Stoicism was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreece
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors,on March 20, 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This page has archives.Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot IIIif there are more than 5.
The following Wikipedia contributormay be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There is uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. There are several sources listed in "Further reading" and some sections that are only one paragraph long: this makes me think that the article might not cover all major aspects of the topic, but would appreciate if a subject-matter expert can comment on that concern. Z1720 (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Contemporary Africa Group 3
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 September 2024 and 27 November 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Londonlove4(article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kobeinthefourth.
Latest comment: 20 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Citation 102 uses a quote from an archived source, in which the meaning derived is not credited, but also quoted. To boot, the source continues to display the most current etymological understanding of the term without the quote. Since the source is an actively running website, it's dishonest and misleading to use an archived and unaccredited definition. 75.27.30.222 (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
citation 102 points to Kant's CoPR currently, is that the same as you meant? I can't make sense of what etymology stuff you are referring to yet but I'd like to verify what you said so the article is high quality ~2026-31153-18 (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply