Talk:Slag Wars: The Next Destroyer
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pi.1415926535 in topic GA review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slag Wars: The Next Destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Slag Wars: The Next Destroyer has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 30, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Slag Wars: The Next Destroyer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 November 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Slag Wars: The Next Destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 04:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Looks pretty good so far. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, done reviewing. Please use {{done}}, {{partially done}}, etc to respond to comments. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Almost there - just a handful of minor grammar edits (one sentences split, and consistently decapitalizing "slags"). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Excellent work on a fascinating topic! Happy to pass this now. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Almost there - just a handful of minor grammar edits (one sentences split, and consistently decapitalizing "slags"). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Infobox and lede
edit- The composer Andrew Barret Cox isn't mentioned in the prose at all; I recommend adding a sentence to the production section or citing his name in the infobox.
- Is a poster for the second season available? If not, I'd change the caption to
Promotional poster for the first season
to clarify.
Done
- I recommend splitting the sentence beginning
The first series...
in two.
Done
- Is Fantasia Royale Gaga a full presenter? if so, she should be mentioned in the same sentence as Camp and More.
Done I rearranged the lede.
Production
edit- Looking at articles for other reality TV series, it looks like many of them have a "format" section before the production section. I'd recommend considering splitting off some of this section (including the quote box) into a "format" section.
Done
- There are a number of awkwardly long sentences in this article, such as the first three sentences in this section. Some, such as
Camp and the programme's...
have two completely different subjects. Splitting them would make the article easier to read.
Partly done I find short sentences inhibit the flow of prose, but I trimmed all three.
- I'm not asking for Hemingway, but there's a one more I'd recommend splitting:
This series featured the same theme song...
- I moved the first half of that sentence to the end of the previous paragraph as it made more sense there.
- I'm not asking for Hemingway, but there's a one more I'd recommend splitting:
- Wikilink Matthew Camp and Chase Icon
Done
- I don't think "commandeered" is the right word for taking over a business (except for perhaps a hostile takeover)
Done Changed to "taken over".
- Use semicolons to separate list items in the sentence beginning
Contestants on the show...
Done
- Cut that sentence after
"he/him" pronouns
and split the remainder off - I recommendFour contestants were from England, with one each from Scotland, Mexico, and the United States.
Done
- I'm not sure if "slag" needs to be capitalized, since some sources don't seem to.
Done
- Now there's a mix of capitalized/non-capitalized. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I went through with Ctrl+F and I think I got them all.
- Now there's a mix of capitalized/non-capitalized. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'd recommend including a photo of Camp since one is available on Commons.
Done
Reception
edit- This section should be moved below the season summaries to match other articles.
Done
Series 1 (2020) / Series 2 (2024)
edit- These sections needs citations for the contestant information and episode titles, and preferably the progress tables as well
Not done As far as I'm aware, contestant progress is covered by WP:PLOTSOURCE, and doesn't require referencing.
- I won't insist on it then, but as a general suggestion I would still recommend adding any sources that are available. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Is there a reason that Tyreece Nye's pronouns are given as "They/Them/She/Her", while other contestants using multiple pronoun sets are given as "She/They"?
- They seem to use 'they/them' pronouns, so changed to that. (By way of disclosure, I haven't watched this, and don't especially plan to at least until it stops being paywalled.)
- Both seasons had a contestant quit - is any information about that available?
- Wasn't able to find anything.
- The "Points Tally Board" table is not needed.
Done
- Phases such as "Slag Wars Season 1 Episodes" and "Original Air Date" don't need to be capitalized
Done
- Don't use small text for the guest listings.
Done
See also
edit- No need for this section - one term is already used in the text, and the other two aren't closely connected to this show.
Done
References
editReference numbers are from this version.
- Several citations including 2, 3, and 20 are missing information such as author, date, and/or publisher
Done I actually cut ref 3 as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE as it did not mention Slag Wars.
- Citations like 3 and 18 should use the website name rather than its url
Done I went through and gave the whole reflist a cleanup. What else needs doing?--Launchballer 13:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Overall
edit- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

