December 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Tarlby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stephan Pyles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Toby (t)(c)(rw) 06:38, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have also reverted your edits to Calligraphy because the Wikipedia:Manual of Style specifies that punctuation goes outside quotation marks and that citations go after punctuation without any intervening spaces. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Olgivanna Lloyd Wright. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 06:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Space before refs

edit

Per MOS:REFPUNCT, please stop adding spaces before ref tags. Please go through all your previous edits and revert all the edits where you have done this. GA-RT-22 (talk) 09:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I just took a look at your contributions and I really think you need to stop. You've made a few good edits, but most of them are doing more harm than good. For example you've added a lot of violations of WP:NOPIPE. Please slow down, browse the MOS, and check the MOS when in doubt. GA-RT-22 (talk) 09:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Why do you keep adding spaces before references? Please read MOS:REFSPACE and STOP doing that. CodeTalker (talk) 06:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

edit
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking

edit

Please see the bottom of Special:Permalink/1327047846 for details. Feel free to remove this message and the block notices above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2025 (UTC)Reply