Talk:Kai Newkirk
 | A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Reywas92 (talk · contribs) on 14 March 2026. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Main character energy
editMany thanks to Reywas92 for your tireless work as a WikiGnome and general entropy fighter including merging/deleting where there is not enough unique content to need a separate article. I apologize that I was unresponsive to your message of March 13, 2026 on my talk page. I assume that what was needed was citation of some news articles with "main character energy" like these at Google News, and I wanted to verify that with you before diving in.
I also have a request for advice about source selection. Do you think including a source that has big "main character energy" but less breadth of acclaim like https://wagingnonviolence.org/2016/04/democracy-spring-money-politics-corruption/ would be more helpful or more hurtful?
Thanks again. Tom Haws (talk) 18:11, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Update: I went ahead and did my best. Let me know if further work is needed. Tom Haws (talk) 05:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Article class and review request
editClass is now C, but I would hope it has achieved B as of the last 24 hours pending review unless I misunderstand what I am reading at Wikipedia:Content assessment#Grades. I am new to judging classes and I am open to correction. If still C, so be it. Please review and let me know your thoughts or suggestions. :-) Tom Haws (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Self-assessed today as B-class. Any comment would be gratefully accepted. Tom Haws (talk) 01:57, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Peer review
edit
I've listed this article for peer review because I just created it a couple of months ago and then I disappeared while it was deleted via PROD. This week I am working on making it B+ if possible. So I thought I would ask for peer review. Any thoughts or suggestions, even casual ones, would be appreciated. No ongoing edit wars or anything.
Thanks, Tom Haws (talk) 23:48, 2 May 2026 (UTC)