| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
penetration info
editI messed a bit around after misreading a table, but corrected it in the meantime.
Penetration is for 90° plate:
124 mm @ 0 m
105 mm @ 250 m
87 mm @ 500 m
70 mm @ 750 m
60 mm @ 1000 m
Penetration is for 60° plate (sloped back by a modest 30°):
95 mm @ 0 m
83 mm @ 250 m
72 mm @ 500 m
62 mm @ 750 m
53 mm @ 1000 m
Source: Small Arms, Artillery and Special Weapons of the Third Reich. An encyclopedic survey" by T.Gander and P. Chamberlain (Jane's Publishers Ltd). I used the German translation of the book from 2005 (ISBN 3-613-02481-2 {{isbn}}: Check isbn value: checksum (help)).
Another source has slightly different info. Penetration for 90° plate: 120 mm @ 100 m 87 mm @ 500 m 60 mm @ 1000m Penetration for 60° plate: 90 mm @ 100 m 72 mm @ 500 m 53 mm @ 1000 m This second source is "German Artillery of World War Two" by Ian V. Hogg, corrected 1997 reprint.
I corrected earlier today the wrong info that penetration was 72 mm at 455 m, supposedly against 90° plate. Now I wrote Armour penetration: 87 mm (3.425 in) at 500 m (550 yards), which is supported by both sources.
Maybe someone who knows the formatting stuff should add a table to the article. 00:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastdingo (talk • contribs)
- I'll do it now. BP OMowe (talk) 12:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)





