This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bsoyka. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform" What the VLOP – findings of an outside auditor for "responsibilization" of Wikipedia. Plus, new EU Commissioners for tech policy, WLE 2024 winners, and a few other bits of news from the Wikipedia world.
@Somethingidk123: Hey there! I'm actually going to point you toward my essay on why you shouldn't start an article just yet. Correctly creating articles on Wikipedia takes a decent amount of experience, and you should try to build up your skills before trying this. I know this isn't quite the answer you wanted to hear, but I hope it's one that helps you grow as a contributor to this great project. Happy editing, and reach out with whatever other questions you may have! Bsoyka (t•c•g) 03:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.
@Artichokedance: Hey there! My typical advice is that newcomers shouldn't start an article immediately. Correctly creating articles on Wikipedia takes a decent amount of experience, and you should try to build up your skills before trying this.If you're really set on this one, though, I'd love to help you do it right. First off, it's important to understand what exactly makes a subject notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. In most cases, you can follow our "general notability guideline" (GNG), which states:
A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
That one's the standard rule, but there are also topic-specific guidelines that can help determine notability. For example, our notability guidelines for entertainers can apply here, so I'd recommend looking at those.Before you start trying to write the article at all, I'd recommend seeing if you can find 2–3 sources/articles that focus primarily on Wigmore and meet the criteria above. A few notes there:
We generally don't consider IMDb a reliable source because of its user-generated nature. For more info on that, see WP:IMDB.
As with most actors, many sources you'll come across are interviews. Those can be a weird point of contention here—see WP:IV for more details on whether it's appropriate to use them. If possible, I'd recommend trying to find multiple solid sources that aren't interviews first, so that notability is clearly established, then work on incorporating the appropriate content from the interviews later.
Don't get discouraged! It's tough to start a new article, even for more experienced contributors. Sometimes, subjects just aren't quite notable enough for an entry here, and that's okay.
Let me know if all that info made no sense—I know it's a lot to take in, but I'd love to help you through it. I'm here for you! Bsoyka (t•c•g) 18:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Leftie0: Hey there! I'm actually going to point you toward my essay on why you shouldn't start an article just yet. Correctly creating articles on Wikipedia takes a decent amount of experience, and you should try to build up your skills before trying this. I know this isn't quite the answer you wanted to hear, but I hope it's one that helps you grow as a contributor to this great project. Happy editing, and reach out with whatever other questions you may have! Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! I am having issues with edits that continue to be undone. The reasons provided include "advertisement/promotion" and COIs. I believe I've disclosed the COI and removed any unintentional advertisement/promotion, but I caution to publish the changes because I've been warned that my ability to edit will be taken away. --ASRSECP (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Bsoyka. Thank you for your work on Roy Applequist. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! Happy new year, and I hope all is well. Do you by any chance have access to the Gale Picture Post Historical Archive? I am trying to trace the provenance of a photo that has been lost due to the acquisition of the photo archives by multiple parties over just less than a century. You can review the first phase of my search here. Thank you! Viriditas (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Question from Intotheweeds (21:50, 20 January 2025)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have no idea what I am doing Ben! I am a disabled veteran trying to create a page for Military Broadcast Radio. can you please help me? --Intotheweeds (talk) 21:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, I was wondering how often I should contribute/edit. I feel if I don't do it for a couple days or weeks i'll forget about it completely. --Alex the confused (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
@Alex the confused: Hey there! See our getting started page for a good introduction to how you can contribute here. And it's okay not to contribute every day, or even consistently at all. We appreciate any and all help in building this project, no matter how much time you're able to dedicate. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 03:33, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Question from RosarioGilson (15:36, 1 February 2025)
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. I have information regarding the passing of Robert Rummer home developer. I would like to add to his page. Please explain how to make this addition. --RosarioGilson (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I want to add “Gulf of America” to the “Gulf of Mexico” site. I don’t want to replace the name, I just want to add it. I think it’s protected or something. What do I do? Also it’s not right that the Persian gulf gets to have “Arabian Gulf” in parentheses. --Waterswine (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
News and notes: Let's talk! The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
Traffic report: A wild drive The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, back in October last year I posted my first article around an "authenticated" internet, but at that time I hide it, because I need to consider that it is not obviously linked to the company I work for. Now I have taken the next step and last week posted on LinkedIn and it caught pretty much interest. What is novel, and where one possibly need a Wiki article, is that it is based on government provides Digital Identities. The thing, as described in the article, it is voluntary, and the use is decentralized, i.e. how it works with physical IDs. I now also posted an article related to the deadlock around CSMA and the not so good idea to legislate backdoors in WhatsApp etc. Protection of children has been the goal all the time, but I think we need an Wiki article on "authenticated" internet. And as I write in the article, one is free to use todays internet, be on darkweb, it is just that we should consider to carve out a place where children, but also others, can be more safe. Is this worth a Wiki article? Thanks in advance --DomPowNow (talk) 13:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Bsoyka I wanted to ask what I have found conflicting information in the article about St. John Bosco, I have studied in a school in his name and one year they gave us all Memorias regarding his history and the history of our school, in my school Memoria it is said that he had a dream or a 'vision' that made him pursue his future goal of helping and becoming a priest, but you can see that in the article it is not mentioned, and I also wanted to ask how do I cite this old tattered book as my source? I do not trust it for no source is given in the book hell it probably wasn't even registered it was just given. Currently scouring the internet for answers thank you very much for your help and uhm p.s English is my second language so please if you have the time try to correct if I said something wrong. --General Wait-And-See (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Question from ILikeDrawing (01:07, 12 February 2025)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
More "xxx in the NFL Draft" case errors in templates
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I failed to notice that a lot of links to these moved articles were in templates. See this search. Can you apply your bot to downcasing "Draft" in those several hundred? Dicklyon (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Question from SarangGosavi (05:17, 21 February 2025)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, not just editing but I want to create my page and publish it. You can check about me Sarang Gosavi Kashmir and you will see lot of news. How can I do that? --SarangGosavi (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Salutations, mentor. I was wondering how do I edit and how do I identify all this code to simplify editing one of Wikipedia's fine articles? --AloofKing (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Question from Bigbeanbag (18:06, 26 February 2025)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi,
I'm wondering if you could explain a little about the formatting and copyright expectations for adding an image to wikipedia pages. --Bigbeanbag (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2025
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.
Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
Sammi Brie(submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
Hey man im josh(submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
MaranoFan(submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.
The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
A request for comment is open to discuss whether AI-generated images (meaning those wholly created by generative AI, not human-created images modified with AI tools) should be banned from use in articles.
A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I hope this finds you well, I am new to editing and I am hoping to create a library of tone reference articles I can work from. Do you have any articles you would recommend that capture the exact tone Wikipedia hopes to provide for all articles? --ClauseTechnology (talk) 18:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Ben: Is there a way to edit an article related to my employer who is an international trade expert? I have examined the rules, but I am not sure of how to remove the stigma of a Wiki paid editing service which apparently did not declare that they received payment for the draft. Am I better off waiting until the draft is deleted, and resubmitting declaring my conflict of interest? Here is the draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Shanker_A._Singham&oldid=1259093379 --Defritzed21211 (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm doing a project about the median wall and it won't tell me if it still exsist's so i would like to find out and then add it to the search --ILikeDrawing (talk) 22:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 67
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 67, January – February 2025
East View Press and The Africa Report join the library
Spotlight: Wikimedia+Libraries International Convention and WikiCredCon
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is TheWikiToby. I'm feeling a surge of nostalgia today and was looking around. I hope that with whatever you're dealing with, you'll be back eventually. Cheers. Tarlby(t) (c)16:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I was wondering how to create a link from one wikipedia page to another via a mobile device. (hyper link) --Zm8n (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello @Zm8n. Bsoyka appears to be inactive for a bit, so I'll be answering this. If you are editing with the source code directly, links should look like [[this]] which would appear visually as this. To make a link that directs to an article that's named differently from the text, it would be typed out like [[this|that]] which would appear visually like that. Tarlby(t) (c)16:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2025
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Gooe morning: I was reviewing a chart of total votes for the 2024 Presidential Election, and it does not "foot." The total on a State row is not the sum of the column entries. I have screen prints and a spreadsheet to show the error, but as it is a chart, do not think this is an easy edit. I created an account, but cannot find my way back to submit the item for consideration. Any thoughts? NumberVerifier (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, and thank you in advance for your help. I'm trying to do a simple edit of Luke Hobson's page. I am named as his coach, which is correct, but Luke had Sharon Weiss and Nenad Rodic at Lakeridge Swim Team. The best citation for which there is no conflict whatsoever is our website https://fullcirclenv.com/LAKEWP/
This is the best and only citation available other than the fact that Mr Rodic has been coaching at Lakeridge for over 20 years and was also instrumental in Luke's development. Thank you. --Helga62 (talk) 23:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hey everyone!
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hello hello to all those who watch/view this page—sorry for leaving you hanging for some time. My first year of college has been quite the adventure, and Wikipedia went on the back burner for a little while. Hoping to jump back in more, although I can't promise a perfect streak of activity—finals are coming up soon-ish! Thank you so much to all those who helped me out, cc @Tarlby above and @Lectonar for changing my mentor settings. 🫶
I'll skim through the messages I've missed and hopefully catch anything important, but please start a new section below if you still need my attention on something.
Welcome back, and you're welcome. Do want me to change the mentor settings? It seems only admins can do certain things over there. Lectonar (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the April 2025 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing.
Election results: In our December 2025 coordinator election, Wracking stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, and Mox Eden were reelected coordinators, and IQR and WikiEditor5678910 were newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC).
Drive: 55 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive 33 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 611,404 words in 237 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: 14 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 10 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 46,749 words in 18 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Drive: 47 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. 28 claimed at least one copy-edit and copy-edited 479,172 words in 207 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 13 to 19 April. Barnstars will be awarded here.
Progress report: As of 9:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 89 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,264 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, IQR, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and WikiEditor5678910.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.
Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:
History6042(submissions) with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
Gog the Mild(submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
Arconning(submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews
In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima(submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.
The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 May 2025
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan A look at some product and tech highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation's Annual Plan (July–December 2024).
@Bagumba: Hey! Yes, that task should still be running daily, although it seems it hasn't made any edits in a while. Looking at a few of those links, I can't see from a quick glance where they actually link to the 2025 page, which is strange. It's also worth noting that the bot won't remove all links to that redirect page, as it avoids making cosmetic edits. For example, the bot won't change [[2025 NFL Draft|2025 NFL draft]] to [[2025 NFL draft]] because there's no real difference to the reader. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 21:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
@Bagumba: Ah, I see what you mean there. I'm not sure why it's not picking that one up! I'm swamped with exams right now, but I'll add it to my to-do list and try to figure it out soon. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 03:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I noticed your signature popping up again over at WP:RX! I'd been a bit worried when I had noticed you less and less, but it's great to see you back again (though I see I'm a bit late to the party). Hope exams went (or are going) well! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!01:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes Issue 68, March–April 2025
In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, Ben. We're talking about a change to your bot at Help talk:CS1 errors. I think it will be an easy change (when the bot fixes the URL, please add a little template, too), and it's not an emergency. This can wait until exams are over. Best of luck with your exams. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
@WhatamIdoing: Hey! I'll let the discussion on this one play out a bit before looking into implementing this—I have a feeling it'll be a bit controversial as all things are on Wikipedia. I'm also not sure it would be as easy of a change as it may seem. As it is right now, the bot basically works by searching for the Wikipedia Library URLs in plain text (think about your typical find/replace in a text editor). This means it wouldn't know the difference between citation templates, external links, or even plain text URLs in articles, which is great for cleaning up TWL links but would make it a bit tricky to have the bot accurately place the icon by citations.Also, exams went pretty well, and I'm now done with the school year—thanks for the encouragement! Bsoyka (t•c•g) 18:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2025
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Ben, thank you for your kind interest to help me navigate Wikipedia. I quite don't understand the notability criteria for persons articles. What does the source being independent of the person imply? I need your assistance on this. And what can I do if I received a redirect message asking me to improve my article? --Monica Joyce (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
@Monica Joyce: Hey there! To share some general info, as mentioned in our notability criteria for people, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. This means we only write about a subject when multiple other reliable sources have written about them first.As for the independence part, that simply means if the subject (or someone close to them) writes about themself, that source doesn't count toward establishing notability. For example, if I were to publish an autobiography about myself and my mom wrote another book about me, neither of those would help establish notability for a Wikipedia article about me. Now, that's not to say such sources can't be used at all—they still hold great information in many cases, but they don't show a subject's notability according to our standards.I hope this helps! If you can link to which draft you're asking about in particular, I might be able to provide more specific guidance. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 18:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, mentor!
I have already advanced a lot without help, but now I must use some. I want to create a page for Ennea Lata, a species firsst described by E.A. Smith. I'm aware that the article is not an orphan, so I have that.
Let me wrap this up. I don't know how to create a Speciesbox. I tried using the template, but it didn't work.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Ben. I have already submitted the article with a name ATTAULLAH KHAN TORU, and it still has not been published although I have already completed all the terms and conditions. Kindly l, let publish my article for public. Thanks and regards --Hashim khan mayar (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Latest comment: 11 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
@HouseBlaster, AstonishingTunesAdmirer, and TechnoSquirrel69:What a pleasant surprise! I'm truly honored to see that I've been able to positively impact a handful of people around here. With seemingly small contributions like hunting down sources, it can be hard to remember the larger difference that we all make every day. Initiatives like this one help me remember that everything I've done here is all worth it. (So thanks for keeping EOTW running, @Buster7!)I went back to read the supports on this nomination—thank you for the kind words there, too, however tucked away in the page history they may be!I know my activity has been a little less consistent lately than I'd like it to be, but definitely consider this editor retained! (and incredibly appreciative!) (and totally only crying a little bit!) Bsoyka (t•c•g) 03:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Two things I must share. 40 years ago my best friend ever passed away. He was a Yellow Lab/Weimaraner mix that my sons named Grover. I hope you can appreciate my pleasure when I saw the Image of Ghost on your talkpage. Also, I'm glad you took the initiative to go back and search for the seconds original entry. I do my best to integrate the seconds into the nomination, but space and duplication are considerations. Best to you. Buster7Chat17:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know I'm a little late, but congrats on becoming Editor of the Week, and thank you again for greeting me all that time ago! I still think of you from time to time, lol. Tarlby(t) (c)00:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Breaktime logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Sammi Brie(submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic articles
Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors' June 2025 Newsletter
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello and welcome to the June 2025 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
Hall of Fame: Congratulations to Dhtwiki for their well-deserved addition to the Hall of Fame last month, and thanks to GoldRomean for the nomination.
Election news: Voting in the mid-year coordinator election ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page.
April Blitz: 14 of the 25 editors who signed up for the April 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 92,769 words in 30 articles. Barnstars awarded are available here.
May Drive: 31 of the 54 editors who signed up for the May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited 384,392 words in 216 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
June Blitz: 10 of the 12 editors who signed up for the June 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 26,652 words in 13 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Progress report: As of 02:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 148 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,270 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes Issue 69, May–June 2025
In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
July 9–15 - Call for candidates
July 18–22 - Discussion phase
July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 27th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 2025! Boy, does it feel good to kick off the year with an issue. Yep, it's been a year since we cleared out the 2022-2024 backlog with issues 23 and 24! Good times. Though in this case "a year" just means... 6 months? 😯 The salience of whatever joke I was planning to make here has vanished speedily. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
WikiTextExpander by Polygnotus, is this edition's featured script. At the click of a configurable hotkey, this script will find and replace or link a configurable list of phrases within the selected text in all source editors (even in the comment/reply field!). Besides allowing the quick insertion of templated messages, this script greatly mitigates the WP:WTF? problem by providing both the legibility of familiar words and the convenience of shortcuts. And to those asking, the capitalization of "Wikitext" as "WikiText" was a necessary sacrifice for far-more-memorable acronymy.
Updated scripts
CanonNi: AlertAssistant has been fixed and rewritten using OOUI instead of Twinkle's Morebits. Such modern, very tool. (Do note that the maintainer has since become inactive.)
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AjaxLoader has been updated to use modern JS APIs that replace the browser's URL bar with the link you clicked on to load in place. The "back" (and "forward") buttons also work now. Cool, innit?
andrybak: Unsigned helper no longer shows an error when the message to sign was added in the earliest 50 revisions of a page's history. This is especially relevant to pages with short histories.
BilledMammal/Move+ needs updating to order list of pages handle lists of pages to move correctly regardless of the discussion's page, so that we may avoid repeating fiasco history.
Requested scripts
We need scripts that...
allow sorting lists of citations such as by URI or other identifier
automatically convert the capitalization of citations' titles
collect a list of discussion participants and generate a ping list
In breaking m:Tech/News, Gadgets can now include .vue files. This makes it easier to develop modern user interfaces using Vue.js, in particular using Codex, the official design system of Wikimedia. Codex icons are now also available. The documentation has examples.
New scripts
Appo/Globstory integrates OpenHistoryMap, updating the map whenever hovering/clicking on a location or year, the latter of which changes the map to be (hopefully) accurate to the year selected. It's pretty interesting.
linkinfo Somewhat similar to WP:NavPops, Awesome Aasim/linkinfo(pictured) provides a collection of links to replace the right-click context menu, presented beautifully.
PreviousDiscussions provides a link to search for your username on subpages of another user's userpage and talkpage conveniently.
Twineeea/noRedLinks brings you to the "read" instead of the "create" tab when you visit a red link. Contemplate life's mysteries as you stare into the blank! Deeply.
No, this is not going to be the enduring tradition of S++ for the future. This was meant to be a joke for the special occasion on the first day of the fourth month but was delayed by four months because I'm lazy.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi i created Kocaeli Health and Technology University but after 6 month (after 3 month indexed in google) the page was not patrolled can you help for this? --Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:50, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Im trying to get that the USNS Big Horn is to be deactivated. Wikipedia is cryptic in how to send info to an editor to get this added . Theres nothing easy about getting legitimate information added by a Wikipedia sanctioned editor to a topic. Im not looking for credit. Im looking for the page to b updated. --Bluemule1 (talk) 02:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
@Bluemule1: Hey there! We don't generally have a way to send info to a "Wikipedia-sanctioned editor" because those don't exist. Wikipedia is open for anyone to edit, including you! If you're uninterested or unsure of how to edit the article on your own, you could also bring up the change on its talk page. (Just be sure to share reliable sources to support the changes you propose!) Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:32, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
hey i do have a question about something, there is a important topic on a page that needs to be addressed and this has been discussed for maybe a year or two its about changing a political parties political position i think it is important to address the actually position of all parties on wikipedia and for some reason this has been addressed and agreed by many and its about reform uk political positioning.
i believe like many many others that it should be changed from "right wing" to "right - far right" because of multiple independent sources of major global media (e.g le monde, al jazeera, byline times, dw and the washington post) now consistently classifying the party as far right.
reform uk's policies on immigration, criminal justice, national identity and civil liberties - along with its anti-diversity stance and rhetoric around open borders and crime - are increasingly aligned with far right european populist movements like the AfD and PiS.
in contrast, the conservatives are already placed as centre right - right wing, so leaving reform uk in the same category no longer reflects the ideological gap between them.
id appreciate your advice or input on how to approach this change properly as me and many have been trying to discuss this but are being ignored. also in the archives you can see how many times this has been discussed. thank you --Jtttttt (talk) 15:46, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
@Jtttttt: Hey! Sorry for the late reply, but I think I'm going to let the discussion here continue and stand for itself, particularly as I'm not as knowledgable in this content area. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! I'm hoping to create two articles, but I have a conflict of interest. Could I ask you for some guidance before I proceed? I've outlined the COI on my user page. Thank you! --RileyRobbins (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
@RileyRobbins: Hey there! I apologize for the delayed response here. Thanks for reading up on our COI guidelines! My main advice is to go through the Articles for Creation process, which allows you to draft your articles outside of the main article space before submitting them for review from an experienced editor who can guide you through any issues and publish the article. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Bsoyka! I have in my hands a dilemma of great significance. Assuming that I closed the peer review, I need to decide if I nominate Outline of Spain for FL or if I decide to improve the article. I actually don't even know if I can, as I'm listed only as the third contributor of the article. Personally, I consider it does pass the FL criteria, but I am 0% sure of that.
When the nomination comes, could you help me get it through? --Earth605 (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
@Earth605: Hey there! To be fully honest with you, I'm not intimately familiar with the FL criteria/process, so I probably can't help you much more than you can help yourself. (I'd be figuring it out as I go too!) If you have any more specific concerns you need help with as you're going through the review process though, let me know and I'd be happy to try to lend a hand! Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello - how do I remove superfluous entries in "References" - specifically in the Bruce Woolley Page - for example numbers 11-16 are irrelevant. Thank you. --Thereminwoo (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
@Thereminwoo: Hey there! On Wikipedia, references are generally defined in the source code of an article alongside the sentence they appear with. For example, when I add a citation here,[1] the reference content appears at the bottom of the article for the viewer, but the actual code for the reference is next to the word here,.However, I advise you to be careful in removing what you think are irrelevant references. 11-16 on that article, while they may appear generic at first, are actually providing valuable info. For example, reference 11 is used to support the sentence, In 1985, Woolley co-wrote Grace Jones' Slave to the Rhythm., which it does quite well. Bsoyka (t•c•g) 17:57, 3 August 2025 (UTC)