Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews

MainUnansweredInstructionsDiscussionToolsArchiveProject This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation. Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here. Everyday life Space Invaders Infinity Gene I've listed this article for peer review because I think it has FA potential. I'm focusing on the quality of the prose but am open to feedback on all aspects to ensure the article has a good chance at FAC. Thanks, (Guyinblack25 talk 02:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)) Engineering and technology Knowledge cutoff I've listed this article for peer review because a couple of months ago, I GAed the article, but it has failed for obvious reasons. Since then, I kind of gave up on the article for a while. However, I have since gained for experience, and I have realized the sources should not be from news, but instead from reputable sources like peer reviewed articles, or the TIME or IBM sources. However, other than the sources, there are other things that need to be improved but unfortunately I do not have enough experience to pinpoint what exactly we need to improve. My aim is a very solid/ middle B tier/ slightly below GA which only needs small polishing. This wiki topic is pretty important, so that is why I allocate my time into this work. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, 16dvnk (talk) 11:48, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Geography and places Foggy Bottom Just completed a full overhaul of this article and looking for feedback on general content, sourcing, structure, prose, etc. Aim to eventually get this up to GA status. Thanks, Wikipedian1234 (talk) 01:52, 13 May 2026 (UTC) History Columbine High School massacre Previous peer review I'm listing this article for peer review because I am looking to take it to GA status in the somewhat near future. I'm seeking to work out any major issues prior to that, and also make sure the article has GA potential to begin with. I've been slowly working on it over the past couple months, chopping any grammatical errors and original research, but at the same time would like some advice on how to improve it more. It's a very in depth article, and takes more than one set of eyes to find any issues. Thank you. Gavetheman555 (talk) 13:35, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Athanasius I Manasses The article concerns a senior Byzantine cleric whose life is poorly documented, but who became the first Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch able to reside in the city in the 12th-century. I have listed it for peer review because I am considering nominating it for FA status, and would be grateful for suggestions on how to improve its prose and comprehensiveness. Thanks, Borsoka (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Natural sciences and mathematics Urtica ferox I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hoping to bring this article to FAC, but would like to get some feedback first. Thanks, Alexeyevitch(talk) 03:01, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Diademed sifaka I have listed this article for peer review because I have substantially revamped it, and I would like to have input and assistance from others to ensure that it meets the standards that are expected for species articles, as this is my first time working on one. Prior to editing the article, hardly anything was cited and much of the writing was left over from when it was created in 2006. This needed addressing; for example, there is 20 years of incorrect information across many different websites that resulted from this article mistakenly assigning the name "ankomba joby" to the diademed sifaka, even though it refers to a different species. My initial goal was to find citations for the sentences that were already present. This turned into re-wording many of them to maintain an encyclopedic tone, and finally I began to add more content based on research articles I had found while in the process of finding sources. This has resulted in an article that is quite different from how it was when I found it. Thanks, Babacoote (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Social sciences and society HPV vaccination in Japan I've listed this article for peer review because... I've listed this article for peer review because I am planning to nominate it for Good Article status and would appreciate feedback on any remaining issues, particularly those related to the current AI cleanup tag. Thanks, 流山隆一 (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC) Robert Kenyon Robert Kenyon is a candidate (and one of two likely to succeed based on polling and analysis) in the 2026 Makerfield by-election. The by-election is a major event as it has implications on whom the next UK prime minister/s might be. Therefore, having good coverage of the candidate is in the interest of the public and Wikipedia readers. For now, I'd like to please ask specifically for feedback on how to improve the article to B-class standard. Thank you! 13tez (talk) 23:38, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Kai Newkirk I've listed this article for peer review because I just created it a couple of months ago and then I disappeared while it was deleted via PROD. This week I am working on making it B+ if possible. So I thought I would ask for peer review. Any thoughts or suggestions, even casual ones, would be appreciated. No ongoing edit wars or anything. Thanks, Tom Haws (talk) 23:48, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Lists Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (Japan) With the Takarazuka Kinen coming up and the potential first Spring Triple Crown winner, I thought it would be a good time to determine what is needed to get this to FL state. While I've worked on FAs before, this is the first list I'll be submitting for FL, so all comments are appreciated. This is an article about the five national-level Crowns Japanese horses can achieve in their career, and the 17 horses that have done so. I've tried to balance the prose sections between comprehensiveness and levity (although truthfully, the Crowns are all either fairly static or very young so there's not much more to say about each of them as individual concepts), then delve into the Crown winners and the individual Crown race winners. I think this article is in a good state now - the only thing I was considering was going through the list of horses in the individual results and applying Interlanguage links (eg Orion the Thanks), but would welcome comments before officially submitting this for Featured status review. Thanks, RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:21, 30 May 2026 (UTC) Timeline of 1980s political violence and sabotage acts in Bulgaria I would like to take this list to FLC and would like to prepare for it. Thanks, Pietrus1 (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC) WikiProject peer-reviews WikiProject Military history: 14th Pennsylvania Cavalry Regiment • World War II