GarethBaloney

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimmy Saville is a nonce (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons:

1. It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject.
2. It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone.
3. It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature.
   

This page meets one or more of the general criteria for speedy deletion and may be deleted without notice. Users who continue to create inappropriate pages will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimmy Saville is a nonce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

First of all the term 'nonce' means "a person who commits a crime involving sex, especially sex with a child." which he did do over the course of 50 years.

Second of all, Jimmy Saville died in 2012. He is not alive anymore (thank God) GarethBaloney (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, GarethBaloney! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Formato (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Formato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The smiffs

Hello, GarethBaloney

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The smiffs, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 28 § The smiffs.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Formato has been accepted

Gary Formato, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

"Mommy kink" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mommy kink has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5 § Mommy kink until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

"Human high-quality man" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Human high-quality man has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5 § Human high-quality man until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qingen Xu

The article Qingen Xu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a BLP article about a very minimally notable person. It is unacceptably poorly sourced. The only part that even begins to suggest notability is the claim that he is banned from China but that is only sourced to his own website. The rest of the sourcing is bad too.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

"Esos son Reebok o son Nike?" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Esos son Reebok o son Nike? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Esos son Reebok o son Nike? until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mikke Van Hool

The article Mikke Van Hool has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG--coverage is limited to database entries and photographs, no secondary RS appear to be available. I found a mere-mention in an F1 memoir , but that's not enough coverage for a biography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

To edit in the Israeli-Palestinian topic area on Wikipedia accounts must be at least thirty days old and have at least 500 edits. This includes editing talk pages, with the sole exception being for simple and specific edit requests, which should be in the form of "change x to y for reason z", complying with EDITXY. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for being such an awesome contributor! Maduka Jayalath (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

JT Tran

I agree with the sentiment, but I must deprod it, because it's been through AfD once. You must BVI back to WP:AfD and create a second nomination. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Thankfully someone else appears to have redone it for me! GarethBaloney 15:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Hilton Cowie

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hilton Cowie, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Raph Williams65 Guestbook Barnstar
	Hello GarethBaloney, this barnstar is presented to you for signing my guestbook. Thanks – Raphael 15:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, GarethBaloney! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — voidxor 22:25, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

A fox for you!

I know this is silly but your redirect Bootycheeks made me laugh a little too hard. Keep up the good work!

Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Plural wikilinks

Howdy. This is so minor that I don't want to revert again, but I disagree with your edit here. [[Wikilink]]s is a shortcut syntax for [[Wikilink|Wikilinks]], and is in my opinion superior to creating the page Wikilinks and then redirecting it to Wikilink. Hope that helps. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to be completely honest, I didn't know. It just looked a bit wrong in source editing, although as you said it's a very minor issue. GarethBaloney (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

No worries. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello GarethBaloney! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Is it considered a trivial edit to add stub templates to stub articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:08, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Kilakone Siphonexay

With two clicks, I found significant coverage and added a reliable news source to the article. So I deprodded it. Bearian (talk) 05:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Very well then. GarethBaloney (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you recently removed content from British Rail Class 02 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 19:58, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Hilton Cowie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilton Cowie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilton Cowie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ecourter (talk) 22:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

"Noob vs pro vs hacker" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Noob vs pro vs hacker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 7 § Noob vs pro vs hacker until a consensus is reached. Opm581 ^{(talk | he/him)} 23:30, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Junlper

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Junlper, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Syracuse Circuit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Syracuse Circuit, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)