Jorge Lobo Dos Santos

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hi, thanks for taking the time to review my appeal, even though this is the third unblock request I have submitted, so I appreciate it. My block was not just due to my AI edits on Wikipedia, it was also due to my GA reviews of King of My Heart, which wasn't disruptive just because I published a second AI-written review, even though the first time I published an AI-written review, I was told by an editor that an AI-written review would not suffice. It was because I proceeded to review "King of My Heart" for the third time, where I carelessly ticked boxes without properly reviewing the article. My unverified and unreviewed translations to The Red Tour that I published contributed to me being blocked. Due to the large amounts of unreviewed prose a LLM translated and I then published to The Red Tour article, several editors had to excessively clean up after me, a generous thing to do. I recognise that my reliance on AI to write GA reviews and article prose without rigorously scrutinizing the results, and not properly reviewing article nomination(s) has not met Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, etc.

On How Did It End?, I published AI-written prose that I did not adequately verify for accuracy, etc. One of the issues was that a citation intended to support a piece of prose was an album review that was solely of the standard album edition, whereas "How Did It End?" is included in the double album edition of The Tortured Poets Department sub-titled The Anthology. This mismatch demonstrates the faults of AI in ensuring neutral and factual accuracy.

I understand that these actions have led to a loss of trust within the community. I now appreciate that contributions to Wikipedia I pursue must be examined before being published. All citations and claims in edits I make needs to be verified manually. Due to the lost trust in the community, it would be a good idea for me to avoid any future use of AI-generated prose for any edits on Wikipedia.

I sincerely apologise for the disruption and confusion caused by my actions. If I get unblocked, I will contribute responsibly and be responsible for my contributions. I intend to raise a discussion regarding AI usage on Wikipedia, and in particular to have set policies/guidelines on using AI, instead of there just being essays addressing AI. This will address AI's (in particular LLM's) broader implications for our editing practices.

I respectfully request that you reconsider my block, and allow me to rebuild my lost trust by making careful contributions that are thoroughly verified and independently judged. I'll make future edits with an intent in which I know what I am publishing.

As I stated on my talk page, my disruptive edits on there were unintentional, I was experiencing technical difficulties on my phone, despite the source code being correct.

Thank you for your consideration.

Accept reason:

Per WP:LASTCHANCE. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 20:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

@Asilvering, @Yamla I'd really appreciate if an admin could look into my request. I know admins are quite busy, so sorry if I shouldn't have gone to you guys. :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I've closed your old request. Since I was the blocking admin, I'll leave this unblock request for someone else to handle, but I'm happy to answer questions in the meantime if you have any. -- asilvering (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Please be patient. The queue of unblock requests is chronically backlogged and admins, like all other Wikipedia users, are volunteers. Your request might take days or even weeks before it is reviewed. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes. That was the point I was trying to make, but thanks for the clarification. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@Drm310 I said "I know admins are quite busy". Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 10:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

If I do get unblocked, I'm thinking about starting a discussion regarding AI usage on WP, particularly to start enforcing policies and guidelines instead of just essays. I know that having firm policies and guidelines can be hard as they have to be thoroughly vetted by the community. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I would not advise starting a new discussion on that, there have been plenty. What an admin might look for instead is what content you are thinking of working on, and how. CMD (talk) 07:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

WP:LLM. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks again. While I'm waiting for a response to my unblock request, I'm planning out how I can improve the edits I previously made using an LLM. In particular, I want to go through and ensure that the sources cited in support of a specific piece of prose actually reflect what's said in the source(s), since obviously that’s essential for maintaining encyclopaedic accuracy. I’m also aiming to copyedit the articles just to tidy things up. If there's anything I should keep in mind as I approach this, I'd really appreciate any guidance. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) If you do get unblocked, what kind of edits do you think you will work on? Do you anticipate reviewing more GAs? Additionally, do you think you'll use AI to edit at all, and if so, how? Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 04:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

No, I probably won't review any articles for the matter of fact actually. I might contribute to a FAN or GAN. For example, I might give copy-editing suggestion or just give my input regarding something. I may use AI to edit, but not in the way I've been doing so. Any AI edits I will make will be rigorously scrutinised. AI shouldn't necessarily be seen negatively as a bad thing to use on Wikipedia. If we use it right then, well yeah. If we extensively check and edit the content, AI can be used for the good. But, I totally understand that the community probably don't want me making AI edits, even if they're done in this way.

Hope this helps. :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

One of the main problems with LLM's is that when asking them to generate article text with references, they tend to generate fake or biased info that comes across real, but then you go onto one of the sources, and realise that the piece of prose being supported by that source, does not mention anything from the piece of prose. So, it might be a good idea to move these articles to the draftspace. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

A general rule of thumb on Wikipedia is that if your edits are being questioned on a noticeboard, you should stop performing the kinds of edits that are questioned until consensus is established for such edits. (This applies to all editing disputes, not just LLM use.) The editor who opened the incidents noticeboard discussion started a new discussion on your user talk page (this page) at #"The Red Tour" translation asking you to "halt your AI edits" while the discussion was active. Although you replied to and acknowledged their request by saying "Ok" and "I understand. :)", you continued to post LLM-generated content (including the second good article review), which at that point was disruptive.

To maximize the likelihood that your unblock request is accepted, I recommend that you make a commitment (as an unblock condition) to completely avoid using LLM-generated content in your Wikipedia edits. — Newslinger talk 15:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

I totally get it, @Newslinger. I do understand the effects of my past edits, particularly continuing AI-generated edits after acknowledging the request from @Ippantekina to pause them. I recognise now that I should have halted all AI-related edits immediately until consensus was established. I sincerely do regret that misjudgment. If I do get unblocked, I will refrain from any AI edits, even for simple tasks, until consensus is reached, which I am aiming to raise. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

I hope this reassures the community that I take these concerns seriously and am committed to improving as an editor. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 15:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

The community is more likely to see you take the concerns seriously if you drop the fixation on the issue of AI, and instead let us know what edits you want to make or articles you want to improve. CMD (talk) 16:07, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Well basically all articles that I have contributed to that are LLM assisted. Here are a few: Dancing with Our Hands Tied, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things, How Did It End?, The Eras Tour Book. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, I'm thinking of not editing Draft:Taylor's Version anymore, as well it's all covered in the masters dispute article. Also, there is a chat on Talk:Lover (album) regarding if Lover Fest should be a standalone article. So for that, a paragraph or two would do in the Marketing section of the album article. But yeah, If I do get unblocked, I'm focusing on doing cleanup for any articles involving LLM edits. I'm also thinking of starting a draft on "The Outside" by Swift, with sources I have actually read. I have found books, etc used in other articles of her songs. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, I'm thinking of starting drafts for a few Taylor Swift songs. Using information from reliable sources that I myself have read. I'm thinking of starting drafts on: "The Outside", "Cold As You", "I Almost Do" and "The Lucky One". I haven't started the research yet, but I have found books that talk about the songs from her albums; these books tend to be cited in articles about her songs. I have found Taylor Swift: The Stories Behind the Songs, so that will be good to cite. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 08:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Just realised that "Cold as You" is already in draftspace. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

There are a few copyedits I want to make to Dancing with Our Hands Tied and This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things; particularly regarding the live performances. For example, instead of "Dancing With Our Hands Tied" was included in the setlist for Swift's fifth concert tour, the Reputation Stadium Tour (2018).", it would make more sense for it to be "Dancing With Our Hands Tied" was included in the setlist for the Reputation Stadium Tour (2018)." and you probably get the jist. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 08:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

If I do get unblocked, I also may create a draft for the song "Untouchable". I know that it is quite hard (which is probably why it hasn't been created or drafted) because the original version by Luna Halo isn't really well-known and as documented by reliable sources as Swift's songs are, so it might be tricky to create the article. I'm guessing it would be titled "Untouchable (Luna Halo and Taylor Swift song, respectively)".

I know that I was told that I should only use my talk page for communication about the block, but a change occurred to the 1989 World Tour article: the fair-use image of a promotional poster for the concert film of the tour used in the Concert film section of the article was removed by @Ippantekina, most likely due to the description of the image being AI-generated. While I do understand your reasoning, Ippantekina, the image itself was not AI-generated; only the description was, which I can understand why it may have been problematic. In retrospect though, it may have been better to just update the description rather than removing the image.

Thanks for all of your feedback and time, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 11:58, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

In the Getaway Car (Taylor Swift song) article, there is a piece of prose that is unsourced: A clip from Swift's 2020 documentary Miss Americana showing Antonoff and Swift writing the bridge became very popular after the release on multiple social media platforms. The clip became a template for a popular TikTok trend in 2023. The clip shows the two artists working humming along to the song and screaming out lyrics as they thought of them, which ultimately made it into the final cut of the song. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I might do a peer review of peer review of Judy Garland, to help bring it to FA or GA status. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Looking at my contributions from around the 27th May, the only contributions I made after the disruptive machine-generated translation of the The Red Tour was a GA review of King of My Heart, where I wordlessly ticked boxes without adequately reviewing the article. Obviously, doesn't mean that any of this is right in the way it's been done, but I'm trying to make a point that these edits seem to be made before @Ippantekina consulted me to temporarily halt my AI edits. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

It's promising that you're responding to comments here in a way that does not appear to be LLM-assisted. I'll let another administrator process the unblock request, but I think you have a lot to offer Wikipedia in your own words. — Newslinger talk 16:06, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, they'll all probably need to be moved to the draftspace, and I'm totally fine with cleaning up, etc, where I went wrong. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

• @asilvering - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 03:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

  Dubious, if I'm honest, but don't let that stop you. It's encouraging that more recent replies sound more thoughtful and organic. -- asilvering (talk) 06:24, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks!! Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

  I might start drafting articles which have been generated with an LLM (How Did It End?, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things, etc) just so that if I do get unblocked, I would have already written some prose (with sources I have read of course). Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry, that was worded wrong. I meant that I might start drafting articles that had previously been generated by an LLM. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I would appreciate a follow-up as the unblock request has been active for almost a month. I appreciate everyone's time. Thanks, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

@Jorge906, I'll ping @PhilKnight and @Newslinger just in case (sorry Newslinger, I know you said you'd leave it for someone else, but since it's been a while...?), and I'm sorry you've been waiting so long, but someone will get to it eventually. It's ok to ping a specific admin if you were talking to them and they might have forgotten about you (some of us get a lot of notifications and it's very easy to miss some), but otherwise, editing on this page just makes it look like there's an ongoing and recent discussion, so if anything, it might discourage previously uninvolved admins from having a look. -- asilvering (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Asilvering, I didn't accept the unblock request as you said you were dubious. I have been leaving it to another admin to review. PhilKnight (talk) 19:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks. So, should I just keep my mouth shut, basically? (not trying to be rude) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

You will just have to be patient. PhilKnight (talk) 20:01, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

How long should I wait until following up? Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Hiya @Liz, I logged on to my old account @Jorge0987 to add the {{Old account}} template to my user page. But because I logged in on that account, it's automatically blocked me on here. So, if you could unblock me on there, so I can add that template. Thanks ☺️ Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Deleted talk page comments

Hi, I tried to leave replies to the discussion you pinged me in earlier but they got deleted for reasons I cannot decipher in any way ("talk page rules", apparently). What I said can be found here. Normally I would not draw attention to deleted comments, even my own, but considering the fact you pinged me I believe you wanted my perspective on the matter. λ NegativeMP1 16:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm so sorry, it was an accident! Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

You didn't delete my comments, so you have nothing to apologize for. I'm not even mad at the person who did (just confused). I'm merely bringing to your attention what my perspective on the matter was, in-case you missed it before the comments got deleted. λ NegativeMP1 16:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Yeah I didn't get to see it. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:04, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Because I was confused where they went too. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Through vs By

I noticed that you changed the word 'by' to 'through' with respect to the release of Taylor Swift's music across her various EPs and albums. I just wanted to highlight that 'by' is the grammatically correct word in this scenario - it doesn't signify authorship or anything of that sort but rather a label's role in publishing and distributing an album. You will notice that that is the wording used on album pages for Swift's musical contemporaries as well, for example, + (album), Man's Best Friend (Sabrina Carpenter album), The Secret of Us, The Rise and Fall of a Midwest Princess, Sour (album) and Fine Line (Harry Styles album). As such, I will revert all the edits for the same, unless you have a problem with that. MadelynnSienna (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes, and using 'by' does make sense, my only concern is because in the first sentence of basically all album articles, it tends to have the word 'by' when addressing who the album is by. I guess it's not a big problem, I just thought using the word 'by' twice in the first two sentences wouldn't be very encyclopaedic. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 09:13, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

I understand where you are coming from, but given that most pages follow that format, I would use for the purposes of Wikipedia it is sufficiently encyclopaedic. In my view, it's better to be grammatically correct than avoid repeating words in successive sentences. I hope that's alright! MadelynnSienna (talk) 10:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

@MadelynnSienna: just to clarify my reasoning: I chose through over by primarily for stylistic purposes. Since the first sentence of most album articles already uses by to refer to the artist, I felt that repeating it in the second sentence (for the label) made the lead feel slightly redundant.

I also believed through was factually accurate, as it reflects the label's role in distribution. I understand that by is grammatically correct and widely used, and I'm happy to defer to consensus.

Thanks :) Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cold as You (Taylor Swift song) (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shocksingularity was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the citations are about TS's music in general, could you have more specific to this song?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cold as You (Taylor Swift song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shocksingularity (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shocksingularity (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lover Fest

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lover Fest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lover Fest

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lover Fest".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untouchable (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untouchable (Taylor Swift song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Last Performance (documentary)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Last Performance (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Taylor's Version

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taylor's Version, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Untouchable (Taylor Swift song)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Untouchable (Taylor Swift song), was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Last Performance (documentary)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Last Performance".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:27, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:I'd Lie

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I'd Lie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:I'd Lie

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "I'd Lie".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Outside (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Outside".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Lucky One (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Lucky One (Taylor Swift song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of OK (Katy Perry song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OK (Katy Perry song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OK (Katy Perry song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sricsi (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Lucky One (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Lucky One".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:I Think He Knows

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I Think He Knows, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:I Think He Knows

Hello, Jorge Lobo Dos Santos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "I Think He Knows".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Jorge906 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 10 (band), links pointing to the disambiguation pages LP, Cassette and Digital download were added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2026 (UTC)