User talk:Another Believer/Archive 57
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 50 | ← | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 |
WikiCup 2025 November newsletter
The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:
BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
Arconning (submissions) with 860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
History6042 (submissions) with 804 tournament points
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 635 tournament points
TheDoctorWho (submissions) with 386 tournament points
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 373 tournament points
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 362 tournament points
Extended content |
|---|
|
Our high scorers in the final round were:
The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 106 good articles, 5 good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone! The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.
A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email): |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – November 2025
Extended content |
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025). 
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Portland Cherry Bombs FC logo.jpg
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: October 2025
Extended content | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
The Signpost: 10 November 2025
- News and notes: Temporary accounts go live and WMF board member self-suspends
ArbCom elections draw close, and Wikimania '27 in Santiago.
- Community view: Six Wikipedians' thoughts on Grokipedia, and the humanity of it all
It ain't a five course meal, according to one of our interviewees.
- Wikicup report: BeanieFan11, WikiCup victor of 2025, covers the results
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
- In the media: Jimbo's book, an argument about genocide, and a train of shame
Wikipedia's new rival, political controversy in Italy and other Wiki-reports.
- Recent research: Taking stock of the 2024–2025 research grants
$400,000 USD in total funding: what did we get?
- Opinion: With Grokipedia, top-down control of knowledge is new again
Does it shed any light on particular topics that are better suited to LLM-generation than others?
- Obituary: Struway
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: The documentaried, the disowned, the deceased, Diwali and the Dodgers
You know your man is working hard, he's worth a deuce.
- Comix: Head of steam
'Sblood!
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 21
Extended content |
|---|
|
 Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on October 24. Please help translate.
Upcoming and current events and conversations Let's Talk continues .jpg)
Annual Goals Progress on Infrastructure
Annual Goals Progress on Volunteer Support 
Foundation statements
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. Let askcac
|
Need some assistance
ResolvedHi, I’m trying to move Draft:Vezirja into the mainspace, but I don’t know how to do so when a redirect already occupies that article name. Cornmazes (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Hoya alagensis
ResolvedYour substub Hoya alagensis doesn't have a infobox or taxonbar. Why not? Abductive (reasoning) 19:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Misuse of OneClickArchiver
Extended content |
|---|
|
Please see these edits. I notice that you created Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science/Archive 10 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science/Archive 11, even though Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science/Archive 9 was nowhere near the level set by I know that it's a script: but as with all edits - script-assisted or otherwise, you are responsible for all actions that occur when committing an edit to save. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
AfD
@Ad Orientem, Liz, and OwenX: I give up. It is clear a constructive discussion cannot be had here. How disheartening, ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think that's a fair accusation. So far, you seem to be the only one who refuses to engage with others here, with your repeated "LEAVE ME ALONE!" comments. If you are willing to engage in a serious, level-headed debate about the subject, you can open an RfC at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars, where the general notability of single episode and single contestant articles can be debated calmly, based on our guidelines, rather than on accusations of personal gripes. If you approach it that way, I have no doubt that Woodensuperman would be happy to discuss the merits of the issue with you. Until then, however, we are not going to put work on the topic on hold just because you don't wish to be notified about it. Owen× ☎ 14:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- @OwenX I've not refused to engage. I've begged to have a measured discussion about this, but instead I just log in to deletion notification after deletion notification by the dozens. Some of these articles have already survived AfD multiple times. I would love to have an actual discussion about this, but I do not feel like that's being reciprocated. I think nominating dozens of articles at once is unfair and a strain on the system, but no one else seems bothered so I guess I'll just watch the stack of cards fall. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm glad to see that you are already engaged in actual discussion about this, over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#RuPaul's_Drag_Race_franchise_episodes_and_notability. Editors like Woodensuperman, Reywas92, MikeAllen, and Gonnym aren't out to get you. They are hard-working contributors who are focused on quality rather than quantity. They are listening and responding to your concerns, while adhering to our notability guidelines. Work with them to reach a consensus that is in line with our P&G. Owen× ☎ 14:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, but I am also a hard-working contributor who understands notability criteria and wants to see a path forward that's not AFD AFD AFD AFD AFD. It does feel like select editors are out to get me, but I'm trying to understand and propose a constructive way to continue this work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Excellent! I fully support your work on a constructive way forward. Ignore the AfDs for now. Almost anything deleted or redirected can be restored, if there's consensus to do so. Owen× ☎ 15:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't plan on revisiting the AfD discussions. I find those totally unnecessary and distracting from the real conversations that should be had. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- @OwenX - As the discussions seem to be heading in the right direction, in your role as admin, are you able to close the nominations I made today as withdrawn pending outcome of discussion, which looks to be heading down the draftifying route anyway. Obviously if they've had input from anyone else, they will need to stay open. --woodensuperman 15:24, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Acknowledging the ping. As productive discussion appears to be in progress, I don't see any need for my further involvement here and I have nothing to add to the comment I left yesterday. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Woodensuperman: If you are the nominator, and no Delete views were entered, you are allowed to close your own AfD as withdrawn, per WP:NACD and WP:SK. Let me know if you need any help with that. Owen× ☎ 15:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, didn't realise that, done! --woodensuperman 15:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Woodensuperman Are you willing to withdraw Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hun Makeover and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Me Out!, too, for now, since no one else has weighed in yet? I trying to cut down the number of side discussions. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:14, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, didn't realise that, done! --woodensuperman 15:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Excellent! I fully support your work on a constructive way forward. Ignore the AfDs for now. Almost anything deleted or redirected can be restored, if there's consensus to do so. Owen× ☎ 15:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, but I am also a hard-working contributor who understands notability criteria and wants to see a path forward that's not AFD AFD AFD AFD AFD. It does feel like select editors are out to get me, but I'm trying to understand and propose a constructive way to continue this work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm glad to see that you are already engaged in actual discussion about this, over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#RuPaul's_Drag_Race_franchise_episodes_and_notability. Editors like Woodensuperman, Reywas92, MikeAllen, and Gonnym aren't out to get you. They are hard-working contributors who are focused on quality rather than quantity. They are listening and responding to your concerns, while adhering to our notability guidelines. Work with them to reach a consensus that is in line with our P&G. Owen× ☎ 14:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- @OwenX I've not refused to engage. I've begged to have a measured discussion about this, but instead I just log in to deletion notification after deletion notification by the dozens. Some of these articles have already survived AfD multiple times. I would love to have an actual discussion about this, but I do not feel like that's being reciprocated. I think nominating dozens of articles at once is unfair and a strain on the system, but no one else seems bothered so I guess I'll just watch the stack of cards fall. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
@Ad Orientem, Gonnym, Liz, and OwenX: I took it upon myself to move all of the RPDR articles to the draft space. I then started working to improve entries, and I've already been successful in having multiple drafts accepted at Articles for Creation. The drafts have been accepted by different editors, so clearly there are others who think these entries have value. I am doing exactly what was asked of me, yet I'm still logging in to notification after notification of redirecting and tagging for deletion (including this article, which was recently accepted and has already survived a deletion discussion). This feels overly aggressive and unnecessary. It is so obvious to me that there are many notable episodes of the show, but one editor is going out of their way to make sure I make no progress in this area of the project. Please help. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Great to see all the good work you're doing, Another Believer!
- In a collaborative project, contributors will always differ in their views. There is nothing "aggressive" in tagging or nominating a page someone believes doesn't belong here. In the end, it's the community, not any individual, who decide on the fate of the page. Don't get distracted or discouraged by such actions. Work with the AfC reviewers who accepted your draft, as well as with those tagging or nominating the articles you wrote. Remember, they aren't targeting you; they're trying to improve the encyclopedia, just like you are.
- Also, don't focus on just one topic. I'm sure there are many articles that can benefit from your attention. Don't turn yourself into a single-purpose editor. Owen× ☎ 17:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you're feeling targeted. That isn't my intention. The other articles that have been recreated and submitted through AfC seem to have something exceptional about them, they've won awards, etc., and I would suggest an award winning episode should usually meet any notability issues. But I'm just not seeing it with this one. There is nothing remarkable about this episode, in fact, looking at the reviews, it seems it might be a bit mediocre. WP:NEPISODE sets a pretty high bar for individual episodes. To use an example for scripted television, look at how few Friends episodes meet this standard. All I'm seeing here is WP:ROUTINE coverage, nothing that sets it apart, which is why I think we need to have the discussion. As Owen says, the community will decide, not simply me or you. --woodensuperman 17:34, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- So, I can move the articles about episodes that have won awards back into the main space? ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Again, not for me to decide, probably best to continue the path agreed at with other editors at the TV project, and submit to AfC. But my personal view is that award winning episodes are likely to be notable. --woodensuperman 17:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, sure. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you would stop making me feel like no matter what I do is wrong. I am trying to do good work here and there are other editors who see value in my efforts. I've expressed how your actions are making me feel and you continue to lean in hard. Please let me continue to work in peace. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Equally there are other editors who are also finding a lot of the Drag Race articles aren't notable. It's a collaborative project so "letting you work in peace" isn't in the spirit of things when other editors outside of the Drag Race project are disagreeing with you. Maybe you should consider a wikibreak if you are feeling like this. --woodensuperman 17:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- lol ok ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Equally there are other editors who are also finding a lot of the Drag Race articles aren't notable. It's a collaborative project so "letting you work in peace" isn't in the spirit of things when other editors outside of the Drag Race project are disagreeing with you. Maybe you should consider a wikibreak if you are feeling like this. --woodensuperman 17:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, sure. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you would stop making me feel like no matter what I do is wrong. I am trying to do good work here and there are other editors who see value in my efforts. I've expressed how your actions are making me feel and you continue to lean in hard. Please let me continue to work in peace. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Again, not for me to decide, probably best to continue the path agreed at with other editors at the TV project, and submit to AfC. But my personal view is that award winning episodes are likely to be notable. --woodensuperman 17:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- So, I can move the articles about episodes that have won awards back into the main space? ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Emptying out Categories
Hello, Another Believer,
I was just wondering, why did you empty out all of the season categories in Category:RuPaul's Drag Race episodes? I haven't read the collapsed message above this one but I will do so after I post this. I wish you wouldn't collapse discussions though as it makes them difficult to read. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Liz Some editors at WikiProject Television insisted that essentially none of the Drag Race episodes are notable. I strongly disagree but felt I had no choice but to move all of the articles to the draft space. If I hadn't, someone else would have. I think the entire thing is completely unnecessary and uncalled for, but my requests to keep content in the main space fell on deaf ears. I know many of the episodes are notable, but I'm not going to argue with editors about it, so I'll get back to building content. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also, I collapsed the above discussion in an attempt to move on. If you want the fuller picture, you'd need to review this page history to see the many AfD notifications, my requests to be left alone, and other discussions I've removed (again, I'm trying to move on and get back to work). Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:15, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Liz: Update: Approximately 40 entries have been restored, and now we are starting to restore the subcategories, too. None of this was necessary, but happy to see lots of progress in a short period of time! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:RJ Skillets
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 Hello, Another Believer. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "RJ Skillets". Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 22 November 2025 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Oh. My. Gaga! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)- @SafariScribe: Thank you so much! I'm on a mission to prove there are many notable episodes of Drag Race. "With gratitude" (yes, that's a Drag Race reference!) :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Anniversary Another Believer 🎉
Hey @Another Believer. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 18 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 14:37, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Gnoeee: Thank you! I love this project and think it's needed now more than ever. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 22
Extended content |
|---|
|
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on November 7. Please help translate.
Upcoming and current events and conversations 
Annual Goals Progress on Infrastructure
Annual Goals Progress on Volunteer Support
Annual Goals Progress on Effectiveness
Board and Board committee updates
Foundation statements
Other Movement curated newsletters & news Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. Let askcac
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Squirrel Games has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2025 (UTC)- @Robert McClenon Thank you so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:04, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
 |
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your constant hard work on creating, saving, improving and expanding LGBTQ+ related articles! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:30, 26 November 2025 (UTC) |
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives Wow, thank you so much! I appreciate your kind words. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
What's better than a barnstar? A turkey! Or maybe the barnstar is better. Anyway...
 |
Bri has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! ☆ Bri (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
|
DaniloDaysOfOurLives has given you a turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Shadow of a Man (song)
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Shadow of a Man (song) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 03:40, 27 November 2025 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978 Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:28, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Trump: The Rusical has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2025 (UTC)- @TheInevitables Thank you so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- No worries :) TheInevitables (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- @TheInevitables Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has a few more drafts for review, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- No worries :) TheInevitables (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
Extended content | |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 1 December 2025
- News and notes: Election cycles come and go, and Wikimedia Foundation achieves record revenue in 2024–2025!
Admin and ArbCom elections upcoming, BoT elects two new members, task force advises to close Wikinews and keep Wikispore, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- In the media: Wales walk-off, antisemitism, supernatural powers, feminism turmoil, saints, and sex
Plus mammoth mummy sex-change operation completed!
- Recent research: At least 80 million inconsistent facts on Wikipedia – can AI help find them?
And other recent publications about contradictions and retractions.
- Disinformation report: Epstein email exchanges planned strategy, edits and reported progress
At work on Wikipedia whitewashing. How much should they be paid?
- Traffic report: It's a family affair
Even in these times there is something to be thankful for!
- Book review: The Seven Rules of Trust
Jimmy Wales and Dan Gardner write a book inspired by Wikipedia. What's in it?
- From the archives: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein ..."
The twists and turns of Epstein’s portrayal on Wikipedia.
- Humour: An interview with Wikipe-tan
A conversation about being the mascot of Wikipedia.
- Opinion: AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles
Using ChatGPT to fact-check a month's worth of Today's featured articles.
- Serendipity: Highlights from the itWikiCon 2025
A recap of the latest convention of the Italian Wiki-community, held in Catania from 7–9 November.
- Comix: Madness
It could happen to anyone.
Nomination of Pixie Polite for deletion
Extended content |
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixie Polite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Problems with A+F
Hi there, Another Believer, and thanks for all your support in this area. I have mentioned this on the WiR talk page and on Talk:Art+Feminism. You might be able to help in contacting those responsible for the project and inviting them to react. In particular, it would be useful to find the Wikipedia user names of Nina Yeboah, Bisagna Suh and Miranda Pratt. In my opinion, whatever the current politics they are facing, they deserve our support.--Ipigott (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Another Believer: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Thanks so much, and happy holidays to you as well! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: PharmaRusical (RuPaul's Drag Race episode) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)- @Monkeysmashingkeyboards Thank you so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 07:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Monkeysmashingkeyboards @Liz: Sorry to see the article has already been nominated for deletion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Monkeysmashingkeyboards Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to and end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Monkeysmashingkeyboards @Liz: Sorry to see the article has already been nominated for deletion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
Nomination of PharmaRusical (RuPaul's Drag Race episode) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PharmaRusical (RuPaul's Drag Race episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC) |
- @Monkeysmashingkeyboards: Would you be interested in weighing in at AfD? ---Another Believer (Talk) 08:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Born Naked (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)- @TheInevitables Thanks so much! I am pleased to see more Drag Race episode articles accepted to the main space. ---Another Believer (Talk) 08:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Snatch Game: The Rusical has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
– Meena • 12:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)- @Meena Thank you so much! I am pleased to see another Drag Race episode article accepted to the main space. ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! – Meena • 12:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Meena Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! – Meena • 12:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm That Bitch (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
– Meena • 12:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)- @Meena Fantastic -- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 10s Across the Board has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
– Meena • 12:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you! Happy to be making good progress in my effort to get Drag Race episode articles back into the main space. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Divine Inspiration (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)- @TheInevitables Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 06:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter
Extended content | |
|---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2025
Extended content |
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikimedia New York City has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
--Warm Regards,Abhiiriya • [@píng mє] 14:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)- @Cptabhiiriya Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Satín Greco
Cariño! Ya tenemos el artículo de es:Satín Greco listo para ser traducido. :* MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- @MiguelAlanCS Gracias! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Stub at Satín Greco. Feel free to help expand! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2025
Extended content | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 23
Extended content |
|---|
|
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on November 21. This will be the final bulletin for 2025 and we'll be back in late January 2026 with the next issue. Please help translate.
 Upcoming and current events and conversations
Annual Goals Progress on Infrastructure
Annual Goals Progress on Volunteer Support
Annual Goals Progress on Effectiveness
Board and Board committee updates
Foundation statements
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. Let askcac
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pork Chop has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
mwwv converse∫edits 12:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)- @Mwwv Thank you so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Mwwv Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Condragulations (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:57, 12 December 2025 (UTC)- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Phenomenon (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:46, 13 December 2025 (UTC)- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm travelling until the end of the week and don't have much time, but thank you for letting me know! Happy New Year! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:24, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I've given this guy an outline article (he already had articles in German, Italian, French, and Spanish!) but he seems to have done quite a bit of work in (or at least for) the US so I thought you might be interested. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:33, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rate-A-Queen has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
JSFarman (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2025 (UTC)- Thanks so much, and happy holidays! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:51, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- The episode meets notability! Thanks for writing the article and happy holidays to you too. I am very glad to see this year come to a close, althogh I think I have said that every year since 2016. Still! We persevere. JSFarman (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gettin' Lucky (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:14, 15 December 2025 (UTC)- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:18, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitch, I'm a Drag Queen! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ross Mathews vs. The Ducks has a new comment
Resolved- Thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Glamazonian Airways has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)- @Hurricane Wind and Fire Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Mathews vs. The Ducks has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 16:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)- @HwyNerd Mike Thanks so much! Happy editing, ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2025
- Interview: Part 1: Bernadette Meehan
Say hello to the new WMF CEO.
- News and notes: We're gonna have a party!
And a new WMF CEO!
- In the media: The "bigg" bosses: Robertsky and the Pope
Pay up, big guys!
- Traffic report: Death and stranger things
And going for the FIFA prize!
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
Something old and something new!
- Obituary: Michal Lewi (Iwelam) and Alan R. King (A R King)
Rest in peace.
- Concept: List of xxtreme sports (redirected from Electrojousting)
You are viewing an old revision of this page, as edited on 2065-11-10 04:33:10.
- Comix: display: flex-inline;
ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown – Reunited has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)- @Ktkvtsh Thank so much! Happy holidays and happy editing, --Another Believer (Talk) 18:50, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Same to you Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ktkvtsh Category:Drafts about LGBTQ topics has several similar drafts submitted at AfC, if you're interested in taking a look as 2025 comes to an end. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Same to you Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: An Extra Special Episode has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wicked Wiz of Oz: The Rusical! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Htanaungg (talk) 08:49, 20 December 2025 (UTC)- @Htanaungg Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Drag Queens Got Talent – Part 2 has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Htanaungg (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2025 (UTC)- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
- Thank you and Happy Holidays! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tap That App has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
GTrang (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Whatcha Unpackin? has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: ShakesQueer has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)- @TheInevitables Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2025)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unauthorized Rusical (December 22)
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of these sources are WP:ROUTINE, except for the WP:SCREENRANT source. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Your draft article, Draft:Peacock (bar)
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peacock". Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC) |
"Rebel Ridge (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Rebel Ridge (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 23 § Rebel Ridge (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Disco-mentary has a new comment
Resolved- @Kovcszaln6 Done Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:06, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Disco-mentary has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:39, 24 December 2025 (UTC)- @Kovcszaln6 Thanks again and happy holidays! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
 |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026! |
|
Hello Another Believer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you and happy holidays! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
"Percentage (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Percentage (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Percentage (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Fat Man Little Boy" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Fat Man Little Boy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Fat Man Little Boy until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"One Night Love" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect One Night Love has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § One Night Love until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"A Life in Men" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect A Life in Men has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § A Life in Men until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Historia de un Crimen" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Historia de un Crimen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Historia de un Crimen until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Figured I'd ask...
Any chance I could convince you to {{Db-g7}} tag (or at least find alternative targets for) some of the incoming redirects you created to point towards List of Netflix original programming? See for a bit of a list. (Otherwise, you may be seeing some more of these notifications coming soon...) Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Justice Served" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Justice Served has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Justice Served until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:09, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Project Interiors" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Project Interiors has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Project Interiors until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Sunshine Scouts" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Sunshine Scouts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Sunshine Scouts until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Viva La Madness" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Viva La Madness has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Viva La Madness until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
"Queer Eye: Brazil" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Queer Eye: Brazil has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 24 § Queer Eye: Brazil until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bag Ball has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
* Pppery * it has begun... 01:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)- @Pppery Thank you and happy holidays! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Keeping It 100! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
* Pppery * it has begun... 01:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hello, Kitty Girls! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)- @TheInevitables Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:38, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Catrina: La Santa Muerte" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Catrina: La Santa Muerte has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Catrina: La Santa Muerte until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Dark Web (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Dark Web (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Dark Web (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Crocodile (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Crocodile (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Crocodile (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Heaven's Forest" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Heaven's Forest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Heaven's Forest until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"A Chorus Line (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect A Chorus Line (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § A Chorus Line (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Pick & Sepulveda" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Pick & Sepulveda has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Pick & Sepulveda until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
The redirect Billy and the Minpins (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Billy and the Minpins (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Esio Trot (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Esio Trot (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Esio Trot (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
"Henry Sugar (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Henry Sugar (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 26 § Henry Sugar (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - January 2026
Extended content | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wigloose: The Rusical! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nighfidelity (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2025 (UTC)- @Nighfidelity Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:57, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2026)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Unauthorized Rusical has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)- @Ktkvtsh Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Patrick Starrr for deletion
Extended content |
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Starrr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Obviously notable... ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:14, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Moulin Ru: The Rusical has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)- @Quxyz Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- My pleasure Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:55, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Squirrel Games
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Squirrel Games at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 06:59, 30 December 2025 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978 Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Resolved
A tag has been placed on Category:Grammy Award for Best Contemporary R&B Album indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:56, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Liz Hmm, seems to be repopulated. Not sure what's going on but thanks for the heads up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:53, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Belated Wiki Anniversary Wishes 🎉
Dear Another Believer,
Your wiki anniversary was 14 days ago, marking 15 years (as per SUL) of dedicated service! I wanted to extend a heartfelt thanks for your amazing contributions. With over 955,781 edits, your dedication is an inspiration to the community. Wishing you all the best for the year ahead!
Use this Tool to send wiki anniversary wishes to other amazing Wikimedians.
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:09, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Oh. My. Gaga!
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Oh. My. Gaga! at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 05:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Monopulence! has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ca talk to me! 13:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)- @Ca Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: You Don't Know Me (RuPaul's Drag Race) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ca talk to me! 13:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Possibly a soggy snowman, but still good wishes
Happy New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
☆ Bri (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Bri Thanks and Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:30, 31 December 2025 (UTC)