User talk:CopyleftEverything/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CopyleftEverything. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Welcome!
Hi SocDoneLeft! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Mae Louise Miller has a new comment
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, SocDoneLeft. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Mae Louise Miller, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your first article
Thanks, SocDoneLeft, for creating your first article. If you intend to write more biographies of women, you might be interested in joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. In any case, if ever you need any assistance, feel free to let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mae Louise Miller has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)- @DoubleGrazing: Thank you very much! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Face Reality Political Prisoners Freedom Now.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Face Reality Political Prisoners Freedom Now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Yidisher Kultur-Farband. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Shouldn't this be split into two articles with Farband being a disambiguation?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @AngusWOOF: Thanks for the note, but I didn't create this page -- I'm glad they were split, no idea why they were joined. SocDoneLeft (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about North Star Network
Hello, SocDoneLeft
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AngusWOOF and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect North Star Network, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 14 § North Star Network.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- @AngusWOOF: Replied! SocDoneLeft (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
The article List of Socialist Equality Party election results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
These results have not received significant attention from reliable independent sources, which is hardly surprising as they didn't result in any wins or even came close.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Socialist Equality Party election results for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Socialist Equality Party election results until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Action (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Land Reform Movement (China), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fairbank.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Cliffite. User:Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Sorry to pester
Could you please use summaries on everything at the Mike Johnson article? Its history has become a complete disaster over the last few hours so the fewer unexplained edits, the better. City of Silver 19:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @City of Silver: Yes, my bad SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
} Hello SocDoneLeft, at Mike Johnson, you added Daily Kos as a source. Per WP:RSP, Daily Kos should generally be avoided as a source, especially for controversial political topics where better sources are available.
Please use sources highlighted in green in WP:RSP instead. starship.paint (RUN) 06:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Morenoism
Hello, SocDoneLeft
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Morenoism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Morenoism.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Social-Democratic Workingmen's Party of North America for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social-Democratic Workingmen's Party of North America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Fermiboson (talk) 04:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- You are free to refuse to answer this question, since I'm not very clear on the policy on this, but are you the same SocDoneLeft as on Twitter, etc.? The username policy states that usernames referencing real-life celebrities are definitely not allowed unless the identity is verified, but I'm not sure on the policy for online personalities. Fermiboson (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on National Labor Federation
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Labor Federation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Progressive Victory for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Victory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Potential COI
Hi SocDoneLeft, I saw your edit to Keffals, and I'm going to give you a nudge that an edit like that would warrant an inclusion in the edit summary saying "(possible COI)" to adhere to our COI guidelines. From what I understand, you are friends with Vaush and Keffals, correct? I'm not saying you can't edit their pages—what you edited was perfectly fine. :) SWinxy (talk) 06:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- @SWinxy: Fair -- that's my bad, should've noted possible COI! Will do so in future (though I don't plan to edit their page much). SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Progressive Victory logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Progressive Victory logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (December 30)
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, SocDoneLeft!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on List of third-party and independent performances in United States state legislative elections. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Very well researched, congrats!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 13:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks -- but I only moved the page, I didn't do the work! SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Entryism
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Entryism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (January 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi @Johannes Maximilian: Thank you for taking the time to review this article!
- I agree that the article would be better if it had more reliable sources. However, I believe that ALL of the key claims in the article are supported by reliable sources, summarized below:
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cleveland Scene (1) |
 independent newspaper |
Cleveland Scene is a news organization |
full article discusses Maupin's past in the Workers World Party (WWP) and its youth wing, Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST) |
✔ Yes |
CPUSA (2) |
~ CPUSA is a rival socialist organization | ~ CPUSA is a rival socialist organization; however, most of its descriptions of Maupin in this article are factual with accompanying quotes, rather than ideological/opinion descriptions | article discusses Maupin's non-affiliation with CPUSA, collaboration with national Bolsheviks and other far-right figures, and organizational history in detail |
~ Maybe |
The Nation (5) |
independent newspaper |
The Nation is a WP:NEWSORG |
 only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center |
✘ No |
The Guardian (6) |
independent newspaper |
The Guardian is a WP:NEWSORG |
only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center |
✘ No |
CNN (7) |
independent newspaper |
CNN is a WP:NEWSORG |
only briefly mentions Maupin and International Action Center |
✘ No |
Kyiv Post (8) |
independent newspaper |
~ opinion piece, though by writer focused on this topic area | article discusses Maupin, CPI, and its relationship to Tara Reade for half a dozen paragraphs |
~ Maybe |
The Insider (11) |
independent newspaper |
The Insider (website) is a WP:NEWSORG |
entire article is about Maupin, including CPI history, sexual abuse allegations, and relationship with Russian media |
✔ Yes |
Business Insider (14) |
independent newspaper |
Business Insider is a WP:NEWSORG |
~ includes four paragraphs about Maupin's (key) role in getting American left-ish-ists to lend legitimacy to Nicaraguan government via election observation | ~ Maybe |
Newsweek (15) |
independent newspaper |
Newsweek is a WP:NEWSORG |
~ entire article is about an event by Maupin and CPI and their ideology/actions; however, article mostly repeats quotes and social media | ~ Maybe |
Newsweek (16) |
independent newspaper |
Newsweek is a WP:NEWSORG |
a list includes Maupin's name |
✘ No |
TruthOrFiction.com (18) |
independent newspaper |
TruthOrFiction.com is a WP:NEWSORG |
~ entire article is about an event by Maupin and CPI and their ideology/actions; however, article mostly repeats quotes and social media | ~ Maybe |
Polygraph.info (22) |
independent newspaper |
~ Polygraph.info is a US government news source; given that Maupin works for US geopolitical opponents, VOA may be unreliable | most of article is about Maupin and CPI; remainder is about the Rage Against the War Machine event that they helped organize |
~ Maybe |
WUSA9 (25) |
independent newspaper |
WUSA9 is a WP:NEWSORG |
~ although video does not mention Maupin, it discusses RAWM event held by Maupin and CPI | ~ Maybe |
The Week (26) |
independent newspaper |
The Week is a WP:NEWSORG |
~ although article does not mention Maupin, it discusses RAWM event held by Maupin and CPI | ~ Maybe |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- Would you look favorably on creating this article and removing whatever claims do not have reliable sources backing them up? SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello mate, unfortunately, there is just way too much wrong with the sourcing in that draft. Footnotes 4, 9, 12, 13, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 33 refer to sources that are outright unreliable. They need replacing, and it doesn't matter that some other sources might be fine. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Johannes Maximilian: Thank you for your reply!
- I removed all of those sources (except 20 and 21, since they're CPIUSA announcements about itself) and the article was mostly unchanged. Do you have any other recommendations? SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello mate, unfortunately, there is just way too much wrong with the sourcing in that draft. Footnotes 4, 9, 12, 13, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, and 33 refer to sources that are outright unreliable. They need replacing, and it doesn't matter that some other sources might be fine. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Campism for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article Revolutionary Communists of America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not notable, no independent sources for either "Revolutionary Communists of America" or previous name of "Socialist Revolution"
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wellington Bay (talk) 12:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Revolutionary Communists of America for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolutionary Communists of America, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Communists of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on International Peoples' Assembly. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (May 19)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Party USA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Communist Party USA election results, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Maupin (October 17)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caleb Maupin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
CS1 error on Freedom Road Socialist Organization
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Freedom Road Socialist Organization, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
are you the youtuber
idk tho i might be confused ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 21:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
"BreakThrough News" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect BreakThrough News has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 28 § BreakThrough News until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (December 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi @Samoht27: Thank you for your review! The deleted article was massively different from this article. For example, take WP:RS: That article had just 1 (Vice.com).
- This draft has 7 WP:RS ([2] The Guardian, [3] The Free Press, [4] The Jewish Chronicle, [9] The New York Times, [10] Independent Political Report, [18] Vermont Sec of State, and [19] La Repubblica). This draft also has 11 WP:ABOUTSELF sources ([1] ACP Ledger, [5] CPUSA 32nd Convention, [6] ACP Declaration, [7] Hinkle tweet, [8] Garrido article, [11] CPUSA Solidnet message pt1, [12] CPUSA chapter tweets, [13] CPUSA Solidnet message pt2, [14] WAP declaration, [15] ACP Constitution, and [16] ACP Program).
- In addition, each WP:ABOUTSELF source supports no claim that is substantial or self-serving beyond "ACP holds position X" or "CPUSA holds position Y". This is common in articles on smaller political organizations for summarizing their programs (for example). In this article, all claims which go beyond "ACP says X" are supported by a WP:RS.
- If you have time, I would appreciate another review! SocDoneLeft (talk) 00:12, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:American Communist Party has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (December 31)
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on List of Communist Party USA election results. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating the article! May you have a blessed day today!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Concern regarding Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America
Hello, SocDoneLeft. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
PSL
The source I added regarding the PSL's views on the persecution of Uyghurs said referred to the persecution as a myth. This quote was from that article:
"The so-called forced labor rhetoric is unfounded. So is the overall myth that undergirds it, namely that the Chinese government as a part of a “war on Islam” has incarcerated upward of 1 million Uyghurs and ethnic minorities as part of a genocide." Also in this article it says: "The widely published reports of Zenz, the China whisperer for Western imperialism, are also behind the claims of genocide and mass incarceration. " How does this count as original research? JPHC2003 (talk) 06:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @JPHC2003: The PSL article is highly contested. Everything without a secondary source (WP:RS) will end up removed eventually. Find one and feel free to add. SocDoneLeft (talk) 06:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolutionary Communists of America (June 25)
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Sphilbrick:: This is an error. You linked this article: https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/the-left-wing-activists-who-want-to-change-american-politics/
- I can't see the hidden edits. I believe I included 2 sentences from said article, with a reference to that article, in a section on Caucuses to be further reduced later.
- Your reversion also deleted a dozen other non-copyright-affected edits. Please consider reverting back. Thank you. SocDoneLeft (talk) 02:54, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- It wasn't an error. Copying two sentences is a copyright violation, unless the material copied is properly licensed, or it is legitimately quoted.
- Many editors have expressed surprise that the process for removing a copyright violation is not more surgical. An ideal approach might be to remove exactly the problematic material and leave nonproblematic material. While sympathetic to that goal, the challenges os twofold — one,that we literally get hundreds of reports a day and is only a small handful of editors willing to work on fixing the issues and two, simply removing a couple sentences might interrupt the flow so that approach requires substantial time to understand the flow of the article and how these sentences fit into it.. Given the workload and the number of volunteers has Led to the process that if a copyright issue is detected the easiest solution is to do a rollback of all consecutive edits by the editor, restoring the article to the position before the editor started making changes.
- There are rare circumstances where it is worth spending the time to be more surgical but this one doesn't sound like it qualifies.
- I temporarily undeleted the edits, and emailed you a copy of the article as it was just before I did my reversion so you should now have all the material you need to reestablish any acceptable edits.
- I apologize for this harsh approach but I don't see a better solution. Who knows, maybe someone will create an AI tool that can handle the more surgical approach. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work and for emailing me a copy of the article. SocDoneLeft (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Your recent edit to American Communist Party (2024)
Does not substantiate that MAGA Communism is the officially promoted ideology of the party, nor that it deviates enough from similar socially-conservative Marxist-Leninist parties as to no longer count. You must source this credibly or risk WP:OR and speculation. I also notice that nearly all your wikipedia contributions are on this and closely related topics. Special:Contributions/TheSands-12 20:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSands-12 (talk • contribs)
COI question relating to the American Communist Party (2024)
You have been editing on the Wikipedia page of the American Communist Party. With Wikipedia and any other encyclopedia that people use to learn about different topics, groups, and people, it is important to abide by neutrality and the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. A conflict of interest presents a severe challenge to the upholding of this standard because someone with a certain perspective on its own still has room for reaching consensus, whereas with a conflict of interest it is necessary to recuse oneself because the individual has a stake in the matter. Given your previous debate with Haz Al-Din, who is the founding Chairman of the American Communist Party, it does not seem appropriate with this apparent conflict of interest for you to continue editing on the page. ApricotAvalanche037 (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Democratic Socialists of America. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Socialists in Congress list page
I don't know if you saw because I took the liberty of reverting, but that Liberaltarian guy added Ilhan Omar back to the list of socialists and spliced out sections of the reasoning. I feel like this is pretty firmly in bad faith. Should we report? PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 21:20, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- @SocDoneLeft Looks like he hasn't reverted it at least. Anyway, it's been a couple days and he doesn't seem to have elaborated on O'Connell, so I'll probably remove his row and add it to the talk page. I was thinking we could throw in something like this with it to avoid further problems:
- "After a discussion, a majority consensus has been reached that Jerry J. O'Connell does not meet the criteria for this page because:
- 1. He never, as far as any of us have been able to ascertain, declared himself a socialist.
- 2. He never, as far as any of us have been able to ascertain, was a registered member of a socialist organization. (ADDENDUM: For the purposes of this list, a socialist organization is defined as a political organization that publicly and explicitly advocates for socialism. Organziations that merely have socialist members, even in great number, do not qualify. Alleged Communist front organizations also do not qualify, as front organziations, by definition, conceal their true intentions and thus it cannot be immediately determined whether a member knew it was a front. Furthermore, socialist publications cannot have "members," only employees, and guest writers may contribute to the publication without endorsing every last one of its purposes and associations.)
- 3. HUAC testimony, in and of itself, cannot be relied upon to provide objective historical fact.
- 4. Academic study which relies exclusively upon HUAC testimony to reach such conclusions faces the same issue.
- Until such a time as verifiable, accessible information to the contrary is provided, O'Connell will not reside on the table proper."
- I also figured we could add O'Connell to the "Notable progressive but not socialist members," section, since he did support the Spanish Republic and that in and of itself is extremely significant. PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 16:26, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Need some help thanks
If you could help improve the articles of Belarus' left wing movements in the 1910s-1920s i'd appreciate it. ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 03:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Communist Party (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wolff.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png
Thanks for uploading File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on Socialist Party USA
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Socialist Party USA, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:Ashik Siddique 2025-01-18 People's March.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ashik Siddique 2025-01-18 People's March.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Whpq, thanks for your edit! You are correct. I did not realize that NFCC 1 excludes "could be created" subjects like living people. SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Really excited about some of your drafts!
Read through a few of your drafts and they're looking great! Keep up the good work! Pourlevivant (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Pourlevivant Thank you! Any draft(s) in particular? And thank you for your work on the Green electeds page. SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- DSA history! Pourlevivant (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Working Families Party, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Davis was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
RCA
I saw you previously had worked on the RCA article, I have been reworking the article at Revolutionary Communists of America and could use your help. In order to give the article the best chance at survival we need to stick to as many secondary sources as possible and only utilize primary sources where absolutely necessary. Thanks! skarz (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi skarz: RCA was AFD'd before for lack of WP:RS. I think the current article would suffer the same fate.
- But I think the current draft at Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America fulfils WP:N. Ideally we would move that draft over the current article, not just copy its code, so that author history is preserved. SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Regarding new article: can you rename it?
I wrote the article on Queer Armorer, and I am unaware of how to change the name of the article after, if I understood you correctly you said that I should reach out to you about that? ~2026-85045-4 (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, renaming now! SocDoneLeft (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum reference fix
G'day SocDoneLeft!
I've gone and checked every listed reference to add authors where they were previously left out. From what I could find, there were only two specific authors mentioned (technically it's actually the same dude but I've just rewritten it exactly how it's styled as per the reference), the others not listing a specific person.
Hope this helps! Thanks for the support and tips!
1geel0ng1 1geel0ng1 (talk) 21:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- G'day, accepted! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Regarding Draft:Traffic signal operation in New South Wales
Hello, thanks for your suggestion on Draft:Traffic signal operation in New South Wales. I've added categories and a See Also section - it is ready for re-review. Jakecopp (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi: Accepted! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Draft review request
Thank you for your previous feedback on my Draft. I have revised the article to address the concerns you mentioned . I removed unsupported claims, fixed grammar issues, and replaced several primary sources with independent news references.
If you have time, I would really appreciate it if you could take another look at the draft. Thank you again for your guidance.
Best regards. Hossain Ryhan (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Hossain Ryhan: I have replied! SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Regarding Draft:Zana Gümüş
Hello, I have revised the draft to address the concerns about AI-style writing and over-attribution. I would appreciate it if you could take another look when convenient. Thank you for the feedback. ~2026-14296-17 (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for the feedback. The references have been updated with publication dates, authors were added where available, and categories have been included. Thank you so much for your attention, and for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-14515-38 (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @~2026-14296-17: See Zana Gümüş! Please make any improvements you'd like. SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability
Thank you for the feedback that you provided. I made an effort to revise and edit in line with your suggestions. This is my first one so I thought I would write about a topic I was familiar with. I also removed the LLM suggested language. Please look at the draft and let me know if I am closer to a publishable article. NikkiAllen99 (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @NikkiAllen99: The draft is much improved! I think it's 95% ready. I added two comments. SocDoneLeft (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Declined Article: Lawrence Yu
Thank you for reviewing the submission.
I have attempted to align the draft with Wikipedia's guidance by significantly shortening the article, removing promotional language, and limiting references to independent published sources where available.
The current version only includes information that can be supported by third-party coverage and avoids internal or self-published material. My intention was to present a minimal, neutral overview rather than a comprehensive biography.
In addition, I have added the required paid/connected contributor disclosure on my user page to follow the instructions previously provided.
If possible, I would appreciate any specific guidance on which sections or statements still appear promotional, or what type of additional sourcing would help the draft better meet Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality standards.
Thank you again for your time reviewing the submission. ShalhoubM (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
For your help reviewing drafts
 |
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
| Thanks for taking the time to review several of my draft submissions. I really appreciate the work you do helping move articles through the process. LionmerterTHE (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arlington was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Los Angeles Democratic Socialists of America. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles Democratic Socialists of America, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Acceptance of Eiríka Krogsæter
Hi SocDoneLeft and thanks for all your AfC reviewing! I just wanted to let you know that I've tagged a draft that you accepted, Eiríka Krogsæter, for speedy deletion as a hoax. The creator has just been blocked as a sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tttg2, which is a sockfarm that has a history of creating hoax articles (including an article about an invented species by the same name). As far as I can tell none of the sources mention Eiríka Krogsæter, and I can't find any evidence elsewhere that she existed. Obviously you had no way of knowing that the creator was a sock, but please be careful to check the sources to confirm that a draft is not a hoax before accepting at AfC. Thanks! MCE89 (talk) 11:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @MCE89:: Thank you for letting me know! Sorry for letting this slip through. Is there any chance you could email me a copy of the article pre-deletion? I would like to see how badly I messed up in failing to interrogate the sources. SocDoneLeft (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens! I'm not an admin so I unfortunately can't see the article anymore either. @Newslinger would you be willing to email SocDoneLeft a copy since you were the deleting admin? MCE89 (talk) 11:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. SocDoneLeft, I have emailed you a copy of the deleted Eiríka Krogsæter article. Please let me know if you would like any additional information about that page. — Newslinger talk 14:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Newslinger: Thanks! Looks like two legitimate sources, neither of which mentions Eiríka Krogsæter. Very much my bad. SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. SocDoneLeft, I have emailed you a copy of the deleted Eiríka Krogsæter article. Please let me know if you would like any additional information about that page. — Newslinger talk 14:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens! I'm not an admin so I unfortunately can't see the article anymore either. @Newslinger would you be willing to email SocDoneLeft a copy since you were the deleting admin? MCE89 (talk) 11:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Communist Workers Party
The Communist Workers Party is a defunt organisation. Or is it? An org with the same name exists, here's their website: https://www.cwp-usa.org/. Is it possible that you can add more information relating to this? Thank you in advance if you do and if you don't, well I understand you're busy. Jenkowelten (talk) 06:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- The Communist Workers Party is defunct. The Communist Workers Platform is extant. SocDoneLeft (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)::See also: User:SocDoneLeft/List of leftist organizations in the United States. SocDoneLeft (talk) 12:29, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
Draft review: Draft:Shailendra Singh (producer)
@SocDoneLeft, you have commented
Comment: Thank you for adding more sources. The subject is clearly notable. The article tone is glowing and just reports on Singh's successes. Please rewrite using WP:NPOV. SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2026 (UTC) SocDoneLeft, changed the tone to NPOV. Can you review it again? ~2026-15036-82 (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Waiting for your reply and next steps. ~2026-19713-62 (talk) 07:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Decline of Draft: St. Martin Unity Flag
Hi SocDoneLeft, thanks for your efforts to reduce the backlog at AfC! Just wanted to share some concerns about your decline and comment left on this draft. The main purpose of AfC is to evaluate notability and verifiability; drafts shouldn't be declined because their references aren't formatted with {{cite}} templates, or because they lack categories or sections. If it's notable and referenced, it's better to accept and then apply the relevant maintenance tag. You can find out more about at WP:AFCSTANDARDS :)
Cheers, nil nz 05:11, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Jason Thielman for deletion
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Thielman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Concern regarding Draft:List of political assassination attempts in the United States
Hello, SocDoneLeft. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of political assassination attempts in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Seattle Democratic Socialists of America Logo Tower.png
Thanks for uploading File:Seattle Democratic Socialists of America Logo Tower.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
My draft
Hello,
I am aware that you've reviewed my draft for Anna Keyes Knowlton but I'd like to know if you'd help me write it because I am writing it with only primary sources, local legends, and some books on Thomas Knowlton because she doesn't have a book of her own and they usually only over her marriage and children, not her personal life. Thank you for reading!
From, Lily Weed Lily Weed (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)