Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Germany

Latest comment: 5 days ago by JoeNMLC in topic Challenge - "Mountains of Germany"

German source review

edit

Hello, I'm an employee of Beutler Ink posting here on behalf of our client Jedox. Recently, Jedox the Wikipedia article was deleted due to notability concerns.

Many of the comments in the deletion discussion were looking at the article's sources in use (note: none of the sources I ask about below were used in the now-deleted article). I presented a draft which used German sources, however access and language barrier posed problems.

I have made a new user space draft. Before I submit it through AfC, I wanted to ask editors here if anyone is able to access the German sources below and can weigh in on their reliability and whether they contribute to WP:NCORP?

  1. Freiburg ist das Silicon Schwarzwald[1]
  2. Geschäftsmodell: Verkaufen, wenn der Laden boomt[2]
  3. Software-Spezialist Jedox sammelt mehr als 100 Millionen Dollar ein[3]
  4. Freiburger Softwareunternehmen Jedox setzt zum großen Sprung an[4]

References

  1. Kroker, Michael (6 June 2013). "Freiburg is the Silicon Valley of the Black Forest". WirtschaftsWoche. Retrieved 9 December 2025.
  2. Röderer, Joachim (10 June 2014). "Geschäftsmodell: Verkaufen, wenn der Laden boomt". Badische Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 9 December 2025.
  3. Höpner, Axel (January 12, 2021). "Software-Spezialist Jedox sammelt mehr als 100 Millionen Dollar ein". Handelsblatt (in German). Retrieved 15 December 2025.
  4. Peters, Philipp (15 January 2021). "Freiburger Softwareunternehmen Jedox setzt zum großen Sprung an". Badische Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 9 December 2025.

Thanks for taking a look! Happy to discuss the sources, cheers BINK Robin (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@BINK Robin, the Badische Zeitung articles look likely to be good coverage to me, especially given that one is dated 2014 and one 2021, that is, this is a company that has some "lasting" amount of press coverage outside of press releases. But these sources were all known to editors in the previous deletion discussion, so I'm not sure there's much room to challenge this. I have to say, as an admin I wouldn't have deleted the article as a result of that discussion, which was quite poor overall. (I'd have relisted it with a pointed note that editors should explicitly respond to the German-language sources and not just drop "not notable" as rationales.) -- asilvering (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Asilvering, thanks for taking a look! Do you think it would be a candidate for a deletion review? Or is proceeding with AfC with better sources still the best approach? Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
AFC. The deletion review will be unsuccessful as the consensus of the AFD was very clear. -- asilvering (talk) 01:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
That makes sense, thank you! BINK Robin (talk) 15:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
These sources were retrieved in December 2025; which is before the AfD took place. @BINK Robin:, do you have access to the full text of all the sources you dropped? If so, why did you not engage in discussion during AfD showing in what way they make the article meet WP:NCORP requirements while AfD was still taking place? If you do not, I can't even imagine how you can even try to claim NCORP based on sources you can't access. Graywalls (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Theater am Olgaeck

edit
Notice

The article Theater am Olgaeck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 3 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Unsourced dictionary definition. Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Lacks significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 14:37, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agnes Wabnitz

edit

Hi, I created Agnes Wabnitz. If anyone can help expand this stub, please do so. There are also versions of this article in French, German, and Polish Wikipedia.--User:Namiba 15:49, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nannhausen Airfield

edit
Notice

The article Nannhausen Airfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 16 years. Tagged as Unreferenced 2 and 1/2 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 02:31, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bavarian goods wagon classes

edit
Notice

The article Bavarian goods wagon classes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Everybody knows that we have never published original research.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Natural History Museum, Berlin#Requested move 7 March 2026

edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Natural History Museum, Berlin#Requested move 7 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:36, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for FC Bayern Munich

edit

FC Bayern Munich has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Challenge - "Mountains of Germany"

edit

Greetings, In my wanderings for Unreferenced articles, I found Category:Articles lacking sources from February 2016 with Hundreds of articles, all in need of at least one source. It would be great if several editors here can help improve these articles. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

ω Awaiting - JoeNMLC (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
ω Awaiting - Wondering if these should be PROD? without source to establish notability. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:47, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I found several of these mountains and hills on Peakbagger, for instance Armesberg. Some others could be prodded indeed, like Auf der Baar (not to be confused with the region in southwestern Germany). Markussep Talk 14:21, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Markussep, Thanks for this info. Today I completed the category "B" section. In addition to Peakbagger, I sometimes found a decent Ref in the German article. Plus I also stumbled upon https://peakery.com/, a mapper site, published by Apperies, LLC (hoping it is a reliable source). Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Partly done - Currently at letter "H" in the alphabet and moving forward. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Partly done - Starting letter "M" today, with approximately 100 articles remaining. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Name of Austria area in 1000

edit

Hi, I am creating history map, in the Hungarian history atlas Austria called as "Ostmark", or should I caption it as "Margraviate of Austria"? Which would be more proper in the English map?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kingdom_of_Hungary_in_the_11th_Century_–_German_Wars.svg OrionNimrod (talk) 11:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Edgar Lissel

edit
Notice

The article Edgar Lissel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, for 14 years, except for his own website. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Lacks significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for German involvement in the Spanish Civil War

edit

German involvement in the Spanish Civil War has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:25, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Sängerfest

edit

Sängerfest has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:National Democratic Party of Germany#Requested move 5 May 2026

edit

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:National Democratic Party of Germany#Requested move 5 May 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:31, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Search for sourcing?

edit

Can someone fluent in German see if they can find any sourcing for Hans Krüger (pharmacist)? My skills are kind of bare bones and for a topic like this I am heavily reliant on Google Translate. I'm getting the impression that there may be more sourcing out there. It's kind of slow going because I have to stop and run a translation program, along with much of what I can access being paywalled to some extent like with this source that came up in a Google Books search. It seems like if more in-depth sourcing does exist, it's going to exist offline. This one mentions that he was a member of Bezeichnung Deutsche Apothekerschaft, but I don't know anything about that organization. I think it's part of ABDA, which doesn't look like it's on the level of a Royal Society. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 14:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Silesian language § Requested move 24 May 2026

edit

An editor has requested that Silesian language be moved to Upper Silesian language, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Fortek67 (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

German_humour

edit

Klaus H. Carl

edit

Please add reliable sources, or send it to WP:AfD. Danke. Bearian (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edgar Lissel

edit

Here is another stub of a BLP that has been unsourced for 13 years. The prod tag was removed. Please either add sources or send to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stefan Gradmann

edit
Notice

The article Stefan Gradmann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Unsourced except for unreliable ELs

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bearian (talk) 01:33, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply