Talk:Auf Christi Himmelfahrt allein, BWV 128
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA review
| Auf Christi Himmelfahrt allein, BWV 128 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Bach chose an unusually complex instrumentation in his cantata for the feast of Ascension, Auf Christi Himmelfahrt allein, BWV 128, "two horns, oboes of every kind, strings and continuo and latterly one trumpet"? | ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 20,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
Trumpet in lead (as opposed to "Lead Trumpet"!)
editIs there a reason why the trumpet is omitted from the instrument list in the lead? I feel discriminated against! :) I was tempted to pop it in but then worried that I had missed a memo or there's been discussion of its slight non-mainstream status, which is why I am here now. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 08:45, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was sure I added it, but obviously not. But now. Sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Brilliant, thanks Gerda! DBaK (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
GA review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Auf Christi Himmelfahrt allein, BWV 128/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 12:54, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
This will mark my first review for you in a while, great to be united once more! --K. Peake 09:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
edit- Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
- This is infobox musical composition. The instruments in a Baroque orchestra are sometimes many, it would make the infobox very long if they were bulleted. {{hlist}} is therefore consistently used. --GA
- The first para of the lead should mention the text was possibly changed by Bach himself after stating why he was composed it; the performance should be the last part
- The text change seems no information needed immediately, especially if not even certain, but the performance is needed, - it's like a birth date for a person. --GA
- "It begins, unlike" → "The cantata begins, unlike"
- I am not sure, because I have been criticised for using the word "cantata" too much in previous reviews. Perhaps you can convince me ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
History and words
edit- Is a comma really needed before the usage of 'and' after (Acts 1:1–11)?
- It is needed, but I added to clarify that it is two types of readings. (I still don't know the grammar terms ...) --GA
- Img looks good!
- thank you! --GA
- Where is the personal view part mentioned by [6]?
- Good catch! I added Dürr, in the translation. --GA
- Remove wikilink on chorale per WP:SEAOFBLUE
- yes --GA
- Where do the sources mention these religious quotes or am I missing something here?
- more Dürr added --GA
- Last two paras look solid!
- thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Music
editStructure and scoring
edit- "latterly one trumpet"." → "latterly one trumpet."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
- yes --GA
- Link Neue Bach-Ausgabe to New Bach Edition
- why? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Table looks good!
Movements
edit- Good
Manuscripts and publication
edit- Shouldn't the 2024 manuscript sale be the last piece of info in this section?
- not sure, first manuscripts then publication --GA
- Remove wikilink on Neue Bach-Ausgabe
Recordings
edit- Link Gewandhausorchester to Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra
- same why - redirects confirm that the target is really the one meant, no? --GA
- Remove wikilink on Holland Boys Choir
- not sure, - when the article will be written, or the conductor changes, it will no longer be good, and tough to change 200 articles in such a case --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Notes
edit- Good
References
edit- Good
Cited sources
edit- Why do some of these not have retrieved dates?
- I added one. Do you think books should also have one?
- Allmusic.com → AllMusic with the wikilink
- done --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
External links
edit- Good
Final comments and verdict
edit
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; shouldn't take too long to fix this one! --K. Peake 12:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing, Kyle Peake! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Pass now, I have read through these responses now and understand why you have not implemented certain points! --K. Peake 09:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
