Welcome!

edit
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Volodia.woldemar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Kylemahar902 (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

National varieties of English

edit

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Levko Revutsky, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Military–industrial complex without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes my mistake, pushed accidentally before wrote the edit summary. Volodia.woldemar (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

removal of cited information

edit

There is guidance from ArbCom that removal of statements that are pertinent, sourced reliably, and written in a neutral style constitutes disruption. Instead of removing cited work, you should be questioning uncited information. Instead of removing pertinent, referenced statements, you should remove off-topic statements and original research. If you think the sentence(s) do not accurately summarize the cited work, but the source is reliable and relevant, try to improve the accuracy by rewriting the sentence rather than removing it.

Uhoj (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

edit

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Military–industrial complex".The discussion is about the topic Military–industrial complex.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Uhoj (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply