Talk:Episode 6944

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Olliefant in topic GA review

Discussion on naming convention for articles on unnamed TV episodes

edit

There is a discussion underway at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Titling episode articles without titles that would affect how articles like this one are named.--Srleffler (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 6944/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 05:43, 9 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 00:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply


Lead

edit
  • Leads a little short
  • "Chris Clenshaw revealed that he had chosen Anna for the storyline as she was part of the demographic most affected by spiking" reveal seems like the wrong word here, explained might be better

Plot

edit
  • Plot is over 400 words,

Background and production

edit
  • This seems a little long, can it be broken up into sub headings?
  • "Back in 2014, Jane had covered up Bobby's killing of Cindy and Ian's daughter" this feels very in universe
  • "The episode aired on 16 July 2024.[8][4] It was released on BBC iPlayer earlier in the day.[9]" this isnt production information, it should probably be under a broadcast section
  • "said that that QR code in the episode, which had never been done before in EastEnders, " already said previously
  • The first "Bobby Beale (EastEnders)" link needs to be piped
  • "Bobby Beale" is linked twice in the section
  • The images in the section have a discrepency, only one of them says "(pictured)"
  • Links should be added to the captions of the imaegs
  • Alt text is needed for the images

Reception

edit
  • This seems a little long, can it be broken up into sub headings?
  • Any viewership info?
  • "Knight" is used to open a sentence three times at the beginning of paragraph 2, it should probably "he" one of those times"

References

edit
  • Several refs need to be marked as being alive, refs 11 and 13 for example but possible others
  • Alot of unnecessary duplicated refs across the page, for example Ref 9 is duplicated several times in a row, it only needs to be used once at the end of Knights section
  • Why is "Rayo" a reliable source?

Thoughts

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.