.png){kind=spacer}
You just stay around to keep the tools, you just stay around to keep the tools! You think that we're all fools, you just stay around to keep the tools! Making minute edits every year, you make minute edits every year! We can see it's very clear, you make minute edits every year! Users such as yourself who make a significantly low amount of edits just to keep your administrative tools sicken me and many others. Just give up the tools already!!! What are you holding on to them for anyways!! What a selfish thing to do!!
User:Iridescent: I'm not sure two mistaken identities and one Chillum playing wikicop really constitutes a block log :) —Fortuna, imperatrix 15:58, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Vegetius on legacy admins: ...For men who stopped fighting a long time ago should be treated as recruits.[1]
References
On 13 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the taxi driver in the Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing was later commended for "incredible presence of mind and bravery"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liverpool Women's Hospital bombing), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 1 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1354, the Duke of Lancaster compared his heart to the sea, a fox's hole, and a market-place? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Le Livre de Seyntz Medicines), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
 |
Four Award | |
| Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 1937 tour of Germany by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. — Bilorv (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply |
On 9 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dennis Waterman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Fortuna imperatrix mundi! Your work on Óengus I has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 |
Military history reviewers' award | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between January and March 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space |
On 30 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shane MacGowan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
On 3 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tommy Wood (International Brigades), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irish International Brigader Tommy Wood had only been in Spain for 18 days when he was killed at the Battle of Lopera during the Spanish Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tommy Wood (International Brigades). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tommy Wood (International Brigades)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
| Humorless self-indulgence, be the order of the day. |
|---|
|
See: this GA review, GA reviewer demanding copies of printed sources and User page.
You've got your way - I won't take part in the GA process or any discussions about the GA process - so why are you twisting the knife? If you don't have the power to ban me from the GA process like you claim, THEN HOW ON EARTH have you the right to demand that I am not allowed to post on my own user page, or to demand that I "get back to work". What "work" am I allowed to do? Who gets to decide it? Are you trying to drive me off the project - if so you are doing a good job of it. I don't want to continue this discussion, so please don't.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply |
_detail.jpg)
On 19 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Janet Nelson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 10:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 14 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Timothy West, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 20 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jon Kenny, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 17:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 25 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hīkoi mō te Tiriti, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 16:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, meant to write this last night and my battery ran out just as I was wrapping up. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "entailed in the male line"; the barony of Cromwell was created by writ of summons, so heritable by heirs general, rather than heirs male. The situation on Cromwell's death is exactly that described in Abeyance#History: no account is taken of the relative seniority of daughters, so the title lapses when their are coheirs. (I rewrote the phrase "could not be split between two female heirs" because to me that implies there are circumstances under which a peerage could be split.) Payling just says "elevated to the Peerage as Lord Cromwell, a promotion facilitated by Neville's death four weeks earlier", so I don't feel that I broke source-text integrity on the rewrite (I wouldn't defile one of your articles like that!). Indeed, Cokayne says on p. 554, note "b" that Bourchier "was not a coheir himself", so I'm reluctant to describe him as "remaining heir", as the article does now. I don't want to encumber Neville's article with legal finicking that's rather tangential to the man himself, but I do think the phrasing should reflect peerage law a little more closely; I'd like to hear your thoughts.
As you saw, I spun up a stub on Humphrey Bourchier, 1st Baron Cromwell, which you might be able to pad out from some of the sources you've used, especially Payling. It looks as though Payling is writing his biography for HoP (he must have been in the Commons as well before 1461), which will make interesting reading when it comes out. There's an episode in his history which I don't quite understand: Bourchier becomes chamberlain of the receipt again at Edward's accession in 1461. In 1464, John Leynton, who as the legal mind among Ralph, Lord Cromwell's executors had presumably been sparring with Neville & Bourchier, is appointed auditor of the receipt, and in the next year receives, fide the Calendar of Patent Rolls, "a writing of Humphrey Bourgchier, knight, lord Cromwell, one of the chamberlains of the receipt of the Exchequer, under his seal at arms dated 31 August, 5 Edward IV, granting to the said John for life the said office of one of the chamberlains of the receipt of the Exchequer with the appointment of one of the ushers of the Exchequer and other officers, as granted to himself by letters patent dated 17 July, 4 Edward IV". Apparently Humphrey wasn't supposed to be alienating his office, as the writing is enrolled along with "pardon to the said Humphrey and John of their trespasses in this matter; and confirmation to the said John for life of the said office and all fees thereof." That seems rather relevant to the state of the settlement in the 1460s, and I'm a bit surprised it didn't come into Payling's piece!
Richard Beauchamp, 2nd Baron Beauchamp may also be of interest to you given your recent work: there's an unsourced paragraph there that brings his wife's adultery into the trial of Burdet and Stacy, although the Croyland Chronicle is ambiguous about which Lord Beauchamp's wife was implicated (the 1st or 2nd).
As always, I enjoy reading your historical articles, which are both lucid and full of pertinent detail. Cordially, Choess (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
On 12 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fall of George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 15th-century cause célèbre saw a duchess dead, innocents hanged, villains and sorcerers drawn and quartered, and eventually the king's brother executed in a butt of malmsey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Judicial murder and George, Duke of Clarence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fall of George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 18 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Burdet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Burdet supposedly plotted treason against King Edward IV in 1477 after he killed Burdet's favourite white deer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Burdet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Burdet), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 20 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ankarette Twynho, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ankarette Twynho's hanging for poisoning a duchess was a cause célèbre, and has been described by one modern historian as "judicial murder"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ankarette Twynho. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ankarette Twynho), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Fortuna imperatrix mundi! Your work on 1981 Irish hunger strike has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
On 16 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Stacy (alchemist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Stacy warned the Duke of Suffolk that a Tower would be dangerous to him; Suffolk was later murdered by sailors on a ship called The Nicholas of the Tower? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Stacy (alchemist). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Stacy (alchemist)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 19 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roger Tocotes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roger Tocotes was suspected by the Duke of Clarence of masterminding the Duchess of Clarence's death, but Tocotes avoided capture until the King got involved? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roger Tocotes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Roger Tocotes), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 8 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2025 North Sea ship collision, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when MV Solong struck MV Stena Immaculate in March 2025, the former ship was falsely reported to be carrying highly toxic sodium cyanide? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2025 North Sea ship collision. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2025 North Sea ship collision), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thanks for volunteering at WP:RX ... your research is helping me get the Atlanta Compromise article promoted to FA status. You and all the volunteers at WP:RX are rock stars! Noleander (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply |
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
I did not want to make a reply comment on the coordinator page because I did not want to make it into a big deal or any type of contention. Nor did I want to appear to be critical. Since you commented, I thought I would just leave you a note on the side instead.
I occasionally struggle with templates that are somewhat out of the ordinary and other programming tasks, unlike some others such as Hawkeye7 who have more skill and experience with such tasks. I actually tried to change the alphabetical order and for some reason was not getting it done without deleting some lines. I saw no reason to mention that generally in a reply. Hawkeye7 is right, the bot does not do it and it is not in the instructions, just in the introduction to the voting page. I am reasonably sure that is meant to show neutrality. Also, I forgot about the tally box and I suppose the others did too. The bot also does not do that but Hawkeye 7 has written that he will change that. In my experience, it has magically appeared each year. So in view of the fact there were only five candidates, and I did not want to spend more time trying to change the listings, I gave up on alphabetizing of the entries.
TomStar81 is right that the project "has seen better days" in one sense. There were more coordinator candidates that coordinator slots for some years in the past. Now, the project could use more coordinators. The number of coordinators for the project was set up at 10 plus the lead so that there would be enough coordinators to handle all of the tasks and make some other writing and editing contributions, even if a few coordinators participated only sparingly. As it is, the number of coordinators has been declining over the past few years. We are at a low with only five candidates. Luckily, the project also has had some coordinator-type work from a few coordinator emeriti, former coordinators and experienced users such as yourself. That's not really enough to do all the work of the project, especially promptly. On the other hand, many projects now exist in name only with no coordinators or guidance. They may have an occasional random comment on the talk pages but that is about all.
If you may wish to be added to the coordinator group, the lead coordinator can co-opt new coordinators at any time before the next election and I think would do so gratefully after a request. I hesitate to suggest you add yourself to the list at this late date. However, I think that nobody would object if you did so. Also, you would assuredly get the one vote that is needed to be elected this time around.
Thanks for all your good work for the project and Wikipedia in general. Donner60 (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
 |
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Thanks for fixing-up Every Breath (novel)! Draftifying it was silly of me. ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply |
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fortuna imperatrix mundi Polygnotus (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
...is delighted with your talkpage and has parked her big butt on it to gobble up the food as it falls. (I'm helping with the donuts.) How wonderful that more and more just keeps on coming! She may actually stop "accidentally" eating little users! Bishonen | tålk 19:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC).Reply
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Hi Fortuna, I had been meaning to ask you this for a few days now but I have been really busy and absent-minded lately. Have you considered making a run for adminship in the December election? The Call for Candidates just started, and I think you would be a great fit for the role. I know you already have the support of plenty of users, and you are already essentially an admin without tools, so why not make it official? If you don't want to, that's fine, but I figured I'd ask since having you as an admin would be great for the project. Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
It was an interesting read when I reviewed Poisoning of Abbot Greenwell at FAC. I look forward to more of your articles in the future. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Cheers. MSincccc (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Fyi Yngvadottir, Cultural Memory in the Icelandic Contemporary Sagas: Constructing Continuity at a Time of Transformation is open access at De Gruyter Brill here. —Fortuna, imperatrix 19:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
happy new year! - inviting you to check out "my" story (fun listen today, full of surprises), music (and memory), and places (pictured by me: the latest uploads) any day! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Today you can watch the 2010 premiere of a violin sonata with the composer also the pianist. DYK that around 30 more composers are mentioned on the page? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
20 January is the 100th birthday of David Tudor (see my story) and the 300th birthday of Bach's cantata Meine Seufzer, meine Tränen, BWV 13, if we go by date instead of occasion as he would have thought, so see my story for last Sunday, and celebrate ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
It must be your lucky day! Not one but two of your FAs have been selected to be TFAs in March. Loveday (1458) and 1937 tour of Germany by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor will be offered up so the hoi polloi can move all their commas around. What joy. Uncle Wehwalt, who has arranged this rare treat, wonders if you could check that you are happy with the blurb the latter ran with in 2021 and if you would care to have a go at a blurb for the former. I suspect he is hoping that you will be so excited you will shoot the messenger. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see that the enforcement of the UCoC has not been explained clearly so that some editors, including some experienced editors, do not know that its enforcement is primarily the responsibility of each project, including the English Wikipedia. We, the English Wikipedia, are responsible for the enforcement of the UCoC. I think that we, the English Wikipedia community, are in agreement that there was a violation of the UCoC, and are in disagreement as to how severe the sanction should be for the violation. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
some editors, including some experienced editorscrap, when I am the only editor you chose to post to. I know perfectly well how the fucking UCoC works. I was daring BusterD to put his money where his fucking mouth is and actually make it official. But it's much easier just to throw "UCoC" in like a boogeyman when you don't actually have to prove it. And having the chutzpah to shrill about a chill factor at the same time is frankly hypocritical, if unsurprising: there's a subtext. This whole hysterical campaign—not solely by BusterD—is only superficially against Joseph2302; more broadly it's against the principle of RECALL itself, which some editors would like to eviscerate by any means possible. Take care, —Fortuna, imperatrix 10:16, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have just followed the article at Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks I have had repeated personal attacks from the user KJP1, I had asked them in replies to refrain, they had not, a series of personal attacks had repeated at [] I used the template at TWK given on wikipedia for warning against personal attacks, in hope this would put an end to such personal attacks. You issued me a warning, I didn't intentionally do wrong. How do I deal with being on the receiving end of another users repeated personal attacks? I have already asked them to stop --Pennine rambler (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
idle speculationalready; I think similar advice probably holds true here. (And while you're here, with only five edits to article space this year, you might consider spending less time on the drama boards generally. HTH.) —Fortuna, imperatrix 13:45, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you for help for SV's talk! - Today's main page features four biographies I helped to bring there, two women and two men, three opera singers (one pictured) and an actor, - a record for me, I believe ;) - places have vacation pics, slowly accumulating -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just here to devour some more rain of food. Irresistiblabble! (More donuts, pretty please.) bishzilla ROARR!! pocket 13:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC).Reply
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we discuss different patterns in articles about years on different Wikipedias, we present the video of the Wikifunctions presentation by Nicolas Vigneron at the last Celtic Knot, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on March 2, at 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting).
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.
Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
 |
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we introduce the possibility of creating a function that deals with references and a Wikifunctions internal clipboard, where you can temporarily store any piece of code in order to paste it somewhere else, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I saw that you deleted my request on ANI. Why was this done? Pipoin (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
On 7 March 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Soham murders, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 22:28, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Hey @Fortuna imperatrix mundi. Just wanted to let you know I performed a split, so that there is a distinction between the supports for the TBAN and INDEF. I know you didn't formally propose it, but for the closers benefit, I hope you don't mind that I did this. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that you have left warnings to the TA. I won't reply to them further – there is no benefit to further derailing the OPs thread, feel free to hat the sub-thread from my reply to TA onwards as 'derailment' as a clerk action – though I am morbidly curious what they think my argument is and what accusation I am defending against. Mayhaps just a DFTT situation, but they just cannot seem to grasp that not all incivility is composed of personal attacks. The difference between 'you are an idiot' (PA) and 'you wrote an idiotic comment' (RUDE, usually). I had spade in mind penning it and just posted my actual thoughts. I ought to show more restraint and neither bait nor take the bait. Thanks as always, Mr rnddude (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am rather confused to what you think WP:DENY is, can you tell me what you believe it to be? Also, saying I don't know what I'm talking about is a bit of a stretch when this is quite literally the area I work in on Wikipedia. – LuniZunie(talk) 17:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
True vandals and trollsthat their edits need expunging.Anyway, if you want to discuss the essay further, I suggest you start a discussion on the talk page. Cheers, —Fortuna, imperatrix 18:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I did not remove the comments because I thought they were trolling, it's upsetting to even know people would think that, I removed them because it gives Sugar Tax more reason to go after the editor in question, which gives more reason for them to evade. I'm not trying to be aggressive with you, and I don't like how much this is escalating, I just don't need people going around thinking I think our long standing editors are trolls.Again, I did not remove the comment because I thought it was trolling, I removed it because it only added fuel to the flame. Cheers and I hope we can leave this behind us. – LuniZunie(talk) 18:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)ReplyDenying recognition and infamy neutralizes common primary motivators for vandalism and disruption.
Again, I did not remove the comment because I thought it was trolling, I removed it because it only added fuel to the flame. Cheers and I hope we can leave this behind us.
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we talk about the revamp of the composition language on Wikifunctions, with its potential for further improvements.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I so miss that age of innocence. Thanks for that As far as the actual edit -- apologies for breaking format. I'm a tech nuisance at times. Star Mississippi 19:19, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just wanted to say sorry if I came off as rude or stupid at ANI. Not the intention, I promise. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
TolBot (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we celebrate the launch of the preliminary Beta version of Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
You can say it’s all lies, damned lies and statistics but your initial comment about me was wrong as it was an irrelevant ad hominem pure and simple that had nothing to do with refuting what I said about SchroCat. I am done responding to you, either on this talk page or at the noticeboard; do not continue to respond, ping me, or post related comments on my talk page. Dronebogus (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I pinged as well, but to ensure you see it: you've been named (by me) as a possible party for WP:ARC#SchroCat. Please consider responding there. -- asilvering (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you today for Loveday, 1458, introduced (in 2020): "Coming back in with the medieval masters, as they say. This time, King Henry VI tries to save the world as we he knew it, drawing together warring factions within his own government. "Did it work? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and 15th-century Britain fell deeper into depression". Not surprising really when he was trying to persuade people to hold hands and make up—literally—while each had a small army at his back! It was really Henry's last throw of the dice when it came to wearing the trousers; after his failed initiative, his wife became all the more powerful and war was right around the corner. Usual stuff." - "ritualistic reconciliation", says the blurb, and it did not work. How would a true reconciliation work for the infoboxes, - something that Brian Boulton started in 2013, and it has not worked yet? How is this? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
 | |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
more Bach in story and music, imagine: four Easter cantatas in today's concert! ... and more places in Cyprus --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you today for Duke and Duchess of Windsor's 1937 tour of Germany, introduced (in 2020): "A bloody fool rather than an all-out Nazi, seems to be the consensus. Edward VIII, not me, that is :) Something rather different from me, this will hopefully complement our already-featured article on the King, which, of course, could not give due weight to this curious—verging on the bizarre*—episode of his career."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Today is the last day Easter Oratorio is on the main page, - did you know that the article became FA because I was sooo frustrated that neither DYK nor OTD accepted it for Easter last year, the 300th anniversary? I have a FAC open, in case of interest, 300 on 14 May. There's little hope for a TFA that day (something else pending that is ready and has a 75th anniversary), but I would like it in best shape by then. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:43, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we discuss the first early edits on Abstract Wikipedia, we share the status of Composition Language v2, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 15, 2026 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, DatGuyTalkContribs 09:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we introduce a proposal for Natural Language Generation, we introduce a page for function suggestions from Abstract Wikipedia, we inform you that there will be a presentation about Abstract Wikipedia at WikiCon Australia, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on April 13, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we report on three community proposals on syntactic approaches, we introduce a new Type (Complex numbers), we report on current hiccups on Abstract Wikipedia, we share more information about a presentation about Abstract Wikipedia at WikiCon Australia, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on April 13, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I told you not to contact me on my talk page and you did it anyway. One more time and you're getting reported for harassment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-21685-57 (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we celebrate 4000 functions on Wikifunctions and 1000 abstract articles on Abstract Wikipedia, we announce that we should have fixed some major issues with the websites, we inform you on our latest outreach activities, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 10:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Bridge was yesterday's TFA, - a broad topic by many. My father loved bridges, and I wrote a few articles with that in mind (Empress Elisabeth Bridge, adding to Chain bridge and Müngsten Bridge, the latter for childhood memory), and also thinking of bridges between people. My father travelled to Wales to visit Britannia Bridge, and we circled Manhattan and walked Brooklyn Bridge and Riverside Avenue Bridge (Greenwich, Connecticut) together. - I came across this edit by Slim Virgin today, and smiled. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardinals created by Adrian IV, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victor IV was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we present an academic paper about Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss our latest Type created, and we take a look at the newest created functions.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
Hi Fortuna, coming to you with hat in hand to see if you might be willing to have a look at my stalled FAC for The Horn of Plenty. It's been stuck for awhile now and even David Fuchs putting it on the "FACs needing comment" template week or so ago didn't attract any interest. I'm hoping maybe some new input will get things moving (the more critical the better), and you've been a solid reviewer on previous FACs so you came to mind. No worries if you're busy. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
Please note the following:
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
| May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star RailThe full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Fortuna imperatrix mundi, in the open SchroCat arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, DatGuyTalkContribs 23:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we ask you what would be the relevant metrics for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss our latest news on Composition Language v2, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:21, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat has been closed and the final decision is now viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, DatGuyTalkContribs 13:51, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we announce that is now possible to pass references in Wikidata statements, we introduce the Abstract Data dashboard, we report you on the presentation about Abstract Wikipedia at WikiCon Australia, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on May 11, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 11:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello Fortuna imperatrix mundi,
Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards
Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.
January–February backlog drive
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
May backlog drive
An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.
PageTriage
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we discuss functions creating language fragments, we present our latest news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
|
Greetings, Fortuna imperatrix mundi. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
(This message was sent to User talk:Serial Number 54129 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we present you the current draft of objectives for Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia in the WMF Annual Plan 2026-2027, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we present you a recollection of our work so far, now that we celebrate our 250th newsletter, we share with you a summary of our latest outreach activities, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 10:04, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!
In this issue, we introduce our first function to import images on Abstract Wikipedia, we present our Functions of the Week, and we take a look at the latest software developments.
Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!
Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on June 8, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).
Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
