ℹ️ This is archived talk page

If you wish to contact me, please click here to start a new discussion thread.

Archive 15Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24



Review and publish for Draft:Do the Dance

Hi @Paper9oll, Draft:Do the Dance should be ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and publish if it's alright? Thank you once again! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 17:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.tony 03:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-27

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Administrator changes

removed NuclearWarfare

Interface administrator changes

added L235

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous

  • The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
  • Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!

Tech News: 2025-28

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Photo in commons

Hello! If you have time, I hope you can look into these two Wiki Commons photos below. They’re from a video under Creative Commons, but they’re obviously stills from the Netflix show. Is that still copyrighted? Thanks.

*https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ae-sun_IU.jpg

*https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ae-sun_Moon_Sori.jpg

119.94.161.71 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-29

MediaWiki message delivery 20:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Help

Hello, Paper9oll. I haven’t had enough time to fully understand how automatic archiving of talk pages using bots works. I want to have automatic archiving like yours. Could you create a source code for me that I can place on my own talk page? Something that would automatically archive a section if it hasn’t received a reply for 7 days. Thank you! - Arcrev1 (talk) 06:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1  Done. If you want to change the settings, you can read more about it here. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:34, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
@Paper9oll: Thank you very much! What is the maximum number of discussions that can be stored in an archive talk page? Can it be changed? Also, what about the past discussions on my talk page that have already been there for more than 3 days, should I just archive them manually? - Arcrev1 (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
@Arcrev1 The maximum number of discussion that can be stored in an archive talk page varies, however the maximum size is according to the value in maxarchivesize which is currently set to 150K (i.e. 150 kilobytes). If you don't want to go by sizing, you can change 150K to like 50T (i.e. 50 threads) or something higher or lower. For those past discussions on your talk page that have already been there for more than 3 days, wait for the bot to run later, normally tonight or midnight. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 10:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much! - Arcrev1 (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Request: Update for Choo Young-Woo’s Awards Section

Hello, Paper9oll.

I noticed that the “Awards and Nominations” section on actor Choo Young-Woo’s page has not yet been updated. On May 29, 2025, he won two awards at the Asia Star Entertainer Awards (ASEA): Best Artist (Actor) and Global Rising Artist. This was publicly announced via the official Twitter account for the event.

I’m reaching out instead of editing it myself, just to avoid any possible issues with formatting or sourcing. Thought you might want to take a look.

Thanks for your time. Ssch.cb (talk) 11:15, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:25, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Help with article title for Hyunjin

Hi @Paper9oll, if you have time, can you help take a look at Kim Hyunjin and see if the article title should instead be just Hyunjin as per most reliable secondary sources, or Kim Hyun-jin if the full name is to be used? It's currently a combination of both which I believe is incorrect. If it's the former, it needs to be disambiguated from Hyunjin. Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 16:51, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

@Chyx1095 Quick scan through couple of sourcing, Hyunjin is the common name rather than the current title, no comments on the hyphenated version. I moved Kim Hyunjin to Hyunjin (singer), Hyunjin to Hyunjin (rapper), and redirected Hyunjin to Hyun-jin. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

Tech News: 2025-30

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Current_member

Hello, Paper9oll. I raised a concern at Template:Infobox musical artist regarding the current_members parameter. According to the description, the order should be based on when the members joined, or alphabetical if they joined concurrently. However, in Wikipedia articles for K-pop groups, the members are listed by age. Even though their ages aren't shown, it's obvious from their respective articles that the order is based on age. What is the reason editors of these pages are following a separate practice? - Arcrev1 (talk) 01:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1 You're right that the template documentation recommends listing members by join date (or alphabetically if they joined at the same time), and K-pop group articles often don't follow that. From what I've seen, it's more about informal consistency. Basically, newer editors copying existing formats across K-pop pages ("monkey see, monkey do"). Since age-based seniority is reflected in South Korean cultural norms, that likely carried over into Wikipedia editing without much scrutiny.
Personally, I don't see the informal status quo as "broken". There's consistent formatting across K-pop group articles, even if it doesn't match others exactly. Plus, the documentation itself allows two different orderings (join date or alphabetical), which already introduces some interpretive leeway. It's already not necessarily obvious to readers why some lists are alphabetical and others aren't. So unless this is indeed causing real confusion or edit warring, I'd lean toward the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach.
This is just my personal opinion. I have subscribed to the discussion at the template's talk page; however, I don't plan to participate in the discussion, and I'd appreciate it if this comment isn't quoted or brought into that discussion on my behalf. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 07:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
@Paper9oll: Thank you for your response. I do not intend to quote your comment in the discussion; I was simply seeking an informed opinion on why K-pop group articles often follow an age-based order despite the template documentation recommending listing members by join date or alphabetically. In cases where a particular formatting style becomes a widespread convention within a specific subject area, such as K-pop, I believe it can potentially lead to edit conflicts, even if the likelihood is low, due to differing interpretations of the guideline. This is why I am considering proposing that age-based ordering be explicitly acknowledged as an acceptable option in the documentation. One editor who responded to me expressed agreement with the idea but questioned in what circumstances age order would be appropriate, and I found it difficult to provide a clear answer. I therefore sought additional perspectives to better understand and articulate a reasonable condition under which age-based ordering may be justified. - Arcrev1 (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
@Arcrev1 Just to add briefly: personally, I think whether age-based ordering is added or not isn't really a big issue. If it is added, it would just be another optional recommendation, not something editors would be strictly required to follow. It would simply become one of three recommended orderings, and the choice between them would depend on the individual article or, if applicable, on consensus from a relevant article- or project-level discussion. Regardless, thanks for the clarification that you were just gathering different perspectives. Best of luck with that proposal. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 11:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-31

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

InternetArchiveBot

I already asked in the Teahouse, but I’m also asking you since you have experience in creating articles. I just want to ask why InternetArchiveBot does not rescue all sources in an article. For example, in the Marc Abaya article, I added sources but not all of them were archived by the bot. If that's really how it works, is there any other way? - Arcrev1 (talk) 03:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1 IABot uses an API to communicate with the Wayback Machine. Without diving deeper into technical details, the issue lies on Wayback Machine's end because it fails to return an archived version, so IABot does not archive it. Unfortunately, to the best of my knowledge, the only workaround is to manually archive the failed URLs on the Wayback Machine (preferably as a registered user on the Wayback Machine to get higher priority in the queue) and add them manually into the article. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 27

Review and publish for Draft:A Montage of ()

Hi @Paper9oll, Draft:A Montage of () is ready for mainspace, can you help to review and publish once it's alright? Do take note to publish to A Montage of ( ) instead. There should be a space between the parentheses, but I made a mistake in the initial draft and redirect creation. Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 16:51, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:02, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address

Hello, Paper9oll. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary account IP viewer (checkuser-temporary-account) rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

  • You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
  • Access should not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

  • When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
  • Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
  • Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

@Femke Thanks! Happy editing! Paper9oll (🔔📝) 18:54, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-32

MediaWiki message delivery 03:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
  • Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

Tech News: 2025-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Clarification on Presidential Term and Person Numbering in South Korea

Dear Paper9oll

I'm Korean

Thank you for informing me about that.

It was a wrong decision to make the changes without much thought, but if I hadn’t done so, I wouldn’t have known this fact.

I am writing to provide clarification on the numbering system for presidents in the Republic of Korea, which may differ from other countries such as the United States.

Presidential Term Numbering in South Korea

In South Korea, the presidential term number is based on the sequence of presidential terms, not the individual serving them. Each new term increases the number (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.). If the same individual is re-elected, the term number increases accordingly for each term. For instance, Park Chung-hee served multiple terms and is counted as the 5th–8th president by term number.

Key Examples

Term Number President Name Years in Office Notes
1st Syngman Rhee 1948–1952 First President of South Korea
2nd Syngman Rhee 1952–1956 Re-elected
3rd Yun Bo-seon 1960–1962
4th Yun Bo-seon 1962–1963
5th Park Chung-hee 1963–1967
6th Park Chung-hee 1967–1971
7th Park Chung-hee 1972–1978
8th Park Chung-hee 1978–1979
21st Lee Jae-myung 2025–Present Current president

Important Notes

  1. South Korea uses term-based numbering, meaning a president’s multiple terms are counted separately.
  2. English sources may sometimes use person-based numbering (as in the U.S.), which can cause confusion.
  3. Accordingly, Lee Jae-myung is serving the 21st term in South Korean history but is the 14th individual to hold the presidency.

This distinction is essential when comparing historical records or referencing South Korean presidents in international contexts.

Best regards,

SEO JEOUNG HWAN (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

@SEO JEOUNG HWAN Thank you for your reply; however, as this is a controversial topic, previously disputed here on English Wikipedia and therefore not actionable by a single editor, there's no point in trying to convince me. If you have concerns about this topic, please take them to WT:KO to seek WP:CONSENSUS from the community. This topic was previously discussed at this archived discussion (do not reply there; you must start a new discussion) on WT:KO. Please note that WP:CANVASS is not permitted on English Wikipedia. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:51, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Hangul in lead

Hi, so, there’s no sense in repeating the names in the lead when they’re already in the infobox. They belong in the infobox, not in the lead. Since this is the English Wikipedia, the lead should only include the English name, so there’s no reason to revert my edit. Lililolol (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

@Lililolol Those are your opinions; however, the status quo and established convention indicate otherwise, something that should already be apparent enough as evident in many existing articles. Also, read MOS:KO as it already addresses your opinions. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 19:14, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Review and publish for Draft:Ive Secret

Hi @Paper9oll, Draft:Ive Secret should be ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and move if it's alright? Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 15:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:27, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-35

MediaWiki message delivery 00:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Kindly reupdate

List of awards and nominations received by Byeon Woo-seok https://news.nate.com/view/20250828n03718 Wittykitty99 (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

@Wittykitty99  Done. As I've already mentioned before, do not add content to articles without a reliable source. It is your responsibility to ensure a reliable source exists before adding content. If no such source can be found, the content must not be included at all. Adding content with unreliable sources and only acting after being reverted, when a reliable source was available from the start, is disruptive and unacceptable. If you are unsure how to edit properly and/or are concerned about making mistakes (and to be clear, adding content with unreliable sources after being warned is not a mistake), you should start a discussion on the article’s talk page and use the {{Edit request}} template there, rather than creating unnecessary cleanup for other editors. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Ypu again edited the number of wins and nominations wrong again. Kindly recheck Wittykitty99 (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-36

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Inquiry

Hello~ I've noticed that you've had helped with several K-pop related articles and appears to be well-versed with Wikipedia policies, rules, and regulations. I am wondering if you could provide some guidance. I started Draft:Cha Woong-ki a while back, and today I found that someone had created the Cha Woong-ki article in the main space. What is the best action to take when it comes to the draft page? Should it be redirected or deleted? I have already moved whatever details I have in the draft article to the main article. Thank you! — Eugh jei (talk) 10:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Eugh jei, since you are the sole major contributor, you can either request deletion by adding {{G7}} to the top of the draft, or simply replace the entire text with #REDIRECT [[Cha Woong-ki]]. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:46, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Noted. Made it into a redirect. Thank you! — Eugh jei (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Close RM

Can you please close the RM for Vcha's article, since it's past the 7-day mark? Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 16:47, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

@Btspurplegalaxy, thank you for the request. As the RM was relisted two days ago by another editor (which indicates consensus is not yet clear or stable), it cannot be procedurally closed until one week after that relisting. In addition, I would prefer not to act as closer in this case, since I previously commented in a related (non-official) move discussion on the same article. Thank you for your understanding. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:06, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
How long would you say it needs to stay opened for then? Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 17:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
@Btspurplegalaxy each relisting cycle lasts for one week. After that, if you feel the RM has gone stale or is unlikely to attract additional !votes, you may request for closure at WP:Closure requests, provided the RM has not been relisted again by another editor. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 17:26, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

Tech News: 2025-37

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Rose (singer)

You're reverting all of the edits. If you want to fix some, that's alright.Stately2 (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

@Stately2 please read the WP:MOS if you have not already. You made a multitude of changes including but not limited to violating MOS:RETAIN by changing Australian English to US English even though the article is tagged with {{Use Australian English}}, violating MOS:NOPIPE by adding unnecessary piped links, and editing disruptively by restoring long captions that had already been reverted by another editor. In addition, intentionally removing the wording behind "Undid revision" when reverting does not prevent a ping, so if your intention was to avoid notifying the editor, that approach does not work. As your Bold edits were Reverted twice, under WP:BRD, you are required to Discuss to gain WP:CONSENSUS before you are allowed to restore any of the edits that do not violate the MOS. Restoring without discussion is not permitted and will be considered as signs of disruptive editing and edit warring. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
You're not listening. I was keeping Australian English, feel welcome to put that back. You are making wrong edits. Please fix them. Stately2 (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
This is the talk discussion, it's just the two of us. If you want to create new talk page sections, alright. Stately2 (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Saying that a caption is overly long when it merely has a few more words is not veracious. If you are changing one word in Australian English, for example one with S instead of the Z, that's one thing. You're disagreeing with how many of the edits? Stately2 (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
@Stately2 My position has already been clearly explained above and I will not be repeating it further. I will also not be restoring any of your reverted edits, even if you "believe" they are "correct". On English Wikipedia, you are expected to engage with the policy-based concerns raised rather than rely on personal opinion. If you "believe" that your reverted edits were "correct", the onus is on you to start a discussion at Talk:Rose (singer) and obtain consensus before restoration is allowed. Refusing to do so and continuing to ignore what has been explained falls under WP:IDHT, and restoring edits without discussion falls under WP:DE and WP:EDITWAR. Further conduct along these lines may lead to consequences. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 18:23, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
You're the one objecting. Stately2 (talk) 18:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
@Stately2 Your edits as a whole were reverted (3 times by 2 editors in total) because they were not in compliance with English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, as already explained explicitly above. Regardless of the wording in the edit summary, once your edits were reverted, the entire set of changes is considered disputed under English Wikipedia procedure. This is not a matter of personal objection but of policy. The responsibility is on you to address the policy concerns and obtain WP:CONSENSUS before restoring. As you refused to listen by repeatedly raising personal grievances and/or beliefs that do not address the policies and guidelines here, I will not be entertaining them further. My position above stands and this will be my final reply here. Thanks and regards, Paper9oll (🔔📝) 19:32, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
It doesn't matter to me if you reply or not. I began a talk page section. If you are truly interested in the merits of Wikipedia which is a project, you will not use the terms you do. I have pointed out that you made errors. In your view should all of the edits I made to the article be reverted? No. Thus you are the one in the wrong by reverting all of them. Stately2 (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Need help in citation

Hi Paper9oll,

Thank you for the comment about my edit in the the page - Kim Hye Ja. Could you please guide me on how to properly cite the sources there? Sagarika.b05 (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

@Sagarika.b05 I've added a welcome guide on your talk page with some helpful links. The guide includes introductions to English Wikipedia's key policies and guidelines, especially on verifiability and reliable sources. For the full list of policies and guidelines, you can refer to WP:P&G. You may also find WP:KO/RS and WP:RSPSS useful, as they explain which sources are generally considered reliable (and which are not) for use on English Wikipedia. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Clarifying Founder Information after Multiple Rollbacks

Hi Paper9oll,

About Goldmedalist page, I have clearly stated in the edit summary: "Founder info corrected (FSS disclosure)." In addition, I have provided both the official FSS disclosure link and a reliable news article on the user talk page for verification. May I ask if you have reviewed these sources? Is there anything further that you believe is required? I am wondering whether my contributions are being rollbacked by you even after these references were made available.

EventuallyAligned (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

@EventuallyAligned you stated "Founder info corrected (FSS disclosure)" on this edit. However, that edit summary was unclear and you also did not provide any source in the summary to verify the change, and the phrase "FSS disclosure" was only meaningful to you at that point. That is why I reverted it. Similarly, in the this restored edit, there was no explanation in the edit summary or any expanded clarification of your earlier note. Now that you have provided a detailed explanation above along with two sources, I reviewed the Chosun Ilbo reference (since you linked only to an FSS search page rather than a direct document, making it unclear what exactly I should be looking at). Based on the Chosun Ilbo source, I have applied the changes accordingly. In the future, please explain your edits clearly and provide specific, verifiable reliable source, rather than vague or incoherent edit summaries. Also note that under WP:BRD, once your Bold edit was Reverted, you're required to Discuss and gain WP:CONSENSUS before restoring your preferred version. Failing to do so may be considered disruptive editing and/or edit warring. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution and advice. On the official disclosure site of the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in Korea, it is possible to verify company information and shareholder registers by directly entering the company name and searching the audit materials. Since this is a government site, the system does not generate a fixed URL for the exact page, so one has to search manually. Please note that such disclosures are not provided for every company, but only for those subject to disclosure obligations (e.g., listed companies or certain unlisted companies designated as externally audited under specific conditions).
I will make sure to include more detailed notes in the edit summary in future contributions. EventuallyAligned (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-38

MediaWiki message delivery 17:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

Tech News: 2025-41

MediaWiki message delivery 17:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Making changes

Hello, I hope you’ve had a nice day. I updates Miyeon’s page on Wikipedia. Miyeon is a member in idle (K-pop group). She is considered to be an official main vocalist and visual in the group. I added ‘visual’ onto it however it was removed. I completely understand but just want to say that ‘visual’ is a term given to K-pop idols. It is completely neutral term. Please can I add it back on again? Thank you very much.

94.11.100.218 (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

No, such terms are not allowed for inclusion per WP:CONSENSUS at WT:KO, regardless of whether they are valid terms outside of English Wikipedia. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Review and publish for Draft:Blue Valentine (Nmixx album)

Hi @Paper9oll, Draft:Blue Valentine (Nmixx album) is ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and publish if it's alright? Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 15:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-42

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Dirty Work (Aespa)

I would like to know if "Dirty Work" by aespa is a song or a single album, is this song still considered a single album?

  • because there is a redirect to single album/single

Xp enter49 (talk) 10:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@Xp enter49 On why English Wikipedia classified the single album as an redirect to the song, please refer to Talk:Dirty Work (Aespa song) instead. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
@Xp enter49 To clarify further, since you made changes to both Whiplash (EP) and Rich Man (EP), this suggests that you may not have fully understood what the linked talk page and its discussion were addressing. "Dirty Work" remains a single album as per source, is still listed as such on Aespa discography#Single albums, and also charted on the Circle Album Chart, which, as the name indicates, is a chart for albums. The dedicated article for this album redirects to the song article because the content overlapped and/or was nearly identical prior to the requested move discussion, and following WP:CONSENSUS established there, it now redirects to the song article instead, not because the release itself ceased to be a single album. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
okay I understand Xp enter49 (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Editing Wiki pages

Hi paper9oll,

I noticed that you had reverted my edit from the page Cortis. I am very new to editing around here or Wikipedia in general. I just tried doing that edit as a trial. It would be of great help if you could guide me on the changes or what you thought about my edit in general. I just want to learn :)

Thanks,

Cortanist. Cortanist (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

@Cortanist your edit added a one-off media appearance (even on a well-known show) which falls under routine coverage and thus violates WP:NOTNEWS. The addition also gives WP:UNDUE weight as it is supported only by a WP:PRIMARY source and lacks multiple WP:INDEPENDENT WP:SECONDARY WP:RELIABLE SOURCEs establishing the appearance's notability. Furthermore, the material was added to the lead section rather than the body, which is inconsistent with MOS:LEAD placement guidelines. Even if the placement were correct and such sourcing were available or initially provided, existing WP:CONSENSUS at WT:KO prohibits inclusion of routine guest appearances ("guesting") in South Korean BLPs, whether in prose, list, or table form. Accordingly, this material does not meet inclusion standards and has been reverted. I have also placed a welcome guide on your talk page. You may look through the various links there to familiarize yourself with English Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. If you're unsure about anything, feel free to ask for advice at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Review and publish for Draft:Blue Valentine (Nmixx song)

Hi @Paper9oll, I believe Draft:Blue Valentine (Nmixx song) is ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and publish if it's alright? Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 15:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)