ThePoggingEditor

AfC notification: Draft:Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom. Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for looking! Yeah, I tried getting a discussion going in the talk section but no one replied after several days, so I just decided to do the split myself. I might ask for help making this page live if that's alright, this will actually be my first page I've created. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 13:48, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Fantastic job with Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom. If you're interested in writing more about character articles, I'd encourage you to join the Video game characters WikiProject, as well as, if you have Discord, the Discord page associated with it. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Majora's Mask

Are you interested in working on this? Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I was wondering about whether or not MM should have its own page or not, mostly bc I'm not sure MM had the same cultural impact as OOT. The characters I was gonna add to the main Zelda characters list were Tatl, Tael, the Four Giants, Majora's Mask, Mikau, and Darmani III. I planned on making a note in Malon's section about her Terminian counterparts being Romani and Cremia and give their synopses there, and I was gonna move Skull Kid and HMS from OOT to the main page since they're not terribly relevant in that game.

I also had plans to reorganize that page from grouping by game to grouping by role (Main Characters, Companions, Antagonists, and Other characters). I made the BotW and TotK character list page bc I feel like there were enough characters on their own to justify their page (and it seems to be becoming a sub-series of sorts), and OoT could be argued to have enough relevant characters within its plot to justify its page.

If you think MM has enough relevant characters though, I'll certainly work on the page with you. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

That would be appreciated. I don't really have the energy to write it up, but I just wanted to get the sources needed. I'm also going to grab some scholarly sources to beef it up more. Ideally, I'd like to make articles for Wind Waker characters, Twilight Princess characters, and Skyward Sword characters too. I think all three have potential as well. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, sources are definitely helpful. I'm actually going to clean up OoT's character page first before I work on this. I think that will help me with making MM's character page, which I'm still not entirely sure about, but I can write up a plan to see which Zelda games deserve their own characters page. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 04:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Since you mentioned "all"

See list of current relevant RMs at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Video_game_characters#Recent_move_discussions _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Re: your change of mind on Talk:6-7 (meme)

Hi ThePoggingEditor, thanks for your comments on the move request here! Just so you know, if you want to make it clear that previous comments that you've made in a discussion should no longer be considered, you can strike those comments. To do this, you can use the {{strikethrough}} template, like this: {{strikethrough|Your text here}} → Your text here, or you can wrap your comments in <s></s> HTML tags, like this: <s>Your text here</s>. This will make it clearer that you've changed your mind on something, and your struck comments generally won't be considered in the building of consensus. Thanks! - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Cool, thanks! ThePoggingEditor (talk) 02:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9S (Nier: Automata), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello ThePoggingEditor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 11:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC) @Glasspalace Thanks! Merry Christmas to you too! ThePoggingEditor (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 11:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3 has been accepted

Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:06, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ThePoggingEditor! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 10:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! ThePoggingEditor (talk) 14:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Sergecross73 msg me 16:16, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Re: Mega Man list

At one time that was the case, but it got split off due to consensus because the end result was trying to basically WP:COATRACK non-notable parts to a notable one, especially since the X series has different reception and development. Similar happened with EXE as well. Kung Fu Man (talk) 08:38, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Ah I see. That makes sense. ThePoggingEditor (talk) 08:39, 17 May 2026 (UTC)