Welcome!

edit

Hi Manxshearwater! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [VTE] 23:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jay8g, thank you! Will have a look at these! Manxshearwater (talk) 09:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Great internship

edit

I saw your edit at Nature-based solutions. This looks like a great internship!! I wish you all the best with Wikipedia editing! You might like to help with biodiversity and biodiversity loss. Both articles are not great yet. Please don't just add new content but also improve the reading ease score. Use the readability tool that Wikipedia provides. It's great. You can see the link to it on my user page. Also take a look at the project that I had: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/SDGs/Communication_of_environment_SDGs (it's coming to an end now but I am looking for further funding for similar projects... Maybe we could do something together). EMsmile (talk) 12:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi EM, thank you and lovely to hear from you! I will consider working on those articles and thanks for the tip on readability. Interesting project and looks like a lot has been done. Feel free to send me an email if you'd like to discuss a potential collaboration - that could be great! Manxshearwater (talk) 15:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:No net loss has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:No net loss. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is currently a redirect from [No net loss]] to No net loss wetlands policy. There is also a Requested Move to rename No net loss wetlands policy to No net loss wetlands policy in the United States. Consideration should be given to accepting this draft as No net loss environmental policy, because it applies to other types of environmental resources besides wetlands, and moving the existing article, which is nation-oriented. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Robert! Manxshearwater (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations on the results of your placement - you've made the internet a better place! Lajmmoore (talk) 10:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for my first Barnstar! Manxshearwater (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nature-positive

edit

On 21 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nature-positive, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 90 world leaders have made a pledge to achieve nature-positive goals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nature-positive. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nature-positive), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: No net loss environmental policy has been accepted

edit
No net loss environmental policy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, Manxshearwater, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a well presented biography of Elspeth Hughes-Davies and hope there will be many more. While your editing has already reached a high standard, in connection with women's biographies you might find it useful to look through our Primer. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you @Ipigott, I will have a look! Manxshearwater (talk) 13:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 at Women in Red

edit
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 09:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myvanwy Rhys has been accepted

edit
Myvanwy Rhys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Olwen Rhys, from its old location at User:Manxshearwater/olwenrhys. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liancetalk 15:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this! @Liance Manxshearwater (talk) 15:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olwen Rhys has been accepted

edit
Olwen Rhys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Eloise Butler, from its old location at User:Manxshearwater/eloisebutler. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liancetalk 18:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, beat me to it! Manxshearwater (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eloise Butler has been accepted

edit
Eloise Butler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of No net loss environmental policy

edit

Hello! Your submission of No net loss environmental policy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RoySmith (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2024

edit
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

DYK for No net loss

edit

On 2 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article No net loss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at least 69 countries have "no net loss" environmental policies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/No net loss environmental policy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, No net loss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fantastic Diff post

edit

I saw your Diff post at https://diff.wikimedia.org/2024/10/08/how-a-summer-internship-started-my-journey-as-a-wikimedian/. I just wanted to say THANK YOU for all the work you've done in the Wiki Biodiversity & Women in Red space so far (and for being brave enough to share your thoughts on the Diff blog), congrats on your internship, and keep up the great work in this space! Reach out if I can help in any way. Stitchbird2 (talk) 03:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much - it was great to be able to share my thoughts and glad that someone else was able to get something positive out of them too! I'd be interested to hear what you've been working on lately too and anything you would recommend working on :) Manxshearwater (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Myvanwy Rhys

edit

On 22 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myvanwy Rhys, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oxford suffragist Myvanwy Rhys earned first-class honours from Newnham College, Cambridge, but was denied a degree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myvanwy Rhys. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Myvanwy Rhys), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

  Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red November 2024

edit
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rhys family photos

edit

Hey. Thanks again for your great talk today, and for shining a light on the work of amaizing Welsh women. I found a digitized image in our collection of Olwen Rhys and have uploaded it to Commons and added it to the article. There is an album of John Rhys family photos which contains pictures of Elsbeth and both daughters, but it hasnt been digitised. The ref is "Photo Album 6055". I'll see if i can get some shots on my phone in the next week or so. Cheers! Jason.nlw (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jason.nlw, thank you! This is brilliant, thanks so much for adding it. That would be much appreciated if possible. Was great to hear your talk on the work at NLW and excited to hear about the Welsh time machine! Manxshearwater (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red December 2024

edit
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red January 2025

edit
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red February 2025

edit
Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

  • Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Suggestion:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Somerville has been accepted

edit
Keith Somerville, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red March 2025

edit
Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing,
    and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks

Moving the needle:[1]

  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)
  • 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

References

Women in Red April 2025

edit
Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336


Online events:

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

Tip of the month:

  • When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
    Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
    it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red May 2025

edit
Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338


Online events:

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
    are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:21, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red June 2025

edit
Women in Red | June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340


Online events:

Announcements:

  • Who are the most overlooked and interesting Women in Red? We've no idea,
    but we're putting together our list of the 100 most interesting ex-Women in Red.
    We are creating the list to celebrate 10 years of Women in Red and we hope to present it at Wikimania.
    We are ignoring the obvious, so do you have a name or subject we should consider?
    Can you suggest a DYK style hook?
    If you are shy about editing that page, you are welcome to add ideas and comments on the talk page.
  • The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July, 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,492 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Every language Wikipedia has its own policies regarding notability and reliable sources.
    Before translating an article from one language Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, research
    the subject and verify that the translated article will meet English Wikipedia's policy requirements.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red July 2025

edit
Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red August 2025

edit
Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Original Barnstar
For your hard work creating Women in Red articles! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@DaniloDaysOfOurLives Thank you so much, it was great to meet you last week and congratulations on all your hard work with Wiki Loves Pride! :) Manxshearwater (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red September 2025

edit
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

edit
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Concern regarding Draft:Franciscan Garden, Prague

edit

Information icon Hello, Manxshearwater. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Franciscan Garden, Prague, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - November 2025

edit
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - December 2025

edit
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red - January 2026

edit
Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red February 2026

edit
Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia
    articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

Tip of the month:

  • Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red - March 2026

edit
Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays,
    perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red – April 2026

edit
Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked.
    Someone might be inspired to create an article for her.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Millie Ringold has been accepted

edit
Millie Ringold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

msk 21:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cecile Long Steele

edit

Hello! Your submission of Cecile Long Steele at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:32, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I've made some changes in line with your comments. Let me know if anything else needs changing. Manxshearwater (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Margaret Burton White Houston

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Margaret Burton White Houston, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cecile Long Steele

edit

On 25 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cecile Long Steele, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cecile Long Steele pioneered the broiler chicken industry in the United States after accidentally receiving 500 chickens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cecile Long Steele. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cecile Long Steele), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

  Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – May 2026

edit
Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,
    which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Jeanne Villepreux-Power
added a link pointing to Aquaria
Louise du Pierry
added a link pointing to Sorbonne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisy di Robilant (May 25)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, SomeoneDreaming, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.
  • To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Daisy di Robilant. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
  • If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Daisy di Robilant to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for letting me know @SomeoneDreaming! My apologies - after I submitted this sandbox, I realised it was already created and did not know how to rectify the mistake. Manxshearwater (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
You can place {{Template:Db-g7}} on the page in order to have it deleted, then. Thanks! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Great, will take this forward in future. Thank you. Manxshearwater (talk) 12:18, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Manxshearwater! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - June 2026

edit
Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375


Online events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage
    of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Manxshearwater. Thank you for your work on Kim Jung-soo (businesswoman). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Kim Jung-soo (businesswoman)

edit

Hello! Your submission of Kim Jung-soo (businesswoman) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 20:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeanne Villepreux-Power, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aquaria was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply