Talk:Jose Montemayor Jr.

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jose Montemayor Jr./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 03:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Gommeh (talk · contribs) 18:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Doing this for GARC. Comments will probably come in the next day or two. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

GA criteria commentary

• Article appears stable enough.
• Sources look reliable per WP:CITEUNSEEN.
• The only image in the article is in the public domain as it was created by a Philippine government employee. However, I would try to find a higher-quality image of him. Additionally, I think the caption should be "at an e-rally" instead of "on an e-rally", assuming he was participating in said rally.

• There is another image of him at debates but the portrait cropped versions have relatively less pixels than the main image. Changed caption

• Earwig indicates a 31.5% likelihood for a copyvio. Call me strict, but that number is a bit high for my liking, and I think some (not necessarily all) of the content in question (taken from Inquirer.net, here) can be better rephrased in your own words.

• Most of the "copyvios" are just his positions, and I do not think I can rephrase them. Tried to rephrase some parts though.

Article commentary

• I doubt there is much of a need to have the years in the subsection headings.

• Removed

• Additionally, there are chronological issues: it seems like the first paragraph starts with 2001, then moves on to 2013, and then backtracks to 2007; these events should be presented in chronological order. Please revise the entire paragraph to make sure this is done correctly. I see no issues with this regarding the national elections section though.

• Changed

• Montemayor said that "He will" - the H in he should not be capitalized; this is how it should be: Montemayor said that "[h]e will"

• Changed

• Remove "as": declared a nuisance candidate, and also define what that is or, if there is an article for it, link to it

• Removed and linked

• because of certain issues of death stating - explain what these issues are, and also add a comma before "stating"

• Added comma and linked

• he said that him and David should be changed to he and David

• Changed

• He lost, gaining 10th place or last, receiving 60,592 votes or 0.11% of the votes. His vice presidential candidate also got last place, gaining 9th with 56,711 votes, or 0.11% of the votes. The word "votes" is repeated four times here, please remove accordingly to avoid overusing the word. Additionally the phrase gaining 10th place reads awkwardly.

• Changed

@TheNuggeteer: Please ping me when these have been addressed and I will proceed to a source spot check. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:55, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@Gommeh: responded to all. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 04:24, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Second run-through

Ah, I forgot to add - the lead is a little short. Please lengthen it so it includes more information on him that is covered in the article; e.g. the policies he would have put into action if elected as well as his viewpoints.

• Added

"Philippine Daily Inquirer" should be italicized.

• Done

Is there much information on his personal life? If so, that needs to be added.

• Yes, but as it was a single sentence, I merged it with Early life and career

Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 13:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Source spot check

I will be using this version of the article to check sources for verifiability.

Source 1 checks out.

Source 2(a-g) checks out.

Source 4(a-c) checks out.

Source 7 largely checks out, except for the last part where you say the survey respondents "voted" for Montemayor. The source says "would vote for" him, not that they already did vote for him. The rest of it is fine though.

• Fixed

Regarding source 8, I am not familiar with the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Can you attest to its reliability?

• The chair of the organization seems like a seasoned journalist, the organization was awarded the Kate Webb Award from Agence-France Presse, and is cited several times by Rappler, an already reliable source.

Source 10 checks out (I had to double check what COC stood for, but still it's fine).

Source 13 checks out, although it says "Pasay City" and not simply "Pasay". Based on the content at Pasay I doubt this is a big issue, but I would question whether "City" is necessary or not.

Source 15 does not, as far as I can see, have that specific quote in it, however it does paraphrase it. If this is from a speech of his, it would be better to either paraphrase this in your own words or cite the primary source itself.

• Just removed the quotes. If the source paraphrases this, than this counts as a paraphrase and will not contribute to copyvio.

Regarding source 17, I would say that he "did not report" any donations to be more accurate to the source. In BLPs, I believe it would be best to stick even more closely to what the source says than we normally would for other articles.

• Done

Source 24 checks out.

Ping me when these have been addressed and I'll be happy to pass this. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 13:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

@Gommeh: you may check my edits. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:48, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

• Rizalito David
• Jose Montemayor Jr.

)

• ... that during his vice presidential run, Rizalito David endorsed presidential candidate Leni Robredo in front of running mate Jose Montemayor Jr.?

• Source: CNN Philippines

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Norman Balon
  • Comment: QPQ 2: Template:Did you know nominations/Halloween: The Game; QPQ 3: Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Jane

Created by TheNuggeteer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 3. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 38 past nominations.

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:37, 18 June 2026 (UTC).

• @TheNuggeteer: (not sure why I pinged you at Balon as well...) Both long enough; David is new to mainspace and Montemayor is a GA. Both QPQs complete. Earwig picks up many WP:LIMITED phrases, though I'm not convinced it rises to WP:CLOP. I am not seeing "in front of" in the article and the hook could easily be trimmed to "endorsed a different presidential candidate to his running mate". (The hook itself is marginally interesting; not so dull that I'd reject it, but the time to propose ALTs is now.) Also, backlog mode.--Launchballer 16:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

• @Launchballer: I had another hook idea that both tried to run for president in 2016 and ended up being a tandem in 2022, but it seems too WP:SYNTHy, so I would want to stick with the "endorsed a different presidential candidate" hook. QPQ will come shortly after. I will propose this alt with the same CNN source: 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 01:28, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
• ALT1: ... that vice presidential candidate Rizalito David endorsed another presidential candidate to his running mate?