Question from Jimmywalshtabletennis (12:09, 2 July 2025)

edit

Hi - I would love to creat a Wikepdia Page about my sporting career - Is that possible ? --Jimmywalshtabletennis (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

How accomplished is your sports career? (e.g. what is the highest level of sport you have played in) JMajor14 (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ha Eshawar lal maida (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between April and June 2025. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ha Eshawar lal maida (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Question from JMajor14 (09:05, 3 July 2025)

edit

On the 2025 New York City mayoral election page, there is this User:24Winnetka that is constantly changing the infobox, candidates sub-section, and any listing of candidates for Andrew Cuomo to be first, and calling Zohran Mamdani a socialist, both of which violate many Wikipedia rules. I've tried reporting it on the talk page, and no one is responded. It's getting out of hand, that someone will have to undo their changes multiple times a day. Is there anything more i can do? You can check the changes he has made which have constantly been reverted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025_New_York_City_mayoral_election&action=history --JMajor14 (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Heroine (1783)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Heroine (1783) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ykraps -- Ykraps (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Aradhakwikisevak (07:33, 6 July 2025)

edit

Hello, I recently submitted an edit request on the Talk page of the 'Sadhvi Krishnapriya' article with properly sourced information (including India TV and Times of India links), but it wasn’t accepted. Could you please help me understand what was lacking or incorrect in the request? --Aradhakwikisevak (talk) 07:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any evidence of you leaving a message on that talk page, perhaps you should try posting it again. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Good Question but these are not independent sources.Make sure that you are quoting the these sources to get edits Rehan Manzoor (talk) 20:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Administrator changes

removed NuclearWarfare

Interface administrator changes

added L235

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous

  • The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
  • Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!

Question from Danishabro1989 (21:33, 8 July 2025)

edit

Question from Sexiste tessy (22:44, 8 July 2025)

edit

Question from Danishabro1989 (22:58, 8 July 2025)

edit

Subject Line: Proposed Edit Regarding Labubu’s Cultural Impact

Hi Mentor, I’d like to suggest a minor addition about Labubu’s cultural impact in 2025. A detailed article from a current events site discusses the toy’s viral success and compares it to the cultural disruption of icons like Rihanna and Billie Eilish.

I understand COI rules, so I’m not editing the article directly. Here’s the suggested citation for review:

"Labubu Doll: Viral Toy with a Dark Twist" – WorldStageToday.com

Please let me know if it’s suitable or if it needs changes. Thanks! --Danishabro1989 (talk) 22:58, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

If you want to suggest edits to an article you should post them directly on the article talk page, where relevant editors can respond. Unfortunately that doesn't include me! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

edit
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from SharkJumperNYC on Atomoxetine (11:04, 9 July 2025)

edit

Hey Pickersgill, I noticed that the first line of this article wrongly said that aromoextine was “formerly” known as Strattera. The source is a press release from Eli Lilly Canada, which suggests it is only being phased out in the Canadian market. I am striking the word “formerly” and would like to remove the footnote, but when I try to do so in the mobile editor, a help panel pops up that suggests contacting you. Maybe because I’m a noob editor? --SharkJumperNYC (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@SharkJumperNYC: Hi, I'm not that familiar with the hints given to new users, but there shouldn't be anything stopping you from editing an article that isn't protected, as is the case with this one. We encourage editors to be bold, so please go ahead with changes like that, just ensure that you write your rationale in the edit summary. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Arishgaming (06:29, 10 July 2025)

edit

hi first of all i realy thanks to you and i weich we start particing a english language lisning or spoking, so can you help me ,then we ander stand togather properley and talk feelfree , --Arishgaming (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, if you would like to get started I suggest you have a look at this page. Let me know if you have any particular questions. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Stormchaseronlinux (10:10, 11 July 2025)

edit

Hello! Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I have a quick question, why our my articles always getting flagged for deletion? they aren't advertising at all and when I contest it it fails. --Stormchaseronlinux (talk) 10:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

While I encourage you to speak directly to the editors who put the articles forward for deletion, generally they're being deleted because you're not producing an encyclopaedic article, you're producing a list of features without much context. This reads essentially as an advertisement. I suggest you have a look at existing articles on schools and cars, of which we have many, to get an idea of the style and referencing we look for. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Revdel request

edit

please revdel seriously libelous blp violations by 82.5.104.129 at Pete Winkelman and indefinitely that a/c as clearly not here etc. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:04, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I've completed the revdel. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you but the serious libel is still available (diff) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oops! Second time's the charm. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
TYVM. I should have been more explicit first time. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Rojstiven18 (04:43, 13 July 2025)

edit

{{Infobox government agency | agency_name = Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration | nativename = Pangasiwaan ng Pilipinas sa Serbisyong Atmosperiko, Heopisiko at Astronomiko | nativename_r = | logo = | logo_width = | logo_caption = | seal = File:Philippine_Atmospheric,_Geophysical_and_Astronomical_Services_Administration_(PAGASA)_logo.png | seal_width = 200px | seal_caption = | formed = December 8, 1972; 53 years ago[1] | preceding1 = | jurisdiction = Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) and adjacent areas | headquarters = Science Garden, Senator Miriam P. Defensor-Santiago Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City | coordinates = 14°38′37.1″N 121°2′39.8″E / 14.643639°N 121.044389°E / 14.643639; 121.044389 | budget = 1.79 billion (2021)[2] | chief1_position = Administrator | chief1_name = Nathaniel T. Servando, Ph.D.[3] | parent_agency = Department of Science and Technology | child1_agency = | website = bagong.pagasa.dost.gov.ph | employees = 806 (2024)[4] | chief2_name = | chief2_pos --Rojstiven18 (talk) 04:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, if you would like to test edits you can use your sandbox here. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Cite error: The named reference GovPH-PD78 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. https://www.dbm.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/GAA/GAA2021/TechGAA2021/DOST/I.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. "PAGASA Key Officials". DOST-PAGASA. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  4. Department of Budget and Management. "Staffing Summary Fiscal Year 2024" (PDF). Retrieved April 24, 2025.

Question from Thecode1986 (12:43, 13 July 2025)

edit

Hello --Thecode1986 (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Let me know if you have any questions as you move forward with editing. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Whyisitmakingmecapitalizesap (19:31, 13 July 2025)

edit

is it mandatory to edit? --Whyisitmakingmecapitalizesap (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Every editor is a volunteer. You can edit as much or as little as you want! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Artists in rising (09:09, 14 July 2025)

edit

Can I make my own news --Artists in rising (talk) 09:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please only edit Wikipedia about notable topics for which you have reliable sources. This is not a website for writing about yourself or events personal to you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for deleting some pages I requested! Rafael! (He, him) • talkguestbookprojects 18:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Admin's Barnstar
For beating me to reverting here. Thanks! JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Arpana.chitrangna (13:50, 16 July 2025)

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia page is updated for one of my client, but it is still showing on Google summary --Arpana.chitrangna (talk) 13:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

This query has been answered at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Summary page update - Nisa Godrej. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Henry de Hinuber

edit

I don't follow FAC so it came as a pleasant surprise to see a new article on a Napoleonic-era general on the Main Page. Excellent work! - Dumelow (talk) 06:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! It was an enjoyable article to write. There's a lot of KGL history yet to be written on en wiki. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

TFA

edit

Thank you today for Henry de Hinuber, "about a Hanoverian army officer. Having offered his services to Britain when Hanover was invaded during the Napoleonic Wars in 1803, he spent the next decade commanding a regiment of the King's German Legion. In 1813 he was given command of a KGL brigade fighting in the Peninsular War, serving there until the end of the conflict and conducting a strained relationship with the Duke of Wellington. When Napoleon escaped from his exile Hinuber was prepared to command the division he was at the time leading, but he was superseded. Somewhat understandably frustrated by this, he refused any other commands and missed Waterloo. With the end of the war he joined the reconstituted Hanoverian Army, serving until his death in 1833. A fluent speaker of English and French, he anglicized his name from Eduard Christoph Heinrich von Hinüber."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gerda! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

HMS Heroine (1783)

edit

Hi PC, Hope you are well. I am awaiting replies at Talk:HMS Heroine (1783)/GA1. Happy to give you more time if you need it though. Best Ykraps (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sincerest apologies! I've been dragging my heels for several ongoing reviews but hope to get to them very soon. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
No probs, just checking it hadn't been overlooked. Ykraps (talk) 05:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Message For You At The Talk Section

edit

Question from DuncanA77 (11:43, 22 July 2025)

edit

Hello, as my mentor can I get some advice? I drafted an article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ourea_Events about Ourea Events, a UK company that organises ultra running events. It got rejected first time for insufficient notable info (fine). I added more detail, and it got rejected again with comment "The sources added are more about the specific events themselves, rather than Ourea itself. Not seeing much indication of Ourea specifically being notable." Which is probably fair, and honestly maybe there isn't enough notable detail about Ourea specifically. So I was then wondering whether it would be more appropriate as an article "Races organised by Ourea Events" (with some minor edits) and if that would be more likely to be accepted as an article for creation. Any thoughts? --DuncanA77 (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Isaac Kenyon

edit

Hello. You have protected Draft:Isaac Kenyon, can you please unprotect it? UPE socks will always find a way to publish spam, but it will be much easier to find it and delete it if they continually publish it under the same title, as they have been doing it so far. Thank you. Janhrach (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

edit
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Dibbbbbbbber (18:24, 25 July 2025)

edit

Hello. How do I make a page? --Dibbbbbbbber (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Komsijam (13:43, 27 July 2025)

edit

Trying to create page: How to add photo How to update sports results How to page make visible online How to update references from other languages than English Thank you --Komsijam (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Komsijam (14:13, 27 July 2025)

edit

How to add Medal Table, carrier --Komsijam (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Texasbasketball (00:02, 28 July 2025)

edit

Hey how not to get contested for speedy deletion every time --Texasbasketball (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 231, July 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from 18thcenturyelectrician (16:24, 29 July 2025)

edit

Hello, Can I use a YouTube interview where a person reported on their life and childhood as a source? Can I use a social media post by a person where they reported that their mother died, or they got married, as a source? Thanks in advance. --18thcenturyelectrician (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from 18thcenturyelectrician (18:30, 29 July 2025)

edit

Hello again, Can I reference a comment that an author made in a Substack article (https://substack.com)? if so, how? Thanks in advance. --18thcenturyelectrician (talk) 18:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Thomasnewson (10:45, 31 July 2025)

edit

Hello,

My name is Thomas Newson, and I would like to request a correction to the information currently listed on my Wikipedia page. The information is outdated and no longer reflects my current artistic direction. Despite previous attempts to update it, the page often reverts to older content that inaccurately associates me with a sound and style from over a decade ago.

In 2020, I made a significant switch in my musical direction, and I believe it is important that the article reflects this change accurately, as it directly affects how I am perceived in the industry.

I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss what can be done to ensure the information is current, accurate, and supported by reliable sources.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Thomas Newson --Thomasnewson (talk) 10:45, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from WealthMapper (19:40, 1 August 2025)

edit

Hi, I represent my employer and will eventually be creating a company page in Wikipedia and monitoring that page. From reading the disclosure requirements, I see that I need to disclose this on my user page, but I'm not sure where my user page is. Can you help direct me to the right spot/ --WealthMapper (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from WealthMapper (19:43, 1 August 2025)

edit

Article Editing

edit

I edited two articles one was SRK(Disambiguation) other was BTS(Disambiguation) but they both were reverted for the same reason and the reason is external link in article body So where do i put the link from now on? Nebula566 (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Gyattonizer (14:55, 3 August 2025)

edit

Question from ACZW (05:17, 4 August 2025)

edit

I probably won't be editing often but I didn't know this mentor feature existed and think it's really cool, so just wanted to say hi! --ACZW (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

A fox for you!

edit

I'm sorry to hear about your health issues. I hope you get well soon! <3

GGOTCC 18:02, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, that's very kind. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

Question from Bballymisert (06:48, 8 August 2025)

edit

Hi, I tried to edit an article about Kilbroney and think I've made a few mistakes. --Bballymisert (talk) 06:48, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

edit

Question from MinarchistGuy381 (20:15, 10 August 2025)

edit

Question from CapFlow (14:40, 12 August 2025)

edit

Why does Edit Source come up instead of Edit Article on public pages? --CapFlow (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

You're editing the source code that forms the article. Just terminology! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Ryu298 (01:52, 13 August 2025)

edit

How do I cite sources that are uncited? --Ryu298 (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at this page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Yeehai9527 (09:50, 14 August 2025)

edit

Hi! I just got started as a Wikipedia editor and I'm having trouble distinguishing whether or not a reference is reliable and qualified. An article that I have been working on keeps getting declined because of this. I have looked up Wikipedia's guideline thoroughly, but the definitions are somewhat vague and some even conflict with several references in actual articles. So it would be really nice if you could give me a more detailed review of the article or just point out the exact reference that's unqualified in my article. That would help me a lot on improving my editing. Thanks! The article that I'm working on: Draft:Unilumin. --Yeehai9527 (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, unfortunately I'm not able to be around much right now. You should look to engage directly with the people reviewing the article - I promise they won't bite! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Roy Ropam on Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submitting (07:24, 15 August 2025)

edit

why my draft title is not visible --Roy Ropam (talk) 07:24, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you were editing in a talk page, not the draft itself. Make sure the page has the prefix "Draft:". Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Tranalaombo (21:06, 15 August 2025)

edit

Hello. How to edit reliably --Tranalaombo (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for with that question, sorry! We do have policies surrounding reliable sources, if that's what you mean? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Remiokea (22:31, 16 August 2025)

edit

How do I publish an article that shows new scientific discovery? --Remiokea (talk) 22:31, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, have a look at this page for instructions on creating your first article. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from WealthMapper (16:23, 18 August 2025)

edit

Hi! I recently had a page I was working on deleted. I may have misunderstood something, as I thought that I could create a page and then "officially" submit it for review from Wikipedia experts to get feedback. I was still working on the page and had not submitted it for review yet. One of the reasons noted was that I had not declared my status, but I did that on my User page a couple of weeks ago. I'm not sure where I took a misstep; can you please offer me some guidance? Thank you! --WealthMapper (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, your best bet is to engage directly with the person involved in the deletion. If you discuss it as calmly as you have here, you shouldn't have any problems obtaining an explanation. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, That is the first thing I did--reach out to them to understand where I went wrong in the process. They deleted the page on August 16th, and I responded on August 18th. It is now Sept 6. Is it normal to take that long to get a response? I'm worried my next draft will get deleted before I officially submit it for review. Any advice? WealthMapper (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. The person has not responded to my question. I want to start another draft, but I don't want it to get deleted. I didn't save my last draft as I thought it had to go through a review process. How do I create a draft in Wikipedia and not have it deleted before I submit it for review? The directions make it seem like you create the draft, then submit for review. But since my draft was deleted that process was interrupted. How do I avoid that from happening again while making my draft? WealthMapper (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from TruthSeeker282 on Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By nationality (15:40, 21 August 2025)

edit

Hi! How to add a request? I don't see any button for add/Edit a section. Thank you --TruthSeeker282 (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from DZMMfan (00:12, 23 August 2025)

edit

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

edit
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 232, August 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from SLUH ATL (20:34, 28 August 2025)

edit

hi, how can i contribute a new entry? There is no page for the AAAS Science & Technology fellowship (https://www.aaas.org/programs/science-technology-policy-fellowships) that the recent CDC director, Susan Monarez, is an alumna of. --SLUH ATL (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @SLUH ATL! You can find information about this at WP:Your first article. Your very first step will be to assess if the topic meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. In this case, that would mean finding a few reliable sources independent of the fellowship that discuss the fellowship in some depth. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Help with user

edit

How is the best way to go about reporting someone? This inr user keeps blocking everything no matter how many ways i rephrase it. Wikinerd1991 (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question from Rehan Manzoor (22:14, 30 August 2025)

edit

can i add refrence from external sites --Rehan Manzoor (talk) 22:14, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Rehan Manzoor. Yes, you can! If you use the Visual Editor (editing looks a bit like editing in Word), there is a cite button. You can fill out the url you want to cite, and the citation is automatically formed. Don't forget to click insert.
If you want to link to external websites as an external link: make sure that you only add those in an external links section at the end of an article, as Wikipedia doesn't use any external links in its prose. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
last line I added an external link the removed it ? Rehan Manzoor (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Marked as away

edit

I have marked you as "away" in the mentorship interface since you haven't edited in a while and unanswered mentee questions are piling up. If you return to active editing, feel free to reset your status back to "Active" at Special:MentorDashboard. Thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Femke: @Pppery: Hi both, thank you for cleaning up after me. I do not expect to be back for a while so will leave the mentorship status as it is. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

edit

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just a note that I've started listing out the entries on the above (just the 30-odd major generals left to do), if you were interested in helping out (no worries if not). There'll be a bit of work finding death cause and places, where possible. I'd like to do the admirals and air officers at some point too - Dumelow (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oh, apologies. Just saw the note on your user page, very sad to hear that. Enjoy your wikibreak and I hope you are feeling better soon - Dumelow (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Dumelow: Hi! Hope you're well. Very happy to assist with the list, and I see you've nommed the admirals one for FL. I'm looking to ease myself back in to editing (probably rather slowly), so do let me know if there's anything I can help with. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Glad to see you back but do take it easy! The admirals one is my first FLC so a few things to get the hang of but hopefully it will pass (I think renaming it to ".... admirals ..." will resolve some of the more significant issues raised about inclusion criteria). I'm mostly looking at GANs this month as there is a backlog drive on and next month we're looking to reduce some of the MILHIST article quality backlogs ([Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/November 2025 Article Improvement Drive]]) but would be good to do some content creation in between so might start looking at the WWII generals list again. All the best - Dumelow (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Dumelow: I've made a start on gap filling with the admirals list. Have tried and failed to find free images for Hocken, Tench, and Marescaux. Tench is the last missing a cause of death. I'll try and dip into the SWW generals soon, and have started a new highly ambitious list of my own! Lots to do...Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of HMS Heroine (1783) has passed

edit

Your good article nomination of the article HMS Heroine (1783) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ykraps -- Ykraps (talk) 07:07, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

edit

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

edit

The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

edit

Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 233, September 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Welcome back!

edit

Hey man, just noticed that you've returned to editing. I hope you've fully recovered from your health issues; IMO this site is much improved with your contributions. Kind regards, DonBeroni (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@DonBeroni: Hi! It's very kind of you to say so; nice to be back. Glad to see you're still going strong - thanks particularly for uploading the new image to HMS Hebrus today. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:51, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

edit
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

The Bugle: Issue 234, October 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Guide to temporary accounts

edit

Hello, Pickersgill-Cunliffe. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences Appearance Advanced options Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

November article improvement drive

edit

Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 10 November 2025

edit

December 2025 administrator elections - schedule

edit
  • The December 2025 administrator elections are set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Nov 25 – Dec 1: Candidate sign-up
    • Dec 4 – Dec 8: Discussion phase
    • Dec 9 – Dec 15: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Best wishes

edit

Hello. Just saw your edit to your userpage. I hope this is not farewell for good? In case it is, I just wanted to jot down my thanks for your hard work over the years, particularly at MILHIST, and to say what a joy it has been to collaborate with you on a small number of articles. Best wishes - Dumelow (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Dumelow: Hi! Reports of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. I intend to return when life settles down a little more - there is much left to do! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections - Call for Candidates

edit

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • November 25 – December 1 - Call for candidates
  • December 4–8 - Discussion phase
  • December 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit
Hey, Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:10, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Anniversary Pickersgill-Cunliffe 🎉

edit

Hey @Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 7 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 17:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 235, November 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fake news!

edit

Hi PC, During a review of one of your articles, I made you reorder a number of your inline citations because I believed it to be the style. I should not have done that per WP:CITEORDER and I apologise for doing so. My only defence is that I had been asked to do this in a number of my own nominations by various reviewers and believed it to be policy. Soz. Ykraps (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Ykraps: Hi, absolutely no problem! Ignoring the rules, while I don't go out of my way to order citations I still agree that it looks far neater! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

edit

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

edit
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

edit

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase

edit

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


Administrator Elections - Voting Phase

edit

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

edit

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

edit

Io, Saturnalia!

edit
Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

edit
January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol

New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

  • The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
  • The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
  • Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
  • Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in participating? Sign up here.
You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

2025 Military Historian of the Year - nominee

edit
2025 Military Historian of the Year
As voted by your peers within the Military history WikiProject, I hereby award you the WikiProject Barnstar for being nominated for the 2025 Military Historian of the Year Award. Congratulations, and thank you for your efforts throughout the year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:15, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Hawkeye7: Many thanks, although I'm glad the members saw sense and didn't think I had done enough to deserve victory in the contest. Perhaps next year I'll get some more done! Thanks again for all your hard work in coordinating the project. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 236, December 2025

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


The Signpost: 15 January 2026

edit

The Bugle: Issue 237, January 2026

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 17 February 2026

edit
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

The Bugle: Issue 238, February 2026

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 10 March 2026

edit
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Precious anniversary

edit

The Bugle: Issue 239, March 2026

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

The Bugle: Issue 240, April 2026

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

edit

Checking in

edit

I've seen you've been inactive for several months and just wanted to check in to make everything alright. Hopefully it's just being busy, and not something gone wrong. Hog Farm Talk 23:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi HF. Not doing too well I'm afraid. I do hope to return someday, there is much left to do. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh no, I am sorry to see this. I saw your Maurice Suckling FA article on the front page today and realised it had been some time I last saw you around the traps. Get well and take care of yourself. Zawed (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Hog Farm: @Zawed: Hi again guys, you've given me the little push I needed to try and get back in the saddle. The break was never meant to be this long! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

edit

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
  • May 8–12: Discussion phase
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

edit
May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

edit

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

TFA

edit
story · music · places

Thank you for Maurice Suckling, about "a Royal Navy officer of the eighteenth century. He fought in only one major battle and much of his career was, as one historian puts it, "uneventful and perhaps even lacklustre". For three years before his death he did serve competently as Comptroller of the Navy, enough to make him notable. What makes naval historians prick up their ears about Suckling is less to do with himself and more to do with his nephew, one Horatio Nelson. Suckling was Nelson's first patron in the navy and his influence saw the young naval officer rise quickly through the ranks, such that after Suckling's premature death from illness Nelson remarked "I feel myself to my country his heir...And it shall, I am bold to say, never lack the want of his counsel.""! - Die Stechardin made it to the main page, - the historic woman was a flower seller ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

edit

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

edit

Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 241, May 2026

edit
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

edit
  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

edit
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous