Speedy deletion candidates
editArticles
edit
- 2026 Moldova Open – Doubles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose draftifying because the article in its current state is a blank template, propose draftification per WP:TOOSOON Giulio 09:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Tennis and Moldova. Giulio 09:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:21, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Comment – I guess I'll leave this comment here and then copy it over to the other articles nominated. All of these tennis tournaments will have the draws filled in when the official draw is released on Saturday or Sunday. I guess we can feel free to draftify until then but if we have to wait for the standard 7 days until a decision can be made, then I am not sure that the reasoning will remain valid at that point. Just my two cents. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:13, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep – at least procedurally. Draw is now complete and tournament starts tomorrow, allowing for results and more importantly sources to be entered as the tournament progresses. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Merge alongside with 2026 Moldova Open – Singles into 2026 Moldova Open. There is no reason to have these two additional pages for this tournament. I also agree that we are borderline TOOSOON here, so what I mean is merging whatever content there is on these two pages at discussion closure; I do not think this should affect the outcome in any case. If there was not this discussion open now, I would actually likely have performed a WP:BOLDMERGE myself. Choucas 🐦⬛ 14:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - The draw is set and stuff will be added daily. It isn't like it's two months away from starting... it's happening right now, and a singles and doubles draw is standard procedure. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:10, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any opinion about my merger suggestion? I do not think any information should be removed and that it will be filled naturally, but I also do not see the purpose of separating this one tournament into three short pages instead of just one. Choucas 🐦⬛ 13:33, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do have an opinion on it. I think all the other minor league tennis events handle it as three separate articles so it would be really strange to have this one event a different way. That said, if I was creating all of them from scratch, I would put all three events of the minor league tour on a single page as the norm, and only with something exceptional would I deviate. Usually I think one article can handle yearly info and two draws. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- I understand the argument for consistency, but after looking into it it appears that this pointless division in three concerns thousands of pages... I would be open to keeping this one as is for now, but potentially a RfC about changing this situation could be something to look at afterwards. Choucas 🐦⬛ 14:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed. I'll bring it up at the Tennis Project next week and see what the thoughts are. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
- I understand the argument for consistency, but after looking into it it appears that this pointless division in three concerns thousands of pages... I would be open to keeping this one as is for now, but potentially a RfC about changing this situation could be something to look at afterwards. Choucas 🐦⬛ 14:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- I do have an opinion on it. I think all the other minor league tennis events handle it as three separate articles so it would be really strange to have this one event a different way. That said, if I was creating all of them from scratch, I would put all three events of the minor league tour on a single page as the norm, and only with something exceptional would I deviate. Usually I think one article can handle yearly info and two draws. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any opinion about my merger suggestion? I do not think any information should be removed and that it will be filled naturally, but I also do not see the purpose of separating this one tournament into three short pages instead of just one. Choucas 🐦⬛ 13:33, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Files
editCategories
editNEW NOMINATIONS
Category:Environmental law schools
- Propose Deleting Category:Environmental law schools
- Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING
- We have a number of law schools that offer environmental law classes, law clinics, or clubs. But schools like Yale Law School and UCLA School of Law also have many other areas of study so this isn't defining to the whole institution. This seems akin to a category for undergrad colleges that offer a French major. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Category:IEEE Student Branch
- Propose Deleting Category:IEEE Student Branch
- Nominator's rationale: Per the spirit of WP:C1, an empty category
- We don't have a single article about a student branch of the IEEE. Rather, the only article here is Pensacola Christian College, which has a variety of student organizations and activities including this engineering club. Categorizing whole colleges by each group on campus is not defining and I don't think individual student branches are notable enough for stand-alone articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC)