ℹ️ This is archived talk page

If you wish to contact me, please click here to start a new discussion thread.

Archive 20Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24



Review and publish for Draft:Heavy Serenade

Hi @Paper9oll, can you help to review and publish Draft:Heavy Serenade to mainspace if it's alright? Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 13:03, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:31, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-20

MediaWiki message delivery 19:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Paper9oll,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Response

Hello, I saw your reply on my talk page regarding the article Heeseung. I wanted to add the Hanja name, and its source could be found in this Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSNEoRcakUE, but I'm not sure how to add it. Thank you. Mydeeresthamster (talk) 05:49, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I have now added the citation, thank you. Mydeeresthamster (talk) 05:56, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Resident Playbook Accolades

Hello, I recently added two nominations for one of the actress in Resident Playbook and made sure to include source title and URL from a website with a legitimate article. Why are these being removed? The color prompts for "Won" is also in a different shade of color. Please kindly explain why this was adjusted. 고슴도치0112 (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@고슴도치0112 You need to provide reliable sources that explicitly verify the content being added. Including a source does not mean it is reliable or that it passes verification. For "Won", the formatting is simply incorrect; there is a template for that purpose. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 20:28, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
@Paper9oll 1) For "Won", is this format specific to just that Wikipedia page or is this just in general? The following is in bold is what I used: | style="background:#CCFFCC; text-align:center;" | Won. It is not trivial but I just wanted to confirm. 2) For the two nominations, the citations that I included were articles from direct news outlet (e.g. https://kpoppost.com/fundex-awards-2025-nominees-vote/). It references the message from the award program's direct social media and there is a writer who published it. Why was this not deemed as a reliable source? 3) Isn't this a reliable source? https://www.soompi.com/article/1801829wpp/2025-apan-star-awards-announces-nominees?utm_source=chatgpt.com 고슴도치0112 (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
@고슴도치0112 No, as mentioned earlier, we do not use that formatting here; we use the relevant template. Please check the surrounding entries before making such changes in the future. For sourcing, both sources are unreliable for this purpose under WP:KO/RS. For broader source guidance, see WP:RSPSS. Please note that both WP:KO/RS and WP:RSPSS are useful reference lists, but they are not exhaustive. Also, please avoid using LLMs in talk-page discussions or article writing beyond the limited cases allowed by WP:AITALK and WP:NOLLM. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:18, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-21

MediaWiki message delivery 20:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Review and publish for Draft:Heavy Serenade (song)

Hi @Paper9oll, Draft:Heavy Serenade (song) should be ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and publish if it's alright? Thanks! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 16:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:03, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Date formatting

Hi @Paper9oll,

I noticed you have made formatting changes to several recent South Korean film articles regarding the date columns to reduce to year-only (YYYY) formats and omitting the month and day. Why was this exception made for No Other Choice? Just wanted to gain an understanding to the extent to which it applies. Wheezythewave (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

@Wheezythewave No exception was intended for No Other Choice. The fact that are inconsistencies should not be taken to mean that a different standard was being applied. It is not realistic to expect every single comparable article to be identified and addressed all at once. Data tables are meant to summarize relevant information rather than reproduce every possible detail. Where the relevant award ceremony and its edition meet notability for its own article, readers can access fuller details there, and where it does not, that should not determine the level of detail used in the film article's table. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
I just wanted to understand whether No Other Choice being left unchanged was simply a coincidence, perhaps because it has a more international profile. I have noticed that many American film articles tend to use the full date format in their tables instead. Wheezythewave (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
@Wheezythewave Not exactly sure why intent or a relationship is being inferred here. Regardless, this was already answered above. FWIW, I have now taken a closer look at the table while considering an update, whereas earlier it was only a quick glance, and the formatting is a bit of a trainwreck. It is visually organized by award ceremony, but the date column is effectively the chronological sort key. The sort-key column should ideally have come first, which makes updating the table consistently less straightforward than it may appear and leaves the overall presentation non-intuitive from a reader's perspective. I do not currently have the time or bandwidth to untangle it. If the fact that this table remains inconsistent is a concern in relation to your question, you are welcome to address it. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:32, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

Elixir script

Hi Paper9oll, I don't know if it's only me but after you updated your script, I can't find it when editing any article. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 13:28, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@D.18th Hi, when did it stop working for you? There were updates on 17 May, 19 May, and 23 May. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
After my Elixir.json updated on the 18th then I uninstall and re-install the script the next day but still not working. The last update of my json was on the 20th. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 16:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
@D.18th Just pushed an update, not sure if working for you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:12, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
It is now working thanks alot. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 16:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi again. Would it be possible to include a configuration option for the script to generate citations in either a spaced or compact format? Just like how this script works. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 17:51, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
@D.18th Spaced formatting was explored earlier in the development phase, but it was scrapped due to multiple issues and interference with other script functions. By "compact format", do you mean the "short version" described in WP:NAMEDREFS? Paper9oll (🔔📝) 18:02, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Ah I see. What I mean in compact is there's no white spaces in the citation template (e.g. <ref>{{cite web|title=|url=...}}</ref>) 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 05:55, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Ah okay Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi @Paper9oll, I can't find it as well currently under Tools, whether or not I'm in the edit mode. I'm on "26.05" now according to my configuration. Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 01:18, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
@Chyx1095 It's no longer under Tools > Actions. You should be seeing it floating on the bottom right of the screen as blue "Elixir Console" button. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 01:20, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
@Paper9oll Oh yes, I see it. Thanks for the update! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 01:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-22

MediaWiki message delivery 21:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

hi

I'd like if you could leave my article alone, I am trying to fix it. Oreoiscool99 (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@Oreoiscool99 Asking others to leave the article(s) alone is contrary to ownership. No editor needs your permission to edit any article, whether you created it or someone else did. Also, as a reminder, WP:NOLLM says not to use large language models to generate or rewrite article content. Your recent contributions, such as Draft:Kazuha (singer) and Draft:Queenz Eye, appear to be LLM-style mass rewrites/creations that rely on generic and/or non-verifying sources, weaken verification, and do not resolve the sourcing and/or notability issues. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Your the only person who is saying all of these things i'm starting to get suspicious. also the sources may appear as weak but these are the only sources that are independent and i can use. if deleting all my articles makes u happy then so be it.Oreoiscool99 (talk) 17:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
@Oreoiscool99 If the only available sources are weak, routine, generic, or do not directly verify the claims, then the article(s) or draft(s) does not meet WP:GNG, WP:V, or the relevant subject-specific notability guideline. If your creation does not meet the notability guidelines, any editor may nominate it for deletion under WP:AFD or another applicable deletion process, regardless of whether the draft was accepted through AfC. Your suspicion about me is irrelevant and unsupported; casting aspersions does not answer the sourcing, verification, or notability problems. FWIW, I am not here to debate your feelings or emotions, nor are they relevant to the content discussion. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 18:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Regarding the 5M sales of Gee and the source...

The source I used is the same one used on 2NE1's discography page, where "I Don't Care" has 4.5 million sales on Gaon, and "Gee" is from the same year and uses the same font as their page. Why is it allowed there and not here? ~2026-31906-93 (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-31906-93 Per WP:BLOGS, blogs are not unreliable sources. What you just referenced is essentially WP:OTHERCONTENT. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2026-23

MediaWiki message delivery 21:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Review and publish for Draft:Bite Now and Draft:Imperfect-I'mperfect

Hi @Paper9oll, I believe Draft:Bite Now and Draft:Imperfect-I'mperfect are ready for mainspace. Can you help to review and publish if they're alright? Thank you! Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 14:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

@Chyx1095  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello @Paper9oll. In this edit, your script removed the OSEN links, but the newspaper has an article at OSEN (newspaper). Was this intentional? I also noticed it removed News1 (South Korean company), which makes sense to me since it's a red link. ~2026-33008-28 (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Bug fixed Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-24

MediaWiki message delivery 21:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-25

MediaWiki message delivery 16:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Help with moving an article

Hi Paper9oll!

I was wondering if you could help move the article Kim Min-seo (singer, born 2004) to Minseo (singer, born 2004). The reason being that she usually just goes by the mononym "Minseo" instead of her birth name.

Thank you so much for your help! Wooahitzy (talk) 21:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@Wooahitzy  Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 03:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

Tech News: 2026-26

MediaWiki message delivery 13:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Regarding changes to the article Sunghoon (singer, born 2002)

Thank you for reviewing my message and the edit.

I understand that reliable sources are required for all content on Wikipedia.

For the relevant statement, I used a Weverse LIVE video in which Sunghoon appears to directly speak about his birthplace and where he grew up.

https://weverse.io/enhypen/live/2-134121234

From around 31:31 in the video, he talks about his place of birth and upbringing.

The English subtitles include the following statement:

“My family originally lived in Daejeon, but I was born in Suwon.”

Since subtitles can be switched, this content is accessible to viewers worldwide.

This video was published on January 27, 2024.

In comparison, the current citation used for the “Born” information in the article lists Cheonan as the birthplace, which is sourced from an article dated May 22, 2023:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/music/2023/05/22/enhypen-members-music-kpop-profile/70220608007/

Since the Weverse LIVE is a direct statement from the person concerned and is more recent, I believe it may be a more accurate primary source for this information, and I would like to use it as a citation for updating the birthplace information if appropriate under Wikipedia’s sourcing guidelines.

I am a Japanese user and not very experienced with editing English Wikipedia pages.

Could you please advise on how I should properly cite this video and whether it can be used as a reliable source for updating the birthplace information?

Thank you very much for your time and assistance. D.penguin002 (talk) 08:27, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

@D.penguin002 As WP:SPS WP:PRIMARY only. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Could it be possible to note somewhere, as a supplement, that there was a statement from the person himself until a secondary source article is published? D.penguin002 (talk) 08:58, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
@D.penguin002 You do not need to include a note. You may use that self published primary source, "self" refers to the subject who published the source, not to you, only for the narrow claim about his place of birth. It should not be used to support other claims. That said, the edit may still be reverted by other editors who disagree with using it, particularly because you're replacing secondary source with a self published primary source. Citing both sources together would be contradictory and potentially misleading. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
I usually search for information in Japanese and Korean, but it is likely that that 2023 English article contains incorrect information. In Korean primary sources and in the subject’s own statements within content, Daejeon is described as his hometown, where he lived with his family, while the place of birth is clearly mentioned as Suwon in a Weverse Live. However, I cannot find any information about Cheonan in Korean sources. There are no articles that consolidate his place of birth, so I am unsure whether it is appropriate to leave it as it is. It is likely that in Wikipedia pages of other countries, Daejeon is often listed as his hometown. D.penguin002 (talk) 09:48, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Regarding Sunghoon's birthplace, I have not been able to find any official statement from his agency, nor have I found Korean-language news articles that clearly identify his birthplace.
I also could not find any media source discussing Cheonan as his birthplace. However, I was able to confirm through the edit history of Namuwiki that there was a period when Cheonan was listed in Sunghoon's article. That entry, however, did not provide a source.
성훈(엔하이픈) - 나무위키
After Sunghoon's statement during a Weverse Live broadcast, the Namuwiki article was changed to Suwon. The current article no longer uses the place of birth as the basis for the entry and instead lists Daejeon, which Sunghoon himself has described as his hometown.
Looking at the USA Today article, most of the information appears to be material that can be found through online searches. Therefore, it is difficult to completely rule out the possibility that the author may have relied on Namuwiki or similar online sources. If the information was not independently verified through the agency or direct reporting, there is also a contradiction with Sunghoon's own statement. Considering the unclear source history and the changing birthplace information on Namuwiki, I have some reservations about relying solely on the USA Today article as the reference for this claim.
Because it is unclear what source USA Today used when stating Cheonan as his birthplace, I am considering contacting the author of the article to ask what information was used. If successful, this may lead either to a clarification or correction of the article, or perhaps verification during a future interview with ENHYPEN.
In the meantime, unless there is a policy-based concern, I would prefer to retain Sunghoon's own statement from the Weverse Live as evidence for the place he stated he was born.
If the information is reverted again in the future, I would like to reopen discussion on how contradictory sources should be handled in this case.
Additionally, the USA Today article is currently cited as a source for his date of birth as well. I am planning to replace that citation with ENHYPEN's official profile page, which appears to be a more direct source for that information.
If more reliable and verifiable sources become available in the future, I fully support updating the article accordingly so that it reflects the best available information. D.penguin002 (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2026 (UTC)