On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between April and June 2025. Hawkeye7(talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello, I recently submitted an edit request on the Talk page of the 'Sadhvi Krishnapriya' article with properly sourced information (including India TV and Times of India links), but it wasn’t accepted. Could you please help me understand what was lacking or incorrect in the request? --Aradhakwikisevak (talk) 07:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Subject Line: Proposed Edit Regarding Labubu’s Cultural Impact
Hi Mentor,
I’d like to suggest a minor addition about Labubu’s cultural impact in 2025. A detailed article from a current events site discusses the toy’s viral success and compares it to the cultural disruption of icons like Rihanna and Billie Eilish.
I understand COI rules, so I’m not editing the article directly. Here’s the suggested citation for review:
"Labubu Doll: Viral Toy with a Dark Twist" – WorldStageToday.com
If you want to suggest edits to an article you should post them directly on the article talk page, where relevant editors can respond. Unfortunately that doesn't include me! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
July 9–15 - Call for candidates
July 18–22 - Discussion phase
July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey Pickersgill, I noticed that the first line of this article wrongly said that aromoextine was “formerly” known as Strattera. The source is a press release from Eli Lilly Canada, which suggests it is only being phased out in the Canadian market. I am striking the word “formerly” and would like to remove the footnote, but when I try to do so in the mobile editor, a help panel pops up that suggests contacting you. Maybe because I’m a noob editor? --SharkJumperNYC (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@SharkJumperNYC: Hi, I'm not that familiar with the hints given to new users, but there shouldn't be anything stopping you from editing an article that isn't protected, as is the case with this one. We encourage editors to be bold, so please go ahead with changes like that, just ensure that you write your rationale in the edit summary. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
hi first of all i realy thanks to you and i weich we start particing a english language lisning or spoking, so can you help me ,then we ander stand togather properley and talk feelfree , --Arishgaming (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I have a quick question, why our my articles always getting flagged for deletion? they aren't advertising at all and when I contest it it fails. --Stormchaseronlinux (talk) 10:10, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
While I encourage you to speak directly to the editors who put the articles forward for deletion, generally they're being deleted because you're not producing an encyclopaedic article, you're producing a list of features without much context. This reads essentially as an advertisement. I suggest you have a look at existing articles on schools and cars, of which we have many, to get an idea of the style and referencing we look for. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't follow FAC so it came as a pleasant surprise to see a new article on a Napoleonic-era general on the Main Page. Excellent work! - Dumelow (talk) 06:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you today for Henry de Hinuber, "about a Hanoverian army officer. Having offered his services to Britain when Hanover was invaded during the Napoleonic Wars in 1803, he spent the next decade commanding a regiment of the King's German Legion. In 1813 he was given command of a KGL brigade fighting in the Peninsular War, serving there until the end of the conflict and conducting a strained relationship with the Duke of Wellington. When Napoleon escaped from his exile Hinuber was prepared to command the division he was at the time leading, but he was superseded. Somewhat understandably frustrated by this, he refused any other commands and missed Waterloo. With the end of the war he joined the reconstituted Hanoverian Army, serving until his death in 1833. A fluent speaker of English and French, he anglicized his name from Eduard Christoph Heinrich von Hinüber."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, as my mentor can I get some advice? I drafted an article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ourea_Events about Ourea Events, a UK company that organises ultra running events. It got rejected first time for insufficient notable info (fine). I added more detail, and it got rejected again with comment "The sources added are more about the specific events themselves, rather than Ourea itself. Not seeing much indication of Ourea specifically being notable." Which is probably fair, and honestly maybe there isn't enough notable detail about Ourea specifically. So I was then wondering whether it would be more appropriate as an article "Races organised by Ourea Events" (with some minor edits) and if that would be more likely to be accepted as an article for creation. Any thoughts? --DuncanA77 (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. You have protected Draft:Isaac Kenyon, can you please unprotect it? UPE socks will always find a way to publish spam, but it will be much easier to find it and delete it if they continually publish it under the same title, as they have been doing it so far. Thank you. Janhrach (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Trying to create page:
How to add photo
How to update sports results
How to page make visible online
How to update references from other languages than English
Thank you --Komsijam (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Can I use a YouTube interview where a person reported on their life and childhood as a source? Can I use a social media post by a person where they reported that their mother died, or they got married, as a source?
Thanks in advance. --18thcenturyelectrician (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello,
My name is Thomas Newson, and I would like to request a correction to the information currently listed on my Wikipedia page. The information is outdated and no longer reflects my current artistic direction. Despite previous attempts to update it, the page often reverts to older content that inaccurately associates me with a sound and style from over a decade ago.
In 2020, I made a significant switch in my musical direction, and I believe it is important that the article reflects this change accurately, as it directly affects how I am perceived in the industry.
I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss what can be done to ensure the information is current, accurate, and supported by reliable sources.
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I represent my employer and will eventually be creating a company page in Wikipedia and monitoring that page. From reading the disclosure requirements, I see that I need to disclose this on my user page, but I'm not sure where my user page is. Can you help direct me to the right spot/ --WealthMapper (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I edited two articles one was SRK(Disambiguation) other was BTS(Disambiguation) but they both were reverted for the same reason and the reason is external link in article body
So where do i put the link from now on? Nebula566 (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I probably won't be editing often but I didn't know this mentor feature existed and think it's really cool, so just wanted to say hi! --ACZW (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.
South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.
Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! I just got started as a Wikipedia editor and I'm having trouble distinguishing whether or not a reference is reliable and qualified. An article that I have been working on keeps getting declined because of this. I have looked up Wikipedia's guideline thoroughly, but the definitions are somewhat vague and some even conflict with several references in actual articles. So it would be really nice if you could give me a more detailed review of the article or just point out the exact reference that's unqualified in my article. That would help me a lot on improving my editing. Thanks!
The article that I'm working on: Draft:Unilumin. --Yeehai9527 (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! I recently had a page I was working on deleted. I may have misunderstood something, as I thought that I could create a page and then "officially" submit it for review from Wikipedia experts to get feedback. I was still working on the page and had not submitted it for review yet. One of the reasons noted was that I had not declared my status, but I did that on my User page a couple of weeks ago. I'm not sure where I took a misstep; can you please offer me some guidance? Thank you! --WealthMapper (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, your best bet is to engage directly with the person involved in the deletion. If you discuss it as calmly as you have here, you shouldn't have any problems obtaining an explanation. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, That is the first thing I did--reach out to them to understand where I went wrong in the process. They deleted the page on August 16th, and I responded on August 18th. It is now Sept 6. Is it normal to take that long to get a response? I'm worried my next draft will get deleted before I officially submit it for review. Any advice? WealthMapper (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. The person has not responded to my question. I want to start another draft, but I don't want it to get deleted. I didn't save my last draft as I thought it had to go through a review process. How do I create a draft in Wikipedia and not have it deleted before I submit it for review? The directions make it seem like you create the draft, then submit for review. But since my draft was deleted that process was interrupted. How do I avoid that from happening again while making my draft? WealthMapper (talk) 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Rehan Manzoor. Yes, you can! If you use the Visual Editor (editing looks a bit like editing in Word), there is a cite button. You can fill out the url you want to cite, and the citation is automatically formed. Don't forget to click insert.
If you want to link to external websites as an external link: make sure that you only add those in an external links section at the end of an article, as Wikipedia doesn't use any external links in its prose. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, just a note that I've started listing out the entries on the above (just the 30-odd major generals left to do), if you were interested in helping out (no worries if not). There'll be a bit of work finding death cause and places, where possible. I'd like to do the admirals and air officers at some point too - Dumelow (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh, apologies. Just saw the note on your user page, very sad to hear that. Enjoy your wikibreak and I hope you are feeling better soon - Dumelow (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Dumelow: Hi! Hope you're well. Very happy to assist with the list, and I see you've nommed the admirals one for FL. I'm looking to ease myself back in to editing (probably rather slowly), so do let me know if there's anything I can help with. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Glad to see you back but do take it easy! The admirals one is my first FLC so a few things to get the hang of but hopefully it will pass (I think renaming it to ".... admirals ..." will resolve some of the more significant issues raised about inclusion criteria). I'm mostly looking at GANs this month as there is a backlog drive on and next month we're looking to reduce some of the MILHIST article quality backlogs ([Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/November 2025 Article Improvement Drive]]) but would be good to do some content creation in between so might start looking at the WWII generals list again. All the best - Dumelow (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.
An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey man, just noticed that you've returned to editing. I hope you've fully recovered from your health issues; IMO this site is much improved with your contributions. Kind regards, DonBeroni (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Traffic report: One click after another Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Pickersgill-Cunliffe. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.
Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.
How do temporary accounts work?
Editing from a temporary account
When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.
Temporary account IP viewer user right
How to enable IP Reveal
Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.
Impact for administrators
It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).
Rules about IP information disclosure
Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now!MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. Just saw your edit to your userpage. I hope this is not farewell for good? In case it is, I just wanted to jot down my thanks for your hard work over the years, particularly at MILHIST, and to say what a joy it has been to collaborate with you on a small number of articles. Best wishes - Dumelow (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey @Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 7 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey.:) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙✉17:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi PC, During a review of one of your articles, I made you reorder a number of your inline citations because I believed it to be the style. I should not have done that per WP:CITEORDER and I apologise for doing so. My only defence is that I had been asked to do this in a number of my own nominations by various reviewers and believed it to be policy. Soz. Ykraps (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958
An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in December 2025, with over 1,000 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.
The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
2025 Military Historian of the Year
As voted by your peers within the Military history WikiProject, I hereby award you the WikiProject Barnstar for being nominated for the 2025 Military Historian of the Year Award. Congratulations, and thank you for your efforts throughout the year. Hawkeye7(discuss)00:15, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Hawkeye7: Many thanks, although I'm glad the members saw sense and didn't think I had done enough to deserve victory in the contest. Perhaps next year I'll get some more done! Thanks again for all your hard work in coordinating the project. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Changes to the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy's disclosure rules include broadening the consecutive-blocks exception to cover all admin actions and removing the requirement to revision-delete permissible disclosures once they become unnecessary (instead requiring only their removal). See WP:TAIVDISCLOSE for more information.
Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.
A request for comment is open to discuss retiring CSD criterion R3 in favour of handling such redirects through RfD.
Arbitration
Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.
Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident? A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?
Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I've seen you've been inactive for several months and just wanted to check in to make everything alright. Hopefully it's just being busy, and not something gone wrong. Hog FarmTalk23:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh no, I am sorry to see this. I saw your Maurice Suckling FA article on the front page today and realised it had been some time I last saw you around the traps. Get well and take care of yourself. Zawed (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
May 8–12: Discussion phase
May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).
Arbitration
The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Thank you for Maurice Suckling, about "a Royal Navy officer of the eighteenth century. He fought in only one major battle and much of his career was, as one historian puts it, "uneventful and perhaps even lacklustre". For three years before his death he did serve competently as Comptroller of the Navy, enough to make him notable. What makes naval historians prick up their ears about Suckling is less to do with himself and more to do with his nephew, one Horatio Nelson. Suckling was Nelson's first patron in the navy and his influence saw the young naval officer rise quickly through the ranks, such that after Suckling's premature death from illness Nelson remarked "I feel myself to my country his heir...And it shall, I am bold to say, never lack the want of his counsel.""! - Die Stechardin made it to the main page, - the historic woman was a flower seller ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe,
New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026
Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards
JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Latest comment: 23 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison He has been imprisoned since 2020 for his Wikipedia edits. A fresh campaign is calling for his release.
Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)