User talk:Jorge Lobo Dos Santos/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Concern regarding Draft:Xuxa Produções

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xuxa Produções, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things (Taylor Swift song) has been accepted

This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things (Taylor Swift song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 02:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sid & Judy

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sid & Judy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Last Performance (documentary)

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Last Performance (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 148.252.141.249

Accept reason:

Rangeblock lifted by Yamla. -- asilvering (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

That IP address is a confirmed proxy. --Yamla (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla, I have to say I'm a bit confused by this block. I'm sure there are some residential flags floating around, but that is true for a huge share of the IPv4 address space at this point, and I see no real reason to doubt that this is in fact a legitimate Vodafone UK range. Is this about RP flags, or is there something I'm missing? If the former, I would urge you to reconsider the block (I jotted down a some notes on this general subject on cuwiki a while back, which may be of interest). --Blablubbs (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to be cautious in my explanation, to avoid breaching privacy. This particular narrow IP address range has been used extensively by spammers and there was at least one sock farm operating from this narrow range. However, taking a look at the current state of the technical data, they appear to have largely moved on. I mean, there are still several blocked users operating on this narrow range, but, well, that's not unexpected. Your CU notes make excellent reading. I will go and lift the IP address range block. --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Untouchable (Luna Halo and Taylor Swift song, respectively)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Untouchable (Luna Halo and Taylor Swift song, respectively) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dan arndt (talk) 11:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Last Performance (documentary)

Hello, Jorge906. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Last Performance".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Last Performance (film)

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Last Performance (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#AI editing? concerning User:Jorge906 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Ippantekina (talk) 02:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Garland: Recordings from the M-G-M Films (Motion Picture Soundtrack Anthology)

Hello, Jorge906. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Judy Garland: Recordings from the M-G-M Films".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

"The Red Tour" translation

Did you use LLM/AI to translate the Red Tour from Vietnamese to English? I would really appreciate if you could temporarily halt your AI edits especially when they construct such large content on Wikipedia, and the AN discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#AI_editing?_concerning_User:Jorge906 is still active. Please understand that these massive AI edits are troublesome. Thank you for your understanding, Ippantekina (talk) 04:43, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Ok Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I understand. :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 05:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Just a note that I have indefinitely blocked User:Jorge0987 which I think is an unacknowledged alternate account of Jorge906. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, that was my old account and I know WP has guidelines regarding sockpuppetry, so I guess I should've informed. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Unblock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hi, I understand that my use of AI-generated content on Wikipedia has raised concerns, particularly when I used it in article creation and 2 GA reviews for King of My Heart, and they did not align with WP's expectations, I was told twice that AI wouldn't suffice for article reviews and I now see why these edits are problematic. I have a clearer understanding of Wikipedia's policies regarding editing using AI. I'm still learning how to navigate Wikipedia’s standards, but I genuinely want to contribute meaningfully. While I have used AI to structure content, I've also taken the time to refine it, learnt by editors like @Ippantekina to verify citations (e.g. what's in them, and to make sure the information cited is mentioned in the source(s), and I've learnt to improve my approach based on feedback from editors. After delving deeper into WP's policies on AI, I did see something mentioning along the lines of you can't rely on LLM's to research sources, extract information on them, and turn them into Wikipedia-style articles, as it can just whip something up that's not true. It damages Wikipedia, and well it's a bad look on me and WP's content in general frankly.Moving forward, I will be much more intentional in how I contribute, ensuring that my edits are in line with Wikipedia's expectations. I will only rely on Ai to do stuff like copyediting, because if a machine just does it for you, you're not fit to edit on Wikipedia. I do appreciate any guidance on how I can continue to contribute responsibly. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 08:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

While a good start, the level of concerns about your AI useage didn't just "raise concerns". Esepcially given you have previously promised not to use it, then continued doing so. Also Talk:King of My Heart/GA2 doesn't have any AI useage but illustrates an entirely different form of disruption - you weren't just blocked for using AI. You need to address all of the issues that got you blocked, and demonstrate that you do in fact fully understand that you should avoid using AI altogether, given the fact any trust from the community regarding this with you is gone. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:CHILD

I have removed and deleted your unblock request. Please review WP:CHILD before proceeding. You are welcome to make a new unblock request after carefully reviewing and understanding that essay. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Okay. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wales' Home of the Year

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wales' Home of the Year, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Messing around

Stop messing around. If you want to make an unblock request, review WP:GAB and preview your changes rather than saving your edit and then reverting it. You are being disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

No, I tried to, but it wasn't working on my phone. Sorry for being disruptive, but I hope you can understand that this wasn't intentional. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Honestly, it wasn't intended to be disruptive. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 20:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:How Did It End? has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:How Did It End?. Thanks! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 16:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hi, thank you for reviewing my appeal. I now understand that my block was not just about AI usage, it was due to a pattern of disruptive editing, including my handling of GA reviews, unverified translations. I fully accept that my actions did not meet Wikipedia's standards, and I take full responsibility for the disruption I caused.

One of the main concerns was my repeated use of AI-generated content. I published an AI-generated GA review for King of My Heart and was informed by editor @User:Ippantekina that AI-generated reviews would not suffice. However, I proceeded to review the article again using AI. Additionally, I mistakenly ticked checkboxes after only proofreading the article instead of conducting a full evaluation. I now realise that article reviews require independent analysis and careful verification, and that AI-generated reviews (LLM's) do not meet Wikipedia's expectations.

Another issue was my disruptive editing beyond GA reviews. I created articles and drafts containing AI-generated content without properly reviewing them. For example, in Draft:How Did It End?, while I cited sources correctly, I failed to verify whether the cited information was actually present in those sources. My edits to The Red Tour also involved translations that I did not personally verify and I did not ensure the accuracy of the text or made sure that the citations were formatted properly. I now recognise that this approach was irresponsible and has introduced troublesome edits into Wikipedia.

Additionally, I failed to disclose my previous account, Jorge0987, which contributed to concerns about transparency. I now understand the importance of managing account history properly and ensuring all my edits are made under a single, clearly identified account.

I also acknowledge that my recent edit attempts on my talk page may have appeared disruptive. I was experiencing technical difficulties on my phone where I was trying to submit in an unblock request, which led to multiple saves and reversions. I understand how this could be frustrating for others and I will be more mindful of previewing my edits before saving them in the future.

I have read WP:CHILD and understand the importance of privacy protection and responsible editing practices. Moving forward, I will ensure that all my edits are original, fact-checked, and fully compliant with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Due to my lost trust in the community and their concerns, it would be a good idea and practical for me to avoid publishing AI-generated content entirely, even if it is for simple tasks, like copy editing, etc. If I choose to review an article, I will conduct the review properly, and only submit translations that I have personally verified. I recognise that trust must be rebuilt over time, and I am committed to becoming a better editor by learning from feedback and making careful, constructive contributions. I respectfully request that you reconsider my block and allow me the opportunity to restore and rebuild trust within the community through my future work.

Thank you for your time. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Blocking admin here, just procedurally declining this one as a new unblock request has been opened. -- asilvering (talk) 19:37, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

But this is still AI. -- asilvering (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Although ZeroGPT is coming up clean, I definitely find it suspicious that they're citing certain policies but the follow-up sentences don't align with the stated policy. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Plus the treating of unrelated topics as the same issue (eg. "I will conduct the review properly, and only submit translations that I have personally verified"). CMD (talk) 02:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

I meant add to separate the fact that they are different things, if that makes sense. I know that it wasn't that clear, and I'm going to write another block request. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 11:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: How Did It End? has been accepted

How Did It End?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 23:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Taylor's Version has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taylor's Version. Thanks! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 19:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Mhm. I'm disputing a block I've got, so I can't edit at the moment. :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dhar Mann Studios

Hello, Jorge906. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhar Mann Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taylor's Version (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JSFarman were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

submitted by a blocked editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taylor's Version and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The 1989 World Tour Live.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The 1989 World Tour Live.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Query

Hi @The Bushranger, when I submitted an unblock request, you said that I had previously promised not to use AI on WP. Would you be able to find a record of that? As I checked the adminators noticeboard regarding my AI edits, and I couldn't seem to find anything of me saying I would refrain from using AI.

Thanks. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 18:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

It's the comment here (I'd link the diff but it has been oversighted). - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh okay. Thanks :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

The Wizard of Oz being promoted to FA

@Samurai Kung fu Cowboy, do you think The Wizard of Oz could be nominated for FA? Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 13:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

@Jorge906, while you're blocked, the only thing you can use your talk page for is communication about the block. -- asilvering (talk) 15:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh I wasn't aware of that. So, is that a policy... Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

@Asilvering, apologies for the oversight. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wales' Home of the Year

Hello, Jorge906. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wales' Home of the Year".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Untouchable (Luna Halo and Taylor Swift song, respectively)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Untouchable (Luna Halo and Taylor Swift song, respectively) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 17:29, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry. I thought that I created it as a draft. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:16, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

No worries! When you do create the article again as a draft, you should probably create one version that is for the Luna original and one for the Taylor Swift cover. Having a combined article for both isn't really how things are done, especially because Taylor made a number of modifications. If you can't find enough reliable sourcing to do two separate articles, you could name the article Untouchable (song) and then have the less important version be a subheading - but I wouldn't recommend making the article title so lengthy. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 11:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Alright, thanks:) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 12:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)