Talk:York

GA Reassessment

York

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Unreferenced sections, orange "updated needed" banners, sections that need updating of recent elections and events, and at over 9000 words it is recommended that the article be split off and information be summarised. Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Towards a GA status for this article

Okay, so we have some work to do - my first proposal would be to lose the table with all the railway destinations and calling points from the transport section. Surely this is too detailed and is covered by the York railway station article. It can be summarised in this article with a section of short prose....?

“ Trains from York Railway station run to London, Doncaster, Peterborough, Darlington, Newcastle and Edinburgh with LNER, and across Northern England between Scarborough, Leeds, Manchester and Liverpool with TransPennine Express. Northern provide local services to Hull, Leeds and Harrogate, and Cross Country, which connects Edinburgh, Newcastle and York, with Leeds, Sheffield, Birmingham, and the south-west of England. Additionally, open-access operator Grand Central run trains between Sunderland and London. ”

Thoughts? The joy of all things (talk) 13:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Digital Sectors

Hi, I noticed the recent removal of an edit citing the 2023 York Top 100 Businesses report published by York St John University, which named TSYS and Gear4music as examples of modern digital-sector employers in York, with a neutral tone and independent source. The removal note cited potential conflict of interest due to shared IP activity, but this addition was made in good faith using a highly reputable source that’s directly relevant to the city's economic profile. Would welcome any advice on how to reinstate it in a compliant way, or clarification on whether the source or framing is in question. Thanks. 188.65.101.236 (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I didn't remove it but it did read like it was added by someone connected to the business(es) involved. If that's the case then I suggest you step away and leave it to someone else who may deem it appropriate to add that or similar content. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Images

I have refreshed the multiple images in the infobox added to this wiki page. I'm open to discussion of these images are not suitable. If the images are not suitable please change. Be Bold Thanks MatthewDavid41 MatthewDavid41 (talk) 00:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

"Yorc" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Yorc has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Yorc until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)