hamimh2 (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-34342-03 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosure_Day (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User is clearly using this account solely to vandalize. When I warned him, he said "Stop spoiling movies" showing he has no experience in Wikipedia and is solely using it to vandalize. Sending WP:Spoiler to him only caused him to insult me by calling me "inconsiderate". Please BAN HIM. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- I also reverted their comments to the talk page when it became clear that they were using it to protest my warnings and was NOT acknowledging his fault or attempting to change. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 05:04, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- The Buddha is the Master of Brahmā, Viṣṇu, and Śiva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Block evasion, sock of Sage (Thánh hiền) (see also The Buddha is the Teacher of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:07, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Tanusree debnath (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Schoolbullyreports (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "bully|bullies|bullied" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Domdo.es (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:30, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:30, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- FunIdiot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- Andreaditonno (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Engaged in promotional activities. See Special:AbuseLog/44416632. Agent 007 (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Remi.Symphonix (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. BangJan1999 23:19, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like a Name [at] Company username. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 23:38, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Per Sarsenet; COI/UPE is a separate matter. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:53, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Possibly an undeclared COI. Created draft on Symphonix (since G11 speedy deleted). — ERcheck (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: vandalism high level ~2026-34003-98 (talk) 04:26, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lots of editing due to newsworthiness but not many reverts. Daniel Case (talk) 01:28, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent edits based on arguments which has also disrupted for further addition of informations to keep up to date. Prayushk (talk) 06:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:02, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Last edit on talk was over two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: some unverified user dirupted the page neutrality HomeofIR (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts in nine days. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Multiple editors, both unregistered and registered, keep inserting that she has turned "face" (in normal terms a heroic wrestling character) without using any reliable source. Even her current storyline doesn't show any face or heroic characteristics. I've stated this multiple times while reverting editors, even started a talk page section. Yet no one cares to notice or discuss. This has gone on for days, I don't want to keep endlessly reverting (which might breach 3RR). So I request the page to be given extended protection temporarily. Linkin Prankster (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last reverts were three days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruption/Block evasion. Griboski (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If disruption continues, please re-request. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:07, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Left CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/EE ... if any article in that topic area that doesn't currently have one needs it, it's likely this one. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Requested action: Extended-confirmed protection
Reason: Long term disruptive editing from auto-confirmed editors, including uncited info and drive-by WP:POV violations. I think this page might also fall under WP:CT/AP. Giovanni Potage (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not in two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- And it already has a CTOPS notice per AP on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary user ~2026-33603-57 is reverting one specific icon on the page, without explanation and with invitation to discuss on the talk page. They are an almost-certain WP:SOCK of ~2026-17514-29, who engaged in a slow-moving but ongoing identical campaign about a week ago, which ultimately led to the latter being indefinitely blocked from editing the page (see here and here). Global-Cityzen (talk) 02:42, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:50, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Unprotection: Has both indef pending changes and indef semi, pending changes is unnecessary. Toketaatalk 17:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Both the pending changes and semi-protection were recently placed by the same admin who is active. Was there an attempt made to discuss this article's protection with that admin before coming here? Left guide (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Deb. Giovanni Potage (talk) 22:38, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Billboard Hot 100
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1990 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1991 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1992 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1993 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1994 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1995 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1996 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1997 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1998 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1999 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2000 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2001 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2002 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2003 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2004 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2008 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2011 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2012 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2013 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2014 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2015 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: More Billboard hot 100 articles that don’t need protection anymore. Toketaatalk 11:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Billboard 200
- List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2013 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2014 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2015 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: see above. Toketaatalk 15:13, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Aras Özbiliz
Reason: Has been protected for more than ten years and the last edit was barely 10 months ago so I don't think any vandalism would happen. Last reversion was in Nov 2022.~2026-34131-48 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:31, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Angelo.romano Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I understand there was lots of edit warring on this page, but it was almost all done by temp accounts. Surely we don't need FULL protection on a page to protect against temp account/brand new account vandalism?. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:38, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- (1) There were a nuumber of 'actual' accounts involved in the edit-warring; (2) full protection avoids the effect of disadvantaging unregistered/new users versus autoconfirmed ones; (3) the protection falls off 'naturally' in less than 24 hours. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:59, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please re-add the sockpuppetry and page protection templates ({{pp-protected|small=yes}}
{{sockpuppeteer|banned|checked=yes|locked=yes}}) to this WMF-banned sockpuppeteer's userpage. (I would do this myself but both the userpage and user talk page are fully protected due to sockpuppetry.) SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 23:42, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Adding the newly released Amnesty International report found here: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2026/06/israel-west-bank-ethnic-cleansing/ to the end of the following section of the page "Several human rights organisations, including Amnesty International,[97] B'Tselem,[98] and Human Rights Watch,[99] have likened the Israeli occupation to apartheid; Israel's supporters dispute this characterisation." ~2026-34173-15 (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 11 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:07, 11 June 2026 (UTC) |
| 27 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:52, 10 June 2026 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Hello folks! Till date, I have created about 45 mainspace articles; mostly films, web series, biographies, places of worship and a historical landmark (my most recent creation). I would love to have the Autopatrolled rights; and it might help prevent the piling up of the NPR backlog, even just by a bit. And I believe I am qualified for this. If I am judged ineligible, I would be happy to work upon myself if my shortcomings are pointed out. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Good morning/day/evening my fellow Wikipedians. After 15 years, 200k+ edits and creating a lot of stuff here I think it is time to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have created about 200 list articles and 150+ other main space articles, mostly biographies. All of them are properly sourced, formatted, and comply with core policies (notability, verifiability, BLP, copyright) even the stubs. Although I love all my children I'm especially proud of next WIR contributions: Elske ter Veld · Corry Vonk · Leontien Ceulemans · Mady Saks · Caro van Eyck · Fien de la Mar · Pia Beck · Esther de Boer-van Rijk · Annie de Reuver · Martine Bijl · Josine van Dalsum · Margarita Manso · Ágata Lys · Christiane Klapisch-Zuber · Nina Verchinina · Constance Morrow Morgan · Patricia Lousada
Hi. I've created 26 pages on the English Wikipedia, mostly relating to New Zealand plants. I also frequently create redirects for the common names of plants. Alexeyevitch(talk) 05:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
I want to reapply for Autopatroller, to contribute further for creating new good quality articles, as long as I have reflected latest things happend before and i got an big lesson to not comment/accept new pages more via ip user without letting know. I appreciate any decission. Thank you for your attention. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to create lists of articles I might want to edit based on Regex and categories. Because of my current computing setup I will need to use JWB, which, unlike AWB, requires being on the check page for all actions, including generating lists. I do not intend to actually make any semi-automated edits until I'm more confident in my Regex skills, and am willing to make another request when that time comes. JarJarInks٩(◕_◕)۶Tones essay 15:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
I need to change a couple of thousand redirects real quick due to the French changing the names of their football leagues. Also I'm a page mover and this is just generally useful to have in the toolbox. ⹃Maltazarian ᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 00:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I very often help in WP:AI noticeboard with the takedown of LLM-generated articles. I often have to tag many articles with {{AI-generated}} during reports which can take time. Same thing goes during the WP:LLMPROD process, where I have to add {{prod llm}} to articles. My editing history on Wikipedia is also Poland-related articles on rail transport, such as railway stations. These articles often need maintaining such as updating the Train services section when the train timetable changes in Poland, in which it will on 13 June. Fortek67 (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: My account was registered on 5 June 2026, I have 12+ edits, and my email is confirmed, but I have not been granted autoconfirmed status. I am trying to move an article from my sandbox to mainspace. Past Recognition9818 (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Cosablanca22 (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Matrbhumi (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Hello, according to the result from my AE, XC would be removed "until Edittttor has made enough manual non-repetitive edits to earn the right." I have now surpassed that threshold and am requesting reinstatement. I wish to edit articles about US politicians and sometimes those pages are ECP. For transparency, there is an open AE against me, but I believe that innocent until proven guilty should apply, and I have in good faith met the requirements for reinstatement. Based on the AE archives I've looked at, it could take weeks for a resolution there and it seems punitive to extend my punishment if I have met all the requirements. Will be an opportunity for the community to see how I handle reinstatement until the request is resolved. I will make a note there that I have requested reinstatement here. Thanks! Edittttor (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Have made over 800 edits account is over 3 years old requesting extended confirmation access Sarim Wani (talk) 09:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I'm currently temporarily approved for NPR rights and I've been participating in the May 2026 backlog drive. I'm finding the review process good so far and I take pride in reducing the backlog. I'm hoping I can get an extension in my NPR rights so I can continue working on reviewing new pages. Thanks, DoO2 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'm requesting for permission to NPR. I meet the guidelines stated and I intend reducing the backlog by minimizing spam, unsourced and promotional content across new pages. Retro music11 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Requesting indefinite permissions after two rounds of volunteering for the drives. If that is denied, requesting three months. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 02:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
As a regular editor, I am well acquainted with the guidelines for WP:NPR and I would like to apply for reviewer rights for more useful contribution. Pinakpani (talk) 10:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello again, I would like to request an extension of my New Page Reviewer right until August or permanently if they deem it appropriate. I have held this right since May, and my trial period is set to expire on June 8. I believe I have been able to do a good job during this time. Thank you very much in advance for your time and consideration. Sir Banking (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I have been an active Wikipedia contributor for a while, and thought maybe I could be of help, that's if I meet the requirement to be a new page reviewer. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Devansh Pilania (talk) 08:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'm re-applying for the NPP rights, as it was revoked due to inactivity. I've become active, and spending atleast 6h a day editing. I am now fully confident that I can tackle tasks related to NPP and AfC. Over the last few weeks, I've created 25 articles, edited at least 100 articles, and made over 500 edits in the span of 3–6 months since the start of 2026. I have also participated in AfD and, for the first time, closed an AfD discussion with the help of an admin on the Wikipedia Discord group. I'd like to regain this access, as I will be contributing regularly. Thank you. Tatupiplu’✦ talk 06:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
I am interested in education and would appreciate the chance to help Wikipedia maintain its high standards by reviewing and supporting new articles/authors. Thank you for your consideration. Tbrown2892 (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello. I'd like to request the ability to accept or decline pending changes on both of my accounts (User:Wikipedian12512 and User:Wikipedian12512(alt). I've read the relevant policies (BLP, Vandalism, Copyright Violations, etc.), and think that I could do a reasonable (to start, I'd probably get better over time) job. Thank you! Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
I often do anti-vandalism and during the course of that task I often come across pending changes, I belive myself capable with aiding in this task, and wish to help out. Pyrrhic victor (what did I do) 16:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to request the pending changes reviewer right. I'd like to use this to make sure no vandalism occurs and to help around. Thank you! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 01:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello folks! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer rights. I wish to deal with the concerned pages — accepting or refusing pending changes, particularly, to handle the unsourced edits and COI vandalism. Thank you! BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I'm requesting this right to fight vandalism in PCR-protected articles. I have read the policies and have a basic understanding. This means I can deal with not-that-simple vandalism such as citation to ads and inserting AI-slop, which might be more common in PCR-protected articles. -- Least Action (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
I've been using Twinkle for reporting potential SPs, creating deletion discussions and for notifying new users of unsourced edits. I'm requesting permission to the rollback tool as it'd assist me in reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Retro music11 (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello. I have rollback in my account at Simple Wikipedia. Having tried this evening to counter the activities of ~2026-33439-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I think it would be useful to have rollback here too. I work almost exclusively on cricket articles at present, and it is a subject that frequently attracts vandals. Thanks. Jack (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
I have been a Pending changes reviewer and would like to have Rollback right to enhance my ability to counter vandalism as well as to use new tools it provides like Interceptor. AristocrSirr22 (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting to be a Temporary account IP viewer to deal with vandalism. Recently temporary accounts have been making disruptive edits on the pages Grachi and Esmeralda Pimentel. Knowing if multiple temporary accounts are from the same IP address with be useful when reporting vandalism. I agree to the policy and will only use the addresses for the prevention of vandalism. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I recently started working on reverting vandalism and monitoring the recent changes page, so I will need this permission. I would like to add that I have sufficient knowledge of this permission as I hold it on Wikidata, and I am the one who wrote and created the policy of this permission on the Arabic Wikipedia (which is currently under voting). I fully agree with the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy. Also, for transparency, Just wanted to mention that I currently have a 6-month partial block (page creation & file moves) on Egyptian Wikipedia (arzwiki) due to a false report from an LTA WMF-banned user. There is already an active case with the UCoC committee about this (for more details: meta:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Abuse of power, collusion with a Global LTA, and suppression of appeal rights on arzwiki). Since it's a local partial restriction under official review, it won't affect my work here. Thank You. ^_^ -- 🐦🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
I'm involved in both NPP and AFC, and have been reporting a lot of accounts to SPI recently. I've noticed that a lot of pages often have been targeted by several different sock farms, and this permission would enable me to see if TA's that also frequently edit those topics/recreated deleted pages are linked with other TAs. Additionally, there is an IP sock farm (the Toñito edit summary IP sock farm) that I have been following for around a month now, and I have every page that farm has edited ever on my watchlist and am actively monitoring that. This permission would make it easier to determine when TAs edit the same pages, if they are linked to that TA farm or not. EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2026 (UTC) |
Immediate requests
Deletion
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 710 |
| Templates for deletion | 1,191 |
| Categories for deletion | 740 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 177 |
| All redirects for discussion | 457 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 92 |
| Possible copyright violations | 9 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 720 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 11 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 77 |
Image copyright problems
Page protection
Cleanup
|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,148 | 0.47 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,587 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,319 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 44,663 | 0.62 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 13,325 | 0.19 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 579,110 | 8.05 |
| All articles lacking sources | 44,507 | 0.62 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 70 | 0.01 |
| All articles needing additional references | 529,571 | 7.36 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 5,064 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 108,985 | 1.51 |
| All articles with dead external links | 355,203 | 4.94 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 151 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 11 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles proposed for merging | 216 | 0 |
| All articles proposed for splitting | 899 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
| Stub categories | 21,604 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 374 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 53,054 | 0.74 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 1,725 | 0.02 |
| All articles with style issues | 20,258 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,649 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 17,173 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 388 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 2,119 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,640 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 22 |
| All articles to be expanded | 52,150 |
Special pages
| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
editHong Kong
edit
Misc
edit Delete |
 Keep |
 Neutral |
 Oppose |
 Support |
 Note |
 Template |
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||