1geel0ng1

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, 1geel0ng1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Cities

Please stop changing the descriptions of Australian towns to cities. The word "city" is legally defined. Your changes are simply wrong. All your changes need to be reverted. If you don't do it yourself, you are simply creating work for other editors, so please make the changes yourself. HiLo48 (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

I have reverted your changes myself. Well, all except a handful of cases where you did happen to get it right. Please don't make such sweeping, incorrect changes again. HiLo48 (talk) 01:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Wingeel, Victoria

Hello 1geel0ng1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Wingeel, Victoria, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingeel, Victoria.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

New articles

I noticed you have made three new articles over the last two days, all on historic Australian buildings. While this is excellent—we do love a good heritage architecture article around here—I noticed a few hallmarks of LLM/AI use in your new creations. If you are indeed using AI to supplement/assist the creation of articles, please exercise great caution. There are instances where it appears that your articles differ from the sources they cite in matters of fact. These are minor issues within the articles I've glanced at, but I would ask you take some time to review your work up to this point before going on to your next article. Please feel free to ping me with {{re|Pbritti}} if you have any questions. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:40, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Fyansford Paper Mill. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A great series of articles you've written including this one. They are ideal although I notice the references are bare urls. Probably in 2 years time, every one of these references will be useless as things will have moved. So to make them easier to find can add full publisher information, like who created, publisher, website, location, dates and so on. Adding that information will future-proof the article better and less chance of it being deleted later if the information can't be found to WP:V verify it. There is a wee tutorial WP:REFB that shows you how to create full cites. Might be handy.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 07:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on St Thomas' Anglican Church, Winchelsea. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating a page for this historic church; quite significant in the context of regional Australia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 06:54, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Mount Rouse and Buckley Falls. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed them as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for all you've done on these articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Ingratis (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

• In the Mount Rouse article, there's apparently a snag with reference # 4 to Agriculture Victoria, which doesn't seem to link to anything on Mount Rouse. Could you take a look? (The other refs all look fine). Thanks, Ingratis (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

AI use on Barwon Park

Hi @1geel0ng1. You've repeatedly removed the AI-generated flag from the article for Barwon Park, but the issue is that this article still contains significant problems due to the fact that you used AI to generate it. Below are just some of the claims not verified by the citations associated with them:

• "Constructed between 1869 and 1871 for prominent pastoralist Thomas Austin and his wife Elizabeth Austin, the house is regarded as one of the finest surviving examples of a French Romanesque rural mansion in Victoria's Western District. Set within landscaped grounds overlooking the Barwon River, the property reflects the wealth, ambition and social standing of the Austin's and subsequent owners during the height of the colonial pastoral era."
• "Austin was born in Baltonsborough, Somerset, and came from a family with agricultural and commercial connections. By the late 1830s, he had established himself as a successful grazier in Victoria's Western District, an area that rapidly became one of the wealthiest pastoral regions in colonial Australia due to its suitability for sheep grazing."
• "designed a large French Romanesque-style residence intended to rival the grandest homestead of the Western District. Construction commenced in 1869 and was completed in 1871, using locally quarried bluestone and high-quality imported materials for interior finishes. The last furniture arrived on a ship from London in March 1871"... This source refers to the architecture as Italiante and says that the home was completed in 1869, directly contradicting the text.
• "Thomas became seriously ill after cutting his finger while tending to his horses, with the cut becoming infected. On 15 December 1871, he had to get the finger amputated, and went to visit his daughter's husband, who was a doctor working in Ballarat. Whilst there, it became infected again, and additionally contracted gastroenteritis, and subsequently passed away. His funeral took place on 18 December and was one of the largest in Victoria at the time."

I believe that the AI template should remain until a neutral third party can review the article for accuracy and choose to remove it. There are significant issues with using AI to generate Wikipedia content and your article demonstrates precisely why. Vegantics (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Thomson Memorial Presbyterian Church moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Thomson Memorial Presbyterian Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 08:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Ss Johns' Anglican Church, Colac. Another editor, Hughesdarren, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, Thanks for your contribution. Should the be title be "St Johns' Anglican Church, Colac" rather than "Ss Johns' Anglican Church, Colac"? All of the references listed say "St John". If you would like me to move the article to the correct title then let me know. Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

If you're of the belief that it should be changed, I'm open to that. The "Ss Johns' Anglican Church" was based of the official website, but it seems that because it's an anomaly being called "Ss", people have erroneously called it "St John's" but I welcome your judgement! 1geel0ng1 (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, I hadn't looked at the official website, just at the listed references, but you are correct that does say Ss - I think I'll leave it as is and post this thread on the article talk page. Best Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomson Memorial Presbyterian Church has been accepted

Thomson Memorial Presbyterian Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Athanelar was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability. Connection to a notable family does not confer the same: see WP:NOTINHERITED

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Athanelar (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, 1geel0ng1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Athanelar (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Addiscot Beach moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Addiscot Beach. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Triptothecottage (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I've subsequently made the notability more clear on Addiscot Beach. The article contains no machine-generated text, and I'm not sure as to why it was marked as such. The article also already contains relevant sources from books and news, as well as other sources. 1geel0ng1 (talk) 22:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of Template:Monarchy of Antigua and Barbuda

Template:Monarchy of Antigua and Barbuda has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. CROIX^talk 21:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Politicdude was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

this has not fixed the problem. areas must be notable on their own, not solely due to connection to a notable person. See Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) for more information on how to make this article suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Politicdude (talk, contribs) 17:12, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 49 and 51 Gertrude Street, Geelong West

The article 49 and 51 Gertrude Street, Geelong West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBUILDING, sources don't show any "historic, social, economic, or architectural importance" and a search doesn't bring up anything

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. echidnalives - talk - edits 11:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of 49 and 51 Gertrude Street, Geelong West for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 49 and 51 Gertrude Street, Geelong West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/49 and 51 Gertrude Street, Geelong West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

echidnalives - talk - edits 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of 44 and 46 Forfar Road, Hamlyn Heights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 44 and 46 Forfar Road, Hamlyn Heights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/44 and 46 Forfar Road, Hamlyn Heights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Idontwantaaccount (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Note

Hello. I'm sorry I've had to introduce myself through nominations for deletions like this. I wanted to leave you a quick note, because despite a few things you're a constructive contributor and someone we're lucky to have here on Wikipedia!

I know it can be a bit disheartening for your work to be nominated for deletion, but I'd like to encourage you to stick with it and develop your article creating skills. Content policies and guidelines, such as notability and no original research, can be difficult areas to get your head around, and it can take some time to fully grasp them. Significant coverage is probably the key thing here: it's important to ensure that an article topic has sources which "addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content". It also mentions that trivial mentions are not enough to be considered significant coverage.

My main recommendation to you would be to primarily create articles through the Articles for Creation process until you've had more experience with the content guidelines here on Wikipedia. It can be annoying to have submissions rejected, but the constructive criticism can be really helpful, and beats having work nominated for deletion later. And where you need a bit more support, the AfC help desk will always be happy to help you out!

If you have any questions about all this, or there's anything I can help you get better versed in, feel free to let me know! I wish you luck in your future creations and contributions! Thanks, echidnalives - talk - edits 11:30, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Geelong Russian Orthodox Church moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Geelong Russian Orthodox Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SocDoneLeft was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article text is not the problem. The sources need to have substantial coverage of the article subject. The church does not achieve notability by association with James Fairbairn.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SocDoneLeft (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geelong Russian Orthodox Church has been accepted

Geelong Russian Orthodox Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been accepted

Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum. Thanks! SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum has been accepted

All Saints' Anglican Church, Derrinallum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of St James' Anglican Church, Morrisons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St James' Anglican Church, Morrisons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St James' Anglican Church, Morrisons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello, I'm ApexParagon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Warrock without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ApexParagon (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St John's Anglican Church, Bannockburn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Lal Lal Falls. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Geelong Russian Orthodox Church for redirecting to Russian_Orthodox_Diocese_of_Sydney,_Australia_and_New_Zealand#Victoria

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geelong Russian Orthodox Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to Russian_Orthodox_Diocese_of_Sydney,_Australia_and_New_Zealand#Victoria.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geelong Russian Orthodox Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geelong Ukrainian Orthodox Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Geelong Hungarian Seventh-day Adventist Church moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Geelong Hungarian Seventh-day Adventist Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on St Andrew's Presbyterian Church, Hamilton. Another editor, ScalarFactor, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Could you please provide page numbers for the Hamilton Spectator source?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ScalarFactor}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ScalarFactor (talk) 00:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

great work creating St Andrew's Presbyterian Church, Hamilton

Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Methodist churches in Australia

Template:Methodist churches in Australia has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Dyers Falls. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:00, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Mount Sturgeon Homestead. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:07, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 1geel0ng1. Thank you for your work on Mokanger. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:20, 16 June 2026 (UTC)