ILoveDogs1337

September 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to LaTeX have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: LaTeX was changed by ILoveDogs1337 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907031 on 2025-09-22T16:34:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ILoveDogs1337, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Adverse childhood experiences did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:01, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Childhood Crimes

Hey @ILoveDogs1337, I noticed you've added to the Adverse Childhood Experiences article that it's also known as Childhood Crimes, do you have a source for this? I used to be an ACEs scholar and I've never seen this wording used in the literature. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:19, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

On Tifinagh

Hi there. Regarding your recent addition to the table of Phoenician letters and its derivations, I'd suggest we don't add Tifinagh. You see, its predecessor Libyco-Berber is already there, and it nicely represents and includes the Berber abjad family with its (purported) closest relative to the Phoenician script. But Tuareg Tifinagh has many differences and a highly derived set of letters that are hard to (immediately) reconcile with Phoenician. Not that there isn't an explanation, but that table isn't going to depict the complex relationship between graphemes. Never mind Neo-Tifinagh, which I think should never be included for obvious reasons. I personally consider the table is already overly inflated as it is. It should only depict those alphabets closely related to Phoenician, and I believe including more than one Indic abugida, Cyrillic or Mongolian is beyond absurd as they are highly evolved and derive from many intermediaries. The same goes for Tifinagh. Regards. 31.221.135.15 (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Signing in articles

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Neologism. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on talk pages or project pages such as the Teahouse. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Babu88

mdsajib1213 36.255.80.149 (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

BRO, WHAT THE FLEK IS Babu88? ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 13:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Do not do this. It is inappropriate of you to request a rename of a different user. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blissymbols, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, History of telecommunication, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:15, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to String operations. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page String operations has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Was yeah just flek up you acz meant to be an insult? Belbury (talk) 11:24, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at String operations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fakoo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fakoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 10:18, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Fakoo

I have moved your article to draft space, where you can work on it before submitting for review. Please don't try to move it yourself. Deb (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

sorry. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 10:55, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Fakoo alphabet (from the website).png

Thanks for uploading File:Fakoo alphabet (from the website).png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Fakoo script.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Fakoo script.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fakoo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fakoo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://fakoo.de/en/fakoo.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The4lines |||| (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fakoo alphabet (from the website).png

A tag has been placed on File:Fakoo alphabet (from the website).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://fakoo.de/en/fakoo/fakoo-alphabet.html?pl (lists this as CC-BY-NC licenced; cannot be freely hosted on Wikipedia, could not be claimed as fair use) and has no credible claim of non-free use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Belbury (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fakoo script.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Fakoo script.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://fakoo.de/en/fakoo/fakoo-alphabet.html?pl (lists this as CC-BY-NC licenced; cannot be freely hosted on Wikipedia, could not be claimed as fair use) and has no credible claim of non-free use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Belbury (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Blissymbols name example.png

Thanks for uploading File:Blissymbols name example.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

It's made by me, you doodad ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

And its in CC0, a public-domainish license. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 07:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Why are you being rude? All you need to do is complete the upload form correctly. Deb (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

kk bro ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Repeatingly restoring content

Hi ILoveDogs1337! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of String operations. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:String operations, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. You seem to have misunderstood what the section is about; replacing all of one letter with another in a piece of text would not work as a word filter.. Belbury (talk) 09:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Stranger in a Strange Land, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.‎ Criticize (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Stranger in a Strange Land did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ‎‎ Criticize (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

yea ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Blissymbols, you may be blocked from editing. A WP:REDDIT post is not a reliable source. Belbury (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

But How do I cite a Twitter/𝕏 post like what I will? ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

You can use the {{cite tweet}} template.

If you're planning on citing the same type of content as was in the Reddit post, though, social media usually isn't an appropriate source for Wikipedia, under WP:SPS. Belbury (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Solresol, you may be blocked from editing. ZimZalaBim^talk 15:08, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Reappropriation, you may be blocked from editing. stop adding things you know are unsourced; sources are needed beforehand, not after the fact. ZimZalaBim^talk 16:54, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

"Stop adding things you know are unsourced; sources are needed beforehand, not after the fact." - ZimZalaBim Oh. WP:CS ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

You seem to be acting as if this is the first time someone pointed out to you the need for proper sourcing, yet there's like a dozen of warnings above. Please adjust your approach accordingly. --ZimZalaBim^talk 17:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

yeah (See WP:REDDIT) ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, as you did at Reappropriation, you may be blocked from editing. Final warning on this important behavioral misstep. ZimZalaBim^talk 14:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Ohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohhohh ZimZalaBim, How dare you give me a last chance? That's it. You're grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded grounded for 10 decades! Go to your room right now! Yeah, but I'll explain the part. Anyone can create a personal web page, self-publish a book, or claim to be an expert. Self-published material, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), content farms, podcasts, Internet forum postings, and social media postings, are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published sources may be considered reliable if published by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. Be careful when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will likely have published it in independent, reliable sources. Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ILoveDogs1337 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

References

Recent edits to vowel pages

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ oklopfer (💬) 13:37, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Oklopfer, Can you find audio for most IPA phonemes ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

This site is copyrighted, so we should not re-upload to Wikimedia, and opinionated, so we should not use it as sourcing, but https://jbdowse.com/ipa/ has a very large portion. ~ oklopfer (💬) 13:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

bru just do your own ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 14:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Oklopfer: Regardless, some of the audio samples on that website may be inaccurate. For example, r̝ may be z͡r rather than ð̠͡r. - BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 21:10, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

oh. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 04:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Edit summaries

You've been warned at least twice before, and you still are making edits with improper edit summaries. Please follow our guidelines on this. --ZimZalaBim^talk 19:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ZimZalaBim^talk 18:08, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

The thread is: WP:ANI § Unconstructive and unwillingness of ILoveDogs1337. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:19, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveDogs1337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I mistakenly vandalized some linguistics pages.ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 06:26, 23 November 2025 (UTC) ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 06:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"mistakenly"? Were there other pages you were intending to vandalize instead? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:00, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 06:20, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Please read through all the warnings on your Talk page and the ANI thread linked in the last section, because that's not the only reason you were blocked. You should also re-read the Guide to appealing blocks as you've not addressed most of the things you need to.

We already know what you did, it's clear in the multiple warnings messages above. You need to read through all of those & the ANI thread, then explain why you caused those problems and convince an admin that you understand exactly what to do to avoid each one from happening again.

Blocks are to prevent disruption, so you need to prove that you won't continue to be disruptive. Just saying you'll do better isn't enough, you need to describe exactly what you'll do differently next time. Blue Sonnet (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Yeah. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveDogs1337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I vandalized some pages earlier and sorry. I'll stick to expanding stubs when you accept me. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declining per Blue-Sonnet, who said this much better than I could put it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

I've moved your latest appeal to the bottom of the page, please keep things in time order so they make sense. This is kinda long, but please read it all as I think it'll really help you.

I'll be very honest with you - you've not really addressed what happened properly. You need to explain why you behaved that way and what's changed in the short amount of time that's passed.

I don't think you've done enough to persuade an admin that you won't make more unacceptable comments like you did before. Just saying you don't do it again isn't going to cut it - people say that all the time because it's easier to say than do. You need to show proper understanding of everything that happened and that can't be done in one sentence.

I'm also worried because half of your edits had to be undone by other editors for many different reasons - basically they didn't meet various Wikipedia policies.

We're all volunteers, doing this in our own time, so whenever you vandalise or make a poor-quality edit, someone else has to fix that and it's not fair that they have to do that. You are responsible for reading and learning how Wikipedia works; whenever you get a warning you should be reading it to try to understand why there was a problem and what to do next time.

I think this appeal will be declined unless you can be very open and persuasive about what happened for every warning you received, why it happened and how you'd act differently next time.

You do have a way out of this - I think the Standard offer (link) would be great for you.

You need proof that you've changed and can be a good editor, yes?

You can get that proof at Simple English Wikipedia (link), a project that's very similar to Wikipedia but is much easier to understand and, more importantly, where you're not currently blocked. You edit over on Simple for a few months, learn the ropes and build up a history of good editing. You can even choose a different Wikipedia project at List of Wikipedias, if something else takes your fancy.

Then you come back here in six months or so, with a load of evidence to back up your next appeal - you can go "Look, I know I screwed up and didn't react the way I should have. I've learned how to be a good editor, here's all my proof!"

Does that sound like a good idea? There are some great editors and even admins who were in the exact same situation you are in now - they followed the Standard offer and learned how to do better. I think you can do this too. Blue Sonnet (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveDogs1337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Here's a timeline. In October 2025, I wanted to change another user's name. In November 2025, I forgot to know how to cite a source. Now, i'll stick to expanding stubs. ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is inadequate. You should take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no abuse of multiple accounts. You should use your time to contribute to another Wikimedia site, perhaps the Simple English Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) We already know what you did and what you want to do, the missing piece of the puzzle is proof that you can be trusted on Wikipedia.

It's been less than a month since your appeal was declined, and there's nothing in your new appeal that's substantially different to your last one. I am almost certain that it'll just be declined again.

I strongly suggest you delete this open appeal (whilst it's still blue) - declined (orange) appeals can't be deleted and will stay here for everyone to view unless you make a successful appeal in future.

Delete this appeal and focus your efforts on the Standard offer I recommended earlier - this is your only realistic prospect for getting unblocked.

This new appeal also resets the six month waiting period on the Standard offer, another reason you should delete it before an admin sees it. Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your appeal was declined, please be aware that the six month waiting period is from the date of your last edit - the date of your appeal. If you try to appeal again, that will keep getting longer. Please follow the advice I gave last month, this is really your best chance to come back. Blue Sonnet (talk) 17:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILoveDogs1337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Here's a timeline. In October 2025, I wanted to change another user's name. In November 2025, I forgot to know how to cite a source. Now, i'll stick to expanding stubs. I know I screwed up and didn't react the way I should have. I've learned how to be a good editor, here's all my proof!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. asilvering (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ILoveDogs1337 (talk) 07:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

This request is going to be declined, I have the strangest feeling that telling admins "Do not decline this unblock request." and ignoring all the advice given to you won't work... Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  asilvering (talk) 05:44, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

See also

• Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ILoveDogs1337 PhilKnight (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)