User talk:Another Believer/Archive 40
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | → | Archive 45 |
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation ousts, bans quarter of Arabic Wikipedia admins
Plus admin update and cool tools for the new year.
- In the media: Odd bedfellows, Elon and Jimbo, reliable sources for divorces, and more
Sometimes you need to read more than just the headlines!
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
Interview of ComplexRational about their recent request for adminship.
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
Wikifunctions might drag it down.
- Essay: Mobile editing
Frustrations and successes.
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
Congratulations.
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
And other new research findings.
- Serendipity: Wikipedia about FIFA World Cup 2022: quick, factual and critical
How Iranian press agencies help Wikipedia to reflect football in a better way.
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
You head into the featured content report. Amongst the features you see astronauts, both Gilbert and Sullivan, Ursula K. Le Guin's incredibly talented mother, and Billboard charts. It is pitch black, you are likely to be eaten by a grue.
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
It is mostly about football!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
In which a couple sentences of text recontextualises an image.
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Photographers, Sandy Hook, the shocking use of Nazi symbols in articles about Nazis, and "You wouldn't recognise a fact if it bit you in the ass".
Happy New Year, Another Believer
Chris Troutman (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2024 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 go well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
- @Chris troutman: Thank you! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Extended content |
|---|
|
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
User:Another Believer/Projects/Video Games
Extended content |
|---|
|
More GA or FA video games?:).Happy New year! 88.236.107.149 (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Oh. Ok no problems thanks. 88.236.107.149 (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Another Believer
~~~ — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
@TheManishPanwar: Thanks! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Improvement
Hi sir, would you please help me to improve my one article.
Draft:Sachidanand Bharti - Wikipedia — MANISH talk 16:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Another Believer!
Another Believer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Moops Thanks! Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- :)
- — Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 A tag has been placed on Category:Categories created during Wiki Loves Pride 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bailey's Taproom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @BuySomeApples Thank you! I look forward to responding to any concerns you may have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bluehour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- @MasterMatt12 Thanks! Looking forward to addressing any concerns you may have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Bluehour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bluehour and Talk:Bluehour/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Aviv (restaurant) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviv (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- (sigh...) ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
 |
The Resilient Barnstar |
| For having to deal with my accusation of paid editing, and dealing with it calmly and appropriately. MasterMatt12(talk) 01:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks. I wish there were more I could do about the ick factor and the sketchy editor(s) causing me so much frustration, but I appreciate you've shared what you can. I'd appreciate if you would strike or collapse your accusation in the nomination discussion and please let me know if there's anything else you need from me re: Bluehour. For now, take care. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
 |
Sorry that all this is happening to you, I don't know why some people just decide to be unkind. I'm reviewing the page now but I also wanted to let you know that not everyone is out to get you. A lot of us appreciate your contributions. BuySomeApples (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- I was stopping by to say the same. Wow! What an awful thing to do (re: and WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej). S0091 (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @S0091 Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- I was stopping by to say the same. Wow! What an awful thing to do (re: and WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej). S0091 (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
Extended content |
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
|
What Hells Angels and drag queens can teach us about stigma
Extended content |
|---|
|
Thought you'd be interested in this as a possl source. The Cambridge Judge Business School website link is just an introduction to the actual paper which should be great for a citation or two. They say "Organisational stigma is better understood through the lens of 'Straight Outta Detroit' and 'RuPaul’s Drag Race', as illustrated by a special issue of the Journal of Management Studies co-edited and co-introduced by Thomas Roulet of Cambridge Judge Business School." ☆ Bri (talk) 03:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
The article Bailey's Taproom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bailey's Taproom and Talk:Bailey's Taproom/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bailey's Taproom
The article Bailey's Taproom you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Bailey's Taproom for comments about the article, and Talk:Bailey's Taproom/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! BuySomeApples (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2022
Extended content | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
File:Tusk (Portland, Oregon) logo.png listed for discussion
Resolved
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tusk (Portland, Oregon) logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- From the team: We heard zoomers liked fortnights: the biweekly Signpost rides again
It's not just a phase! Well, maybe it is.
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
Long-time contributors imprisoned for 32 and 8 years after "swaying public opinion" and "violating public morals".
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
UCoC draws nearer, alongside the rise of the machines, in mainspace this time.
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
Wikipedia's birthday, a cute dog, and nipplefruit.
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
The depths of Commons, at your fingertips. Or eyetips.
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
Debunking widely-told myths about New York's grandest and centralest railway station.
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
The economics of Wikipedia.
- Gallery: What is our responsibility when it comes to images?
When notability conflicts with what it might be used for.
- Humour: New geologically speedy deletion criteria introduced
7,000,000-year Landmasses for Subduction discussions considered "too long".
- Opinion: Good old days, in which fifth-symbol-lacking lipograms roam'd our librarious litany
Allow us to bring you back, back, back, to days of Wikifun rampant.
- Featured content: Flip your lid
...and your ambigram. Also: Boring lava fields, birds of Tuvalu, and commelinid family names with etymologies.
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
War, sports, and all types of chaos.
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The editor with five million edits, the death of Aaron Swartz, and rollback.
The article Bluehour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bluehour for comments about the article, and Talk:Bluehour/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MasterMatt12 -- MasterMatt12 (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- @MasterMatt12 Thanks for reviewing and related help. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asian restaurants in Chicago
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
A tag has been placed on Category:Asian restaurants in Chicago indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
Extended content |
|---|
 The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
Notability question
Extended content |
|---|
|
Hi. You seem to know a lot about restaurants and dining notability, so I wanted to ask you if you think Yardley Inn (an article at afd) is notable. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Irene Dubois for deletion
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Dubois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Sorry to hear it
I'm sorry about your dog, AB. Bishonen | tålk 20:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC).
- Same. Really sucks to lose a pet. :c Elli (talk | contribs) 20:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Bishonen and Elli: Thank you, both. He was a wonderful companion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I just saw this and thought I should say something positive, though it's hard to think of what that might be. Life sucks sometimes. Better times ahead for you, I hope. Your friend – ☆ Bri (talk) 03:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Women in Red in February 2023
Extended content | |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
My condolences
Hey, I just wanted to say I'm really sorry to see that Kobe passed away. Sending my condolences and a big hug. Armadillopteryx 00:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Armadillopteryx That's very thoughtful, thank you so much. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
Extended content | ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
Homosexuality in football month
Not sure if you'd heard about this, I hadn't, but apparently February is LGBT+ football month in the UK. If you wanted article inspiration, maybe that's an area you could direct your attention. I think there's a series on Justin Fashanu that might need an article... Also my prelude to also offer my condolences. Kingsif (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the condolences. I don't edit football entries much, but I might poke around to see if there's anything I can do. You're welcome to identify any article issues or improvements over at WP:WLP2023, if you're interested. Thanks again and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bit House Saloon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bit House Saloon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SyntheticSystems -- SyntheticSystems (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SyntheticSystems Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Grand'mere Eugene: FYI! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
LA Kings Monument image file
Extended content |
|---|
|
Hello. I hear you’re the original uploader of the image on the LA Kings Monument article. I’ve been wondering if it is possible to use the image on the Los Angeles Kings page, as it states the file can only be used for one article only. But I think it should be used on other Kings related articles as well, not just one. Any answers? Marino13 (talk) 23:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
Last issue's vow for "something to show for these efforts" revisited.
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
As well as the continued rise of the machines, and Amanda Keton's WMF departure.
- Section 230: Twenty-six words that created the internet, and the future of an encyclopedia
Section 230 before the Supreme Court in two cases, with broad implications for the web.
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
Or Santos on Wikipedia?
- Special report: Legal status of Wikimedia projects "unclear" under potential European legislation
WMF issues salvo in latest battles of the Posting Wars
- In the media: Furor over new Wikipedia skin, followup on Saudi bans, and legislative debate
The good, the bad, and the ugly.
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
Isamaa party sponsor Parvel Pruunsild files claim in Tartu County Court against WMEE head Ivo Kruusamägi and Reform Party politicians.
- Opinion: Study examines cultural leanings of Wikimedia projects' visual art coverage
English Wikipedia among most "global" and Thai Wikipedia's among most "Western", but non-Western works neglected overall.
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
And other new research publications.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
An interview with those who pitch in together
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
Letting you find out about yourself (and others).
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
An exceptionally good period for featured articles.
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Can we have a chat?
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Extended content | |
|---|---|
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
moves to draft
Extended content |
|---|
|
Hey, AB. I've moved to draft Draft:Blazing Bagels and Draft:Yesler Hillclimb. I am very concerned about your continued inability to assess sources' support of notability when it comes to your local businesses, landmarks, etc. Not everything in Washington and Oregon is notable simply because local sources are covering it. I think you should leave these articles in draft until you've found three sources that support a claim to notability. And please, please indicate which three to make it easier for others to see what you're using to support the claim. It's not fair to make people look at 15 (or 80, or 100) sources to figure out what you are saying indicates notability. More is not better. We only need three. Please, please don't just keep adding more and more and more bare mentions. It doesn't help. It only makes life harder for other editors. Valereee (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
Why are we collapsing this? Valereee (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- I very often collapse sections on this page. I mean no offense, truly. I don't really see the point in moving an article like Blazing Bagels to the draft space. If you feel the topic is not notable, then raise your concerns on the talk page, or add a notability or merge tag so others can weigh in. I hear your concerns and I appreciate what you're saying. We clearly have different interpretations of some of Wikipedia's rules and that's ok. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why won't you just tell us which three sources convinced you? Why? Valereee (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Seattle Coffee Works for deletion
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seattle Coffee Works until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Please leave me alone. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Extended content |
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. Thank you for your work on Birthplace of Seattle Monument. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
|
Image for The Embrace
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
|
Thanks for making me aware of the correct procedure to include fair-use images. I have now uploaded the image to en.wikipedia rather than wikimedia commons - will this be sufficient to replace the image for The Embrace? Tyxcho (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
|
Refbombing
Extended content |
|---|
|
Hello, I've been seeing several complaints in recent AFDs for articles you have created or support that you are bombing them with low quality references. For example, Seattle Coffee Works has 82 (!) references which is probably 60 more than is needed. This causes undue hardship on editors who are examining these articles in a deletion discussion and I sincerely hope it is not an intentional move on your part as a way of keeping an article. But I've seen editors complain about the number of low quality sources and then gone on to say that you put in even MORE references after they complained about it so I'm not sure what to think. You are a very experienced editor and article creator and know a good, quality reference that provides SIGCOV from a citation to a listicle or blog. Please use some restraint with your articles and don't include every mention of a company or restaurant in an article, use some discretion and use a lower number of higher quality sources from here on out. Thank you for considering this comment. Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
|
- Why are you still adding references. I just went through the article culling the many overcites. Stop, please. —¿philoserf? (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- jfc, no matter what I do on Wikipedia, someone complains. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should take a moment to self-examine that. I do things folks disagree with too. But it isn't "...no matter what I do...". —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Philoserf Why am I wrong for adding a claim about the sign being compared to Hammering Man? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then you misunderstood what I objected to. I objected to adding a second reference to a statement that was already referenced in article already pointed out by numerous editors as overcited. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then I'll stop adding content altogether. Over it, anyway. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry brother. Worn down? Have a great day whatever you do. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Philoserf Thanks! I'll enjoy another urban hike in Seattle. Then, expect edits at Super Bowl LVII halftime show! :p ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry brother. Worn down? Have a great day whatever you do. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then I'll stop adding content altogether. Over it, anyway. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then you misunderstood what I objected to. I objected to adding a second reference to a statement that was already referenced in article already pointed out by numerous editors as overcited. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Philoserf Why am I wrong for adding a claim about the sign being compared to Hammering Man? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should take a moment to self-examine that. I do things folks disagree with too. But it isn't "...no matter what I do...". —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- jfc, no matter what I do on Wikipedia, someone complains. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2023
Extended content | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Hello
Hi there! 
Just popping in because I’ve seen you around and I’ve been glad to see someone from a similar area with the same interests as me on Wikipedia! Cheers! BhamBoi (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @BhamBoi
Like Hello back! Nice to e-meet you, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
Issue One request
Hi @Another Believer — I noticed that you previously made edits to the Issue One page, and I was wondering if you could take a look at some recent edit requests I made on the Issue One Talk page. I have a COI as I work for Issue One, so I'm hoping an uninvolved editor like yourself could take a look at what I've put together. Thank you! AR at Issue One (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bit House Saloon
The article Bit House Saloon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bit House Saloon for comments about the article, and Talk:Bit House Saloon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SyntheticSystems -- SyntheticSystems (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Grand'mere Eugene: FYI and congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for including me in the nomination process! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 03:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Created a page for My Dad the Bounty Hunter!
Thought you might be interested since you created the re-direct for it back in January. I liked the series a lot, and have been really enjoying Marvel's Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur too, and started watching Karma's World (I created the page for it a while back) today, and am really enjoying that too Historyday01 (talk) 13:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Historyday01 I noticed! I have a habit of creating redirects for shows to programming lists (and redirects of episodes to shows). I'm not familiar with the show but perhaps I'll tune in some time. Keep up the great work here! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yeah, its a pretty good show, but I only wish it was longer. Historyday01 (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
_(5530819321).jpg)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- News and notes: Terms of Use update, Steward elections, and Wikipedia back in Pakistan
UCoC Enforcement Guidelines pass, Wikimedia Enterprise financials, GPTs gone wild, and a speedy deletion criterion removed.
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
Also: Russ Baker's BLP, the digital commons, the NSA, and more on Pakistan.
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
Gautam Adani and his companies possibly behind scheme featuring scores of socks, infiltration of articles for creation process.
- Essay: Machine-written articles: a new challenge for Wikipedia
GPT: friend or foe?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
Your one-stop hooker's handbook.
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
But much else to be found.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
Lovey-dovey stuff for Valentine's.
- Traffic report: Superbowl? Pfft. Give me some Bollywood! Yours sincerely, the world
And maybe a side of AI.
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
Also: let's delete images of Muhammed! Let's delete portals!
- Cobwebs: Editorial: The loss of the moral high ground
Yesterday's controversies, reported on today.
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
A musical interlude.
Orphaned non-free image File:To Honor the Immigrants, Columbus, Ohio.jpg
ResolvedExtended content |
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Editing news 2023 #1
Extended content |
|---|
|
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
Talk pages project  The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools. It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.  An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site. New Project: Edit Check The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more. |
Women in Red March 2023
Extended content | |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2023)
Extended content | |
|---|---|
|
.svg)
_logo.png?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
Greeting from Calabria and help request for Vincenzo Ferrera and Draft:Dado Coletti
Dearest Jason, Best regards from Calabria, I am writing to greet you and know how you are, I am quite well for now, I have seen your contribution to that disaster that happened on the other side of my region, a wonderful and welcoming region, despite everything and not for some consciences. In any case, my good Jason, I ask for your precious help to resolve once and for all the situation of these two biographies, that of Dado Coletti which has been waiting to be published for months and that of renewing Vincenzo Ferrera. I know you are very active and I was wondering, in my little ignorance if you could help me with the case. While waiting to hear from you, I wish you a bright greeting and a good evening, from little Campora San Giovanni in Calabria. Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 18:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)