Talk:.55 Boys

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

History -- Belted Case

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since steel is stronger than brass, it seems unlikely that the weapon system overall could be strengthened by cutting away a ring of steel in the chamber and replacing it with a ring of brass on the cartridge case. The abandonment of belted cases in modern magnum sporting cartridges -- despite ever increasing pressure levels -- indicates that belts do not help to contain high pressures. Possibly the belt was added to ensure positive headspacing (positioning in the chamber) for the slope-shouldered cartridge case? Or, the fact that the .55 caliber cartridge cannot fully chamber in a .50 BMG weapon (such as the common M2 machine gun) does not mean it would not jam in the chamber and take the weapon out of action at a critical moment in combat. So perhaps the belt is intended to provide positive visual recognition. Or perhaps it is designed to stop the round in the M2's belt feed mechanism, before it ever reaches the chamber. These are just guesses, but so is the current information in the article. It may be best to remain silent about things we do not know for sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:B930:7B90:7C78:2E26:A515:7051 (talk) 14:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Parent case disagreement

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A citation is present earlier in the article for .55 Boys being derived from the Hotchkiss round. The infobox says it's derived from .50 BMG and so does an uncited claim a bit later in the article. Someone please make all sections and the infobox agree (probably favor the Hotchkiss as parent case because it has an actual source already and it seems less logical for Britain to have created a crappy, old-timey parallel to .50 BMG given the assumption that they have real .50 BMG available to be modified) EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Add topic