Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 February 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log

February 20

edit

Template:Zastava vehicles

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2026 March 1. Primefac (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Welcome Guide

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unused welcome template with no documentation. Probably redundant to a more commonly used welcome template, of which we have many already. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It says it's a duplicate of Template:W-graphical. We should start reducing the amount of welcome templates and standardize them. Gonnym (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maggie Gyllenhaal

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Only directed two films, and as one of many producers on The Kindergarten Teacher, she cannot be considered the primary creator for this per WP:FILMNAV. In any case, does not meet the threshold for WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 08:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Archived reflist

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe this banner is worth the banner bloat. It goes out of date as soon as someone adds a new source, and the more important question is whether there are any WP:DEADREFs in the article. I recommend deleting. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this adds more work and you also can't really trust it's accuracy. Maybe if this was added and removed by a bot, but it isn't. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

German road templates

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after subst'ing and/or replacing extant uses. Primefac (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated German road templates, some templates in Germany Wikipedia were deleted DiaoBaoHuaJian (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. At least some of these templates are in use, at Bundesstraße 430 for example. "Outdated" is not a valid TFD reason if the templates are in use. If they are redundant, what will they be replaced with? – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:23, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • substitute and delete. these were created when articles were being translated from German, and these templates were copies of the one of the German WP. however, the German WP doesn't use these anymore, so if we want to update the route maps to match the German WP, it would be easier to use copies of the new German WP templates, not these outdated ones. if the German WP was still using these, I would say keep, but German WP is not, so we should substitute and delete. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete (and eventually replace with newer systems) per above. Also, this process is already at its end, so lets finish this deletion. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2026_February_20&oldid=1341171777"