Lanceloth345
Welcome!
edit
Hello, Lanceloth345, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Gjesti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BUNNYDICAE🐇 20:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Lanceloth345,
- I am replying here to your message posted on my Talk page, for convenience.
- I note that you took the liberty of moving this draft page back into Main space. Please do NOT do this in the future: it was moved to draft space for a reason, and whether any revisions you have made since make the page acceptable for main space is not a decision you are yet sufficiently experienced to make.
- Accordingly I have moved the page back to Draft space. On the draft's Talk page, could you please provide WP:THREE, and also which notability criteria you believe the draft page meets (presumably an item in WP:MUSICBIO). Cabrils (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi and my apologizes for renoving drom dradt to mainspace, i thought that it complete notability and toher criterias as article. I have posted to talk page of draft page with necessary informations. Thank you. Lanceloth345 (talk) 03:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 18
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shkodra Elektronike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ledion Liço has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cabrils (talk) 07:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Lanceloth345. Thank you for your work on Tërmet Peçi. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Very nice! Thanks for putting this together.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Moriwen (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- hi @Moriwen:. thank you for review, i have an draft page draft:Gjesti create times before, can you take a look to see if it's ready for mainspace? also i make some significant changes at that draft after was declined first time.Thank you. Lanceloth345 (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
edit
Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Ylli Rakipi. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 14:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Taffer Thank you now i understand better :) Lanceloth345 (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Spartak Ngjela. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, it was unintentionally, but meanwhile i added more sources, if you can see those sources supoort removing of tag that you added? Thank you. Lanceloth345 (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- You removed the tag after adding the references, but there are still whole sections that lack references to sources. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ah i see,thank you . Lanceloth345 (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- You removed the tag after adding the references, but there are still whole sections that lack references to sources. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
edit
Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Dollia, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:47, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi i saw your tag at article, it' s not ai generated its just adopt from albanian language original version of article. Lanceloth345 (talk) 16:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- also to he mentioned references are based on article and meaning of "Dollia" i just tried to adopt real meaning in english, so it's a misunderstood of you that it looks like "i generated" it's not my first article created and i know how to create articles. Lanceloth345 (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Did you use AI to translate the article? jlwoodwa (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- absolutely no, i have translated,adopted by myself. Lanceloth345 (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jlwoodwa i have retranslated, and now i think its better not looking as ai generated text. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: MCN TV (August 14)
edit
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MCN TV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anila Basha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Member and Executive Committee.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Non-attributed translations
edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from sq:Adi Krasta to Adi Krasta. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:
NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for you advices, i hae added and done all steps, into en article page and talk page too. Lanceloth345 (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note that this also applies to any other articles you've translated, such as the one highlighted above at #August 2025. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed, Thank you. Lanceloth345 (talk) 10:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Note that this also applies to any other articles you've translated, such as the one highlighted above at #August 2025. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Good work on sourcing Julian Deda
editYou've done a good job, taking Julian Deda from a barely defensible article with two unreliable sources and only one reliable one, to a well referenced article . Thanks for the contributions! signed, Willondon (talk) 22:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, i appreciate your comment and will go forward to contribute in Wikipedia. Lanceloth345 (talk) 22:34, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ledja Liku
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ledja Liku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at []. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Diella (AI system)
edit
Hello! Your submission of Diella (AI system) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CoryGlee (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @CoryGlee all fixes that you required at template page are made into article. Thank you :) Lanceloth345 (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Good work, mate. Have a nice day :-). Best for you. CoryGlee (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you i aappreciate, have a great day too. Lanceloth345 (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Good work, mate. Have a nice day :-). Best for you. CoryGlee (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Lanceloth345. Thank you for your work on Piero Ausilio. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this page for a Italian football executive, sufficiently in the news to warrant coverage. The page seems to be heavily based on the Italian article; remember to acknowledge this in the first edit summary; see HELP:TRANSLATION.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 21:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
- I understand concern, and im doing in future articles if are translated from other wikies. Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 00:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Lanceloth345. Thank you for your work on Agron Gjekmarkaj. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources and make sure to footnote each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Your thread has been archived
edit![]() |
Hello Lanceloth345! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Lanceloth345. Thank you for your work on Lori Hoxha. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Lanceloth345. Thank you for your work on National Inspectorate for Territorial Protection (Albania). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Draft review request
editHello Lanceloth345
I recently created a draft biography about the Albanian singer Naldi and I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at it when you have time. Here is the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Naldi_(singer) If anything needs improvement or correction, please let me know. Thank you very much for your help. ~2026-16271-76 (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Draft review request
editHello, I noticed that you have worked on several biographies of Albanian public figures on Wikipedia. I’m a fan of the Albanian singer Naldi and I created a draft article using information from reliable media sources. If you have time, could you please take a look and let me know if anything should be improved before review? Draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ronald_Sefullahu Thank you for your time. ~2026-16446-34 (talk) 01:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
edit
Hi Lanceloth345, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Arcticocean ■ 19:45, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Arcticocean, thank you i really appreciate, and this makes me to go further with new articles mantaining Wikipedia standarts, as per new page patroller, may i apply anytime? Thanks again. Lanceloth345 (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
- I have just added new request for new pages reviewer, Thank you again for your support. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
edit
Hi Lanceloth345, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 17:58, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you i appreciate it, i try to do my best. Lanceloth345 (talk) 18:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Gjesti
edit
Hello, Lanceloth345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gjesti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Lori Hoxha for deletion
editThe article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Hoxha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Hello!
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. G. L. Talk 13:28, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Upcoming expiry of your patroller right
editHi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 2 May 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive
edit| May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Lori Caffe for deletion
editThe article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Caffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Your draft article, Draft:Gjesti
edit
Hello, Lanceloth345. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gjesti".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026
editHello Lanceloth345,

Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.
January–February backlog drive
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
May backlog drive
An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.
PageTriage
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Orphaned non-free image File:Top Channel Films logo.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Top Channel Films logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:46, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lori Caffe logo Albania 2025.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Lori Caffe logo Albania 2025.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Warning for sockpuppetry and revocation of autopatrolled
editCopied from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanceloth345:
This is your only warning for sockpuppetry. It should have been obvious to you that it was not okay to participate in the same discussions under multiple identities, and if you had not owned up to it so quickly, I would likely be blocking your account. If you engage in behavior like this again, you will likely receive an indefinite block. I would strongly advise you to stick to not edit logged-out at all, or on any undisclosed accounts at all, as people are unlikely to assume good faith in the future. Furthermore, because your sockpuppetry involved moving pages to mainspace, thereby using your autopatroller access, I will be revoking that right, and will leave a note that your new page reviewer status would have been revoked too if it had not already expired. You can re-apply for either permission at WP:PERM.
-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 07:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- I understand your concern and i promise i will stick to my registered account, i apologise again for my attitude as i explained before, i will try to do my best to further contribute to Wikipedia. Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 08:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

