Annh07

Archives (Index)

2024/February 2024/March 2024/May 2024/September 2025/January 2025/June 2025/December

Hey, noticed you made a change on Anuel AA, why is that?

why Prepucinho (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

@Prepucinho Please see WP:AIGI. Annh07 (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

User Names Report

I am new to Wikipedia editing: Anno7 just reported my username (just created): Can we talk about it? AIethics was already taken - I don't mind changing it if its is thought promotional but please let me know how such things are evaluated and when so that I can change it if necessary. Is it blocked until I change it? Can I just change the user name and keep the content of the page. I wish that whoever reported this could have discussed the issues with me first - otherwise it's just discouraging.  AIethics.ai (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @AIethics.ai. Because your username blatantly violates the username policy, this issue needs to be handled at WP:UAA. Whether or not you get blocked depends on the administrator's decision. If you are blocked, follow the administrator's instructions to be unblocked (including changing your username). Your page will not be deleted unless it meets one of the speedy deletion criteria. Annh07 (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your anti-vandalism work on AFC Redirect/Categories, always reverting vandalism, sometimes i want to revert it but it has already being done by you, Good Work. Destinyokhiria (talk / cont) 07:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you :) Annh07 (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Miss Earth in India

Thank you for the note. I confirm that I am the director of Miss Earth in India and therefore have a conflict of interest. I have now added a disclosure to my user page in line with Wikipedia’s paid editing and COI requirements. I will not edit the article directly and request that independent editors review the draft for suitability. Miss Earth in India (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Miss Earth in India,

Thanks for doing that. Make sure you disclose your conflict of interest on your user page. Follow the instructions on your talk page or here, WP:DISCLOSE.

Additionally, you need to change your username because it violates the username policy; specifically, your current username is promotional and does not represent you as an individual person.

If you need further assistance or have other issues, please post your question at the Teahouse. Annh07 (talk) 15:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reverting on EFFPR

Hi Annh07. Please don't revert good faith false positive reports like you did here because they are badly formatted. It takes a few seconds to fix a badly formatted report. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I was a little hasty, thank you for fixing it. Annh07 (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Elizabeth Berkley

no birthday was listed..ive never really added before im not sure what I have to use as a credible source ~2026-68882-5 (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

how do I share where I obtained her birthday ~2026-68882-5 (talk) 18:55, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

If you want to include her date of birth in the article, you need a reliable and verifiable source. If you're unfamiliar with how to cite, please see Help:Referencing for beginners. Annh07 (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Adding details from IMDB

Hi,

I added a statement in the biography of Hania Aamir that was rejected 3 days back because the source is IMDB. Does this mean this cannot be added to her Wikipedia page? ~2026-60793-8 (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Based on previous discussions, the community has concluded that IMDb is not a reliable source; see WP:IMDB. However, you can still add information about her as long as you can provide a reliable source. Any unsourced content is subject to removal and cannot be restored without providing a reliable source. Please see WP:PROVEIT. Annh07 (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

OK. Thanks ~2026-60793-8 (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I am adding the details again with some other link. You may please remove it if this still cannot be accepted. ~2026-60793-8 (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate your efforts. However, unfortunately, I declined. The reason is that IMDb is unreliable, and therefore other sources citing IMDb are also unreliable. You know, the article you're viewing on IMDb was posted by a user; anyone, including you, could post a similar article. Most of the information on IMDb is user-generated content, and combined with IMDb's lax moderation, it becomes unreliable. Please see WP:USERGENERATED. Annh07 (talk) 12:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Pending Changes Reviewer's barnstar
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in for January 2026. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. MWFwiki (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For username patrolling! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the barnstar! Annh07 (talk) 11:56, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers for February 2026. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. MWFwiki (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the barnstar! Annh07 (talk) 02:53, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Moves

We tried moving Ursula Brunner simultaneously, some of the revisions are now deleted. Please step back while I try to fix things. Toadspike [Talk] 10:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Very sorry for the move conflict. Toadspike [Talk] 10:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Should be good now! Again, my apologies for the chaos. Toadspike [Talk] 10:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike This has happened to me a couple of times before; however, this is the first time I've seen an article disappear due to a move conflict. Anyway, the issue has been fixed. You did a great job! Annh07 (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. It disappeared because I was trying to delete the redirect under G6, but by that point you had already moved the article there. Relatively speaking, this incident wasn't so bad: I once accidentally deleted Tropical Storm Co-May while trying to move it and didn't even notice until someone pinged me...not my proudest admin moment. Toadspike [Talk] 11:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I see, there has to be an administrative action (deleting) for an article to disappear like that; otherwise, it would still exist even if a move conflict occurred. Annh07 (talk) 11:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I noticed that too; the original article is missing. Hopefully, you'll fix it. Annh07 (talk) 10:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for dealing with whatever just happened with my talk page. Clearly, someone is unhappy with me. I appreciate the cleanup. Joyous! Noise! 21:52, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@Joyous! Glad to help out. Annh07 (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Explanation

I only left the times on the Day page in the 12-hour format, which is the officially used format in English. Since English doesn't use the 24-hour format, I removed it. ~2026-17341-60 (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

As far as I know, the 12-hour format is commonly used in the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, while the 24-hour format is more widely used globally, and it's also the international standard. Annh07 (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

I thought better of it, reverted my edit to the previous one, including the 24-hour format, but with the 12-hour format in parentheses. ~2026-17333-03 (talk) 20:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

I also think that's the best way to present it. Annh07 (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your illegal editing

Observation and warning: A group of attentive trade observers is following your sabotage activities on Wikipedia. We are already in possession of your real name and will take legal action against you. This will be associated with high financial penalties against you. ~2026-17392-27 (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I hope you've read WP:LEGAL; posting legal threats here is pointless. Annh07 (talk) 08:36, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Ballon d'Or

Hi. What can we possibly do to stop that user? He keeps adding absurd claims. Can we still revert or we could break any rules? Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 23:07, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

@Mazewaxie. They've been reported here, and I guess the administrators will intervene soon. Annh07 (talk) 23:11, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I hope so. Thank you for you cooperation anyway. With this kind of users we need to be so patient... Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 23:13, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Furthermore, we should not perform more than three reverts on a single page. Annh07 (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

PCR Award - March 2026

	A barnstar for you!
	Congratulations on being one of the top 5 pending changes reviewers during 25 February—25 March 2026! [source/credit] randomdude121    10:21, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Follow-up on Promotional Content and Guidance Request

Hi Annh07,

I apologize for the promotional content I added earlier, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines and will ensure my future contributions remain neutral and properly sourced.

I would also like to ask about similar cases I’ve noticed, such as the flail mower page I edited earlier. I have noticed that our competitors, Mechmaxx and Woodmaxx, appear to include promotional content. I came across these while conducting research, and I understand that this does not justify my edits.

Could you please assist me on how situations like this should be handled or reported appropriately?

Thank you for your time and guidance.

Yours sincerely,

JacobLavin JacobLavin (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JacobLavin,

I've removed the spam links of the companies you mentioned. Whenever you see spam links or promotional material in articles, you're encouraged to remove them.

This is the important part for you. You mentioned above that "I have noticed that our competitors"; this means you have publicly disclosed your affiliation with the organization you are promoting, or in other words, you have a conflict of interest with that organization. Wikipedia has guidelines on conflicts of interest that editors with a COI need to follow; please see WP:COI, WP:PAID.

To keep Wikipedia neutral and non-promotional, editors should avoid editing articles with which they have a conflict of interest. While editing with a conflict of interest is technically not disallowed, it's discouraged. The recommended best practice for editing an article where you have a conflict of interest is to write on the article's talk page, suggest an edit, and tag the request with the {{edit COI}} template to flag it for volunteers without a conflict of interest to implement.

If you need help, please post a question at the Teahouse. Annh07 (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Follow up.

hello, I saw you deleted my duplicate on the review ppage. I apologize for that as it was accidental. Thank you. Jakerrr1 (talk) 18:37, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

@Jakerrr1 No problem. Your request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager, so please be patient. Submitting duplicate reports is unnecessary. Annh07 (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

658jf

Hey! Thanks for all your anti-spam efforts. I see you on my watchlist nearly every day! I just stopped by, one as an FYI: I indef'd 658jf because checkuser shows they're a block-evading spammer, and second to say feel free to report spammers at a lower threshold. AIV is hit and miss unless they're persistently spamming from one account but WT:WPSPAM is available. I get notifications for new reports there (and the spam blacklist). I'm happy to look into almost any obviously bad-faith spammer because a lot of link spam comes from black-hat SEO firms and there are usually more accounts and more links out there. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, WT:WPSPAM seems like a better choice than AIV/WT:SBL for reporting spammers at a lower threshold. Annh07 (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

hello.

i noticed you changed an article about "Member states of the United Nations" why? it's not vandalism, it's nostalgia. Thu Jan 20 2005 12:00:00 GMT+0000 Nazar Horzhiy Sergiyovich (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

You removed almost all of the content from the page, which is considered vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Edited "byHussein" in "Telegram (Software)"

Hello, I'm wondering why my edit and addition to "Telegram (Software)" was rejected. Byhussein (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Byhussein. The link you added to the article is a spam link. Please see WP:LINKSPAM, WP:ELNO. Annh07 (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't mean to, sorry about that. I was just referring to adding a reliable source, nothing more. I can edit it again without the link, can't I? Byhussein (talk) 09:11, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

You may contribute content to articles as long as it's cited from reliable sources. Any material lacking a source may be removed. Annh07 (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I'd just like to bring to your attention...

... that Special:Contributions/~2026-20002-85 is obviously the very same user who had been edit-warring on 2025 Singaporean general election as Special:Contributions/TXDCJ before that one got indeffed Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:46, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. WP:BLOCKEVASION, with very clear evidence. Annh07 (talk) 12:33, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

User

Hi I believe you are in an edit war with a user I have been watching / trying to stop. Have you put some on administrators noticeboard or do you want me to? Busandtrainfannorthwestgeography (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Busandtrainfannorthwestgeography. Are you referring to this user, User:HATO Gandony i pidary? That's an LTA named Salebot1, and they've been blocked. Whenever you see users engaging in similar behavior, please report them to WP:AIV/WP:ANI. Annh07 (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok! I must say you did a really good job managing it! Congrats 🥳. Have a good evening/weekend. Busandtrainfannorthwestgeography (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, and you too! Annh07 (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I just watched and tried you actually did stuff! Take the credit! 😃 Busandtrainfannorthwestgeography (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Have you considered taking up a mop?

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. I think you would be a good administrator, and you appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already!

Interested in becoming an administrator? Check out some RfA advice, or ask a nominator about next steps!

Kj cheetham (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

I think you'd make a great admin and even without looking for the backlogs, it would make a huge difference if you could deal with all your reports yourself. If you want to chat privately, my email is always open! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm glad others also recognize that you'd make a great admin Annh. You're well suit d based on the great work that you do! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I agree with my colleagues; you could do a lot of good with the mop. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:19, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@Kj cheetham, @Femke, @Hey man im josh, @Vanamonde93. Thank you all so much!

Actually, I prefer to do my editing work as freely as possible, and although I still do some administrative work every day, I have no intention of becoming an admin. I never imagined I would receive so much support from you all. Annh07 (talk) 10:15, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Interesting point about working 'freely'. For me, the period before and just after my RfA felt less free, as I knew people were more likely to look at my edits in detail and I didn't want to ruffle feathers. That stopped quite fast after my RfA however, and I now edit as freely as before. WP:ADMINACCT is secretly how most respected non-admins already work, as being responsive is simply part of being part of the community. There are some admin actions that require follow-up, whereas others rarely do. For instance, I've heard people giving out many AE sanctions say they feel less free in their editing, as they remain the first port of call for an appeal. Other tasks (like working at CSD, UAA) very rarely have follow-up. If you ever change your mind and would like to not wait on admins to action your reports, my email is always open! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

To echo what Femke said, I'm also happy to discuss further if you change your mind! I try to think of adminship as just some extra tools so I can do things myself rather than needing to asking someone else (though do still get a second pair of eyes on things at times as appropriate). -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@Femke, @Kj cheetham. Thank you very much for your helpful advice. I'm considering my choice.

@Hey man im josh, FYI. Annh07 (talk) 22:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

That's fantastic to hear! I think you could do a lot of good, even if you didn't want to explore areas outside of where you already work. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Just wanted to pile on with the others - I've seen your work around here and know you'd do a good job with the mop, should you choose to take it up. Pahunkat (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

@Pahunkat Thank you so much! I'm still thinking about it, but you've helped me feel much more confident. Annh07 (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I'd like to join the chorus. I think you'd make a great admin and much of the work you already do lends itself to the tools. And we always need more anti-spam admins. As all the others have said, you're welcome to reach out to me privately if you feel like it. And @Pahunkat don't think you're not on my radar. If you'd been back for a bit longer, I'd be pestering you; maybe next time! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

+1 to the pile on. Haven't see anyone else mention it here, but your responses to newcomers here on your talk page are admirable. – LuniZunie_(talk) 16:05, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell @LuniZunie Thank you for the kind words. I'm just trying to contribute in any way I can, and I always try my best to make everyone feel welcome here. Annh07 (talk) 09:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Sounds like exactly the qualities I look for in an admin! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for dealing with the vandalism on my Talk page! Cheers — MWFwiki (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@MWFwiki Thank you so much! Glad to help out. Annh07 (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For persisting in the fight against innumerable vandals with insufficient active admins online. I've got an actual headache; I wonder how you deal with vandalism so diligently. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

@EnIRtpf09b Thank you very much. You know, we can contribute in many ways; since I can't contribute much to creating or improving content, I choose to protect it. Annh07 (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

It's the same for me. I have college and other stuff to do. Fighting vandalism tends to be repetitive once you get the hang of it which is helpful if you're a really busy person. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

"move-protected" edit request(s)

Hi Annh07, thanks for those RM/TR moves. I'm trying to clean out the tracking category, and per brief discussion with an admin I believe all of the following redirects-from-merges should have |redirect=yes added to the editnotice. Edits in this namespace are restricted to PM/TE/sysop and making a talk page to suppress a maintenance category through a {{TPER}} just seems silly, so could I ask you to please add that parameter to the following pages:

• Template:Editnotices/Page/26 December 2024 Israeli attack on Yemen
• Template:Editnotices/Page/April 2025 Brooklyn clashes
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Ayman Siam
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Headwater Diversion Plan (Jordan River)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/January 2015 Shebaa Farms incident
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Khalas clan

Thanks, ScalarFactor (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hey @ScalarFactor, I've done as you've requested for the first five & since I created the editnotice on the redirect target for the last one, just G7'd and moved that one. I've also gone through and cleared out all but three of the tracking category for you. If you ever notice any more of these feel free to ask me, since I've been active in the area recently and some of these might be my fault anyways. Thanks, Staraction (talk · contribs) 22:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, @Staraction! This category was ~2/3s emptied just through WP:RM/TR anyways so I don't anticipate too much more for the immediate future. ScalarFactor (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

@Staraction, thanks for covering for me while I was away.

@ScalarFactor, feel free to ping me if you need help updating or fixing editnotes. Annh07 (talk) 13:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Awarded for being one of the top five "pending changes" reviewers in the last thirty days. Thank you!  — MWFwiki (talk) 05:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 07:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

🫡 ~2026-25637-80 (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

IMDb sources removed

Hi @Annh07, removed the IMDb sources for this article: Draft:Clyde Magbanua. Anything else needs fixing? ~2026-25497-96 (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, currently the sources are still too weak to imply notability (WP:CREATIVE / WP:NBASIC / WP:GNG). I encourage you to find at least four to five independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. Annh07 (talk) 22:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Knee Scooter page edits

Hi @Annh07

You have sent me a message about removing the links from the edits I made to the knee scooter page. However, it looks like you have removed all of the content, not just the links. Please could you advise as I am new to this! Foot&AnkleSupport (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Foot&AnkleSupport, the source you used as a reference is unreliable because it's a commercial site, so I've removed it. Please see WP:ELNO, WP:LINKSPAM. Once references are removed, unsourced content may be removed per WP:V. I combined both in a single revert. You can add the content back as long as it comes from a reliable source and doesn't contain spammy links. Annh07 (talk) 14:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

RM/TR

Oops! Looks like we both tried to move Cocoa solids at the same time and ended up cancelling each other out. I'll let you do it so we don't run into the same conflict again. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 13:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@GearsDatapacks Oh, no problem. I'll do it again. Annh07 (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Annh07,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey there how are you doing ERinmoor (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

@ERinmoor I'm doing well, thanks! Do you need any help? Annh07 (talk) 08:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

April 25

I just added an inline citation. Does it suffice? IGAEB (talk) 20:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

@IGAEB Okay, that's fine, thank you. Annh07 (talk) 20:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Myuoh kaka roi

User talk:Myuoh kaka roi Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash ~2026-31364-18 (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

If you want to report a user for edit warring, please report them here. Annh07 (talk) 13:43, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I wasn't involved any any edit wars in any related recent topics and I didn't violated three revert rule so remove all of these baseless allegation Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

@Myuoh kaka roi Don't worry if you haven't done anything wrong, nothing can happen.

@~2026-31364-18 I see you've posted a similar report at ANI. Please clarify this matter. Note that if you cannot provide a satisfactory explanation, your actions will be considered harassment of other editors. Annh07 (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

@Annh07The ANI is finally closed as there is no evidence found against me and the ip user should be charged with harassment. Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

@Myuoh kaka roi I sent the user a warning. If they continue, you may consider using higher-level warnings ({{uw-harass3}}, {{uw-harass4}}) or reporting them to ANI. Annh07 (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!!

	A barnstar for you!
	Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – Destinyokhiria (talk / cont) 06:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 15:16, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

@Destinyokhiria ~2026-32347-60 (talk) 18:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-32347-60 hello. Destinyokhiria _{(talk / cont)} 19:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Claremont Computer Network

Dear Annh07,

You declined my submission on 2 June 2026 regarding the Claremont Computer Network here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Claremont_Computer_Network

This was allegedly because my draft was not adequately supported by reliable sources and my references did not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies.

I would like to bring to light documentation for your consideration which can be found using the California Business Search provided by the California Secretary of State (https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/search) or from the American Registry of Internet Numbers Whois-RWS (https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-23-142-172-0-1/pft?s=NET-23-142-172-0-1).

Is this sufficient to have my article on the Claremont Computer Network be approved upon a subsequent review, provided that I also include a paid template disclaiming my conflict-of-interest (COI)?

Best regards, Tesfa at the Claremont Computer Network (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

They aren't saying the business does not exist, they are saying it does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. A listing for a business number and a LinkedIn page is not enough to show that it's notable. SuperCode111 (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Dear SuperCode111,

Thank you for your input. That is understandable. I argue that we should make an exception for the arbitrary tradition that a business need to appear in a newspaper in order to announce its formation. The Claremont Computer Network LLC is recognized as an active business by the California Secretary of State and holds IPv4 addresses from the American Registry of Internet Numbers. I am seeking to gain further clarity as to whether that will suffice for notability. Otherwise, it's pretty straight-forward to have an article printed in a recognized primary source.

Best regards, Tesfa at the Claremont Computer Network (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

That is not the "arbitrary tradition" and we cannot "make an exception". Editors are just random people who decided to edit, and we don't have any extra rights nor is there a person to ask to make an exception. Please read WP:N and there you will see the notability rules, you need "significant media coverage" among other things. SuperCode111 (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Dear SuperCode111,

Thank you for the clarification.

Best regards, Tesfa at the Claremont Computer Network (talk) 05:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for cleaning up that mess. I've google translated what they were putting in, and it appeared to be about a Russian kids' TV show. Vandals, eh? CheeseAndJamSamdwich (talk) 08:39, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

@CheeseAndJamSamdwich. Thank you so much! Yes, that's an LTA named Salebot1. Annh07 (talk) 09:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Clintonian Triangulation move

Hi, I just wanted to specify what happened regarding the Clintonian Triangulation move.

I moved the page from 'Triangulation (politics) to 'Clintonian triangulation' since the page primarily talks about Clinton, I then decided less than a minute or so later to revert it back to 'Triangulation' and added a discussion in the talkpage of whether 'Clintonian triangulation' is a more fitting name or not. The Capitalization of 'P' in 'Politics' wasn't intentional, it was a just typo.

If I had negative intentions or ignored naming conventions - I wouldn't have reverted the page back to 'Triangulation Politics' and started a conversation in The Talkpage of which name works better for the title of the article. Best Wishes. Apallo334 (talk) 20:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Hi i saw that you revered the edit for the "Hugh of Cyfeiliog, 5th Earl of Chester" at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Can you explain why you revered it with this edit. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 17:50, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

@Cosmic840 This request is not yet complete, why did you remove it as completed? Annh07 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Because the i started the RM at Talk:Hugh of Cyfeiliog, 5th Earl of Chester and i removed it as completed. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 17:57, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

@Cosmic840 I understand and I don't object to you removing it, but it's clear that this request is not yet complete; if you want to remove it, please use an accurate edit summary, such as "started an RM". Note that the script doesn't allow you to provide an edit summary, so you should remove it manually. Annh07 (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2026 (UTC)