Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 April 12

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All red links. WP:NENAN. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Minor league baseball halls of fame

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Southern and No consensus on international without prejudice against renomination that focuses specifically on that template. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There navboxes for the halls of fame of Minor League Baseball leagues are a case of WP:TEMPLATECREEP and Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox. Election to these halls of fame are not significant enough to be mentioned in the lead of most of the bios, most who became major league players, and many of the inductees are quite accomplished with many navboxes already.—Bagumba (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, the minor league Hall of Fames are important to their organizations and the league. The two links above are to essays, which have nothing to do with policies or guidelines and are just opinions. An option would be to add the navboxes to just individual articles of those who never made an impact in the major leagues, and this was the height of their career. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There's no guideline based reason to keep either. Per the WP:NAVBOX guideline:

    The use of navigation templates is neither required nor prohibited for any article.

    So ultimately, it is "just opinions" to keep or delete. —Bagumba (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. It's unlikely that readers will navigate between these individuals via this navbox. These are rather insignificant accomplishments for players that achieved much more in the major leagues. The list articles are sufficient for readers interested in the hall of fame members. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear what this template is supposed to be used for. It might just be a test. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.