User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 23

Archive

Draft:James Stakes

Hi, if you come across and kids posting personal details about themselves best to request oversight. If you don't already have an easy way to request you can add the following to your common.js

importScript('User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js' ); // Backlink: User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort.js 
importScript('User:SD0001/twinkleos.js' ); // Backlink: User:SD0001/twinkleos.js

Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @KylieTastic Delsort does handle that? I never knew. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

lol, no I cut and pasted the wrong thing. Doh KylieTastic (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Ahah, I thought as much. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting my error. KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2025)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Performance Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: 99-year lease • Criticism of monarchy Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
47		International Prize for Arabic Fiction (talk)	Add sources
404		History of Romania (talk)	Add sources
726		Rose Bowl Game (talk)	Add sources
28		SMPTE 292 (talk)	Add sources
9		Aké Arts and Book Festival (talk)	Add sources
36		Heat-transfer fluid (talk)	Add sources
54		Obafemi Awolowo University massacre (talk)	Cleanup
23		Gender inequality in Nigeria (talk)	Cleanup
49		Cripping-up (talk)	Cleanup
172		Ordered dithering (talk)	Expand
2,467		Caffeine (talk)	Expand
112		Timeline of the Boko Haram insurgency (talk)	Expand
10		The Dark Flood (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
397		A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55		BBC Radio London (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
37		Pokémon TCG Live (talk)	Merge
3		Arthur Townend (talk)	Merge
5		Pimaco Two, Arizona (talk)	Merge
18		Koleje Śląskie (talk)	Wikify
224		Maiduguri (talk)	Wikify
244		Culture of Nigeria (talk)	Wikify
14		Miroslav Formánek (talk)	Orphan
11		Bole Festival (talk)	Orphan
12		April 2022 Benue State killings (talk)	Orphan
13		Robinson O. Robinson (talk)	Stub
36		A Father's Pride (talk)	Stub
15		Zikora (talk)	Stub
6		Wana Udobang (talk)	Stub
2		Jowhor Ile (talk)	Stub
7		The Spider King's Daughter (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2025)

Various crop seeds Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Crop Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Performance • 99-year lease Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Jaane Anjaane Hum Mile

FYI. CNMall41 (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Kingsley Assefuah

Hi SafariScribe, you previously declined my draft for Draft:Kingsley Assefuah with feedback about the references. I have since updated the article and added new sources. I've resubmitted it to the AfC queue, but I just wanted to let you know in case you had time to take another look. Thanks! YMWriter (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Alright. Goodluck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kambili

The article Kambili has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incredibly short article on a fictional character that contains no info that can't easily be part of the book's article. Sources are also unreliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation review on Hans Wilsdorf Foundation

Hello SafariScribe. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Hans Wilsdorf Foundation is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Hans Wilsdorf Foundation will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
22		Chima Anyaso (talk)	Add sources
14		Women in the World (talk)	Add sources
625		Joseph Schumpeter (talk)	Add sources
742		Jesus (name) (talk)	Add sources
4		Patty Paine (talk)	Add sources
135		Right of return (talk)	Add sources
98		History of Christian theology (talk)	Cleanup
18		Ziv Cojocaru (talk)	Cleanup
324		Cryopreservation (talk)	Cleanup
6,855		Malta (talk)	Expand
2,951		Trojan War (talk)	Expand
294		A Promised Land (talk)	Expand
794		Development of the New Testament canon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8,426		Meta AI (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
468		Antinomianism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
158		Coating (talk)	Merge
968		Rhododendron (talk)	Merge
6		The Shadow Heart (talk)	Merge
147		Christianity in the ante-Nicene period (talk)	Wikify
56		Warrior Games (talk)	Wikify
10		Shazamat (talk)	Wikify
3		Nicolas Cilins (talk)	Orphan
13		Kanpu masatsu (talk)	Orphan
16		Avner Avraham (talk)	Orphan
21		Daniel Cnossen (talk)	Stub
8		Joash Amupitan (talk)	Stub
8		Jagua Nana (talk)	Stub
31		Aboh Mbaise (talk)	Stub
240		Dream Count (talk)	Stub
4		Calw Hermann Hesse Prize (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Kambili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kambili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kambili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 18:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello SafariScribe, could you help me on the notability for my draft pls?

Thank you for reviewing my earlier draft. I added a section with external media features. Would that qualify the notability criteria?

kind regards, NordicSea (talk) 09:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

No my dear, it won't add to the notability. Please I want you to also answer this message on your talk page. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:16, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:John MacAlarney

Hi, take a look at it now and see what you think before I submit it again. R2025kt (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Bravissimo @R2025kt, hai fatto molto bene. I have accepted the draft and remember, for it to appear on search engines, it will undergo the NPP process, where it could be determined and accessed. For now, congratulations and find yourself a bottle of drink! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Jarett Kobek

Hi SafariScribe I sent through some addition links to the teahouse but for some reason they are not going through. If you could please look again at this person's notability - he his not conected to me in any way.

This guy is a pretty well established author - and is well-known in the literary scene. https://www.simonandschuster.com/authors/Jarett-Kobek/239108514

He is a simon and schuster author!

https://www.ft.com/content/39e7bcb4-ceab-11e7-9dbb-291a884dd8c6

Jarett Kobek is a Turkish-American writer known for his provocative and satirical novels that critique contemporary culture, technology, and society. His most notable work is the international bestseller I Hate the Internet. Key Works I Hate the Internet: An international bestseller, this novel offers a "sardonic tone and willingness to tackle controversial subjects" related to the digital age, corporate interests, and social dynamics online.

ATTA: A novella that serves as a fictional biography of 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta, praised for its "compelling literary style" and deep research into the character's motivations and background. Only Americans Burn in Hell: Described by Alan Moore as the "best satire of our contemporary nightmare," this novel is a fantasy that critiques a world ruled by a billionaire reality TV star and the decline of American democracy.

The Future Won't Be Long: A novel that explores 80s and 90s gay New York life, the art world, and American disillusionment through the lens of a friendship between two main characters. Do Every Thing Wrong!: XXXTentacion Against the World: A deep dive into the life and social media presence of the late rapper, characterized by its non-traditional, research-heavy approach. Style and Themes

Kobek is recognized for his unique narrative voice, which often blends fact and fiction to offer a unique perspective on current issues. His writing is characterized by: Satire and Cultural Criticism: He uses a sharp, often controversial, tone to critique subjects like capitalism, social media culture, identity politics, and the state of modern literature. Thorough Research: His works are noted for extensive research, from the social media presence of a rapper to the life of a terrorist, which grounds his narratives in reality.

Metafictional Elements: His narrative style can be fast-paced and jumpy, sometimes incorporating metafictional elements or trigger warnings for things like "capitalism" and "the awful stench of men".

He has been nominated for a Pushcart Prize and his work has been anthologized alongside authors like Haruki Murakami.

Cheers

Feldspa

can we get a second opinion? Feldspa (talk) 15:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

@Feldspa, you've done your part well and that's fine. The author has only one notable book, I hate The Internet, but that isn't enough, including many articles and short writings to meet WP:NAUTHOR. By some years coming, the author might become notable, there's no deadline. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Legora draft article

Hi SafariScribe, Thank you so much for reviewing Draft:Legora and providing feedback. I was a bit surprised by the decline as the article is now supported by multiple in-depth and independent sources including Business Insider, Reuters, Forbes, Bloomberg Law and Sifted - covering funding, growth and recognition as a tech unicorn. Please could you clarify if there are specific facts or sections where you feel sourcing or notability is lacking, or if there's something about the sources themselves that is lacking? I'm very happy to address any concerns you have. Thank you again for your time! --Neilyoung77 (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

No I don't have any other problem. Any reviewer would handle that. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:24, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2025)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Kidnapping Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Crop • Performance Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Humaniti Hotel Montréal, Autograph Collection

Hi Scribe, I can only assume this acceptance was a mistake? It does look (from skimming the source titles and nothing more) that the topic may be notable, but this borders on G11 and is almost certainly created by UPE. -- asilvering (talk) 20:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

I was almost cleaning it up before I had an emergency. That's a good catch by you. For the editor being possibly an UPE, I don't normally check editors before declining or accepting. The draft, now article has been listed at AFD. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Article denial for no reason

Hi Safariscribe, You recently rejected one of my article submissions and I wanted to know why. you said it was rejected because:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject

That is just insane. I added over 20 differant referances that are all in depth, reliable citations. i used a mix of Primary and secondary souces. What more do you want me to add. I bet that if I added a citation for every word, you still would reject it. Can you explain to me in more depth why it was rejected. Thank you for understanding.

N.Cooksey N.Cooksey (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Out of the 19 sources, sources 1,3,5,6,10,15 (total 6) were from www.kinley.com.au, the estate's website. They are called WP:PRIMARYSOURCES because they don't show notability rather they are used to verify some claims about a company, which these ones doesn't serve. Source 2 from www.yarraranges.vic.gov.au is more like a property listing website and fails WP:RS. Hoyne is a blog website, same as Henley, a blog site owned by a property building company. Big build is a governmental website but its article about your draft is nothing to write home about; it is not independent of it, hence fails WP:RS. Above all, your draft is promotional and meets WP:NPOV issues. I will advise you to start reading WP:YFA in order to digest how Wikipedia works. You may also visit the WP:TEAHOUSE incase you have some questions. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Ryan Bridge and Elliott Stanley

Hello. Thanks for reviewing Draft:Ryan Bridge and Elliott Stanley. Could you help me to understand what's required to improve the chances of the draft being approved? You advised that the draft needs multiple sources. It currently has 14. Is that not enough? I wondered at first if it might be that some of the sources only mention Bridge and Stanley in passing, but at least some of them are in-depth, e.g. "Red flags: The non-existent company behind Brum's Union Jacks", "EXCLUSIVE: British businessman linked to £40MILLION holiday sickness scam is named by cops", "Lamp-post flags organiser has 'no regrets'", "Birmingham 'Raise the Flags' founder was at Solihull asylum hotels protest". Stirchley resident (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The Birmingham Dispatch doesn't appear to meet our criteria for reliable sources. Again, The Mirror article is about Ryan Bridge and never connects him to Elliot; it could be interpreted that Bridge is another person apart from the one written about in the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Could you explain which of the criteria the Dispatch doesn't meet? It's a respected local newspaper that's part of a national network of similar titles. The link between the two is made clear in several of the other sources, e.g. "Birmingham flag wars erupt in quiet village as defiant dad faces death threats". Stirchley resident (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Above all, my reason for declining was that there is no way the sources cited shows that the individuals meet WP:GNG. Apart from founding the "non notable" campaign group, is there any other thing they did? Then they are not notable. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

The page you linked to states "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". There are now 17 sources that the draft cites, all of them independent. Stirchley resident (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

There's also an additional Telegraph article, though when I tried to cite it, it tripped some filter - I think because of a word used in the article title (reported at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports). Stirchley resident (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

• You're clearly relying on WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE as a reasoning here. Your comments on the newspapers as sources are ridiculous. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
• I've now added further sources. In light of this and Andy's comment above, would you be able to take another look and reconsider your verdict? Stirchley.resident (talk) 17:30, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

  I am not a master over any draft. Another reviewer may see to that. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:13, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

  Per request, apologies for unnecessary ping here Safari Scribe, I didn't see this discussion had already occurred. Regards, CNC (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Somtochukwu Maduagwu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Somtochukwu Maduagwu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Somtochukwu Maduagwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ednabrenze (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SafariScribe. Thank you for your work on Stephen Ezeanya. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please establish notability as per WP:BIO. I will be moving it draft space. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei, I have reverted your draftification. That was a very wrong move, you made. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:15, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

@SafariScribe - I am not a subject expert. However, you currently have two sources, and I don't see how either of them establishes notability. Of course, if I made a mistake or I missed something, I would appreciate if you could WP:AGF and discuss the issue at hand with me directly before jumping to complaining to others. Mariamnei (talk) 10:28, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei, don't tag me on my talk page pls, I must get the notification without that. First, if you aren't a subject expert, please don't attempt the article on presumption because we review articles here on the possibility of "will it pass when subjected to WP:AFD?", if you have doubts, then tag it and never draftify especially when it was written by an experienced editor; almost all the articles on Wikipedia started as a stub with one or two sources until expansion as days get by; same is applicable here: it's better to tag and article as "not notable" or "needs more sources for verification" than dratifying them. On the other hand, Asilvering is an admin I respect so much and she knows the best way to convey these messages to you. I may be advocating for the revocation of your NPP right because I want the best for you. It's not a matter of rushing, you could always get the tool when you are ready to use them well. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:18, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

I have received complaints that I should have draftified articles that I approved and the opposite direction as well. I have reviewed hundreds (if not thousands) of articles in the last couple months; I have received a small number of complaints and been thanked by many users for constructive behavior.

I am not convinced that the article in question would pass in an WP:AFD and I certainly think it is borderline. WP:42 says that there need be multiple sources discussing the subject, and I do not see that here. If you disagree with me, this is a simple content dispute, and I believe that you should have assumed good faith and discussed it with me rather than casting aspersions and immediately writing to an admin saying that I am a terrible reviewer. This is also not reflective of the vast majority of reviews I have done, and I am still learning and open to hearing feedback and improving. 12:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC) Mariamnei (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Please don't be ignorant, there is always room for improvements. No one casted aspersions on you and if you accuse me for that, I will take it as lack of WP:CIVILITY. Why won't you just calm down and read again the NPP standards or perhaps the general notability guidelines as well as arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and see why it's important NPP reviewers should know this. I can never condemn your good works here; I must confess you are one of the best contributing NPPers herein, however mistakes does happen and no one, expect God is the master of perfection. How could you tell me that the Archbishop of an Archdiocese would fail an AFD? have you read WP:NBISHOP?

My dear, when this type of complaint gets to you, there are few things to do: read it, breathe, tell the complainant that you could do better and that it's just a mistake, refresh your memory on the guidelines especially on notability (because you need to be sending some articles to AFD at some point), and come out better. These are little things but being faithful to them will keep you going. Devo dire ancora che stai facendo molto molto bene qui. Gli errori spesso succede ma non mostra che sei male; non é va bene così. Fai il tuo migliore e lascia l'altre cose per Dio, okay. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:00, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the reference to WP:NBISHOP; you have now showed me in policy where I erred. I was looking for something of that sort in the notability guidelines, but it does not seem to be linked to the general notability page. I will review the NPP standards again. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

untitled

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Abuse of Process and Trolling at AfC/RM/TR - Draft:Houshmand Dehghan. Shatootesabz (talk) 14:30, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

about "Hooshmand Dehghan"

"Regarding the draft 'Houshmand Dehghan,' please specify exactly which claim or which section of the article lacks sufficient or reliable sourcing. This article contains academic sources, such as Handal (2021) and Lambden (UC Merced), that have analyzed and cited his work."Shatootesabz (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

speedy deletion

"I have requested the speedy deletion of the Houshmand Dehghan page. Please delete it. I hate Wiki." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shatootesabz (talk • contribs) 18:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2025)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Emergency management Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Kidnapping • Crop Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Second oppinion on declined draft

Hi SafariScribe, I've been working on Draft:South Park Commons that your reviewed and declined. I sought advice from an experienced AfC reviewer (Qcne) regarding the strongest sources for notability (see User_talk:Qcne#Thanks_for_guidance!).

Based on that discussion, I presented strong case citing fully focused New York Times, TechCrunch, and Business Standard articles, which we both believe establish GNG. Could you please take another look? Thanks! --Saphelion (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

I have replied there. Thank you! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:44, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation review on Hannes Pichler

Hello SafariScribe. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Hannes Pichler is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Hannes Pichler will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Prince Alexander Literary Prize (Belgium)

Hello,

Thank you very much for reviewing my article. I hope you're doing well today.

You said that the article fails WP:NAWARDS, but that is an essay page, not a guideline page. Essay pages are just opinion pieces, not Wikipedia guideline pages. It does have 3 sources that you can read, and it also has another source that does exist, but that I haven't found a link to yet. Also, could you be more specific on what part of WP:NAWARDS you think it fails? Let me know if you need help translating.

Thank you for your time and effort on my article. Orlando Davis (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you and I appreciate you reaching out to me for clarification. May I beg to reply you later after my classes today, maybe in the afternoon. Please. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

No problem! Thank you for responding. Orlando Davis (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the work you did on my Prince Alexander Literary Prize article. Have a great day! Orlando Davis (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

And you too, @Orlando Davis! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:08, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Questions About Draft:Kris Sidial

Hi SafariScribe. You rejected my Articles for Creation submission at Draft:Kris Sidial on the basis that Sidial does not meet the notability requirements. The article relies heavily on citations to Bloomberg and Business Insider. I figured both publications have a "broad audience", he is the primary subject of each article, and both are profile pieces, not routine announcements or churnalism. I know you probably review a lot of these and get plenty of complaints from people that get their articles rejected. However, I'd be in your debt if you could teach me what I'm missing about the criteria and these two articles. Mperry1512 (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Mperry1512. I also approve theses two sources but they aren't enough to determine notability, see WP:THREE. Other sources in the draft fails our reliable sources criteria, hence my decline. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:11, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Questions about Draft:Battle of Nawanpind

Hey, you just declined my draft on the Battle of Nawanpind during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani war.

Here's the link to the draft - Draft:Battle of Nawanpind#Battle of Nawanpind

1. I wanted to understand why was this draft declined.
2. Since you had mentioned references, I would like to add that the battle in question hasn't been covered well and therefore does not specific mentions anywhere else (which is why I sought to create the wikipedia page).
3. The references I do mention are either news articles (by highly reputed newspapers/media organisations) or books that have unfortunately not been digitised (yet).
4. I would love to add more references but the particular war in question (the 1971 India-Pakistani war) was 13 days long and thus, most of the coverage/papers on it focus on its offensive and not defensive battle (which is what the Battle of Nawanpind was).
5. Moreover, Wikipedia already has a mention of the battle in another page linked here (it is the page about one of the units that participated in the battle) - 173 Medium Regiment (India).

Asc9924 (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Asc9924 for the write up above. I have a few question: does any of the sources, i.e books referred it as "Battle of Nawanpind"? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the reply. As far as the name is concerned, the battle of is called either "Engagement at Nawanpind" or "Battle of Nawanpind" in most of the primary sources (i.e., sources by the Indian Armed Forces and the Government of India) like wartime citations which are published in The Gazette of India, an official communique of the Government of India. The citations I have added in the draft are also from Gazette. Asc9924 (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

If you do think it is necessary to add the Gazette as a source, I'd be happy to do so. Asc9924 (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

if that is the most appropriate source that defines the war, then add them, trim the draft and remove unnecessary informations except ones said by the source (s). Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:18, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Olivia Park is needed in Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Olivia_Park

She has already Korean Wikipedia. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%B0%95%EC%9D%80%EA%B5%90

And s A Soccerkk (talk) 05:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Soccerkk, unfortunately the draft doesn't meet the threshold for acceptance here, on English Wikipedia. May I also let you know that different Wikipedia has their different notability guidelines, hence an article may exist in German/Korean Wikipedia but not here. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:08, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Safariscribe

November thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for support in November! - On St. Cecilia's Day - patron saint of music - I remember a composition by Benjamin Britten, and have a woman on the main page who illustrated songs, with a sense of humour. My places take you to Milan, my first visit to La Scala, and music features our latest choral Abendlob, with English music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Gerda Arendt. Wait, of you've been to La Scala, do you speak Italian? (Funnily asking). Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:22, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2025)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Computer algebra system Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Emergency management • Kidnapping Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 December 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Thanks For the Help

Hey SafariScribe,

thanks for the for approving my article, Ive been helping out with another draft id like to have you check out if possible Draft:McKinzie Scott. Thanks again Lopsd (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Lopsd, I am sorry for the late reply. Today is Sunday and as well, very hectic for me. We don't normally review per request but I do it since it does clear the same backlog. I think the tagged draft has been reviewed. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:06, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

cheers! had to remake it because of the issues, all fixed now so if you want to take it look at it now it would mean a lot. Lopsd (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation review on Costume Designers Guild Awards

Hello SafariScribe. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Costume Designers Guild Awards is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Costume Designers Guild Awards will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation review on Electoral Boundaries Review Committee

Hello SafariScribe. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Electoral Boundaries Review Committee is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Electoral Boundaries Review Committee will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Question about Draft:Harry Potter (pinball)

Hello, I wanted to ask you about the notability aspect of the reason for declining Draft:Harry Potter (pinball). I thought the Pinball News references taken as a whole, including count as one, and RePlay magazine would count for another (it is also published in printed form in the August issue), and the review at might count as a third?

The other issue of what I might need to remove from the article due to being unsufficiently sourced is obviously a bit of a moot point until notability is established. Wilbers (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

@Wilbers, Pinball News is not reliable because it is a blog written by one person. I also don't know the reliability of Replay magazine but let me trust the team. In this case, we need sources that are reliable and a good example of the subject's significant coverage.Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

The Punchball mag is also [ Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:23, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Pinball News is a lot more than that, although the editor is also effectively head writer. It does say on that about page "Finally, you may have noticed how the ‘I’ from the first few paragraphs has turned into a ‘we’.  That’s because Pinball News is not my site.  It is the collaborative work of all the dozens of writers who have contributed or continue to write for us.  Sure, I edit the site and write some of it, but the writing stays fresh thanks to the variety of voices and opinions found in our articles."

For example, is definitely written by someone else, with editorial oversight. Wilbers (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Wilbers, you edit on Pinball News, sorry? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:15, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

No, I was just using that as an example of an article on the site written by somebody else. I also noticed that in Pinball Magazine 2 (2013) there is a 6 page interview with the editor of that website (Martin Ayub). Given in that he says helping reporting for BBC news is his job I've had a search for something online saying that, and I've come across this , especially the three minutes following 3:40 where he talks about journalistic standards and bias which lends credance to Pinball News being a reliable source. Wilbers (talk) 12:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC review of Draft:Udi Mokady

Hi SafariScribe! I saw when reviewing Draft:Udi Mokady at AfC that you had previously told the creator that they needed to provide copies of book sources within their draft itself in order for those sources to be considered by AfC reviewers . I’m not sure I really agree with that advice, since including copies of a book within a draft will almost always be a WP:COPYLINK violation (in this case the creator followed your suggestion and included their Google Drive links to scans of the book within the draft, which I have now removed). WP:AFCSTANDARDS also specifies that offline and book sources are acceptable. Just wanted to suggest that in future you might want to request that quotes/scans be sent to you directly via email or leave the draft for another reviewer if you don’t have access to book sources, rather than suggesting that copies of the books be included within the draft itself. MCE89 (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @MCE89. I appreciate! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Daniel Freedman meets notability requirements in every category

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Daniel_Freedman_(musician) Daniel Freedman has been in 2 TONY award wining broadway shows as a featured performer, Hadestown and American Utopia. Was also featured in the film of American Utopia. Their work as a leader and sideman has been reviewed and featured in the US's top journals and newspapers. Every cite in bold meets these requirements.

Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

Micallef, Ken (July 2016). "Best Albums of 2016" (PDF). Downbeat. 83 (7).
Ratliff, Ben (21 December 2012). "A Cubanized Blending of Musical Languages". New York Times.
Tamarkin, Jeff (1 July 2016). "Daniel Freedman: Imagine That". Jazztimes. Retrieved 15 August 2024.
Rentner, Simon. "Imagine That: Daniel Freedman". wbgo.org. WBGO.
Chinen, Nate (8 September 2016). "Jazz Listings". New York Times.

Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

 1998	Various Artists	Jazz Underground: Live at Smalls	Impulse! Records
 2009	Sting	If on a Winter’s Night…	Deutsche Grammophon

Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 5] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. Note that this criterion needs to be interpreted with caution, as there have been instances where this criterion was cited in a circular manner to create a self-fulfilling notability loop (e.g., musicians who were "notable" only for having been in two bands, of which one or both were "notable" only because those musicians had been in them.)

 Ryzik, Melena (21 September 2021). "Bicycle Diaries: Cruising With the 'American Utopia' Family". New York Times. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
 Pearis, Bill (4 March 2018). "David Byrne debuted "untethered" 'American Utopia' tour in NJ (video, pics, setlist)". brooklynvegan.com. Brooklyn Vegan. Retrieved 4 March 2018.

Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

Chinen, Nate (28 March 2010). "Funk, Jazz and Bollywood With Rhythms of Africa". New York Times.
Jackson, Josh (3 July 2012). "Daniel Freedman: Lessons From Motoring In Mali". NPR.
Ratliff, Ben (21 December 2012). "A Cubanized Blending of Musical Languages". New York Times.

Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, such as a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications). Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.

Hans, Simran (19 December 2020). "American Utopia review – David Byrne and Spike Lee burn down the house". The Guardian.

Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.

Jackson, Josh (3 July 2012). "Daniel Freedman: Lessons From Motoring In Mali". NPR.

Mistephake (talk) 18:46, 30 November 2025 (UTC)mistephake

Hi @Mistephake, I have commented there with regard to your comment above. Please check the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:13, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

I've updated ref 1 with a page number. Mistephake (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi safariscribe. Sorry i added all that content on your talk to establish Freedman's notability. If Freedman's notability is not in question then it appears you denied the article based on the cites about his family members. Please explain why these refs are not verifiable: The Brooklyn Rail is a noted journal and Pitchfork. thanks Mistephake (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Look at what I am saying, @Mistephake. If he did all those things in the draft, then he is notable. Nevertheless Wikipedia works with verifica grom reliable sources and that's how we prove of truly truly he is notable. We need sources that lists him, in each of the song, as a leader or co-leader and at its best, review of the music. This is usually difficult to find, but if he is notable and most likely attain WP:SIGCOV, then thee should have been sources that lists at least a handful and review of sole of his works where he served as the leader or co-leader. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:57, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

please don"t be condescending. I've used these sources in dozens of articles and they all met approval. Mistephake (talk) 16:01, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

OK.so you wrote "We need sources that lists him, in each of the song, as a leader or co-leader and at its best, review of the music". I've read over WP:SNG Freedman's name IS listed in every review of his work as a leader.

Sidemen in theatrical shows and bands are often not mentioned in reviews. However Freedman's name would be listed in dozens of Playbills. Freedman also performed in the film version of American Utopia. His name may not be in the review but it is in the credits. Mistephake (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2025)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Judgement Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Computer algebra system • Emergency management Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors experienced in drives or blitzes and in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor (with their permission, of course) to be a Guild coordinator until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June 2026. September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nitin Kumar Gupta

Hello, SafariScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nitin Kumar Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:09, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

A Shuttle in the Crypt moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to A Shuttle in the Crypt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheInevitables (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

@TheInevitables, so three sources cannot make the page notable? Please read WP:NBOOK and space me and other article creators, like you, the time to stop moving a wrongly draftified page to mainspace. I have reverted your move. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:28, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

It does appear that my draftification was incorrect. I thank you for making the necessary changes, and I'll strive to avoid making that same mistake in the future. TheInevitables (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2025 (UTC)