Talk:Nazi architecture

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Kaihsu in topic The typography image

"The Speer of Hamburg"

edit

Tone is pro hitler

edit

Several sentences have a tone supporting hitler and worse some guess what further expansion of the horrid empire would mean. Very uncouth. Very gross.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.21.95.46 (talk) 06:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about? 47.197.35.111 (talk) 03:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please point out which sentences you are referring to. Copy & paste works well for that.

Context of architecture

edit

I added two paragraphs about how the architecture differs from Classism, citing a psychological study that found people reacted differently to Nazi buildings than typical examples of Classism. I also added a section about the context under which the buildings were created. Part of the history of the architecture was that the buildings were built for reasons beyond aesthetics––they were also helping the Nazis exterminate people by providing more situations for forced-labor. It's important to consider on this page because Nazi architecture was not just a style, it was an entire political system. Goldrider (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: History of Modern Design

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Roscoetherooster (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Amiller2002, Lilibet128, Jamiee365, Addison18?23.

— Assignment last updated by Antje Gamble (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The typography image

edit

The image of "Nazi style typography" should be removed as it is nothing of the sort. There was no specific type of Nazi typography, as the text indicates, but there were stages. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done Kaihsu (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply