User talk:AllWeKnowOfHeaven/Archive 1

Archive 1

DYK for First Lady Bake-Off

On 4 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article First Lady Bake-Off, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the First Lady Bake-Off was inspired by a political gaffe by Hillary Clinton and predicted five out of seven elections? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/First Lady Bake-Off. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, First Lady Bake-Off), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Cactus fries

On 7 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cactus fries, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that cactus fries taste similar to onion rings and asparagus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cactus fries. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cactus fries), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Barbecue in South Carolina

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Barbecue in South Carolina, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Lemon pepper wings

On 15 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lemon pepper wings, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that basketball player Lou Williams was nicknamed "Lemon Pepper Lou" after an incident involving lemon pepper wings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lemon pepper wings. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lemon pepper wings), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thank you for creating Grape hull pie! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!

I create lots of entries about restaurants (sometimes with resistance), so your work on food-related entries pops up in my watchlist now and then. Just wanted to say thanks for working to create and improve so many articles related to food and drink. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Thanks man! You're doing a lot of great work too covering restaurants. That's an important part of local and cultural history even though most people don't think of it that way. Communities are built around foodways. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 15:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Agree. I wish more editors saw restaurant entries as covering culture and history, not just companies. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. Thank you for your work on Dukes Bar-B-Que. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

I'm thrilled to share the exciting news that your article has met all of Wikipedia's guidelines! After a careful review, I'm happy to say that it's good to go. Great job! Wishing you and your family an absolutely fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, that's awesome! I hope you have a fantastic day as well! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Barbecue bologna

On 3 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barbecue bologna, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oklahoma tenderloin is baloney? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barbecue bologna. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Barbecue bologna), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. Thank you for your work on Southside Market & Barbeque. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 00:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Chicago-style barbecue

On 9 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicago-style barbecue, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chicago-style barbecue is cooked in an aquarium smoker? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicago-style barbecue. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chicago-style barbecue), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) 00:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southside Market & Barbeque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elgin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

"Fish ribs" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fish ribs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29 § Fish ribs until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:American Deli

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Deli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jar jow

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jar jow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jar jow

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jar jow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AllWeKnowOfHeaven. Thank you for your work on Garry Kennebrew. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a very blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AllWeKnowOfHeaven. Thank you for your work on Jar jow. Another editor, JSFarman, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 06:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Fried macaroni

Hello AllWeKnowOfHeaven, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Fried macaroni, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fried macaroni.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black's Barbecue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockhart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Burger Continental

On 11 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Burger Continental, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Burger Continental served dishes like "Chicken Erotica" to jurors in high-profile cases, including the trials of O. J. Simpson and the Menendez brothers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burger Continental. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Burger Continental), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Sennecaster (Chat) 00:03, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Assitance, mentorship and guildiance needed on contributing to wikipedia

Please i have some literate books which i have read and were very helpful can i contribute more of them? and can i be guilded by you in other not to violate any rules. @AllWeKnowOfHeaven and i dont know if literatures books and authors aren't accepted on wikipedia because the jeanne bender was actually tagged for deletion can you guilde? Emilydaniel (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

@Emilydaniel: Looks like your page was nominated for deletion because they don't think the page is notable and you didn't mention that you were paid to make it. Just follow the guidance that people are giving you on your talk page and the deletion nomination. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 18:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I will Emilydaniel (talk) 19:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Xx network

Hi can you please tell me which sources I should remove or change. Which one you think are not reliable in the context in which they are referenced?

1- Talk: Anonymity in practice: Xx network, 12-1pm EDT 10/4 online
2- https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/008.pdf
3- What is cMix? Is it Different from cMix? (15 September 2023)
4- Polkadot (DOT): Definition, History, and How It Works
5- The quantum future is coming and David Chaum’s xx network is ready for it — Inside Quantum Technology (June 2022)
6- David Chaum Says His New Cryptocurrency Is Quantum Computer Resistant — Cointelegraph (2019-08-21)
7- Chaum, David; Larangeira, Mario; Yaksetig, Mario; Carter, William (2021), W-OTS(+) up my Sleeve! A Hidden Secure Fallback for Cryptocurrency Wallets, 2021/872
8- Sleeve Wallet Generation Tool — xx Network Docs (learn.xx.network)
9- Chaum, David; Cardoso, Bernardo; Carter, William; Yaksetig, Mario; Aroso, Baltasar (2023), Phoenixx: Linear consensus with random sampling, 2023/1262
10- Yin, Maofan; Malkhi, Dahlia; Reiter, Michael K.; Gueta, Guy Golan; Abraham, Ittai (2019-07-23), HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchain, arXiv:1803.05069
11- Team, The Diem (2021), DiemBFT v4: State Machine Replication in the Diem Blockchain
12- Xx Messenger — Apps on Google Play
13- Elixxir / Xx Messenger Android — GitLab
14- Todos los secretos que el cripto pionero David Chaum le reveló a Forbes
15- phoenixx.io
16- Proxxy — proxxy.xx.network
17- Proxxy — xx Network Docs
18- Haven — haven.xx.network
19- Elixxir / Haven — GitLab
20- Crypto forefather David Chaum issues new digital currency — The Block
21- Directory Jstrob (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Jstrob: Look for generally WP:reliable sources and remove ones that don't seem to match these guidelines. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Bluevine

Hey @AllWeKnowOfHeaven! Thanks for your help on formatting the Bluevine post–this is the first time I have worked on a post so it's helpful to understand the do's and don'ts. I think we got all the formatting right this time, so hopefully it will be published. Regardless, I appreciate your help! RobBV (talk) 20:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @RobBV: thanks for doing that! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

AFC reviewing

Hi there, and thanks for AFC reviewing! I'm here via Draft:On the Beginning of Human History, with a request that you please don't decline drafts for things like It's still much too detailed and could do with fewer subsections. This is an editorial opinion, and it doesn't have anything to do with whether the draft would be deleted at AFD or otherwise breaks important content policies, which is the AFC acceptance bar. We're not WP:GAN. We're just here to take the load off AFD and off CSD taggers. Thanks again for reviewing. :) -- asilvering (talk) 18:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

@Asilvering: That was my mistake, I'll focus more on cut-and-dry policy issues instead of editorial quibbles. Thanks for the reminder! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Aluma Restaurant (Jerusalem)

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my article.

I have removed promotional wording and replaced it with neutral wording.

I appreciate your help with the article. Orlando Davis (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

@Orlando Davis: Thanks, I'm taking a look at the article now. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:RentalReady

Hey, just wondering what exactly was wrong with the sources? Not contesting the decision, I can’t figure out which of the guidelines I’m violating? --DollarStoreBa'al^Converse 12:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @DollarStoreBaal44: WP:NCORP explains the guidelines for company pages and sources. If you can add better sources, then do that and resubmit the draft so it can be reviewed again. Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft review - Roman Foltyn (Oscar winner)

Hello. Recently you declined my draft of the article of the person Roman Foltyn, who has received an oscar for his contribution to the Trinity 2 system. I was wondering, if you can tell me your reasons, so i can improve the article. Thanks a lot! Lauramaris (talk) 10:15, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Lauramaris: absolutely. My main concern was that most of the sources are not reliable or independent, and the tone of the page is promotional. All of these issues can be fixed by adding better references and editing the page before resubmitting. Thanks for contributing! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the fast answer! I deleted some of the references such as to ARRI (company page). I also changed the wording from "which was the first" (might be promotional?) to a more neutral version. Since I believe the list of films in which the system was used is your reference to promotional, I deleted this part as well. Since I can find no more reliable source than the oscar site itself and their youtube and press channel, I hope these will be amongst the other press artcles be enough. Can you please have a look at it again? Or do I have to go through another process with another person from here on? Thx :) Lauramaris (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@Lauramaris: Thanks for the work on the draft, but the sources don't meet WP:GNG. Receiving an Oscar will help with notability but may not be enough on its own. If you can continue to improve the draft, you can resubmit it so that another reviewer can assess it. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft review - Agentforce

Hi there! You reviewed my initial submission of Draft:Agentforce, which was recently declined a second time.

I was hoping you would be willing to review the page and provide some feedback on the current draft, because I believe it reflects reliable, significant coverage of a notable subject (one that has the potentially to be particularly disruptive, and not necessarily in a good way), based on the citations provided and the page's contents.

The second reviewer also noted the page read as advertorial, which was obviously not my intent (and you also did not note) - just to allay any concerns, I have also edited down some of the page's descriptive language.

This is my first time submitting a page, so any feedback is helpful. Thank you - appreciate your time and contributions to the project! 12EnergyPizzas (talk) 22:41, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @12EnergyPizzas: Thanks for editing the page after the second reviewer's feedback. I think their feedback for you was fair. I didn't tag every issue, just the one that I thought was most important (notability) and they also might notice things that I miss. After reviewing the references in the article, I'm still not sure that it is notable. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Appreciate the response and feedback. I would argue the subject is independently notable - there are other uncited articles I believe meet those standards, like this one - as a piece of technology. I also think last week's news of its deployment within federal operations, which was covered by Axios and Gizmodo (among others) further support that notion - both because of how it is being used, and the potential impacts (and those we've already seen) it has on workforces and productivity as a result of its advancements. 12EnergyPizzas (talk) 21:14, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

The most important guidelines re: companies are WP:NCORP and WP:GNG, I'm not sure the sources meet that. The potential impacts of something aren't something that Wikipedia can predict, so it can't help with notability. A different reviewer rejected the draft again for similar reasons. I left a note on your talk page about how to disclose a conflict of interest if you have one. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I wanted to have a discussion to get clarification, as I had read the relevant guidelines before considering a topic for my first attempt at writing an article from scratch, and disagreed with the conclusions. To clarify my last comment, I think the potential impacts of any unsecured AI technology within the federal government (ICE, for example) are incredibly problematic.

We disagree on the notability of the topic - that's fine, but immediately jumping to the conclusion I'm some agent, pun intended, for Agentforce is absurd.

That being said, I do appreciate the discussion, and thank you again for explaining your thought process behind the rejection. 12EnergyPizzas (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Congratulations on the High Density Calorie Award!

	The High Density Calorie Award for finding gaps in our shelf stable food knowledge
	I bestow upon you the High Density Calorie Award for finding gaps in our shelf stable food knowledge by creating the Bar (food) page! Its hard to find structural gaps on Wikipedia, but sometimes you do -- and you filled it with the densest, most shelf stable possible calories! Keep up the great work! Sadads (talk) 16:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

@Sadads: Thank you! I was honestly surprised to see that it didn't exist already. It's rare to get a chance to create a "foundational" page. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi AllWeKnowOfHeaven, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Sohom (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

the draft your reviewed

Hi! I saw your review for the draft I submitted. You wrote that it has promotional tone. It is not the issue discussed on the talk page and I believe there is nothing promotional in the article, no exaggerated or controversial claims. Draft:Winston Weinberg There are also no promotional paid sources used, but only reputable legacy media.

Would you please point out what is advertising there to I could address it? Thanks in advance! WestwoodHights573 (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @WestwoodHights573: the overall page feels resume-like and am not sure if it's notable. I'm more or less in agreement with the source assessment by @SmokeyJoe: and the results of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Weinberg which was just a few days ago. I'm leaning towards the idea that this page isn't suitable for Wikipedia. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @AllWeKnowOfHeaven! Thanks! Here is the source assessment we did with SmokeyJoe on his page, as we did not have it on the talk page of the article. We discussed there the sources that qualify for GNG. User talk:SmokeyJoe#draft The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston Weinberg was during the holidays, and did not include actual discussion about concrete points. That is why I recreated the draft, to make appropriate edits there, and find different sources, which I have been doing with the help of SmokeyJoe. WestwoodHights573 (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @WestwoodHights573: I don't know if the sources you found demonstrate notability for Winston Weinberg, they're mostly about Harvey. It seems like SmokeyJoe didn't exactly see eye-to-eye with you on them being sufficient either. I appreciate you taking the time to work on this and find all this stuff, I just don't think it's enough. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

ChromaWay

Thanks AllWeKnowOfHeaven for your review of Draft:ChromaWay. I always try to keep my Wikipedia writing fully neutral and verifiable, but I may be missing something here. Could I ask you to point to a specific sentence or section that you felt came across as promotional, so I can address it directly? Many thanks! /Urbourbo (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Urbourbo: the whole page seems to focus on the company's financials, innovations, offerings, and how great it is. An encyclopedia article is usually a bit more sober and is only going to include really relevant and well referenced information. It shouldn't seem like a press release. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking your time to explain. I've now made another attempt to clean up the language. Best, /Urbourbo (talk) 11:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Top AfC Editor

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@Ozzie10aaaa: Woah,, very nice! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Draft:DropDesk rejection

Hello @AllWeKnowOfHeaven: @ChrysGalley:,

I am writing to ask for advice regarding the rejection of Draft:DropDesk.

I have been working with reviewers ChrysGalley and TheObsidianGriffon over the last week. ChrysGalley specifically requested that I remove promotional sources and fix the attribution of a Motley Fool analysis (which was incorrectly cited as Nasdaq). I performed all the edits.

I believe the issue while stripping down the article and removing sources, made the article and sources look far thinner than it is.

Could you clarify if these specific sources were deemed non-significant, or if the rejection was based on the reduced quantity of citations?

I would appreciate the opportunity to re-integrate some of the industry coverage (like Restaurant Dive, CBS Insights, Etc) if you believe it would help establish notability.

Thank you for your time. GrahamABeck (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

@GrahamABeck: I rejected the article because I didn't really see sources that were of the calibre required by WP:significant coverage. I did some searching on my own WP:BEFORE and figured that this isn't ready to meet notability guidelines yet. Adding the sources you removed wouldn't really help, the problem was they weren't the right kind of sources. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Chromia

Hi @AllWeKnowOfHeaven: Many thanks for taking your time to review Draft:Chromia (blockchain). With regards to your comment about reliable sources, were there any sources in particular that struck you as unreliable? I believe that practically all of them are written by independent journalists in reasonably large news outlets. Similarly, regarding your comment about advertising language, if you could point out any particular phrases that you feel would need to be reworked, that would be highly appreciated. All the best, /Urbourbo (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@Urbourbo: Most crypto news sites are considered unreliable for Wikipedia, so pretty much all of those and any primary sources connected to Chromia. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @AllWeKnowOfHeaven: I have now gone through the text again and made a number of edits to address your concerns, including reducing feature-oriented language and removing comparative phrasing. Some crypto-related and two interview sources remain, but I've made an effort to limit their usage to basic factual verification only. What do you think? If you have any further feedback before I resubmit, it would be highly appreciated. All the best, /Urbourbo (talk) 11:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

@Urbourbo: If it were me, I wouldn't approve the draft with the current sourcing and the way that it is written. It's still too promotional and not notable enough. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

@AllWeKnowOfHeaven: Thanks for sharing your assessment! I'll probably strip it down drastically then before resubmitting. Best, /Urbourbo (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

New page

I saw you just reviewed the page I made Draft:Skild AI and maid a note this submission appears to read more like an advertisement. Can you please help me understand what is promotional there? So I could address it.

Description is very short. Funding section is standard: size of funding and who are the investors. Then I made a section called "Technology", which is also very short and explains what is the project about. There is no promotional language. For example here:

Skild AI develops large-scale AI models intended to control and coordinate robotic systems without tailoring software to each specific robot type. The company refers to its core model as the “Skild Brain,” a general-purpose AI designed to operate across various robotic embodiments and environments. These models are trained using simulated data and human demonstration videos to accelerate learning and generalization across tasks and hardware. WindsorMaster47 (talk) 19:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

The page puts a focus on the company and its products goals, aims, and features. It feels more like information you'd see in an advertisement than what you'd see in an encyclopedia article. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I understand now. I fixed that. I also explained on my talk page how I know about this place. WindsorMaster47 (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

OK, you can resubmit the article. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I did! I made a reception section, added 2 sources for it and about governance. Feel free to take a look, make better edits or let someone else to review. I appreciate the feedback. WindsorMaster47 (talk) 20:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Power Integrations, Inc. Rejection

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Power Integrations, Inc.. I need more help on figuring out why the sources I used don't fit the requirements as in-depth, reliable, secondary and strictly independent.

More than half of the sources I cited are bylined articles from well-known industry publications. They focus on Power Integrations, but are not promotional, and not initiated by the company. In addition to those, the following sources are all from major news outlets. They feature Power Integrations as the main subject, but focus on the news and are balance in their reporting.

I need more guidance on how they are lacking so I can find more suitable sources. Thank you.

3. Reinhardt, Andy (1998-10-05). Gross, Neil (ed.). "A Cork for Leaky Electronics". BusinessWeek.

8. "Pulling the plug on standby power". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2025-12-16.

9. Landers, Jim (2001-08-22). "Bush war against `energy vampires' is tricky business". Chicago Tribune.

10. Wayner, Peter (2003-05-01). "How to Sidestep a Two-Pronged Vampire". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2021-05-05. Retrieved 2025-12-15.

11. "2 Executives Resign at Circuit Maker". The New York Times. 2006-05-06. Retrieved 2026-01-12.

23. Nellis, Stephen (2025-10-13). "Power Integrations joins work with Nvidia on power supply push". Reuters. Retrieved 2025-12-12.

24. Ballesteros, Angelica (2025-10-14). "Power Integrations (POWI) Jumps 24% on Nvidia Partnership". Yahoo Finance. Retrieved 2025-10-14.

25. Opdyke, Jeff (2001-06-27). "Power Integrations Discourages Flighty 'Momentum' Investors - WSJ". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2026-01-12.

~2026-77768-0 (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

This page Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) will help you to understand. You should also follow the other reviewer's advice and try to make sure it does not seem like an advertisement. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

AllWeKnowOfHeaven, I think another look may be needed. I've looked at "2 Executives Resign At Circuit Maker", "Power Integrations joins work with Nvidia on power supply push", and "Power Integrations Discourages Flighty 'Momentum' Investors", and all three look to me like significant coverage in independent reliable sources. If they still seem inadequate to you, could you please explain why? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 00:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mx. Granger: Well they seemed routine to me but I won't fight it if you think otherwise, I'm sure you know what you're doing. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern For Draft: Asap Semiconductor

Hi AllWeKnowOfHeaven, I wanted to ask what mistakes i'm doing with the citations for ASAP Semiconductor and can you guide me in getting this article live. I think ASAP Semiconductor is notable enough to be published on wikipedia. MHaroonAliKhan (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @MHaroonAliKhan: You aren't doing anything with how you've made the citations. It just doesn't seem like the company is notable and that's not something you can fix yourself. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nui xào bo

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nui xào bo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Request on 07:28:42, 18 February 2026 for assistance on AfC submission by Adambrami

• Adambrami (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Art of the Possible (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't understand why my references are not adequate? These are articles and reputable third party sources that are talking about Art of the Possible? What more do I need?

Adambrami (talk) 07:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

The references just need to be a little closer to WP:NCORP, if you can find some that'll help meet that. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I have the New Zealand Herald (NZ's only daily news paper) and a whole lot of trade magazines like NZ Business and NZ Management and NZ Marketing magazine. I am based in New Zealand, there and I don't have much more to pull from? ~2026-11041-65 (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I have the New Zealand Herald (NZ's only daily newspaper) and a whole lot of trade magazines like NZBusiness, NZ Management and NZ Marketing magazine. I am based in New Zealand, there and I don't have much more to pull from? Those are all independent publishers? Adambrami (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, that probably isn't enough. I can see your draft was rejected, so if you have further questions you should ask that reviewer for their thoughts. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bill Wong

Hello, AllWeKnowOfHeaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bill Wong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Script for good article

Hi! I just wanted to tell you that you can pass/hold/fail good article by using this script. Hope this helps! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 03:45, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

@Camilasdandelions: That does help, thank you! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:47, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Synami resubmission

Hello, and thank you for reviewing Draft:Synami and providing feedback. I have made the following changes based on your comments:

• Removed directory and database sources (G2, ZoomInfo, The Org)
• Removed all unsourced statistics and promotional language
• Added independent editorial sources including The Recursive (therecursive.com) and regional press coverage from MakFax and Marketing365.mk
• Shortened and neutralized the article to a factual stub format
• All remaining claims are now cited to secondary, independent sources

I have resubmitted the draft for review. If you have time, I would appreciate any further feedback.

Thank you. VirtualA (talk) 18:52, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @VirtualA: Thanks, I'll leave a note on the draft. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft review

Hello! I received a notification that you reviewed my draft and declined it, stating that it reads like an advertisement. It’s a very short article that includes a list of funding information and some basic history about the company.

Could you please be more precise about what exactly makes it sound like an advertisement? It also does not have any grandiose language and read as very basic and neutral. I also added sources that provide a lot of information about the technology. I'd appreciate your review.

Draft:Physical Intelligence Inc. Jarvis635 (talk) 02:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Jarvis635:, the funding information and product stuff is mostly what makes it seem like an ad. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@AllWeKnowOfHeaven I understand, but this is important information that is included about all other companies on Wikipedia. I made the article after taking a look at some examples. I explained history behind the company, then technology about what it does and added information about it's funding. It is very brief. I also removed the word "valuation" from the heading, so it looks like standard paragraph companies usually have. Can you take a look at tell me if it meets the standards now? Jarvis635 (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@Jarvis635: Sorry! Including a lot of information about funding rounds actually isn't supposed to be done, if you saw other pages like that then they weren't up to standards. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:42, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I also saw your comment that many of the sources are about funding rounds or investments. However, sources 1–6 are not about funding. Can you please review those? They provide detailed reporting on the company and its history. Sources 7–12 do mention different funding rounds, but they also discuss investors and include more general information about the company. While those later sources are more routine, the first six are not.

I also trimmed information about funding, it is very brief. This is a big company I used as an example - Anthropic#Funding Jarvis635 (talk) 03:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

That's a little better @Jarvis635: but I'll let someone else take the second review. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Can you then change the comment you left? @AllWeKnowOfHeaven You wrote that many sources are about funding announcements or investments, which isn’t very accurate because those are the last sources at the end of the article, connected to the funding paragraph. Jarvis635 (talk) 06:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@Jarvis635: Reviewer comments and past declines aren't really supposed to be tampered with. They'll be moved if the page is published but otherwise they should be left alone. You also shouldn't comment on your own draft, but you can use the talk page to discuss it. Don't worry, the next reviewer will look at the draft and all of the references, they won't just read my comment. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@AllWeKnowOfHeaven another reviewer named Jo hola posted on my talk page that I can create articles myself without posting a request to Articles for creation. Should I crate it here instead of the draft page? Wikipedia:How to create a page Jarvis635 (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Jarvis635: You can if you want to, but if you don't fix the issues there's a good chance it will be deleted after you create it. If you wait to fix all the issues and for it to be approved, you don't have to worry about that. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Got it! I addressed the issues you showed me to the best of my ability. Jarvis635 (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Crisol: Theater of Idols

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Crisol: Theater of Idols, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Davy Holden

Hi AllWeKnowOfHeaven,

Thanks for taking the time to review my draft page for "Davy Holden". This is my first time trying to create a Wikipedia page, so I am still trying to get the hang of it. I appreciate your feedback. I will review your comments and re-work the draft, taking your comments into account.

Regards,

Firbolgfan Firbolgfan (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Request on 00:26:00, 4 March 2026 for assistance on AfC submission by Darrelljon

• Darrelljon (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Death of Liz Barraza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. Thanks for reviewing the draft. I believe it may meet the requirements though? The only references about the event are reporting the event solely not in passing. They are all reliable news reports by established news organisations. A couple of them are also following up several years later.--Darrelljon (talk) 00:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Darrelljon (talk) 00:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

@Darrelljon: Most of them are local sources, so I fear this fails WP:GEOSCOPE. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 01:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Jim Carrey Clone Conspiracy

Hello and thank you for reviewing my recent draft of the Jim Carrey Clone Conspiracy. I created the page as so much misinformation is circulating on this topic right now, not just in fringe groups, but by popular media and celebrities. I think a wiki article on this will help with the truth in this discussion, but you are right about the short duration, so I will monitor the situation and if articles by reliable sources on it are still being published in a month from now, I will resubmit. Bugfingers (talk) 07:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bugfingers: Thanks, that seems like a good way to handle it! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 07:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Whole hog barbecue is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Whole hog barbecue is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Excellent, I will remember my pledge! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Whole hog barbecue has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Whole hog barbecue has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Whole hog barbecue has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Whole hog barbecue has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Yum yum sauce

On 5 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yum yum sauce, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that yum yum sauce is sometimes called "white sauce" or "shrimp sauce", although it is neither white nor contains shrimp? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yum yum sauce. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yum yum sauce), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:35, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Request on 02:37:10, 6 March 2026 for assistance on AfC submission by TheIshikawa

• TheIshikawa (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:John O'Donnell (anime industry executive) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm a bit confused as to the message that this was not adequately sourced. This individual is on par with other industry folks that are currently published, such as Gen Fukunaga or John Ledford and I sourced information with links on the relevant details; he was also interviewed extensively on the Anime Business YouTube series, which I used to verify many details and also provided as a source link. The subject's business Central Park Media is also already an article.

Anything that you feel that I should look to add, I most certainly can do, but I am surprised to see this rejected when the articles about the other two industry veterans are much more weakly sourced. (I was planning to work on updates to them as well.)

I am working on an industry history book, but as that is not yet published, I can't use that as source material.

Thank you for your assistance.

TheIshikawa (talk) 02:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

@TheIshikawa: I declined the draft because it doesn't show that WP:GNG is met through significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Sometimes older Wikipedia articles are poor quality or don't have good sources, but this doesn't mean that articles can be substandard (that's what WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is about). The other articles should probably be either improved or deleted if there aren't better sources. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I rewrote this looking for better sources that should be more reliable and made some other tweaks in order to improve the flow. Please let me know if this better satisfies your concern. I agree that some of these other articles need work, and once I get this to a point where you can be satisfied with it, I can look at some of those others to improve in the same manner. Thank you. TheIshikawa (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @TheIshikawa: the sourcing is better and I'll see if there's anything I can do myself to improve the draft. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I will look at any changes that you might make so that I can learn from it for future work. I also updated the other AfC that was declined (Robert Place Napton) in the same manner for your review. TheIshikawa (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Knut Eirik Dahl

@AllWeKnowOfHeaven

Thank you for taking the time to review this draft. I completely understand the need for high-quality sourcing to establish notability. I’m hoping to clarify the nature of a few specific sources used in the draft that focus directly on the subject.

While they come from the financial trade press rather than consumer newspapers, these are independent, secondary, and highly reliable journalistic outlets, not primary corporate announcements:

- Financial News London (Ref 10 - "Spencer House recruits funds specialist from JP Morgan"): Financial News is owned by Dow Jones (the publisher of The Wall Street Journal). It is a major, independent journalistic organization with strict editorial standards. This article is not a primary press release; it involves analysis of the context and reasoning behind Dahl’s move and his specific background in the funds sector.

- PAM Insight (Ref 9 - "Lord Rothschild-backed asset management M&A boutique recruits new partner"): PAM (Private Asset Managers) Insight is a well-established, independent B2B publisher for the global wealth management sector. The journalist here provides secondary analysis by framing Dahl's hire within the broader context of a Rothschild-backed boutique pulling senior talent from JP Morgan. It is not simply repeating a press release either; instead it provides a background and reasoning for the move and a brief history of why it happened.

- Hedge Nordic (Ref 8 - "Bear Stearns hires Knut Dahl...") & Hedgeweek / Institutional Asset Manager (Refs 3 & 11): These are established, independent trade publications with dedicated editorial teams. They are strongly considered reliable within the financial sector because they write for an audience of institutional professionals who require factual accuracy; they might not be standard consumer news, but they are highly valued within the community. They act as secondary sources by curating, fact-checking, and contextualising personnel moves within financial services.

Because these articles are written by independent journalists applying their own editorial oversight and industry context to the subject, I believe they meet the criteria for reliable, independent, secondary sources.

I’d be grateful to hear your thoughts on this, or if you have advice on what else might be needed to cross the threshold for significant coverage. Thanks again for your time! Befektetésibankitörténelem (talk) 21:16, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

As a further note, I have been told that sources appear somewhat routine. The sources given do not simply discuss every job move in their sectors - there are far too many. Some might say that the sources do look fairly routine, but the fact that they exist in such a big sector speaks volumes on notability. They discuss it because it is notable that a firm with a very strong reputation has gone out to poach an individual with a strong skillset, who now actually leads that firm. They also go further than simply repeating a press release by providing analysis and context.

It is hard to find a large number of articles on an individual who has clearly become rather private since taking this position. What is not quiet, however, is the business itself: it has advised on a number of extremely well-known details while under Dahl's guidance. That is why I am writing this article - I strongly believe that the Managing Partner of a firm that is extremely active in very notable deals (as evidenced in the career section by the sheer number of deals of firms with their own pages) is notable. Taken as separate pieces, the sources might seem weak. But taken with all the other aspects, it paints the picture of someone leading a very influential company. Befektetésibankitörténelem (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@Befektetésibankitörténelem: Thanks for explaining all of this. The sources still look more like it is considered routine coverage when people talk about WP:ROUTINE. Even if every job change isn't mentioned in listings like this, the listings themselves aren't considered noteworthy. The financial trade publications might be reliable, but they're too niche to show that this person is broadly notable. Looking at the draft, it doesn't seem to be notable yet. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I understand your point about being broadly notable, but, for example, 90% of mathematics wikipedia pages are not "broadly notable". They are notable to a specific group, and that is why they exist. I am a mathematical physicist and I find wikipedia articles for topics and fields that I never would have thought existed. But they exist because they are notable to the subset of people interested in them, even if that is not the wider public. If wikipedia was only for things considered notable to everyone, then there would not be very many articles at all. Befektetésibankitörténelem (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Befektetésibankitörténelem: Wikipedia has different standards of notability for mathematical concepts than it does for businesspeople and companies. When I review a draft, I compare it to the existing standards for that type of page. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Denodo: AFD Discussion

Hi @AllWeKnowOfHeaven You nominated my article Denodo for deletion based on it not having significan, independent reliable sources. I have responded on the deletion discussion with my comments on this, with links to some really strong, independent sources that have been used in the article that all show that the article meets WP:CORP. I also added in 2 more sources this morning that I found for strong, independent journalist publications.

Some of the other sources I have added are more press release or company related sources, however, I have added those as third-party sources, with plenty of reliable, independent sources to verify my claims.

Please relook at the sources in the article and reconsider your nomination.

Thanks so much! Van1985 (talk) 08:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:MelbourneIdentity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelbourneIdentity. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Giraffer (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Harry Akin

On 14 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harry Akin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John F. Kennedy asked fast-food entrepreneur Harry Akin to lead the desegregation of United States restaurants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Akin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harry Akin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Rejection of Draft: David Nasser inquiry

Hi! I saw my submit for approval for Draft: David Nasser was rejected. I was the one who edited and submitted it. I made my best attempts to cite with legitimate sources but I see that was the reason for the rejection. I am new to this, so would you mind shedding some light on where I went wrong? I would love to learn better and make sure I understand how to create a better draft. Thank you! DNOinfo (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @DNOinfo: I declined the draft because the sources you included don't show that the page meets Wikipedia's guidelines for notable people. It would improve the draft if you could find more sources that are sufficiently independent of the subject and that are reliable. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your response.

I would love to do this to make it more credible.

Are you able to guide me on which sources specifically were problematic? I believe there were at least 3-4 which were fully independent and reliable, and all the rest being independent. But I may be misunderstanding the guidelines, and so would love to specific guidance if possible. Thank you so much! DNOinfo (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@DNOinfo: Of course! Sources that interview or were written by the subject aren't independent, and neither are sources that were published by an organization he's affiliated with. Speakerpedia also isn't considered independent of the subject. Wikipedia:Notability explains all this. AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback. I have resubmitted after working through the Notability standards and guidelines and believe this submission is better. Appreciate you helping me through this on my first contribution! DNOinfo (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2026 (UTC)