Gubble flex
Welcome!
editHello, Gubble flex, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alive (video game, 1998), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 20:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alive (video game, 1998)
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Alive (video game, 1998) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from psxdatacenter.com/games/J/A/SLPS-01527.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 20:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Alive (video game, 1998) moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Alive (video game, 1998). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and thus no indication that it might be notable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Impact Racing moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Impact Racing. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has no lead section.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ZombiUwU (💬 ~♥~ 📝) 01:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Impact Racing (February 28)
edit
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Impact Racing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Gubble flex!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC) |
April 2024
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Gubble flex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Your reason here I consider this to be a misunderstanding or mistake. My previous contributions demonstrate my commitment to the platform's policies and my intention to contribute constructively. I am willing to discuss any problem. Gubble flex (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Then please discuss your violations of the non free content policy. 331dot (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gubble flex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I have been blocked due to edits that were considered erroneous. However, I want to explain in detail what happened: When editing the article, my intention was to correct incorrect information that I found on the page. Unfortunately, due to a misunderstanding, some of my edits were interpreted as erroneous. This was a mistake on my part and I take full responsibility for it. :Reviewing my edits, I can see how they may have been misinterpreted, but I want to assure you that my intention has always been to contribute positively and constructively to the community. and I must always respect the platform's policies. :To avoid future misunderstandings, I commit to being more careful in my edits, carefully reviewing my changes before submitting them, and communicating transparently with other editors if I have questions about an edit. I am also willing to participate in any additional training on the platform's editing policies if necessary. :I appreciate the work of the moderators and understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and quality of the content on the platform. I am willing to discuss any additional concerns you may have and clear up any misunderstandings. :Thank you for your attention and consideration.
Decline reason:
According to zerogpt, this request was generated by an AI. We have no interest in edits from AI chatbots. Nor does it address your violations of the non free content policy, as you were directed to do by 331dot. If you are attempting to demonstrate you need to remain blocked, you are doing an excellent job. Yamla (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Concern regarding Draft:Alive (video game, 1998)
edit
Hello, Gubble flex. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alive (video game, 1998), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Alive (video game, 1998)
edit
Hello, Gubble flex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alive".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Impact Racing
edit Hello, Gubble flex. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Impact Racing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Unblock request
editGubble flex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Your reason here
- Ok, I'm going to talk about myself and not about others.
- I was the one who violated the non-free content policy because I purposely put the image of a video game called impact raing from ps1 from 1996 and I had no right to put that to tell the truth I crossed the line and that is very wrong I did it what an idiot I am I admit it is my fault I cannot deny because it is the truth I embarrass others I am guilty what I did was very regrettable I am responsible for having done it and I will assume responsibility I really regret it, it was me mainly disrespecting the non-free content policy and it's wrong
- Now my behavior
- My behavior is disgusting and terrible and more unpleasant and with greater catastrophe and disaster, in addition to the fact that I am a tremendous stupid and asshole and idiot and an idiot that I really am, it cannot be that the bastard that I am should correct my behavior correctly, my behavior, absurd idiocy.
- and apart from that I admit
- That all my contributions will always be registered to Wikipedia because you can analyze and also review the edits of what you have made even if it has been deleted and if they blocked me you can see and also review the truth, I will not deny it because it is the pure 100% truth on other occasions.
- Now if I want you to trust me I have some reasons
- 1- I promise to respect and maintain the respectful tone of Wikipedia's policies and even the Wikipedia's terms of service policy and the non-free content policy and other Wikipedia policies in which I must respect it with all my will
- 2- I promise not to violate the non-free content policy again. and it will not happen again, I will prove that what I did was pretty bad, so I regret what I did, I promise it will not happen again.
- 3- Correct my abusive behavior and especially my conduct and I will have a good behavior and a better one for my abused behavior and make myself a better correction
- 4- I will demonstrate and promise to propose to improve and even correct or make a correction and resolve the problems take the strongest measures necessary to resolve the issues I will solve any problem in every situation I am willing to rebuild at all costs
- Those are my reasons why I must correct my bad behavior and my conduct and I must have good, better behavior and my behavior I am the most disappointing I will not violate the non-free content policy again I will respect it with everything I will not behave badly again and I will not return with bad behavior I promise
- I violated the non-free content policy, I admit it, I truly regret it I was a stupid.
Decline reason:
This is mostly gibberish. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gubble flex (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi there! I've gone ahead and moved your most recent unblock request to the bottom of the page as having your talk page in chronological order is helpful for those reviewing your request. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for forwarding my request, I appreciate it. I will take it into account more for the future.
February 2025
edit
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.
In response to UTRS appeal #110030 I have restored talk page access, to allow you to post an unblock request here. JBW (talk) 00:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Gubble flex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I request to be unblocked. I understand why I was blocked. I uploaded copyrighted material that did not meet Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, and that was my responsibility. I also acknowledge that I misused my user talk page while I was blocked. I want to clarify that I will not use AI, LLM, or chatbots on Wikipedia in the future. I understand why this affected trust and I will not do it again. If I am unblocked, I will avoid all non-free posts, follow the policies carefully, and maintain respectful and content-focused communication. I understand that trust takes time to rebuild and I am willing to do so. Thank you for your consideration. Gubble flex (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Promising to stop using an LLM (such as ChatGPT) while responding using an LLM is not going to help you get unblocked. Given that you are blocked (not ChatGPT), we are interested in hearing from you. Unblock requests must reflect your own understanding of the block and your willingness to follow Wikipedia’s policies going forward. Because this request does not demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked or how you plan to change your editing behavior, the request is declined. You are welcome to submit a new request written in your own words. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:24, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gubble flex (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- @JJMC89: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think they really understand why they were blocked. It wasn't for an upload but for repeated violations on Draft:Impact Racing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- You're right. I now see and understand that the block was mainly due to repeated issues with Draft:Impact Racing, not just one post. I didn't manage the comments or the policies properly, and of course, that's my fault. I've taken the time to read the relevant policies and I see what I did wrong.
- If I'm unblocked, I'll be more careful, follow the instructions when they're given, avoid non-free content, and refrain from using AI or similar tools on Wikipedia. Thanks for looking into this. Gubble flex (talk) 22:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
I'll ... refrain from using AI or similar tools on Wikipedia.
Start with this response. See WP:LLMAPPEAL. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)- Thank you for letting me know.
- I want to be very clear: from now on, I will not use AI, LLM, or chatbots on Wikipedia in any way.
- And now I also understand that the block was mainly due to recurring issues with Draft:Impact Racing and not just one post. I didn't follow the instructions correctly, and of course, that's my fault.
- If I am unblocked, I will comply with the policies, follow the instructions when they are given, and focus my comments on improving the content.
- Thank you for reviewing it again. Gubble flex (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think they really understand why they were blocked. It wasn't for an upload but for repeated violations on Draft:Impact Racing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)