User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2024 November

Previous · Index · Next


Jump-to links

2025   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2024   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2023   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2022   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2021   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2020   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2019   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2018   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2017   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2016   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2015   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2014   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2013   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2012   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2011   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2010   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2009   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2008   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2007   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2006   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2005   Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

2004                                                           Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec  

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - October 2024 Newsletter

edit

Nomination for merger of Template:Talkfact

edit

Template:Talkfact has been nominated for merging with Template:Fake citation needed. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 174.94.28.189 (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #652

edit

Tech News: 2024-45

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #653

edit

Nomination of Anne Duncan for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne Duncan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Duncan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-46

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

"San Francisco." listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect San Francisco. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § San Francisco. until a consensus is reached. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

edit

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-47

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #654

edit

Add a Fact survey and thank you

edit

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

"BO⅂ICE" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect BO⅂ICE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § BO⅂ICE until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry allegations

edit

I am not Teapotsofdoom. I have restored the pages in question to before you improperly struck my edits. I even fixed November 19 for you, but if you want to go back and strike Teapots's edits from November 20, be my guest, but I'm not going to take the time extricating mine from the other. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

while i won't opine much on the ip being or not being a sock, i don't think saying that the ip saying they're not a sock is proof that they are is the best argument you could come up with. maybe "overly similar behavior" or "spi tools" would work a little better
and for the record, i don't think referring to rich as an idiot is the best of comebacks either cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Nothing of the IPs was deleted, only struck, except where I removed a whole RfD and the IP was the only !vote. Therefore when the IP restored all Teapot's content, saying "restore; I am not a sock" this seemed an admission to being Teapots. Their re-revert comment is much clearer. It's good that they understand my take of their original edit summary, but only they know what they originally meant. If they are not a sock, then all is good, although they do seem to share behavioural traits with Teapots. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC).Reply
yeah, that's a little better cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
on a semi-related note, wouldn't just deleting the discussions from rfd cause technical issues, with the funny rfd boxes still in the redirects? not that i'm much of an expert in the area of technical closure, but i'm pretty sure closing them as speedy keep without much prejudice to renomination would have caused way less trouble cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think I fixed the redirects. Also Teapots didn't notify the creators, so there's that. Anyway what you say makes sense, I just didn't have (and don't have) time at the moment to spend on this, I already spent more than I should. (Your triple : was confusing!) All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC).Reply

New message to Rich Farmbrough

edit

Regarding your {{Vertical text RTL}} template, would you mind moving it to something like {{Vertical text RTL columns}}? I feel {{Vtext-css3}} may be a more natural fit at the base name. Remsense   07:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You should be able to move it yourself, which I don't object to. I wonder if there is, or should be, a naming convention for css templates though. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC).Reply

Tech News: 2024-48

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #655

edit
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stránov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Nördlingen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply