Wikinerd1991

blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Theashleet per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Geekola. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 00:39, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Not the same user

These are not the same people. Why was no investigating done? Wikinerd1991 (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

@silvering has done no investigating whatsoever

@Asilveringhas done no investigating for what is accused of being a sock account. Whatever that is. Wikinerd1991 (talk) 01:53, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Entitled to review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikinerd1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I dont understand why I was blocked. As it says in terms and conditions I am entitled to know why. I am not that other account. That isn't my name. @AsilveringWikinerd1991 (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

My use of CheckUser confirms your abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikinerd1991 (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Waiting

For @Asilvering Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Bowling is gatekeeping a page

@bowling for life is gatekeeping hard. This user is not allowing updates to Skeleta. This user for some reason is doubling down on heavy metal. Any edits by this user are considered to be tainted. Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:02, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Wrong

@Datguy has no idea what he is talking about. There eas no investigating done. I do not understand what I did wrong. Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Geekola is me

May as well add thay since you are on a power trip @Asilvering Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Help

When am i getting a reply

{{unblock}} Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Waiting

@Asilvering Wikinerd1991 (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Wikinerd1991, pinging admins doesn't make things move faster. There's an unblock queue and this is a volunteer project. It can be days or weeks until someone reviews your unblock request; this isn't like calling customer service. And highly likely means that there was significant technical evidence linking this account and the Theashleet account. If you'd like to be unblocked, your best approach is to be patient, and have a reasonable explanation why it appears that different editors were editing the same article using the same or very nearby internet and/or PC. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

And yes, you were informed why you were blocked and there was a documented investigation. The block notice at the top of this page details why you are blocked and links you to the conclusions of the investigation. In any case, you've admitted the sockpuppetry by saying you are also the user of the Geekola account. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

@CoffeeCrumbs, where did they say that? And Wikinerd, you've confirmed that you're Theashleet pretty clearly by your own behaviour since the block. I really quite strongly suggest you find something else to do with your time. -- asilvering (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh nevermind, I see that now, I skipped reading the headers I suppose. I'm not convinced, frankly. Looks more like they're trying to get someone else blocked because they can. -- asilvering (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikinerd1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

What do I need to do to get in good standing? I have retired my other account. I just want to contribute, like... that is all I want in this.

Decline reason:

As per below, the WP:SO is available to you. Note that you worked hard with this account to demonstrate you cannot be trusted, though. So you'll have to work really hard when you are eventually eligible for WP:SO after at least six months away. Yamla (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest you look at the WP:Standard Offer. PhilKnight (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2025 (UTC)