User talk:JarrahTree/Archive 55

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mitch Ames in topic Mitch

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

edit
  • In the media: Knowledge under fire
    Can Wikipedians help save the world's knowledge and shine a light on current events?

Some falafel for you!

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #332

edit

Help from New User

edit

How does one get a draft published, specifically my draft:the boston club and draft:the pickwick club? CheersRober King Carter (talk) 01:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia?

edit

I don’t think so. I think you lot caused me enough grief already. Nearly killed me, in point of fact. I have no intention of doing anything more for Wikipedia than I already have. Australian Wikipefians caused me enough damage already. No regards, Chris.Sherlock (talk) 11:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Freight Rail/Rail Freight

edit

Thanks for the opportunity to comment :) . See my response on the category talk page. James.au (talk) 00:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #333

edit

Re: ho hum

edit

Oh yes. Are you referring to anything in particular? Graham87 23:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, JarrahTree. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Portals WikiProject update #020, 12 Oct 2018

edit

Whew, a lot has been happening.

A bit of defending of the portals has been needed. But, most activity recently has been directed upon maintenance and development of existing portals.

The majority of portals now use the new design, about 2400 of them, leaving around 1200 portals that still employ the old style.

Newest portals

edit

Please inspect these portals, and report problems or suggest improvements at WT:WPPORTD. Thank you.

MfDs

edit

Since the last issue of this newsletter, Nineteen portals were nominated for deletion. All posted by the same person.

Two portals were deleted.

One resolved as "no consensus".

Sixteen resolved as "keep".

Links to the archived discussions are provided below:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Air France
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Alexander Korda
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:August Derleth
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Average White Band
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bee-eaters
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ben E. King
  7. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Benny Goodman
  8. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bill Bryson
  9. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Billy Idol
  10. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Billy Ocean
  11. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bob Hope
  12. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bobbie Rosenfeld Award
  13. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Body piercing
  14. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Canton, Michigan
  15. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Compostela Group of Universities
  16. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Diplo
  17. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Diversity of fish
  18. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pebble Beach
  19. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Peter, Paul and Mary

Many thanks to those who participated in the discussions.

To watch for future MfD's, keep in mind that the Portals WikiProject is supported by automatic alerts. You can see them at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals#Article alerts: portals for deletion at MfD

Creation criteria

edit

There was also some discussion of creation criteria for portals. The result was that one of the participants in the discussion reverted the portal guidelines to the old version, which has the minimum number of articles for a portal included in there: "about 20 articles", a guideline that was in place since 2009.

Many of the portals that existed prior to April 2018 do not have that many (being limited to however many subpages the portal creator created), and therefore, these portals need to be upgraded to the new design (which automatically provides many articles for display). Using the new design, exceeding 20 articles for display is very easy.

Linking to the new portals

edit

Efforts have been underway to place links to new portals (all 2200 of them created since April).

  1. Link (portal button) from corresponding category pages.  Done
  2. Link from See also section on corresponding root articles. Partially implemented
  3. Link from bottom of corresponding templates. Partially implemented
  4. Link for each portal on Portal:Contents/Portals. Partially implemented

Your help is needed. It is easy to access the page mentioned in #1, #2, & #3 from the portals themselves.

AWBers could do these tasks even faster (that's how the category pages were done), except #4...

Item #4 above pretty much has to be done by hand. (If you can find a way to speed that up, I would be very impressed). The links needing placement can be found at Portal talk:Contents/Portals#These are not listed yet. Instructions are included there.

The conversion effort: news sections

edit

There are still around 1200 old-style portals that have only undergone partial conversion to the new design concepts, still relying on subpages with copied/pasted excerpts that have been going stale for years, out of date (manually posted) news entries, etc.

The section currently being tackled on these is news. You can help by deleting any news section on the old-style portals that has news entries that are years old (that is the dead giveaway to a manual news section). Be sure not to delete the news sections of portals that have up-to-date news, or active maintainers. For maintainers, look at the portal's categories, and/or check the participants list at WP:WPPORT.

Eventually, conditional news sections (that appear only when news items are available for display) will be added using AWB to all portals without a news section.

News items (and even the news sections themselves) are automatically generated for portals that were created using the Basic portal start page. On those portals, there is a hidden comment at the top of the page (that you can see in the edit window), that says this:

<!-- This portal was created using subst:Basic portal start page -->

Design development

edit

Presently, we are in the process of implementing the new design features, creating new portals with them, and installing them in existing portals.

But, what about development of new new design features?

We have a wish department.

Post your wishes at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Design#Discussions about possible cool new features, and they might come true. Many have already, and for many of those, this is where they were posted.

Cascade effect

edit

A resource that has been elusive so far will be obtained eventually: categories. That is, the ability to pull category member links to populate a page.

Rather than populate portals directly with such links, it may be more beneficial to the encyclopedia to utilize them in navigation footers, because portals already have the ability to generate themselves based on those.

So, this would create a cascade effect: auto-gathering entries from categories, would enable the construction of new navigation footers, that would in turn support the development of new portals.

The cascade effect would also be felt by existing portals, as existing navigation footers could be expanded using the category harvesting methods, which would in turn expand the coverage of portals that access those navigation footers.

You can help by providing leads about any potential category harvesting methods. Please report anything you know about harvesting categories at WT:WPPORTD. Thank you.

Looking into the future: the quantum portal?

edit

One idea that has been floating around is the concept of a pageless portal. That is, a portal that isn't stored anywhere, instead being generated when you click on a menu item or button.

Many of the new portals were generated by a single click, and then saved via a second click.

Therefore, it seems likely that the portals of the future will employ the one-click concept.

Because of the need for customization by users, this concept would need to be augmented with a way to integrate user contributions. This could be done in at least two ways: posting an existing portal, autogenerating one from scratch if such does not yet exist, or have a special data page for user contributions that is folded into the auto-generated portal.

How soon? That is up to you. All that is needed are persons to implement it.

Until next time...

edit

Keep up the good work on portals. They are improving daily. Thank you.    The Transhumanist   04:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Email

edit

No disagreement here. I'm just highlighting the problem to try and pre-empt a re-run of the same discussions that've got nowhere in the past. That WA example is obviously better - but WA is relatively unusual in having reasonably clear and permanent regions, which makes that approach challenging to replicate unless you can somehow work out equivalents in other states.

(I always read and appreciate your emails - I need to work out where they actually get sent to so I can reply that way.) The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

email this user works both ways - in preferences - from what I understand. JarrahTree 08:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your talk page message - huh? The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: September 2018

edit




Headlines
  • Albania report: Collections of Museums in Albania
  • Armenia report: GLAM+Wikidata
  • Australia report: WikiTour AU
  • Brazil report: Developing tGLAM: a landing-page generator for GLAM initiatives
  • France report: European Heritage Days; Linked data for archaeology; Paris: Edit-a-thon at Mobilier National
  • Germany report: History of Women and Democracy, Wikipedia-Culture-Ambassadors and two GLAM-on-Tour-stations in just four weeks
  • Macedonia report: Wiki camps in Macedonia
  • Malaysia report: Wikipedia for Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museum
  • Mexico report: Open GLAM Mexico 2018
  • Netherlands report: >20,000 press photographs 1940-1990 uploaded, GLAM Wiki Meeting, Aerial Photographs, GLAM-Wiki Manual & Wikipedia Course for Historical Societies
  • Norway report: Women in Red; Researhers Days 2018; The 2019 edition of #wikinobel
  • Poland report: Archival photographs and literary knowledge enrich Polish Wikipedia
  • Serbia report: Impact of GLAM seminars: Decentralization of GLAM activities
  • Sweden report: Wikidata P3595 Biografiskt lexikon för Finland; Student Project at the Nordic Museum; Learning about sources on Swedish Wikipedia
  • UK report: Botanical illustrations and Wiki Loves Monuments in Scotland
  • USA report: Back to school
  • Wikipedia Library report: Books & Bytes–Issue 30, August–September 2018
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata Tour Down Under
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Ancient jarrah tree felled at future Bunbury Outer Ring Road =

edit

Hey, Jarrah Tree, hope you are nowhere near Bunbury - you might not be safe!

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-12/gelorup-felled-tree-causes-community-outrage/10237104

SurveyorMJF (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #334

edit

Your message

edit

Thanks for letting me know. It wasn't on my watch list, but I've put it on now. I don't feel the few edits there have been are important enough to be worth bothering about, but of course that could change if much more comes. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

edit
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello JarrahTree, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #335

edit

Email

edit

Hi. You may not agree with me replying publically here, but I believe others have a right to know there are more Wikipedians disagreeing with his editing behaviour. To be honest, I had very quickly given up on collaborating with him. Back in January 2017 I asked him multiple times to provide edit summaries, so others can get an idea of what he wants to do, especially when reverting people. Alas, as you can see from his contribution history: still not a single word, yet communication is essential in a project like Wikipedia. I saw he told you to mind your own business; he did the same to me. Probably also the only time he edited someone else's user page other than his own... This is obviously WP:NOTHERE ("Little or no interest in working collaboratively") behaviour, but he does start communicating when deletion of his work is imminent. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

edit

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

  • Library Card translation
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Portals WikiProject update #021, 24 Oct 2018

edit

Portals have passed the 4,000 mark.

More new portals...

edit

Here's a list of portals created since the last issue

Please inspect these portals, report problems or suggest improvements at WT:WPPORTD, or develop them further (see below). Thank you.

What's next?

edit

There is still lots to do...

There are many subject gaps that need to be filled. This can be done by creating new portals, or by adding Selected article sections to existing portals. To create a new portal, simply place {{subst:Basic portal start page}} on an empty portal page, and click "Preview". If the portal is complete, click "Save". After you try it, come share your experience and excitement at WT:WPPORTD.

Each new portal is just a starting point. Each portal of the new design can be further developed by:

  • refining the search parameters to improve the results displayed in the Did you know and In the news sections.
  • adding more specific Selected articles sections, like Selected biographies.
  • inserting a Recognized content section.
  • adding more pictures to the image slideshow.
  • placing a panoramic picture at the top of the intro section (especially for geographic portals).

Besides the new portals, there are still about 1200 portals of the old design that need to be converted to the new design.

Many portals need to be de-orphaned, by placing links to them (in the See also section of the corresponding root articles, at the bottom of the corresponding navigation footer templates, and on the corresponding category pages).

Many of the new portals still need to be listed at Portal:Contents/Portals.

Bugs keep popping up in portals. These need to be tracked down and reported at WT:WPPORTD.

Tools are needed to make developing and maintaining portals quicker and easier.

Dreaming up new features and capabilities. Innovation needs to continue, to design the portal of tomorrow, and the portal development-maintenance-system of the future. Automation!

So, if you find yourself with a little (or a lot) of free time, pick an area (or more) above and...

...dive in!    The Transhumanist   07:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Freo

edit

Help please

edit

Hello JarrahTree,

It would be great if you would clean up the Talk Page of Eulophia bicallosa. I will use my skills with ⌘C, ⌘V on the other Eulophia articles as I write/edit them. Thanks mate! Gderrin (talk) 23:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Endeavour or Leeuwin

edit

Are you sure that that is the Endeavour? I thought I saw the Leeuwin, and the Events Hightlights supports that idea. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Graeme Henderson, producer?

edit

Is Graeme Henderson, Australian maritime historian and author, also the producer of Under the Mountain (miniseries)? It seems unlikely, but the latter links to the former. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

edit
  • Technology report: Bots galore!
    Bots can do anything you want – well, almost.
  • Special report: NPP needs you
    WMF continues to stonewall development; NPP wishes again relegated to stocking fillers.
  • In focus: Alexa
    We are all writing for Amazon.

Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018

edit
Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

Wikidata imaged

Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock.

Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists.

Gran Teatro, Cáceres, Spain, at night

It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more.

And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more.

Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake.

Birthday logo
Links

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

iNews

edit

JarrahTree L oleh iNews Current Anchors, Anchors Former Anchors --N1631 (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Baru (N1631) -> bnm1234 di Langsa --N1631 (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #336

edit


SPI

edit

Your report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manda 1993 seems to be mangled. I'm hesitant to interfere at SPI so I'll settle for drawing your attention to it. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I can't always respond that quickly. I was trying to deal with too many things at once, including eating breakfast (good too!). Anyway, what you should do is refile the report but follow the instructions at WP:SPI rather than trying to edit the case directly. I would have fixed what you did or asked a clerk to do so, but it was more than a little bit of work. Better for you to take another stab at it. If you have questions, let me know...here, not on my Talk page. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
very very sorry, somewhat complex issues my end as well - I appreciate your response, very much. I lose faith in everything when I get confronted by this particular sock, I keep forgetting the tell tale signature.. it really is so damned obvious, I had only clicked, to go out for a meeting when it struck me it was our friend again... JarrahTree 14:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
as I have said to ianvector i know it is the same editor by the signature edit pattern, but if I have to log a spi case for the procedure, in about 12 hours, I need to slow down with some intense project tagging as my way of slowing down :) JarrahTree 14:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your work on making the spi page more apt and relevant JarrahTree 15:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
hahah - even cheeky enough to watch the process and offer a part of what they were expecting (baru=new) - oh well back soon - if the pattern keeps repeating itself... JarrahTree 15:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your email

edit

Persoonia articles

edit

Hello JarrahTree,

I am curious about your ratings on Talk:Persoonia hindii‎ which you have left as "Start" class and on Talk:Persoonia isophylla, Talk:Persoonia isophylla and Talk:Persoonia elliptica which you have changed fom "Start" to Stub". Very strange since the only real difference between the four articles is that the first one lacks an image. Can you enlighten me please? What else do they need to be rated "Start"? Gderrin (talk) 01:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply mate - for a moment, I thought the world was ending! Gderrin (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sorry JarrahTree - but here's a wet fish! Nearly every time you add a state project to plant Talk pages to which I've contributed, you are changing "start" to "stub". Zieria articles are the present problem. The world is ending. Gderrin (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #337

edit

This Month in GLAM: October 2018

edit




Headlines
  • Belgium report: Erbstuecke edit-a-thon; Women in Tech edit-a-thon; Wiki Club Brussels; Wikidata workshop + party
  • Brazil report: "There is no reason not to participate in a GLAM-Wiki initiative": an interview with the director of the Museum of Veterinary Anatomy
  • Estonia report: Estonian art and geoscience collections finding their way to Commons
  • Finland report: (RE)Photographic autumn
  • France report: GLAMWiki 2018 Tel Aviv; City of Grenoble
  • Germany report: GLAMorous Conferences
  • Netherlands report: ‘More Gelders Heritage available via Wikimedia’ by Erfgoed Gelderland; Writing week Friesland; Wiki Techstorm
  • Norway report: Wiki Loves Monuments and wikinobel
  • Poland report: Heirlooms - locally and internationally
  • Serbia report: The growing GLAM
  • Sweden report: Roundtripping Project, Books Import and Wikidata Imported to SOCH
  • Switzerland report: Built heritage conservation on Commons; les sans pagEs at a Modern art museum
  • UK report: Wikidata in Oxford
  • USA report: Wikiconference North America Culture Crawl
  • WMF GLAM report: Documentation survey, Structured Data on Commons consultations, blog posts and conferences
  • Calendar: November's GLAM events
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

AWB

edit

Hello JarrahTree, your AWB access has been added. Please be sure to review the Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules_of_use before using. — xaosflux Talk 16:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #338

edit

Platycercus icterotis

edit

Hey. Simple thing, do you have a picture of a rosella? Or is there some where or way of finding one? I need one, a photo, of a rosella; illustrations wont do it seems. Regards, cygnis insignis 11:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

edit

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello JarrahTree,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
  • Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, JarrahTree. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #339

edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #023, 25 Nov 2018

edit

There are now 4,180 portals.

Will we break 5,000 by the end of the year?

I know we can. But, that is up to you!

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Happy Holidays

edit
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Jingling along

edit

The following portals have been created since the last issue:

Keep 'em coming!

By the way, the above list was generated using this Petscan query. It can be easily modified by changing the date. The data page (under the Output tab) also has options for receiving the data in CSV or tabbed format, which some operating systems automatically load into a spreadsheet program for ease of use, such as copying and pasting the desired column (like page names).

In closing

edit

We'll keep it short this issue.

Expect a flood next time. Or the one after that.

Cheerio,    The Transhumanist   07:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #340

edit

bah

Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018 =

edit
Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

WikiCite issue

GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California.

Wikidata training for librarians at WikiCite 2018

In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point.

Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: "bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector.

Links

Account creation is now open on the ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of text mining.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

edit
  • Gallery: Intersections
    Biology or technology? Form follows function in nature and the constructed world.

Wikidata weekly summary #341

edit


Hello JarrahTree, I came across this blog about depths of shipwrecks dived. http://blog.gue.com/extending-the-envelope-the-20-deepest-tech-shipwreck-dives/ I noticed that you were interested in shipwrecks & wondered if there should be a Wikipedia page or section on Technical Diving to cover "The deepest first dives on shipwrecks"?

Thanks Musicwaves (talk) 18:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #342

edit

This Month in GLAM: November 2018

edit




Headlines
  • Albania report: Wiki Photo Walk Albania 2018; Wiki Loves Monuments Albania
  • Armenia report: Singing Wikipedia; Photographs by Vahan Kochar
  • Brazil report: Diverse milestones for the Brazilian community
  • Denmark report: Intercontinental digitisation efforts
  • Estonia report: Making contacts both internationally and in Estonia
  • Finland report: Art and edit-a-thons
  • France report: Bibliothèque publique d’information; 3D museum collections on Wikimedia Commons
  • Indonesia report: Conserving and digitizing texts in West Sumatra
  • Macedonia report: Wiki Training at National and University Library "St. Clement of Ohrid"
  • New Zealand report: Equity, Wikidata, and the New York Times
  • Norway report: Collaboration with The National Archives of Norway
  • Philippines report: Wiki Loves Art
  • Poland report: Archival image uploads, student collaborations and international projects
  • Serbia report: Photo finish of the WIR's
  • Sweden report: The Swedish Performing Arts Agency; Library data starts to take shape; Learning Wikipedia at the Archives; Wikimedia Commons Data Roundtripping
  • UK report: Sum of All Astrolabes
  • USA report: Wikidata Workshop at Pratt School of Information; Wikidata Presentation for the New York Technical Services Librarians; Wikipedia Asian Month; Cleveland Park Wikipedia Edit-a-thon; Historic Ivy Hill Cemetery Workshop
  • Wikipedia Library report: Books & Bytes–Issue 31, October–November 2018
  • WMF GLAM report: Welcoming Satdeep Gill; Structured Data on Commons; WikiCite
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.


Category:Critter of the Week has been nominated for discussion

edit

Category:Critter of the Week, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

edit

Hello JarrahTree,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

re Universal Publishers (Australia)

edit

I note you have removed the external link with the dead website address but there is still another version of that dead URL in the website. I was also in the process of trying to find a new website address for them but without any success.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merry Xmas

edit

Will be travelling back to Dullsville for Xmas on Friday and will be back again in new year. Have a merry xmas and happy new year. Cheers Hughesdarren (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #343

edit

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13

edit
Newsletter • December 2018

This month: A general update.

The current status of the project is as follows:

  • Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
  • I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
    • Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
    • If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
  • Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.

Until next time,

-— Isarra 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

edit

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

  • OAWiki
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


Merry Chrismouse:)

edit
so, just where Chrismousies hidden?

Hi JarrahTree, hope you have a great festive season. Coolabahapple (talk) 6:58 am, 24 December 2018, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC+8)


This sort of christmas message gets the jarrahtree veterinarily speaking high merit award for:
  • adequate reference and link to a book about rodents
  • probable feline appreciation or not
  • probable ecologically sound measures for rodent population control or not
  • high level children access capacity that does not spoil the sense of christmas
  • sufficiently neutral for any belief system at summer solstice
  •  Done
  • Noting the reviewer of the item has probably (heisenberg rules) got completely wrong the reading of what the book is about

Happy christmas to the page watchers here as well. trust your christmas is a safe one. JarrahTree 7:45 am, 24 December 2018, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC+8)

Coolabahapple (talk) 6:04 am, 26 December 2018, last Wednesday (6 days ago) (UTC+8)

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda

edit
Holy moses a welsh christmas in three testaments - oh well here's for a welsh singers echo chamber. JarrahTree 8:02 am, 24 December 2018, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC+8)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

edit
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

Hi JarrahTree, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,

   Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 8:07 am, 24 December 2018, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC+8)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

edit
  • News and notes: Some wishes do come true
    NPP wins the wish list poll; Wikipedia editors will be able to work better at night; new WMF appointments and new arbitrators; and who wants to be an admin?
  • In the media: Political hijinks
    Wikipedia says 'ta' to British M.P. and 'buh-bye' to U.S. President's image vandals.
  • Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
    Plus: reliable sources, notability, and fallout from the self-blocking software changes.
  • WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
    Discovering how new and unregistered users make articles with the members of WikiProject Articles for Creation.
  • Blog: News from the WMF
    In and around the WMF and its projects from the WMF's web site.
  • Essay: Requests for medication
    When the desire to continue to have the privilege of editing Wikipedia overrides the body's innate desire to choke the living shit out of some bastard who really has it coming.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 9:36 pm, 24 December 2018, last Monday (7 days ago) (UTC+8)

Austral season's greetings

edit
Austral season's greetings
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 6:05 am, 25 December 2018, last Tuesday (7 days ago) (UTC+8)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

edit
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

Hi JarrahTree, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,

   Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 9:42 am, 25 December 2018, last Tuesday (7 days ago) (UTC+8)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

edit
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello JarrahTree, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 2:31 pm, 25 December 2018, last Tuesday (7 days ago) (UTC+8) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #024, 26 Dec 2018

edit

Last issue, I mentioned there would be a flood, and so, here it is...

Portals status

edit

We now have 4,620 portals.

And the race to pass 5,000 by year's end is on...

Can we make it?

The New Year, and the 5,001st portal, await.

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Evad is back!

edit

After disappearing in mid-thread, Evad37 has returned from a longer than expected wikibreak.

Be sure to welcome him back.

Improved cropping is coming to Portal image banner

edit

User:FR30799386 is working on making {{Portal image banner}} even better by enabling it to chop the top off an image as well as the bottom.

Many pictures aren't suitable for banners because they are too tall. Therefor, User:FR30799386 added cropping to this template, so that an editor could specify part of a picture to be used rather than the whole thing.

Upgrade of flagship portals is underway

edit

Work has begun on upgrading Wikipedia's flagship portals (those listed at the top of the Main page).

So far, Portal:Geography, Portal:History, and Portal:Technology have been revamped. Of course, you are welcome to improve them further.

Work continues on the other five. Feel free to join in on the fun.

Spotting missing portals that are redirects

edit

In place of many missing portals, there is a redirect that leads to "the next best topic", such as a parent topic.

Most of these were created before we had the tools to easily create portals (they used to take 6 hours or more to create, because it was all done manually). Rather than leave a portal link red, some editors thought it was best that those titles led somewhere.

The subjects that have sufficient coverage should have their own portals rather than a redirect to some other subject.

Unfortunately, being blue like all other live links, redirects are harder to spot than redlinks.

To spot redirects easily, you can make them all appear green.

What's new in portal space?

edit

Keep 'em coming!

edit

And I'll see you next issue.

Sincerely,    The Transhumanist   4:08 pm, 26 December 2018, last Wednesday (6 days ago) (UTC+8)

Wikidata weekly summary #344

edit

Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018

edit
Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

Learning from Zotero

Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support.

Zotero logo

Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects.

Zotero demo video

There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine.

Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code.

Links

Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 3:08 am, 28 December 2018, last Friday (4 days ago) (UTC+8)

Thanks for the welcome!

edit

I guess I'll keep plugging away from these IP addresses for now. Given how much wonderful work of yours I've seen on the project, I think I can only aspire to what you've been achieving. Keep up the fabulous energy. Cheers! 59.102.86.112 (talk) 8:48 am, 30 December 2018, last Sunday (2 days ago) (UTC+8)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #025, 30 Dec 2018

edit

We can now crop the tops of pics to make banners

edit

Before, we could only cut off the bottom of pics.

User:FR30799386 has pulled it off, and made the upgrade to {{Portal image banner}}...

So, this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side
Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Becomes this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side
Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Here's the code for the above banner:

{{Portal image banner|File:American Falls from Canadian side in winter.jpg | [[Niagara falls]], from the Canadian side |maxheight=175px |overflow=Hidden|croptop=10}}

To see it employed in a portal, check out Portal:Niagara Falls.

About that end of the year goal...

edit

We were racing against time to create 5,000 portals by the end of the year (just for the heck of it).

We made it. We've passed the 5,000 portals mark, with time to spare!

And the 5,000th portal is Portal:Major League Baseball, by Happypillsjr.

Congratulations!

What's next?

edit

The 10,000th portal mark. But...

...there is plenty else to do in addition to building new portals:

  1. The new portals need to be linked to from the encyclopedia.
  2. On those portals about subjects that are not typically capitalized, the search parameters need to be refined/expanded, to maximize the chances of Did you know and In the news items being found and displayed.
  3. A Recognized content section needs to be added to each portal that has a corresponding WikiProject.
  4. Addition of a category on those portals that lack a subject category.
  5. Implement the portal category system, adding the appropriate categories to each portal.
  6. Upgrade, and complete (as per the tasks enumerated above), the old-style portals that are not regularly maintained, which have not been converted yet (about 1,100 of them).
  7. Find and fix the remaining bugs in the underlying lua modules.
  8. Build portal tools (scripts) to assist in the creation, development, and maintenance of portals.
  9. Build a script to help build navbox footer templates, via the harvesting of categories, amongst other methods.
  10. Update the portal building instructions.
  11. Update the portal guideline.
  12. Refine the programming of the portals to reduce their load time.
  13. Design and develop the next generation of portals and portal components.

And whatever else you can dream up.

But most of all, have a...

Sincerely,    The Transhumanist   8:27 pm, 30 December 2018, last Sunday (2 days ago) (UTC+8)

Happy happy

edit
Happy New Year
and all the best for 2019!
- Evad37 [talk] 10:19 am, Yesterday (UTC+8)

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.

Mitch

edit

I'm snarky now because he keeps doing this and has seemed impervious to any attempt at reason the umpteen times this has happened previously. It takes a lot of time to have to revert mass nonsensical category changes because Mitch is at it again. The solution to the situations Mitch finds is almost always discussion (the Royal Exhibition Buildings categories would be another good one), but Mitch never does it and always is bold in the stupidest possible way. If I have to clean up after someone in a major way for going on ten times, I tend to stop being polite about it. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

No disagreement here. It is a bit difficult with something like Sydney Opera House because (with the exception of "Mathematics and art") it doesn't seem to me like there's much in the way of unreasonable categories. We might not need "landmarks in Sydney" and "tourist attractions in Sydney", perhaps (maybe someone should try to merge them?) - but not much that'd be easily pruned. Perhaps a solution there could be to stick Category:Sydney Opera House in each category, rather than the main article - it already exists and it's in a random half the categories, which doesn't seem very sensible regardless. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yep. It really does often need discussion to hash out category trees in such a way that they're actually logical instead of evolving in all directions at random - we've usually got good outcomes when we've bothered to do it in the past, and it's something we don't do enough. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to comment at Wikipedia talk:Categorization § A need for guidance. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A pie for you!

edit
Here's a New Year's Pie! Thanks for everything you do! ——SerialNumber54129 16:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
"goes down to the dance, very clever!" Excuse me Jarrah tree, but I didn't grieve about someone until I saw this user name on my watchlist and now it turns up here (they will know what I'm talking about, don't archive me). cygnis insignis 16:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

2019

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #345

edit

Yealering

edit

Hiya, I noticed you had posted all the images of stuff in the town of Yealering on Wikimedia Commons, you didn't happen to get a snap of the lake while you were out that way did you? Hughesdarren (talk) 09:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Late Thanks

edit

for the season's greetings. I've spent every day since 26th coping with illnesses. New Year's lunch was half a toasted sandwich I found in the only shop open (after trekking 5 kilometres) in between hospital visits to an aged philosopher, a relative of mine. Still, hope your year shapes up better than the prospective one that will keep me usefully away from wiki in the forseeable future. Cheers.Nishidani (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #346

edit

This Month in GLAM: December 2018

edit




Headlines
  • Armenia report: Cooperation with Yerevan Drama Theatre Named After Hrachia Ghaplanian; Singing Wikipedia (continuation); Photographs by Vahan Kochar (continuation)
  • Australia report: 2019 Australia's Year of the Public Domain
  • Belgium report: Writing weeks German-speaking Community; End of year drink; Wiki Loves Heritage photo contest
  • Brazil report: Google Art and GLAM initiatives in Brazil
  • India report: Collaboration with RJVD Municipal Public Library
  • Italy report: Challenges and alliances with libraries, WLM and more
  • Macedonia report: Exhibition:"Poland through photographs" & Wikipedia lectures with children in social risk
  • Malaysia report: Technology Talk and Update on Wikipedia @ National Library of Malaysia
  • Portugal report: Glam Days '18 at the National Library of Portugal
  • Sweden report: Hats 🎩🧢👒🎓
  • UK report: Oxford
  • USA report: Holiday gatherings and visit to Internet Archive
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata reports
  • WMF GLAM report: Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons: pilot projects and multilingual captions
  • Calendar: January's GLAM events
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Request

edit

Please forgive me if I have been inconsiderate of your fellow editor. That was certainly not my intention. I was aware today when I went to his page that he had not edited for awhile but I thought it was most likely a break or such. I never considered anything more dire.Buster7  14:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #347

edit

Category:Islands of the Ssouth coast of Western Australia

edit

FYI: . Mitch Ames (talk) 10:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply