Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos

Welcome!

Hi Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! RFD (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Lefcentreright. Your recent edit(s) to the page Belinda Bozzoli appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you have a source, please do add it back. Lefcentreright ^{Talk | Contribs | Global} 10:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Sevim Gözay moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sevim Gözay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EN-Jungwon 07:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Muazzez Bora moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Muazzez Bora, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

If you remove the draft template, as you did here, it will delay review of your draft article. In addition, categories are hidden in draft space and should not be restored until the article is accepted and moved.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:54, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Muazzez Bora

Hello, Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muazzez Bora, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muazzez Bora

Hello, Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muazzez Bora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sevim Gözay

Hello, Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sevim Gözay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sevim Gözay

Hello, Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sevim Gözay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Sarah T. Schwab moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sarah T. Schwab. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sarah T. Schwab

Hello, Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarah T. Schwab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2026

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Malesh Soro, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Instead of blindly reverting, please join the discussion at Talk:Malesh Soro. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Go there, the source is there, look, I shared the link, the date of birth is correct, stop taking it back every two seconds, the correct one is 1977. --Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos (talk) 06:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't think the source is reliable. It's strange that the best (or only) source we can find is some website about Football Manager. Surely if the birthdate is publicly known we'd find it elsewhere? Robby.is.on (talk) 08:12, 24 February 2026

The information is correct, sir. Don't go on too long. Okay, do whatever you're going to do.--Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2026 (UTC)(UTC)

The information is correct, sir. As you keep insisting… But what do you base that assumption on? Robby.is.on (talk) 09:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

The date in the original source is what they wrote when they recorded it there. It can't be fake. Now relax, stop writing, Robri.--Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos (talk) 10:36, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Who is they? What is the original source? On https://sortitoutsi.net I have been unable to find any information about who runs the site. Whether they go a good job of checking the data being submitted is completely unclear. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Mind your own business, Robroy. The date is correct. ~2026-12093-59 (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

My son, we said he was born in 1977, it's written in the source, they wrote it while he was alive, that's the real date, do you understand, Rose?--~2026-12331-95 (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC))

- Note: Possibility of this being a TA sock of @Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos. Read WP:CON, WP:AGF, WP:Cooperation and WP:SOCK ★ Campssitie (msg) (contribs) 🧋🏖 08:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Malesh Soro. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

 Courtesy link: WP:ANI § Trolling and WP:LOUTSOCKING

--Gurkubondinn (talk) 22:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Birgit Berthold

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Birgit Berthold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tuzla Anatolian High School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tuzla Anatolian High School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tuzla Anatolian High School

The article Tuzla Anatolian High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no RS, no evidence subject passes WP:GNG

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Tuzla Anatolian High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuzla Anatolian High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuzla Anatolian High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 14:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Birgit Berthold

The article Birgit Berthold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:SIGCOV

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't like people who come to my page and write messages thinking about deleting it. Delete all the items I've published collectively. I've opened it on English Wikipedia. Don't write again now. Go about your business.--Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos (talk) 07:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Birgit Berthold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birgit Berthold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birgit Berthold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Holly Warlick. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. The sources you've provided are far short of reliable, and we need a reliable source, particularly in a WP:BLP article. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Okey no problem sir...--Kostantinopolisli Kostantinopulos (talk) 04:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)