Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old. |
Autopatrolled
- Tatupiplu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created around 43 articles, mostly about insects and other species. I plan to continue contributing and creating new articles every week. It would be great if I could be granted autopatrolled rights, as this would help reduce the workload for NPP reviewers. Tatupiplu’(she/her · talk · email) 07:20, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Tatupiplu: your one biography article is missing citations (Vladimír Balthasar). Could you also explain Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayathripuram Educational & Charitable Trust? voorts (talk/contributions) 20:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @voorts: Thanks for pointing this out. I have now fixed Vladimír Balthasar by adding better citations and correcting the death-date sourcing issue. Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayathripuram Educational & Charitable Trust, that was one of my early article creations from 2020. Looking back, I agree with the AfD outcome. At the time I misunderstood the subject as essentially a school/primary-school article, but the discussion correctly treated it as a charitable organization, where the cited material did not establish notability. The sources were mainly a government/NGO listing, the organization’s own material, and local event listings, which may verify some facts but do not provide the independent significant coverage needed for WP:GNG / WP:ORGDEPTH.
- I would not create that article today without independent, reliable secondary coverage. My more recent creations are mostly species/insect articles, and I now focus on keeping new pages narrowly written, reliably sourced, neutral, and verifiable. Tatupiplu’(she/her · talk · email) 03:53, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
- Animaliak (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Prolific article creator with Women in Red. I spot-checked their recent creations for notability, copyright hygiene, and text–source integrity, and found no issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:18, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Animaliak: why is Jholerina Brinnette Timbo notable? I'm not seeing any significant coverage cited in the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Also Jordan Chanetsa. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:38, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. I think both of them are significant figures in the LGBTQ community in their respective home countries (both of which lack legal and social protections for transgender people, which can make it more difficult to find sources from the country about them). I would say that there is significant coverage in at least some of the sources cited - Jholerina had obituaries published in Mamba Online (a regional LGBTQ news websites) and by several human rights organisations, while Chanetsa's work has been covered in German cultural media. I do 100% agree that there is a lack of coverage among mainstream outlets, but given what I have said about the lack of coverage on particularly transgender people in southern Africa, I still think they are notable people deserving of articles with some sources that are significant available; of course, I am always happy to search the web for more. Animaliak (talk) 08:34, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
- CharlieMehta (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting restoration of the autopatrolled user right. It was revoked on 4 December 2025 when I was blocked in connection with an SPI investigation led by Moneytrees. Later, I was unblocked on 11 December 2025 and was advised to spend a few months doing uncontroversial work before requesting the right again. asilvering also advised against reapplying too soon. I followed this advice and waited approximately six months before making this request. Since my unblock, I have focused on uncontroversial editing and have created 22 new articles, most of which were successfully reviewed (Total: 85 articles, 2 deleted). I would appreciate having the right restored so that my new page creations no longer require manual review. In support of this request, I am linking to the most recent comment by Moneytrees. I respectfully ask that this request be evaluated on its own merits and based on my editing record since my unblock. Thank you. Charlie (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC) Charlie (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)