Your submission at Articles for creation: University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (April 24)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All the unreferenced or primary-sourced material needs to be removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Krimsonbat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pseudochorthippus montanus

edit

Thanks for your translation to Pseudochorthippus montanus from the existing German Wikipedia article at de:Sumpfgrashüpfer. After translating an article, you also need to make sure the citations are correct as well, as seen here, you created 20 cite errors. So can you clean up the cite errors you created. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berlin Electric Tramway has been accepted

edit
Berlin Electric Tramway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz has been accepted

edit
University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oelinghausen Monastery has been accepted

edit
Oelinghausen Monastery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 05:17, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geology of the Palatinate Forest has been accepted

edit
Geology of the Palatinate Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 06:41, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter and Paul, Bonndorf im Schwarzwald has been accepted

edit
St. Peter and Paul, Bonndorf im Schwarzwald, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swiss National Exhibition has been accepted

edit
Swiss National Exhibition, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:52, 9 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parliamentary Inquiry Committee in Switzerland (June 16)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many paragraphs unsourced or cited to single source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoldRomean (talk) 04:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Acetabuloplasty has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acetabuloplasty. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I've already added new sources and citations as needed. Thank you for your comment! Krimsonbat (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acetabuloplasty has been accepted

edit
Acetabuloplasty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mgp28 (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Lörrach has been accepted

edit
History of Lörrach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corporate Digital Responsibility (July 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:01, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parliamentary Inquiry Committee in Switzerland has been accepted

edit
Parliamentary Inquiry Committee in Switzerland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corporate Digital Responsibility (July 13)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Cloventt were:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Corporate Digital Responsibility. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A previous reviewer marked this as possibly AI-generated, but I don't think it is. It is a translation of the German-language article, and even with my extremely mediocre German I can see it is a nearly direct translation of the article, which was written back in 2018. This article does, however, contain a lot of corporate waffle that is not encyclopedic, and reads more like a business school essay. I am not convinced this subject deserves its own article. It would be better for relevant information from this article to be merged into the Corporate social responsibility article instead. The entire prose of this article could probably be summarised there in one or two short paragraphs.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atari 800XL has been accepted

edit
Atari 800XL, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atari 400 (August 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AirshipJungleman29 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Atari 8-bit computers instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Concerns have been raised about your repeated creations of overlapping WP:REDUNDANTFORKs at Talk:Atari 8-bit computers#Merge proposal - "Atari 800XL" translated from German Wikipedia. Please collaborate with other Wikipedians to ensure that articles are equally useful and helpful to readers. You have not made a single talk page edit which wasn't adding banner templates or the like. Translation from other Wikipedias under the purview of OKA does not mean you are given free rein to ignore the guidelines of English Wikipedia. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
@AirshipJungleman29 Thanks for letting me know of this issue. I have just read and answered the Merge Proposal on the Talk:Atari 8-bit computers#Merge proposal - "Atari 800XL". It was not my intent at all to ignore the Wiki guidelines I was just unaware this all was happening. I will do as proposed on the Talk page and act accordingly from now on. Krimsonbat (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ground-living spider has been accepted

edit
Ground-living spider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 12:46, 22 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Vyazma–Bryansk has been accepted

edit
Battle of Vyazma–Bryansk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Krimsonbat. Thank you for your work on Battle of Vyazma–Bryansk. Another editor, Zzz plant, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I accepted this at AfC because it is a well-developed article translated from German and there was no English-language article connected to the topic on Wikidata, but now I see that we have Battle of Bryansk (1941) here on en-wiki - there may be a merge and/or redirect in order here as it seems there is at least some topic overlap.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zzz plant}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zzz plant (talk) 03:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otterberg Abbey has been accepted

edit
Otterberg Abbey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aeon Sentinel (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Atari 400, 800, 800XL

edit

Hi! I noticed that you made copies of my articles from the German Wikipedia. Unfortunatey you did not include my user name anywhere. Please do so, according to the license under which I publish. The proper way would be to import the German version, and then translate it. Confused? Please ask administrators for help. Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalmenhof has been accepted

edit
Kalmenhof, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Corporate Digital Responsibility

edit

Information icon Hello, Krimsonbat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corporate Digital Responsibility, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Corporate Digital Responsibility

edit

Hello, Krimsonbat. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Corporate Digital Responsibility".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Atari 400

edit

Information icon Hello, Krimsonbat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atari 400, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Krimsonbat. Thank you for your work on Kalmenhof. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this translation.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 08:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Atari 400

edit

Hello, Krimsonbat. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atari 400".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:24, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brontotheriidae, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bark and Dakota were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply