Xavier Serif

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Xavier Serif, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 13:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Categories

Hello. Regarding this recent edit of yours , I noticed you attempted to add items directly to a category page.

In Wikipedia, we do not add articles to a category by editing the category page, we add them by editing the individual articles' pages and linking the category from there. Please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization#How do I add an article to a category? For newer editors, it's understandably a counter-intuitive system.

Category pages are not intended to be exhaustive lists. In fact, they are not really lists at all in the sense they only display subjects with Wikipedia pages. They are navigation aids; merely groupings of related, existing English Wikipedia pages.

To categorize a page, first make sure the page actually belongs to the category. Then, go to the page you wish to categorize and add the category at the bottom of the page with the other categories. For instructions on how to do this using VisualEditor, see Help:VisualEditor § Editing categories.

For further detailed information, see Help:Category and Wikipedia:Categorization. Let me know if you need any assistance or have any questions. Cheers! --DB1729 (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

thank you very much for this clarification Xavier Serif (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

please see WP:REFB for help with correctly formatting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Xavier Serif/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Xavier Serif! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I am perplexed. Perhaps you can assist. Nelly Sfeir Gonzalez was founder and editor of the Bolivian Studies Journal, a peer reviewed academic journal. She was elected president of SALALM, a librarian association with international membership. She wrote 5 books, two of which won national awards. Why exactly did you reject her so quickly? Go to Amazon and input her name. Open the Bolivian Studies Journal and see her listed as an Editor Emeritus. Go to Past winners of Jose Toribio Medina Award on the SALALM website and see her name listed. In any case, please assist in editing the page. You seem to be over eager to close the door. You value highly your power to deny access. But in this case your zeal is mis placed. Please go back and re read the page more carefully. There are book reviews cited, etc. I am curious about your own professional background. Might you have your own Wikipedia page? Sincerely, Xavier Serif (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Gonzalez may well be notable but your draft was very poorly sourced and was also a copyright infringement so has been deleted. My own professional background is completely irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 19:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

If poorly sourced, who can assist with sourcing? What exactly is basis for copyright infringement? This appears to be a new claim made after first draft rejected. Put aside your hurt pride and assist in advancing human knowledge. Please specify what you think is copyright infringement to give opportunity for correction. Your professional background is relevant when evaluating the merits of an academic librarian’s career accomplishments…

Xavier Serif (talk) 21:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I declined your draft because of poor sourcing, I am not an admin so cannot see the content of your draft now, User:Jimfbleak deleted your draft Draft:Nelly Esther Sfeir de Gonzalez for copyright infringement of https://www.tributearchive.com/obituaries/19245649/Nelly-Sfeir-Gonzalez you will need to contact them for details. Once again my professional background is NOT relevant when evaluating the merits of an academic librarian’s career. Theroadislong (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Theroadislong, Thanks for ping, I'll reply below Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Just weighing in here as the admin who tagged it. @Xavier Serif you may not copy/paste published sources. Whether or not she's notable has no merit on that. You must draw from sources and write in your own words. Besides being copyright violations, the tone is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. Please disclose your conflict of interest appropriately and perhaps leave this for a neutral editor. Star Mississippi 01:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nelly Esther Sfeir de Gonzalez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nelly Esther Sfeir de Gonzalez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tributearchive.com/obituaries/19245649/Nelly-Sfeir-Gonzalez. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Star Mississippi 18:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Reply

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please don't write about your friends, relatives or colleagues, and read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• It's hard to make sense of your supposed refs, none are formatted correctly, most don't have links or have links that don't go anywhere useful, many are inappropriate, including blogs and an on-line encyclopaedia, many are repeated. A obituary in a local newspaper is also unlikely to be a good source.

• It's unclear whether she meets notablity guidelines, you list honours, but they are unsourced and nothing to suggest the awards are notable themselve

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• The whole text has a gossip column style, eg Growing up, Nelly preferred to play “cops and robbers,” shoot marbles, jump rope and spin the top with her older brother Pepe rather than play “tea time” with dolls with her younger sister Yola, which Nelly did nevertheless to please her.. How does that make "Nelly" notable? Then there's outright spamming like the groundbreaking peer-reviewed Bolivian Studies Journal beginning in 2002. This journal has established itself as the premier international academic journal in its subject matter.

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your text was also badly underlinked, and you should use standard English capitalisation. The primary reason for deletion was that it was largely copied from a page marked © 2017-2022 Tribute Archive. All rights reserved. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Xavier Serif! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Assistance in sourcing a biography Wikipedia page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolivian Studies Journal (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or asking at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bolivian Studies Journal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bolivian Studies Journal

Hello, Xavier Serif. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bolivian Studies Journal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bolivian Studies Journal

Hello, Xavier Serif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bolivian Studies Journal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bolivian Americans

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bolivian Americans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natasha Gonzalez

Hello, Xavier Serif

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Adamtt9, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Natasha Gonzalez, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Adamtt9}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Adamtt9 (talk) 22:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

@Adamtt9:

Please assist me in deleting the Natasha Gonzalez page from Everybodywiki. i have personal privacy and security concerns for the subject of the page.

Appreciatively, Xavier Serif Xavier Serif (talk) 14:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Natasha Gonzalez

Hello, Xavier Serif, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Justiyaya, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Natasha Gonzalez, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Gonzalez.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justiyaya 14:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

@Justiyaya:

Please assist me in deleting this page Natasha Gonzalez from Everybodywiki. I have personal privacy and security concerns about this page, especially date of birth.

Appreciatively, Xavier Serif Xavier Serif (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Can't exactly help you as Wikipedia has no affiliation to that site but I think you've already blanked the page there.

Links in Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/DEF#EverybodyWiki could help Justiyaya 15:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Walter Gonzalez Gonzalez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bolivian Studies Journal

Hello, Xavier Serif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bolivian Studies Journal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Nelly Sfeir Gonzalez

Hello - I have added a notice to the page for Nelly Sfeir Gonzalez about sourcing. You have added a series of statements that are unsourced. All information on Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources and original research is not permitted. DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

there are numerous books on this subject, including one by Ulises Estrada. See also the Wikipedia page for Tamara Bunke. There are many scholars out there who will provide additional citations over time. Xavier Serif (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pietro Sfair (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two sources, one of which is an offline one cited with insufficient bibliographic detail, the other a blog, is not enough to either establish notability or to support the information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pietro Sfair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pietro Sfair has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pietro Sfair. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emilio Sfeir (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emilio Sfeir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keserwan District, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chehab and Shahin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Sfeir, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Sfeir

Hello, Xavier Serif. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sfeir, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pietro Sfair (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not far from being accepted. However, more words do not make a better article. Please remove irrelevancies and unreferenced POV statements and attend to formatting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pietro Sfair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emilio Sfeir (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emilio Sfeir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pietro Sfair has been accepted

Pietro Sfair, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emilio Sfeir (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.opinion.com.bo/articulo/cultura/aventuras-pelicula-emilio-sfeir/20241121000042960857.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

• Draft:Emilio Sfeir may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Emilio Sfeir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Emilio Sfeir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.opinion.com.bo/articulo/cultura/aventuras-pelicula-emilio-sfeir/20241121000042960857.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

February 18, 2025

Hello Serapimblade:

Did you consider my previous communication which indicated that the Wikiedia Page Draft Emilio Sfeir was created prior to July 8, 2024, that a Wikitia Page copied this text word for word and published it on the internet on August 21, 2024, and that all that pre-dated the Opinion article which was published November 28, 2024. In other words, the Opinion article copied the Wikipedia Page Draft Emilio Sfeir and not vice versa? Xavier Serif (talk) 09:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Agnel Sfeir

Hello, Xavier Serif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Agnel Sfeir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Cooperative School of La Paz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Henderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Multiple issues

Hello, I'm Pbritti! I noticed that you have been here a while, but also observed a good number of major problems in your edits. Among them, there has been an absence of adequate sourcing, the inclusion of original research, and mislabeling of almost all edits as minor edits despite substantial changes. I believe that you might benefit from reviewing so of Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines, which are helpfully summarized here. If you have additional questions, please reply here. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

It also seems like you have devoted most of your editing to promotion of people with the surname Sfeir. This is not productive and may constitute a violate of Wikipedia's neutrality policy. Please refrain from promotional editing and avoid turning pages into directories. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:04, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern Pbritti. Regarding your concern about turning pages into directories-- prior to your recent wholesale deletions of two days ago, the Sfeir surname list inlcuded the names of 61 persons. Please take a look at the Wallace surname list on Wikipdia-- it has 299 names. Moreover, such Wikipedia page has only three sources, one of which is from the Wallace Society. Do you consider that promotional editing? (I do not) How do you reconcile that? It is also curious and unfortunate that you find a sentence referencing the spread of the Sfeir name beyond its place of origin through the Lebanese Diaspora (for which there is a separate Wikipedia page in existence) to be objectionable, unsourced, subect to confict of interest, and promotional. It is simply a statement of fact, which is patently obvious just looking at the list of people on the Sfeir surname list that you yourself choose not to include in your wholesale deletions. There is Alfredo Sfeir from Chile, Dahd Sfeir from Uruguay, there is Andree Sfeir-Semler from Germany....And you decide not to delete Samir Sfeir, for which there is currently no Wikipedia page in existence but you do decide to delete Claude Sfeir, who is all over google and featured in publications such as the the New York Times?. Just because I contributed that edit? This is irrational. By the way, I have no family, friendship or commercial connection to Mr. Claude Sfeir. I have never met with him or communicated with him in my life. One has to wonder if you have a bias against the Sfeir family. Xavier Serif (talk) 05:48, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance Pbritti. Regarding sourcing, i count 43 soures cited. Why did you delete those? I can understand deleting unsourced text--but deleting every single edit I made over several years... that is hard to understand. You have also deleted links to pre-existing wikipedia pages for Paul Sfeir, Valeria Sffeir and Jean Salim Sfeir--pages which I had nothing to do in creating them and actually have never contributed edits to those pages. Why are you throwing out the baby with the bath water. You have also deleted text from the Sfeir surname wikipedia page that I did not contribute--others contributed them. Please be more focused in your editing targets rather than applying an all or nothing approach. Xavier Serif (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sfeir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sfeir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Sfeir

Hello, Xavier Serif. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sfeir, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Sfeir appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. i believe that you are acting in good faith but that you are mistaken. Please see WP;NLIST (Notability of lists): "An entry in a list is not required to be notable; it is sufficient that the entry has verifiable information that is relevant to the list topic." Xavier Serif (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

No advertising, publicizing, or promoting is going on. This is merely a good faith effort to reflect the world wide spread of the Sfeir name, part of what is called the Lebanese Diaspora (please see Wikipedia article on this subject) Xavier Serif (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

The correct guideline in this case is WP:APORED, which states that you should Write the article first; in other words, not include red links or people without Wikipedia articles.

It definitely appears that you are a WP:SPA dedicated to promoting people with the name Sfeir, which I'll note is similar to your username. Other people have pointed this out before, including @Pbritti just a few months ago, and you continue to evade the question of why you are doing this. Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Dear Editor--

WP:APORED is a shortcut for the Wikipedia essay Red links in article text. An essay is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, as it has not been throughly vetted by the community. The proper principle to apply here is WP:NLIST (Notability of lists): "An entry in a list is not required to be notable; it is sufficient that the entry has verifiable information that is relevant to the list topic."

By the way, in your haste to delete all my contributions, you even deleted several entries that are designated in red and are clearly both notable and verifiable and thus meriting their own stand alone Wikipedia pages-- for example Claude Sfeir and Jorge Augusto Cavero Sfeir. Why this inconsistency?

As I have stated before, I am not promoting people with the name Sfeir; I am building and expanding the knowledge base of Wikipedia to more accurately describe the surname Sfeir. So, I am promoting full and comprehensive knowledge. That is what an encyclopedia is about. Xavier Serif (talk) 09:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

You are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Your additions to that page have included passages terminating in citations wholly unrelated to the content they are supposed to verify. In the rare instance where there is more than a coincidental relationship between the citation and your additions, the citation is to a website of no reliability whatsoever. You also appear to be utilizing LLMs to assist you in your edit warring. Stop now. ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaime Laredo, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Watkins was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ana-Maria Vera

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ana-Maria Vera, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:36, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jaime Laredo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jaime Laredo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2026 (UTC)