Wikipedia:Peer review/Parasocial interaction/archive1


I would appreciate feedback on this article about parasocial interaction. I have edited part of the article, specifically within the "Parasocial relationships" section. My contribution focuses on the "Focus on relationships" subsection, where I added a subsection on "parasocial romantic fantasy." I would especially appreciate it if reviewers could take a look at this part of the article. I am particularly looking for comments on whether the structure and organization are clear and logical, whether the writing is clear and appropriately encyclopedic in tone, and whether the sources and citations meet Wikipedia standards. As this article is still under development, I would greatly appreciate any suggestions for improvement. Thank you! Meiqi Jiao (talk) 19:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meiqi! Great job!! This is so well written and easy to follow. Your subsections on reciprocation, internal and external motivation, and positive and negative impacts make this well organized. I made some minor edits to improve grammar and fluency for clarity. To further improve your section I would recommend broadening the examples beyond K-pop to include other fan communities, and consider adding a visual such as a screenshot of a fan platform like Weverse to help illustrate the concept of reciprocation. Overall you did amazing and this is really well done! Dang.hazel (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Olliefant

edit
  • I don't see the relevence of the image
  • Tons of uncited info and unattributed opinions
  • Link DoDo to a relevent article
  • "One character, Elmo, is iconic in..." this whole section is very confusing to read and needs to be rewritten
  • WP:Dupelink problems
  • Alot of fairly short paragraphs could be combined
  • Citation errors and I counted atleast one external link randomly inserted
Thats what I found, overall I think this needs alot of work and some copyediting, I would recommend taking this to WP:GOCE Olliefant (she/her) 23:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]