Talk:Green–Left Front

Green–Left Front has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 1, 2026. (Reviewed version).

Skip to table of contents

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Green–Left Front article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics

GA review

Latest comment: 4 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Green–Left Front/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 10:32, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: EasternShah (talk · contribs) 05:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Violence coalition which→Violence coalition, which
European Greens, while on national level→European Greens; while on national level,
Do not let Belgrade drown this is capitalized differently in its own article
nothing major but you use while often for conjoining sentences, try to vary it a little
the 2023 protests as one→the 2023 protests, as one
list only won 14 seats→list won 14 seats WP:WEASEL
obstruction from the government→government obstruction
Since the beginning of the student-led When did they begin? this should be noted
, while it declares itself [...] decision-making→ ; it declares itself [...] decision-making
- this is a sentence fragment if you do not put anything opposing because of the "while"
Lazović stated that it would be why conditional, why not use is?
In May 2025, ZLF presented its anti-corruption programme.[54] this should be under Domestic issues, it feels out of place currently
sourcing is needed for the birth dates of the presidents

That's all for now, I'll come back soon to complete the review. Sahib-e-Qiran 05:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

improvement of education→improvement of the education
has high democratic voting rights what is meant by this? do they support more democracy inside Serbia or is the organization itself very democratic?
otherwise the prose is clear and good

Image review

File:Green–Left Front logo.svg PD
File:Radomir Lazović October 2023.png PD
File:Biljana Đorđević (cropped).jpg CC BY-SA 3.0

Source review

98 and 99 are not marked as (in Serbian) although they are
I will check sources 2, 4, 8, 9, 24, 47, 40, 58, 67, 72, 36, 77, 82, 85, 90, 95 those that I do not say anything about are okay
all of them checked out, I used DeepL to translate serbian

@Vacant0: Alright that's it, I am ready to pass this once you address my comments. Sahib-e-Qiran 16:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. All should be done now. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pass you fixed all my major concerns, meets WP:GA? Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 15:13, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic