Talk:Everytown for Gun Safety
| This is the talk page for discussing Everytown for Gun Safety and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text or other creative content from Moms Demand Action was copied or moved into Everytown for Gun Safety on 2017-07-04. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Partisan language
edit17:32, 20 August 2007 66.108.111.61 (Talk) (21,500 bytes) (→Criticism and Controversy - Removed partisan language) (undo) Why would it be "partisan language" to state that "Their actual goals are unclear" based on the fact that the CDC has been unable to find a single law out of ~26,000 that supports their position? This makes their actual goals very unclear to me, as they are either 1. dumber than dirt, or 2. have some other goal (most probably gathering power for themselves, but that's speculation on my part, so I left it out). If I don't see a response I'll revert your change in a few days.
Move to "Everytown for Gun Safety"
editPossible partisan or incendiary language?
editUnder the "Moms Demand Action" subsection in the "Organizations" section, the group are "... for violation of the second amendment and gun ownership prevention..."
This reads partisan, if not incendiary.
There's also no source or quote for it. It just says they advocate for that, as fact. 130.44.166.158 (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
"Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable"
editThe top of the article says "Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable." Why? That message was added by David Gerard, who added it as they were removing the deprecated source Epoch Times. I don't see any unreliable sources in the article.
If nothing comes of this within 7 days, I'll remove the message.
PiratePablo (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- I removed the message because nothing came of this within 7 days. PiratePablo (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2026 (UTC)