Former good articleStoicism was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2011Good article nomineeListed
November 5, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is uncited text throughout the article.
  • There are sources listed in "Further reading" that are not used as inline citations. These should be used as-such or removed.

Is anyone willing to fix up this article, or should it be nominated to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 08:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. There are several sources listed in "Further reading" and some sections that are only one paragraph long: this makes me think that the article might not cover all major aspects of the topic, but would appreciate if a subject-matter expert can comment on that concern. Z1720 (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Contemporary Africa Group 3

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 September 2024 and 27 November 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Londonlove4 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kobeinthefourth.

— Assignment last updated by Kobeinthefourth (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dishonest Definition of Contemporary Stoicism

edit

Citation 102 uses a quote from an archived source, in which the meaning derived is not credited, but also quoted. To boot, the source continues to display the most current etymological understanding of the term without the quote. Since the source is an actively running website, it's dishonest and misleading to use an archived and unaccredited definition. 75.27.30.222 (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

citation 102 points to Kant's CoPR currently, is that the same as you meant? I can't make sense of what etymology stuff you are referring to yet but I'd like to verify what you said so the article is high quality ~2026-31153-18 (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply