Talk archive 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

This user knows that it can be a challenge to keep AGF in mind.

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #249 is out: Annual plan 2026-2027

edit

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present you the current draft of objectives for Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia in the WMF Annual Plan 2026-2027, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sincere Thank you :D

edit

For the United States strikes on alleged drug traffickers during Operation Southern Spear, thank you for moving the video and not deleting it. I know you do not like these videos as much, and personally I do not mind them being left out of the infobox as long as they are included. Thank you for remembering and being so considerate. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 13:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-22

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Changes to List of NAE members (electronics)

edit

I noticed that you made a few changes to the List of members of the National Academy of Engineering (electronics) page in the last week or so, first moving the "Year Elected" column to the left side, and then most recently changing the "d." for death year into "Died" throughout the page. I'm not sure if you're aware, but this is one list of ~43 pages that comprise the lists of the members of the NAE and the NAS. I've been systematically updating all 43 pages with the ~10,000 names (living and deceased), pulling them from the online directories, checking and integrating with the existing Wikipedia information, etc. These pages were terribly out of date, and had a lot of incorrect information that had been added in an ad hoc manner over the years.

I believe that all 43 pages should have the same format, and I've been using the format that was set with the NAS pages, which dates back more than 12 years. This includes the "Year Elected" on the right and the indication of the death as "(d. ####)". I inadvertently overwrote your recent change of moving the "Year Elected" column because you moved it when I was in the process of updating that page with the new information between my first minor cleanup and then the full rebuild.

So, if you don't too strenuously object, I would like to revert your change of "d." -> "died" on this page, just so that all ~43 pages are a consistent format. But let me know what you think. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the thoughtful response. I see two (unrelated) aspects:
  • Column ordering — The lists could be seen as either:
    1. "lists of people" (ordered by surname, so having the name in the first column) or
    2. "lists of elected people" (ordered by the year that they were elected, so having the year in the first column)
    The lists are currently #1 and I currently prefer #2 (chronological lists just make more sense to me). However, since the tables can be sorted, the choice is not very important.
  • Died — MOS:DOB advises the use of the whole word rather than just d. – space would need to be very tight to require the saving of just two characters.
To ensure consistency, I am willing to change "d." to "died" in all 43 of the articles.
Of course, there is also an argument for not saying "d." or "died" at all – it should really include DOB as well: M. Robert Aaron (1922–2007), but that is probably a step too far ... — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
On the column order, I think I would more strongly prefer to keep the name as the first column. These pages are "Lists of members...", not timelines of elections, and the primary entity in each row is the person. The election year is essentially a secondary attribute, and as you say, it is already an easily sortable table.
On d. vs died, I see your point about MOS. My reading is that “d.” is permitted where space is limited. I was more focused on consistency, and since d. was used historically in these tables, I had kept it that way when updating them. I am fine with either, but generally I had preferred the compactness of "d." over "died" since there are some longer names and institution names that make the table wide.
I'm not in favor of adding the date of birth, as that is more biographic than membership-relevant information, and it's not information supplied by the NAS/NAE directories, so there would be loads of incomplete entries.
Thanks for fixing the short descriptions (I saw that adding those had created redundancy at the top), and for the discussion. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Green tick GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:32, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LocusAndLeaf: An aside: should the articles be named with an upper case suffix or a lower case one? List of members of the National Academy of Engineering (aerospace) vs List of members of the National Academy of Engineering (Bioengineering). There seems to be a fairly even split... — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 13:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

If it were up to me, I would have them all capitalized, because those are the titles of the NAS and NAE sections. But, there was a discussion about this (somewhat buried) in the talk page for the NAE Aerospace page before I came onto the scene as an editor. An editor decided that these were common descriptive titles and not proper nouns, and there was one supporting vote, so proceeded to change all of them to lowercase. Perhaps they missed a few, like Bioengineering - and I am in favor of consistency, even if lowercase was not my preference, so I would vote in favor of switching to lowercase; it seemed like the time to debate upper vs lower had passed. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I also thought that UC was better ... Done them all anyway — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:39, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. This reminded me that another change that I was considering was adding the official section number in the header at the top of each table, because the section numbers are designated by NAS and NAE, but are not currently in these tables or even clearly described in the main articles about the NAS and NAE. It would look something like:
== Section 1: Aerospace ==
and so forth for all the pages. This might reduce the redundancy of the table header with the page header. I haven't gotten around to this, obviously, but let me know if you think that's a good idea, bad idea, or are indifferent. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
No-ish. When reading an article, the numbers would have no significance. The article should not aim to reproduce all aspects of the source — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay; it sounds like the main article on the NAE would be a better place to describe the organization into sections, perhaps with a table listing the 12 sections in the membership section. The NAS has a separate page on membership and a section describing the major disciplines, but nothing on the 31 named sections within those disciplines (which is how the lists of members are organized). So maybe a table there would be appropriate? LocusAndLeaf (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just a note that I made these two changes, adding brief tables to each page to list the formal sections and classes (for NAS). LocusAndLeaf (talk) 15:47, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #250 is out: Looking back and forward

edit

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present you a recollection of our work so far, now that we celebrate our 250th newsletter, we share with you a summary of our latest outreach activities, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 10:04, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


George Floyd

edit

Hello there. You reverted my insertion of a map showing xenophobia protests in Durban. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_and_March Not sure why. Wikipedia made a wonderful map of protests in the US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:George_Floyd_protests_map. The same is needed here. Derek J Moore (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The March and March article is about an organization. A map of protests in Durban might be appropriate in an article about protests in Durban — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:09, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
March and March are a national organisation. They have organised protests in Durban, Johannesburg, Pretoria. Derek J Moore (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-23

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Died vs. "d." in tables?

edit

Hi! I saw you recently updated the list of National Academy pages with died instead of 'd.' As I'm one of the main people (somewhat sporadically) updating those pages, I just wanted to say thank you for updating all of the pages and not just one, and ask for your thoughts behind using 'd.' when space is limited versus writing out 'died' in the tables? I'm fine with either option, as it was an arbitrary decision I made in the first place. I'm just curious on if there's a guideline beyond 'when space is limited' or anything beyond what's listed in MS:DDOT. Thanks! Cyanochic (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Geniologists often use d. or , but WP has to assume a very general readership and so we should avoid abbreviations - especially where they are not explained. The words born and died are also only four letters, so a two character abbreviation saves very little space and is hard to justify — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Makes plenty of sense to me. I'll make sure to keep with the new formatting. Cyanochic (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kuwaiti companies established in 2012

edit

A tag has been placed on Category:Kuwaiti companies established in 2012 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #251 is out: The illustrated encyclopaedia

edit

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we introduce our first function to import images on Abstract Wikipedia, we present our Functions of the Week, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on June 8, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply