Talk:United States withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal

Requested move 8 May 2018

United States withdrawal from the Iran deal → United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of ActionUnited States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action – This is a more encyclopedic name, and it follows the pattern of Donald Trump and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action —SpanishSnake (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Removing move template: already moved to the requested title. Dekimasuよ! 19:52, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Unclear statement: the agreement is not a treaty?

It is currently written: «a "withdrawal", a technically incorrect term; the agreement is not a treaty» «Officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Iran Deal is an international agreement on the nuclear program of Iran reached in July 2015 between Iran, the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States—plus Germany)[5][6] and the European Union.» Treaty states that «A treaty may also be known as an (international) agreement, protocol, covenant, convention, pact, or exchange of letters, among other terms. Regardless of terminology, all of these forms of agreements are, under international law, equally considered treaties and the rules are the same.»

So I wonder if it is correct to states that is would be «a technically incorrect term» in the summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.188.170 (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

This was simply stated with no source, and is incorrect. I have fixed it, and added sources that say it is not a treaty. Attack Ramon (talk) 22:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Here is some part of explanation:

This controversy might be linked to different definitions used in the international law and in the domestic US market due to the Treaty Clause, as according to Congressional Research Service,

The term “treaty” has a broader meaning under international law than under domestic law. Under international law, “treaty” refers to any binding international agreement. Vienna Convention, art. 1(a). Under domestic law, “treaty” signifies only those binding international agreements that have received the advice and consent of the Senate.

.

References

Merger

User:DarthBotto: Can you show what parts are merged from the other article? --Mhhossein ^talk 06:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: At the time of the initial merger, I felt that the overlap was sufficient. However, I've since implemented content that was better expanded upon with the merged article. At this point, I think a priority will be to clean up this page. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 10:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quotes

This article is tagged, correctly in my opinion, with "too many quotes". In fact, quotes account for about half the article at the moment. Any ideas on how to trim down the number of quotes? I've taken the first step by removing tweets- something not notable enough to be picked up by at least a newspaper article is clearly not noteworthy for an encyclopedia. But there are still way too many quotes. Should we limit them to one per country? Other ideas? Attack Ramon (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality rating

Nearly a B, but the one citation needed has to be resolved. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Fixed not by me though. Lova Falk (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 24 March 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (non-admin closure) Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 00:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

---

• United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action → United States withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal
• Aftermath of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action → Aftermath of the Iran nuclear deal
• Criticism of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action → Criticism of the Iran nuclear deal
• Reactions to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action → Reactions to the Iran nuclear deal
• Negotiations leading to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action → Negotiations leading to the Iran nuclear deal

– Per WP:CONSUB due to recent move of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action to Iran nuclear deal. Considering the subject matter and the fact that the move wasn't fully agreed upon, I feel like it was better to make this a move request instead of just doing it. In the interest of WP:NOTBURO we could probably do a speedy move however. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.